Review: Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End -- Ryan's Review
Filed under: Action, Comedy, Drama, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, New Releases, Disney, Theatrical Reviews, Fandom, New in Theaters, Family Films, Johnny Depp, Remakes and Sequels, Summer Movies
.jpg)
About seven hours into Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End, someone stuffs a monkey into a cannon, lights the fuse and sends it shooting across the deck to crash into another character. That monkey is like us, the audience -- bruised, confused and unsure what it did to deserve this punishment. We have to endure a hurricane of hooey, a hydra-headed story with more subplots and pointless reversals than a Raymond Chandler tale and more doodad MacGuffins -- a compass that points to this, a key that unlocks that -- than even a parody could endure, all of which leads to a sort of white noise of confusion where a plot should be. Even if that monkey-cannon were pointed at my head, I couldn't explain to you why, for example, the key pirates from the previous two films are now introduced to us as 'pirate lords' -- leaders of some kind of pirate's union, which, judging by Captain Jack (Johnny Depp) and Captain Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush) does not offer dental. It's their lordship, and what that means for pirates everywhere, that this trilogy capper is supposedly about.
You'll remember that at the end of the last film, Dead Man's Chest, Depp's swishy swashbuckler was betrayed by Keira Knightley's colonial babe Elizabeth Swann, left manacled to the deck of his ship as it was being eaten by a steroid-squid, in the hopes that a sticky pirate curse would drown with him and his ship. The audience wasn't fooled -- even the most casual moviegoer knew Depp would be returning for part three -- but films that include an easy-breezy transition between life and afterlife often find themselves having to paddle twice as hard to get dramatic tension going, which is one of the problems that most plagues At World's End. After all, if no one can really die, what's the worst thing that can happen? (One of the reasons I've never bothered to read a comic book in my life, by the way) Somewhere around the thirty-minute mark of this one, we're re-introduced to Captain Jack, who is stuck in some kind of Looney Tunes purgatory, commanding a ship sitting in the middle of a desert, and crewed only by multiple Jack Sparrows.
Before that can happen, however, we're whisked away to the land of Singapore, where Elizabeth Swann and Barbossa are improbably on some kind of stealth mission to enlist the help of Chow Yun-Fat in the whole scheme to free Sparrow from his afterlife prison. I can't imagine who thought it was a good idea to have Yun-Fat in this film, and I'm sure he would agree with me -- his scenes accomplish absolutely nothing except to pad the running time of the film an extra twenty minutes or so, and culminate in a bizarre set-up where he thinks that Knightley's character, wearing a triangle hat, is some kind of reincarnation of a goddess and tries to rape her. Don't ask. By the time the 'let's bring back Jack from the dead' part of the film is over, you're sort of hoping that things might get on the right track and liven up, but you're only kidding yourself -- that's when the real complications begin. Maps, keys to help read maps, and maps to help find keys, and so forth.
The big Keith Richards cameo, which we heard about forever, is also a wash-out -- he has one or two lines and is seemingly reading them off cards. It's almost as if he's there under duress. A more significant waste, however, is Davy Jones (Bill Nighy) the octopus-faced underworld captain introduced in the second film, and one of the few memorable characters in the entire series. Where he was menacing and mysterious before, he's now turned into a talky supporting player who absurdly sits down at meetings with the human characters to engage in their discussions about maps and keys. If I followed things correctly, I think Tom Hollander's character, a sort of bureaucratic Little Lord Fauntleroy of the high seas, commandeers Jones' powerful ghost ship The Dutchman, which can dive like a submersible and is crewed by a walking, talking Red Lobster platter, in the hopes of using it to stop an uprising by the union of pirates. Why doesn't he (Hollander) just use his influence to call down the thunder of the British fleet? Oh, forget it.
A few good moments are sprinkled throughout -- the filmmakers were smart to bring back Naomie Harris and Nighy, even if both of them are misused, and Knightley gets a couple of good lines -- but success has spoiled Captain Jack. The first film, perhaps coasting on low expectations, was a whimsical high-seas adventure in which the supernatural elements were well-handled and executed with style. A sense of economy was evident -- every shot was made to count -- but now we've arrived at the opposite end of the spectrum, with minor scenes getting twenty-minute setups and the smallest characters being allowed their own plot resolutions. Remember the guy who was in love with Knightley's character from early in the first film? He gets a good fifteen minutes. We're left with a sea-going Matrix trilogy, utterly superfluous, doomed to be forgotten. There's a moment in this film when one bit player turns to another and says "Do you think he's just making it up as he goes along?" They should have had the decency to keep that in-joke to themselves.









Reader Comments (Page 2 of 5)
5-26-2007 @ 1:13PM
Lisa said...
I actually liked the movie a lot a bit long but overall ok. Yes there were a lot of subplots and double crossings but that all occurs to stay true to a pirates real character "looking out for number one". The ending was real sad cuz i wanted will and elizabeth to be together, but i actually stayed through the "forever ending" credits and there is a last scene that kind of puts your heart at rest about the two at least u know they really love eachother the kid in the end of the credits looks like the kid at the beginning of the movie though so i wonder whats that all about?
Reply
5-26-2007 @ 4:02PM
Austin said...
I thought this movie was the best of all three, but make sure you totally understand the first two before you go see this one, if you do, then the movie will be a whole lot better
Reply
5-26-2007 @ 5:09PM
J said...
the critic forgot to mention that there's more chemistry between Geoffrey Rush and the monkey than there is between Knightley and Bloom.
Reply
5-26-2007 @ 6:12PM
Vasilios Hatzis said...
I saw Pirates 3 on thursday night and went into the movie really excited and left the movie feeling like i just dropped 10 bucks into the crane game machine trying to get the harvard diploma and came up empty handed.
But it wasnt a total loss, i mean, Johnny Depp was fantastic as Captain Jack Sparrow as usual and his performance as said captain (to me anyways) is one of the best and most entertaining characters in cinema in the last few years...Savvy..??!!!
Captain Barbosa gave every dentist who saw the movie nightmares while still turning in a great performance.
Miss Keira Knightly still makes me wonder whether or not she has what it takes...but still looks hot while doing it (even when she channels Mel Gibsons' William Wallace for a rally cry in one scene)
Orlando Bloom as the honest blacksmith turned swashbuckler still has the mystified/brooding/intense/confused look on his face like he's trying to decipher a sudoku puzzle every time he's on screen.....and Tia Dalma's character seriously needs to lay off the hash...
All in all it was a confusing 3 hours with more plot points and twists than the war in iraq...yet more entertaining.
But i guess that's what hollywood has come to these says with more sequels being churned out than there are wayans brothers (how horrible was spider-man 3)...but hey they have to make money some how...thankfully Johnny Depp is in a league of his own when it comes to acting. Hell, they can make a fourth one (which there are rumors already) called Pirates of the Carribean 4: Captain Jack Sparrow Goes Flyfishing for three and a half hours and i'd still go see it!!!
Reply
5-26-2007 @ 6:40PM
luvpirates said...
So many people missed the boat on this movie(no pun intended). It's a fantasy movie. No action? boring? There was plenty of action. I agree there were some scenes that could have been deleted. They just weren't necessary. Overall I enjoyed the movie completely and it kept me glued to my seat.
Reply
5-26-2007 @ 7:55PM
Christiane said...
You wouldn't know a good movie if it came up and bit you in the ass! The movie was full of twists, action packed, and kept the viewers interest. The set-up of Pirates 3 reminded me of another great movie, "Pulp Fiction." Let's face it people...ALL movies have scenes that are considered cheesy and unnecessary to the plot. I never listen to a "Critic" to decide weather or not a movie is good or bad. That decision lies within each of us. Everyone that left the theater last night was doing nothing but raving about how great it was. For being a sequel...and a third one at that...this was by far the best one yet.
Reply
5-26-2007 @ 8:40PM
Suzanne said...
I was thoroughly entertained by this third film...one question though-what did the E I symbol mean? Was it something Calypso said and I didn't understand? It made the Brit Captain speechless and unable to give a command...that scene of him going down the stairs was fantastic! Great special effects and alot of levels going on throughout...waiting til all the credits went thru to see the green flash ten years later was worth the wait and shows how complex movie making really is... it was visually stunning....
Reply
5-26-2007 @ 9:58PM
Hannah said...
Okay, for one, the people who saw this one and not the first two, you are in no position to trash it. Of course it's not going to make sense to you! Go rent the 1st and the 2nd one, and then go back to the 3rd.
I don't understand how the 3rd movie was bad at all. The fact that Jack Sparrow went crazy...I loved that! I mean come on, if you did the unthinkable [coming back from the dead] wouldn't you go crazy too? This one completely tied up the first two and answered all the questions I had. I loved all the twists like Elizabeth becoming Pirate King [or Queen] and Will becoming Captain of the Flying Dutchman.
All in all, I thought this movie was FANTASTIC and I am definitely going to see it again..and again.
Reply
5-27-2007 @ 12:35AM
Bope said...
I just wanted to say something about the ending. After the credits you have the scene of Elizabeth and her son waiting, The deal was that after you give your heart to the ship, you have to spend 10 years leading those who are dead. After the 10 years, if your true love is waiting for you, you're released they waited for 10 years and so they broke the curse and freed Will, because it was proven as true love. Thats why Davey Jones was so angry at Calypso. Thats why he told the pirates how to bind her. Remember when he asked her why she wasn't there?She wasn't true love. I checked this out on other sites to make sure as well.
Hope that helps
if you didnt see the scene its on youtube
:D
Reply
5-27-2007 @ 10:57AM
Steve C said...
For my money, this review was RIGHT ON TARGET. I liked Pirates 1 and 2 and had high expectations for this one. Sadly, it disappointed with a lot of nonsense. For me, Pirates 3 had a stupid storyline, insufferable dialog, and gratuitous grossness (that made kids and adults alike turn their heads in disgust -- think toes, tentacles in the face, for instance). The original creative idea has run its course. Hopefully, World's End signals the series' end.
Reply
5-27-2007 @ 11:32AM
Jenna said...
Okay I have a lot to say starting with what the heck is wrong with you people. The Pirates series is AMAZING!!!! It was incredable action packed, it had great dedicated actors who did way more than their job they made it seem so real. These movies were extremelly hard to make, if you hadn't noticed and you have absolutely no right to critize them. And as for some of you idiots such as Crystal, this is the last movie incase you didn't get the clue by the title. And whoever wrote this review I would like to have a word with you. So what if some scenes were a little weird, nothings perfect. This series is probably the best one, it is the most sucessful. And also if you disliked the series so much why the hell did you watch it. I love Elizabeth Swan and Will Turner they are such a cute couple. And they make their relationship look so real which is different in most movies. As for Johnny Depp he is hilarious, and an amazing actor. This movie is fantastic!!!!!! I am so unbelievebly uspst that they are not making another one. And as for you complainers out there, I would like to see you make a better movie series. Oh wait you can't you know why because this is the best movie series ever. So stop sitting around mopping and critizing other people. THIS MOVIE ROX!!!!!
Jenna
Reply
5-27-2007 @ 12:05PM
Cheryl said...
What bothers me about all this is that everyone complained that there wasn't enough action and now everyone is complaining that there was too much action and not enough cleverness. I thought all along that the cleverness and uniqueness of The Black Pearl was what made it great. Even then the action parts were the LONG parts.
When we get past that, you have to remember the "circle of life". Will's son is now 10 years old - just the age Will was when we first met him. And Captain Jack is sailing the ocean in a dinghy, looking for the Black Pearl - just the way he was when we first met him. I loved the first one (saw it 28 times in theatres) but I'm happpy for this to be the last one unless we can have another one like the first one.
Another thing, why do you think the writer's made it so confusing? So you would have to go see it several times just to figure out the story - duh. The second time I saw it I figured out why Will's the captain of the Flying Dutchman instead of Jack, and the third time I figured out why Will's dad stabbed him. Yeah, there's a lot of unanswered questions but that's life (or afterlife).
Bottom line - don't make another one unless it's CLEVER. Go watch something else if all you want to see is things getting blown up.
Reply
5-27-2007 @ 12:29PM
Cheryl said...
Suzanne
E I stands for East India Trading Company - the "business" of Lord Beckett. If you didn't see the first two movies, then you should go back and watch them at least 3 times each (well, maybe you could watch Dead Man's Chest just twice).
Reply
5-27-2007 @ 12:33PM
Marian said...
Well, I agree that Sparrow lost all his wits and just went crazy in this one. I mean that's what was sooo awesome about him to begin with; he mad you think he was mad, psycho, weird, and VERY mysterious, but yet had it all together in the end (of PoC1). But this time, he lost all that and was just plan out of it! I loved PoC1, I still have it mainly memorized (mainly due to my child), the second was okay, I didn't like them leaving it with Will and Eliz not being together but you would have though that at the end of the 3rd they would have been... In my opinion that was one of the biggest mistakes (another being too many plots inside a plot)!! They could have had Jack become captain of the Dutchman and then he could release Will. Besides it's time to lay it down. This should have been a really great one that tied all the strings, let everyone end up where they wonted and put it all to "end" like the title says!!!!
Reply
5-27-2007 @ 7:01PM
Dave said...
Does anyone Remember that these are suposed to be family fun movies, possibly even kid movies. Im sick of these high profile "I want genius to be satisfied" critics, or all these "it was tooo long cry babys", go watch Titanic or one of your stupid 10 min steven sigal thrill rides you idiots it was a good movie.
Reply
5-28-2007 @ 12:36AM
toby tyler said...
You had me at 'monkey'...
Reply
5-28-2007 @ 1:50AM
Sam said...
What the hell are you on about?! I saw it 2 days ago and let me tell you it was so bloody awsome, i LOVED it!!! It was funny, sad and PACKED with action! It was REAALLYY GOOODD!! It was so sad how Will died and became immortal on the same they got married! =(
GOOD MOVIE 5/5
Reply
5-28-2007 @ 6:14AM
Helena said...
Where I don't completely agree with this critics view I must confess I am sorely dissapointed.
I loved the first two and hoped to see a little more character development in Will and Elizabeth in nthe absence of Captain Jack in this film, which was delivered, obviously the first good part of the film. I also thought it had alot of good adventure and some great humour I didnt feel it was too long at all.
However the ending completely let it down for me, we're supposed to be happy with seeing Elizabeth just seeming to be content with sitting on some desert island for the next ten years waiting (not fighting to find some way to get her man back which is the very least I'd have expected from a strong girl such as her) and Jack loosing the pearl... again, and this time even his most faithful just leaves him?! There also seemed to be alot of things left open at the end but theres no promise of a number 4. All I can say is that I hope that there will be and that it will round this off nicely and get us to a point where we feel happy with the explanations and whats happening to our favourite characters.
Reply
5-28-2007 @ 2:32PM
andydreamseeker said...
Glad that it ended or has it?
Check out my review here:
http://andydreamseeker.blogspot.com/2007/05/movie-review-pirates-of-caribbean-at.html
Reply
5-28-2007 @ 2:46PM
daniel morgan said...
the third and final movie of the pirates of the caribbian had great graphics, its hilarious value was sky rocketing and its story line was well set out, any film that has to follow the film next on screen will have to surpass the frenzy of lushous screen play - overall i think that it was a great film, it was better than the second but i knew that it would have a hard job to top the first one of the trilogy. still a great film.
Reply