Depressing Statistic: 53% of Moviegoers Don't Mind Pre-Movie Advertising
Filed under: Box Office, Distribution, Exhibition, Newsstand, Movie Marketing
If ever there was a case of statistics being, how to put it politely, skewed, its showcased in this article in The Hollywood Reporter. According to a recent Arbitron survey which asked moviegoers their opinion of pre-movie advertising in theaters, a rather unbelievable 53% of "frequent" moviegoers -- those that attended more than five movies in the past three months -- said that advertising before a movie is acceptable. Compare that to the 46% of people who responded that TV advertising is acceptable.According to the article, the study also showed that 59% of moviegoers recall the experience of watching onscreen advertising before the movie on their last trip to the theater. To those statistics I just have to say "huh"? I don't know about you, but I and pretty much everyone I know find advertising before a movie to be very unacceptable. So much so that its one of the reasons I pretty much stopped going to regular theaters to see movies. That and the parents who insist on taking their five-year-old to R-rated films and then wonder why they keep crying.
Fortunately, there is still a theater here in Los Angeles that doesn't have adverting -- its called the Arclight and its the only place I will go, other than screenings, to see a film anymore. Now, I'm really trying not to be so negative these days but in my mind, the only thing these statistics, if true, seem to prove is that 53% of "frequent" moviegoers need to have their heads examined. They're probably the same rocket scientists who think Ghost Rider and Eragon are the epitome of cinematic excellence.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-09-2007 @ 7:44PM
Gilbert Davis said...
Well you know, there's something weird and strange and interesting about seeing some television show showcased or some upcoming movie given the Entertainment Tonight treatment on the big big screen. And then a well done commercial or two or three, not like we haven't seen them before. Not so bad. And you know, the screens used to be populated by that lame slideshow or a loop of the same songs that never ended. And of course try watching PBS and not getting all those 'high end' commercials not to mention pledge drives and commercials for the yearly auction. Advertisement is everywhere and in the movie theater I just hope the floor is clean and they keep teenagers from running amok. Like you I feel as if I have an inherent right for things to stay the same but unfortunately life doesn't work that way.
Reply
3-09-2007 @ 8:45PM
donny said...
Frankly, I think this is the most irrational blog entry I've seen on cinematical. If you are that bummed out by advertisements, go 10 minutes later.
I'd agree that repetition in ads before movies is annoying (How many years in a row do I have to see the same Toyota commercial anyway?), but in the world of theatre problems this only ranks very slightly above the theatre employee with no sense of humour that introduces the big shows. Afterall, didn't Norbit lead the box office recently? Isn't *that* more concerning/annoying/disappointing? Its definately more deserving of the "frequent moviegoers need to have their heads examined" quip.
Reply
3-09-2007 @ 9:32PM
Wabbit said...
Hah, in Singapore at least it's standard practice by just about every cinema to show advertising before a show. Never realised it was an issue at all.
Do trailers count as advertising too? I always liked watching the trailers before a film.
Reply
3-10-2007 @ 1:24AM
Jette said...
I would be less annoyed by pre-movie ads if the sound was lower. I can't talk to my friends before a movie because the theaters have the commercials' (or First Look, whatever you want to call it) volume so cranked up that I can't hear anything but the ads. It completely removes the social aspect of moviegoing for me. And "go ten minutes later" only works if the movie isn't going to sell out. Like Chris, we have solved this problem by avoiding theaters that show the commercials, and fortunately Austin has a few of these theaters (Alamo, Dobie, Highland).
Reply
3-10-2007 @ 2:33AM
Dwayne Conyers said...
My only complaint is that the popcorn, pizza and twizzlers are all gone before the movie actually starts. Bummer!
Hey, I never went to a movie when I was in Singapore. I wonder if you get Durian and Rambutan instead of popcorn? At least some lor mai kai, meh.
--
dwacon
http://dwacon.blogspot.com
Reply
3-10-2007 @ 5:36AM
Benjamin said...
10 minutes later even when it’s busy would work over here (the UK), where can you generally buy your tickets way before going in (that's in distance and time); I've bought tickets, gone shopping and come back sometimes. Or you could go one step further and actually book from home, on the phone or online.
And I like the ads, again it might be a UK thing but cinema ads over here tend only to be the artistic ones where the creatives seem like they’re more interested in winning awards than selling the product. Most are pretty good and one out of the reel might just be a masterpiece. We've got people like Jonathan Glazer turning them out here so...
Check out his reel here:
http://www.academyfilms.com/
Incidentally, has everyone seen the new BMW ad with the, uh, re-imagining of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony on it? I’d love to see that on a big screen.
Reply
3-10-2007 @ 12:57PM
Alex said...
I've seen countless movies with pre-show ads over the last few years. Not once - NOT ONCE - has it kept me from having any kind of conversation with the people I was sitting next to. If anything, it's given us something to talk about if only to make fun.
Movie prices are through the roof, especially when you live somewhere like New York City. But the pre-show ads are so harmless in regards to the whole moviegoing experience, it's not even an issue worth complaining about. How about only being given a choice between Norbit and Wild Hogs? This advertising gripe is just there to make us forget that we're being asked to pay ridiculous prices to see BAD movies.
Bottom line: if blatant manipulation is a problem, why are you going to the movies at all?
Reply
3-11-2007 @ 1:46PM
Alan Hoffman said...
I used to be vehemently against pre-movie advertising (especially Regal Entertainment Group's atrocious "The Twenty" - they've since changed the name to "Regal First Look" I believe), but it seems like they've made the advertising segments shorter, and during them I'll just talk to whoever I'm with at that time or get some popcorn. Some of the ads are even mildly entertaining - case in point a "behind the scenes look" at Spiderman 3 before the 300 premiere last night - some people even clapped during the advert.
However, I agree, the constant advertising and sky rocketing prices are aggravating, but I'll deal with it to spend some time at the movies. It's obvious theaters are a dying business, so I understand if they have to add advertising to reap some profits. BTW - The ArcLight is phenomenal - whenever I'm in LA that's my theater of choice.
Reply
3-13-2007 @ 4:48PM
Kevin said...
Sheesh,the people that work on this website sure do have a lot of complaints. This has got to be about the most mundane and pointless thing I can think of to get upset about. Next thing you know Chris is going to be all pissed off that the cups his sodas come in say "Coke" on them. OH NO!! So you sit through 5 minutes of commercials. Some of them are entertaining, some of them are stupid, all of them are easily ignored. "very unacceptable"? Waste your time being angry at something slightly more meaningful, like the fact that you can't get the same number of hot dogs as buns at the grocery store. Now theres something we can all get up in arms about!
Reply