Will 'Man Eating a Baby,' Other Scenes Get Grindhouse An NC-17?
Filed under: Action, RumorMonger, Fandom, Scripts, Exhibition, New in Theaters, The Weinstein Co., Movie Marketing
There is no movie I want to see more right now than Grindhouse, the upcoming "double feature" from Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino. Today's news only makes me want to see it more. Sources are saying there is no way the current version of the film can earn an "R" rating. Frankly, I think the audience for this film wants more more more sex, violence, and nudity -- so what's the problem? Well, without the "R" rating, the film won't be shown in mainstream theaters, won't be advertised in many newspapers, can't be carried at Blockbuster, etc. Basically, the studio would lose money. Rodriguez and Tarantino are intentionally adding splices and scratches to the print, to give it that cheap 70's feel, and also so they can add in splices if the MPAA demands cuts (Read more on this here.) From the sound of things, they better get splicing.
So far, most of the content issues with the movie are coming from the fake trailers that will show between Rodriguez and Tarantino's films. One of these fake trailers, for a film called Werewolf Women of the SS is directed by a man who is no stranger to ratings controversy, Rob Zombie. In his trailer, "a cute, topless girl is roughly tied down on a table by evil female Nazi experimenters who begin draining her blood and, as she screams in agony, they brand her like livestock with a coal-hot steel swastika. And every girl in the Nazi concentration camp is topless." Um...when can I see this thing again?
Eli Roth, director of far and away the best of the recent "torture porn" horror flicks - Hostel, shot a trailer for a fictional movie called Thanksgiving, a play on all the 80's slasher films that took place on various holidays (Arbor Day Massacre, that sort of thing.) His clip contains a scene in which Jordan Ladd is giving oral sex to her boyfriend and when she reaches to stroke his hair, she realizes he has lost his head. (Temptation to make "head" jokes rising...rising...overcome.) Another scene shows a cheerleader stripping naked, right down to the Full Britney, while bouncing on a trampoline. From what I've read, it doesn't end well for her. (Let's just say you don't do the splits when cutlery is around.) In yet another scene, an obese man...eats a baby.
So obviously this stuff isn't for the squeamish and it's probably not one for the whole family. But since this is supposed to be a no holds barred, unsanitized, over-the-top thrill ride, it'd be a shame to have to see a watered down version. There will undoubtedly be a "Directors' Cut" DVD down the line, but I'm excited to see this with a blood-thirsty, enthusiastic audience at the theater -- aren't you? Studio insiders are saying "Some cuts definitely will have to be made. There's no question." Here's hoping they get moving on this new "Hard R" rating the MPAA is trying to set in motion. And here's hoping when that happens, they give credit to my man Roger Ebert, who's been pulling for this for years.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-16-2007 @ 11:03AM
Michael said...
Why do the dynamic duo have to submit this film for a rating at all? Why can't they say "Screw the MPAA. We don't want to make any cuts to our films" and just release it unrated? Lord knows you can buy or rent tons of unrated films, even at Blockbuster or Walmart. That would completely bypass the whole NC-17 issue and disrupt the MPAA's chokehold on the industry. Who better to challenge them in this way but Mssrs. Tarantino and Rodriguez?
http://www.myspace.com/scoobarama
Reply
3-16-2007 @ 11:58AM
Charbarred said...
Why not submit this to the MPAA? It will be a huge hit in the movie theaters cuts or not cuts. After that suckers like me will pay extra to own the "Uncut" DVD. Double whammy...hell I paid more to get the Asian Kill Bill DVD than I did to see it in the theater.
Reply
3-16-2007 @ 12:05PM
broadwayrock said...
In the latest Guardian film podcast there's an interview film composer David Arnold where he states that Edgar Wright's trailer for Grindhouse will be called: 'Don't!'. The trailer supposes to starts off with the line 'if you're thinking of going into that basement, Don't!'
Its going to be their tribute to all the awful British horror films of the 70s (Hammer horror etc), it apparently features lots of different actors in its 90 second runtime.
The podcast feed is here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/podcast/0,,329548943,00.xml
He talks about Grindhouse 16 minutes in.
Reply
3-16-2007 @ 12:04PM
misterpink said...
Michael and Charbard,
As Pat suggested in his column, releasing a movie as NC-17 OR unrated would ensure that major theatre chains would not release it. As for the claim that Blockbuster and Walmart carry unrated movies all the time, that is misguided. The "unrated" movies they carry are just mainstream PG-13 (or sometimes R) films with a couple of boob shots added. Don't kid yourself to think that major chains like these don't screen the movies before they put them on the shelves. True NC-17 or unrated movies are still edited down to an R before they ever make to Blockbuster or Walmart's shelf ('The Dreamers' and 'Bad Education' are two recent examples).
Reply
3-17-2007 @ 7:30AM
broadwayrock said...
In the latest Guardian film podcast there's an interview film composer David Arnold where he states that Edgar Wright's trailer for Grindhouse will be called: 'Don't!'. The trailer supposes to starts off with the line 'if you're thinking of going into that basement, Don't!'
Its going to be their tribute to all the awful British horror films of the 70s (Hammer horror etc), it apparently features lots of different actors in its 90 second runtime.
The podcast feed is here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/podcast/0,,329548943,00.xml
He talks about Grindhouse 16 minutes in.
Reply
3-18-2007 @ 2:22AM
IESVSCRISTVS said...
WHAT?!!! A man eats a baby?!! You mean he finished a whole one?!!! I never could.
Reply
3-18-2007 @ 5:05PM
SDGD said...
i LIKE THIS MOIVE ALOT
Reply
3-19-2007 @ 5:42PM
the dav said...
So, let me get this straight. You people are not only okay with a film depiction of a man eating a baby, you are also excited to see such a thing?
I'm no objector to film violence as a principle, but what kind of sick, tasteless moron would actually WANT to watch a woman being tortured in a Nazi death camp is absolutely beyond me. Ooh, and she's topless too? Awesome!! Cause, you know, the only thing better than a naked chick is a naked chick being tortured.
Are you kidding me? I can't believe there's actually a market for this junk. The only reason guys like Tarantino and other "torture porn" filmmakers make any money at all is because there are actually people idiotic and classless enough to call this junk entertainment. These are the same people that are addicted to "shock value" humor, can't tell a joke that doesn't involve sodomy, incest, or bestiality, and somehow take pride in the fact that they can tolerate abhorrent filth. Is that something to gloat about? That you have no standards, and will watch, listen to, or say anything? That you will sit in an audience and cheer and holler for more blood, more torture, more rape? Very admirable.
Now you don't need to reply back to this about the First Amendment, hiding your lack of standards behind free speech and saying "they can express themselves however they want," and "it's our choice as consumers to watch what we choose to." I know all that. If you want to go see a man eat a baby, go right ahead. I'm simply calling you a sick, tasteless, classless, pathetic moron.
Enjoy your movie, losers.
Reply
3-21-2007 @ 3:38AM
morgan said...
ew...im sry, i saw the "...man eating a baby" and i was just like...OMG! im only 13, but still that absolutely disgusting and tasteless...sure watch what u want but at least get it when its on DVD...dont put it in THEATRES tho...in PUBLIC!?!?!?!? i mean jeez, watch ur own tasteless s**t but dont watch it in PUBLIC!well, i guess that all i have to say...all u wronchy ppl who watch that stuff, u beteer thank our founding fathers for the 1st amendment!!!!!!!!
Reply
3-19-2007 @ 7:39PM
Fat Tony said...
You're calling us sick for enjoy a movie? Morals? Thats something invented by people way back when, to make other people feel that something they felt was wrong, is wrong. Now I understand its a bit grotesque, but jesus christ it's a god damned movie! I mean come on? You actually think they're going to put actual torture in the theaters? And also, You wanna know why it seems so sick? Because frankly, that's what you call good acting. Acting like your being tortured is hard, its not just, "Scream." You have to imagine your really being tortured. And the fact that you're on the internet calling people sick for watching a movie YOU think is wrong, just makes you a fool. God people like this in the world, who think what they think is right, make me sick. Not those types of movies.
Reply
3-19-2007 @ 10:52PM
carl said...
exactly first amendment, which should be y it is allowed in thearters.besides if u guys are really so "appaled" by this, then y did u bother clicking on this link.dipshits
Reply
3-28-2007 @ 12:59AM
MACHETE said...
you people that are talking about this movie being to gross and sick need to lighten up and get that screw driver out of your uptight asses ITS JUST A MOVIE!!! if you dont want to watch it or be any part of it then its just simple... DONT READ ABOUT IT OR WACTH IT!!! DAMN I cant wait to see these movies true movie making at its finest and a man eating a baby? now thats priceless! id make a grindhouse movie about a nun raping, child molesting priest who smokes weed and eats human organs now thats cinema!! enjoy bitches!!!!!!!!! its only a MOVIE
Reply
3-27-2007 @ 11:40PM
Jacob said...
Great... a movie that substitutes style for quality, and grotesqueness for entertainment. Undoubtedly it will appeal to the intellectually bankrupt and perverse population of our country. This population I fear is quickly becoming the majority.
DAMN I cant wait to see these movies true movie making at its finest and a man eating a baby? now thats priceless!
Indeed, somehow sheer gore is entertaining? No dynamic story/plot/action needed; mere cannabilism will gives this mopvie an A+ in your feeble mind.
Reply