Sean Connery Talks to British Tabloid About Bond
Filed under: Action, Sony, RumorMonger, Fandom, James Bond, Remakes and Sequels
Legendary actor Sean Connery hasn't been seen in multiplexes since the debacle known as The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, but there is one role that might entice the imposing Scot back in front of the cameras: that of James Bond Sr. (Well, that role and a huge paycheck, apparently.) In a British tabloid piece that's been picked up by various sites including Hollywood.com, Mr. Connery talks about why he left the Bond series, what he thinks of the Bond 'gizmos,' and also states that it would take a lot to get him back into the movies, but a plum role in the next 007 adventure might actually do the trick. And of course he expects to be more than handsomely rewarded for such a gig. We have no idea if he was cackling with laughter as he said this, but here's what he apparently said:
"I would never return as James Bond. If the part was well written, I could come back as Bond's father but it would cost them. It would definitely cost them," is what the actor is quoted as saying, thereby proving that ego and hubris are good ways to alienate yourself from casting directors. No disrespect to Sean Connery, obviously, but it's not like the Bond series needs the actor in order to sell tickets. Connery's attitude seems more suited to an LXG sequel (or maybe Return to The Rock). Matter of fact, I think the guy should be willing to lower his asking price for a spot in 'Bond 22.' Seems like he might need the gig a bit more than the series needs him -- unless Connery wants his very last movie to be, well, you know what.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-20-2007 @ 3:20PM
Curt said...
I say pay the man his money as long as it fits within the story. They'll make the money back with the extra tickets they'll sell (c'mon, it'd be like a handing of the torch from the best Bond to the new reigning, and soon to be the recognized best Bond).
Reply
3-20-2007 @ 3:28PM
Kakairo said...
James Bond is an orphan, a fact hammered home in Casino Royale. So, no James Bond, Sr., then.
I don't think they should bother. Bond movies should be about Bond, not any of the other characters that inhabit his world. If Connery came back, it would be too much of a distraction.
Reply
3-20-2007 @ 9:27PM
Elrond Hobbert said...
I always thought he'd make the ideal Bond villain- rogue agent kind of guy.
Reply
3-20-2007 @ 4:02PM
kevjohn said...
I always thought (for the past few Bond films at least) that it would be neat-o to bring all the Bonds back, as former James Bondses. The storyline would be that JB is just a role MI-6 assigns to their top agent, and all the earlier JB's come back to help/warn/kill the current edition.
Sounds stupid I know, but until this last film it would have been as the most interesting treatment of the Bond character since Connery ore the tux.
Reply
3-20-2007 @ 8:44PM
Tim said...
Connery needs bond more than bond needs connery? The man is 77 years old with a huge list of accomplishments (not saying that the 45 years of bond isnt an accomplishment either). I dont think either side needs the other.
I would bet that he was making a joke when he was quoted.
Reply