'Da Vinci Code' Sequel Snags Tom Hanks, Source Says
Filed under: Drama, Casting, Sony, RumorMonger, Tech Stuff, Remakes and Sequels, Religious
Though I feverishly tore through the book like a man who hadn't eaten in weeks, when I first watched the big-screen version of The Da Vinci Code, I fell asleep twice. Not once. Twice! And I never fall asleep during a film -- it's, like, against everything I stand for ... or something like that. Regardless, Dan Brown's books are as addicting as your favorite drug. And, right after Ron Howard's film snatched up a truckload of money at the box office, a big-screen version of Angels & Demons was all but certain. While the follow-up was first announced almost a year ago, we haven't heard much about it recently, save for Akiva Goldsman's $4 million payday to pen the script. Now, Cinema Blend reports (via one of their top secret inside sources) that Tom Hanks has officially signed on to reprise the role of Robert Langdon.
Not only has he signed on, but Sony has reportedly shelled out "the biggest salary ever paid to an actor in the history of Hollywood" in order to lock up Hanks in the main role. I'm sorry, but his performance in Da Vinci didn't exactly grab me by the throat -- I hate to say it, but the character is pretty damn boring. It was the story I found fascinating, not Hanks. But, since the moviegoing public is used to seeing Hanks play Langdon, Sony knew they would have to bring him back if they had any chance at another explosive box office take. (Personally, I'd rather see Clive Owen -- the man can stare at a wall for two hours and I'd find it Oscar worthy.)
Angels & Demons takes place one year prior to The Da Vinci Code story. Professor Langdon is summoned to analyze the mysterious symbol that's carved into some dead guy, then winds up pairing up with yet another foreign beauty (apparently, supermodel Gisele Bundchen is up for that role) in an attempt to save the Vatican from a time bomb. Supposedly, Sony was interested in rushing this puppy through in order to release it in 2008; if that's the case, then I expect the deals (will Howard return to direct?) to be announced soon, with production to begin later this year.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-10-2007 @ 1:29PM
Screen Rant said...
Oh goody, maybe this one will be as deathly boring as the last one.
Vic
Reply
4-10-2007 @ 2:29PM
Curt said...
See, I never saw it because when I read the book, I was enthralled at first, but then it was about 100 pages of filler then a "eh" sort of ending. And it took a lot of will to read through that filler.
I figured the movie would be about the same, so I said *F* it.
Reply
4-10-2007 @ 3:50PM
vacelts said...
I liked the book Angels & Demons so much better than Da Vinci Code. Don't get me wrong. I like Da Vinci Code, but Angels & Demons was a better book. I actually read them out of order.
Unfortunately, I don't think that it will make any better of a movie that Da Vinci Code. Too much gets lost in trimming to keep the movie to a reasonable amout of time.
Reply
4-10-2007 @ 4:13PM
Ty said...
I guess I am the only one that liked The Da Vinci Code. I thought Tom Hanks was good, it was interesting and the visuals helped to tell the story. I think Ron Howard did a good job, and I am a fan of the book. I am looking forward to Angels and Demons.
Reply
4-11-2007 @ 11:07AM
John H said...
I think what really destroyed the Da Vinci Code movie were all the protests in front of theaters. It seemed that everywhere I went I saw protesters. Once people get the idea that something is blasphemous, it pretty much causes it to bomb.
Reply
4-11-2007 @ 11:08AM
John H said...
I think what really destroyed the Da Vinci Code movie were all the protests in front of theaters. It seemed that everywhere I went I saw protesters. Once people get the idea that something is blasphemous, it pretty much causes it to bomb.
Reply
4-11-2007 @ 11:04AM
John H said...
I think what really destroyed the Da Vinci Code movie were all the protests in front of theaters. It seemed that everywhere I went I saw protesters. Once people get the idea that something is blasphemous, it pretty much causes it to bomb.
Reply
4-10-2007 @ 7:31PM
Dickens said...
I liked the movie too, i dont really understand all the hate. I guess everyone just loves to hate stuff sometimes. but like cartman said...
"Tom Hanks couldn't act his way out of a nut sack"
Reply
4-17-2007 @ 8:53PM
Cindy said...
I can't believe they cast Tom Hanks as Langdon in the first place! Langdon is suppose to be sexy! Part of the reason the books were best sellers was the fact the main character had sex appeal. It's like casting Susan Surandon as Rachel Sexton WTF!
Reply
7-05-2007 @ 11:11AM
Micael said...
About da Vinci,or should I say Lionardo di Ser Piero,or Leonardo da Vinci, well anyway I read something so interesting about him the oter day I had to write and ask for more,please take a look,I think you will find this is most interesting.
It's abot two new invntions Lionaro sed within is msterpieces to view hs encrypted pictures. It can be found on tis site. www.lionardofromvinci.com
Reply
7-05-2007 @ 11:08AM
Micael said...
Something I read the other day just blew me away about Leonardo da Vinci, it was to new inventions that were discovered by a person in the Boston Ma. area The U.S.A. Te two new inventions prove and sowed ow to view some gret pictres Leonardo sed to ide his most intrsted works. Well anyway they can be viewed at this site http:www.lionardofromvinci.com
Thanks,M
Reply
7-05-2007 @ 11:15AM
Michael said...
Sorry new at this the site is at
http://www.lionardofromvinci.com
Reply