British Airways Cuts Richard Branson Footage From In-Flight 'Casino Royale'
Filed under: Action, Celebrities and Controversy, Newsstand, Remakes and Sequels
In a move that's almost as childish as not sharing your toys, British Airways has decided to conveniently edit out a Richard Branson cameo from their in-flight versions of Casino Royale, as well as blur an image of a Virgin Atlantic tail fin. How darling -- it's like a schoolyard fight between two giant corporations ... but at 35,000 feet. In the original version of Casino Royale, Branson can be seen walking through a metal detector at Miami Airport, then turning around. Producers allowed the Branson cameo after the man let them use one of his planes in their movie.
According to a spokesman from British Airways, it's up to them to decide what they will and will not show: "We screen all films before they're used on our aircraft so that we can control the content of what is displayed. We have full control over what is shown.'' Violence and nudity I can understand, but blatantly editing out a rival airline (and its top chairman) is a tad lame. However, this isn't the first time British Airways and Virgin Atlantic Airways have found themselves involved in a nasty pissing match; last year, Virgin provided U.S. and British authorities with information that lead to a price-fixing investigation involving British Airways PLC. Ha, so they fight back by editing Branson out of Casino Royale? What a way to stick it to the man! What's next -- BA will refuse to allow on board those passengers who bought music from a Virgin store?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-21-2007 @ 11:41PM
Stan Winsome said...
Oh wow, I'm shocked there's not a Fox News Alert on this crucial story. Meanwhile, I still have to pay for a pillow or a crappy sammitch on Delta, that's the real tragedy...
Reply
4-22-2007 @ 8:44AM
cg said...
Bravo British Airways! I despise censorship of any kind but I will make an exception in this instance. Thank you for removing it -where can we buy this version commercialy.
Reply
4-22-2007 @ 9:12AM
Sarah Synthia Sylvia Stout said...
Isn't this a copyright violation? Do they have a contract with the studio saying they have this right? Or are they just like the Xtian group that edits films to fit their morals?
Reply
4-23-2007 @ 6:48PM
Frank Wilson said...
BA is not alone. This is standard procedure for films shown on airline overhead screens. Every airline does the exact same. Nothing new. This has been going on for years. You'll never see any aircraft crashing or exploding either in an airline version. And as far as product placement goes, the contracts are only for theatrical release. TV Versions are also edited for product placement - usually achieved with digital graphics to remove products in shots. These edits are done only with the cooperation of the studios and the approval of the directors. In the case of BA & Virgin, it's simply Virgin trying to recoup the advertising that was cut out.
Reply