Source Says Director Marc Forster Offered 'Bond 22'
Filed under: Action, Thrillers, RumorMonger, James Bond, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels, Daniel Craig
The producers of the James Bond series have historically taken on very traditional directors -- guys who got the job done solidly, with little innovation or originality. It seems, though, that the huge success of Casino Royale has the producers understanding that shaking (not stirring) up the formula can be a good thing. LatinoReview is reporting a rumor (and it is, at this point, still a rumor) that an offer has gone out to Marc Forster to helm Bond 22. Forster made his name with Monster's Ball, solidified his status as a major player with the entertaining but overrated Finding Neverland, and his last project was the interesting Stranger Than Fiction. According to LR, several major directors have met about the possibility of directing Bond 22, including Tony Scott (Top Gun, True Romance), Alex Proyas (The Crow, Dark City), and Jonathan Mostow (the excellent Breakdown, T3).
This isn't the first time Forster has been offered a major franchise. He was asked to direct Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, but chose to work on Finding Neverland instead. I would imagine taking on a Bond film creates the same concerns in a director that it does in the actor who steps into the tuxedo. You don't want to get pigeonholed. But each of these guys has established himself, and each would bring a completely different take to the material. Considering all the love for Casino Royale, it's a little strange Martin Campbell is not in the running, but I think fresh blood is definitely the way to go. Out of the candidates above, I personally would want to see Tony Scott's take most, just because his trashy pop sensibilities might just be what the often stuffy Bond series needs. And I know it's wishful thinking, but wouldn't you love to see what Spike Jonze, Darren Aronofsky, or Alfonso Cuaron would do with the superspy?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-21-2007 @ 2:20PM
RP said...
Nah, give it to Michel Gondry!
Bond can spend the entirety of the film 'shooting' foes with his massive hands after being induced into a coma by a rich, and given the circumstances, most likely evil Japanese buisnessman (who is later revealed to be a prototype robot that went awry).
You know you want it.
Reply
5-21-2007 @ 3:03PM
Donna said...
Here we go again...
"Hey, we've got a new, edgy, serious Bond! Let's go off the reservation with the next film!"
Where have I heard that before? Oh yeah... License to Kill. Which set us up for Roger Moore Mk II.
Finding Neverland was a hugely boring disappointment and Monster's Ball was one of the most overrated shagfests of the last 20 years. Please God no.
Reply
5-21-2007 @ 3:20PM
Akbar Fazil said...
Tony Scott? Please no. Bond does not need it's color palette blown out and over grained.
Reply
8-03-2007 @ 11:28AM
MARTHIE said...
Sorry, much as I love the 'Bourne' films, what belongs to the 'Bond' Sean Connery especially, you cannot replace. The suave elegance of the character is uncomparable and will remain as such in my books!
Reply