Review: Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End -- Ryan's Review
Filed under: Action, Comedy, Drama, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, New Releases, Disney, Theatrical Reviews, Fandom, New in Theaters, Family Films, Johnny Depp, Remakes and Sequels, Summer Movies
.jpg)
About seven hours into Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End, someone stuffs a monkey into a cannon, lights the fuse and sends it shooting across the deck to crash into another character. That monkey is like us, the audience -- bruised, confused and unsure what it did to deserve this punishment. We have to endure a hurricane of hooey, a hydra-headed story with more subplots and pointless reversals than a Raymond Chandler tale and more doodad MacGuffins -- a compass that points to this, a key that unlocks that -- than even a parody could endure, all of which leads to a sort of white noise of confusion where a plot should be. Even if that monkey-cannon were pointed at my head, I couldn't explain to you why, for example, the key pirates from the previous two films are now introduced to us as 'pirate lords' -- leaders of some kind of pirate's union, which, judging by Captain Jack (Johnny Depp) and Captain Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush) does not offer dental. It's their lordship, and what that means for pirates everywhere, that this trilogy capper is supposedly about.
You'll remember that at the end of the last film, Dead Man's Chest, Depp's swishy swashbuckler was betrayed by Keira Knightley's colonial babe Elizabeth Swann, left manacled to the deck of his ship as it was being eaten by a steroid-squid, in the hopes that a sticky pirate curse would drown with him and his ship. The audience wasn't fooled -- even the most casual moviegoer knew Depp would be returning for part three -- but films that include an easy-breezy transition between life and afterlife often find themselves having to paddle twice as hard to get dramatic tension going, which is one of the problems that most plagues At World's End. After all, if no one can really die, what's the worst thing that can happen? (One of the reasons I've never bothered to read a comic book in my life, by the way) Somewhere around the thirty-minute mark of this one, we're re-introduced to Captain Jack, who is stuck in some kind of Looney Tunes purgatory, commanding a ship sitting in the middle of a desert, and crewed only by multiple Jack Sparrows.
Before that can happen, however, we're whisked away to the land of Singapore, where Elizabeth Swann and Barbossa are improbably on some kind of stealth mission to enlist the help of Chow Yun-Fat in the whole scheme to free Sparrow from his afterlife prison. I can't imagine who thought it was a good idea to have Yun-Fat in this film, and I'm sure he would agree with me -- his scenes accomplish absolutely nothing except to pad the running time of the film an extra twenty minutes or so, and culminate in a bizarre set-up where he thinks that Knightley's character, wearing a triangle hat, is some kind of reincarnation of a goddess and tries to rape her. Don't ask. By the time the 'let's bring back Jack from the dead' part of the film is over, you're sort of hoping that things might get on the right track and liven up, but you're only kidding yourself -- that's when the real complications begin. Maps, keys to help read maps, and maps to help find keys, and so forth.
The big Keith Richards cameo, which we heard about forever, is also a wash-out -- he has one or two lines and is seemingly reading them off cards. It's almost as if he's there under duress. A more significant waste, however, is Davy Jones (Bill Nighy) the octopus-faced underworld captain introduced in the second film, and one of the few memorable characters in the entire series. Where he was menacing and mysterious before, he's now turned into a talky supporting player who absurdly sits down at meetings with the human characters to engage in their discussions about maps and keys. If I followed things correctly, I think Tom Hollander's character, a sort of bureaucratic Little Lord Fauntleroy of the high seas, commandeers Jones' powerful ghost ship The Dutchman, which can dive like a submersible and is crewed by a walking, talking Red Lobster platter, in the hopes of using it to stop an uprising by the union of pirates. Why doesn't he (Hollander) just use his influence to call down the thunder of the British fleet? Oh, forget it.
A few good moments are sprinkled throughout -- the filmmakers were smart to bring back Naomie Harris and Nighy, even if both of them are misused, and Knightley gets a couple of good lines -- but success has spoiled Captain Jack. The first film, perhaps coasting on low expectations, was a whimsical high-seas adventure in which the supernatural elements were well-handled and executed with style. A sense of economy was evident -- every shot was made to count -- but now we've arrived at the opposite end of the spectrum, with minor scenes getting twenty-minute setups and the smallest characters being allowed their own plot resolutions. Remember the guy who was in love with Knightley's character from early in the first film? He gets a good fifteen minutes. We're left with a sea-going Matrix trilogy, utterly superfluous, doomed to be forgotten. There's a moment in this film when one bit player turns to another and says "Do you think he's just making it up as he goes along?" They should have had the decency to keep that in-joke to themselves.









Reader Comments (Page 3 of 5)
5-28-2007 @ 7:05PM
Sarah said...
I enjoyed every minute of the movie and it was so unpredictable that's what made it great. You got to know the characters even more and they went through so much together and against each other. I would pay to see it again and I probably will. I love the fact that there is a possibility for another one. I think the movies keep getting better. The 1st one was the setting the 2nd one took off and the 3rd picked up where the 2nd left off. I loved seeing all the other characters too. And Jack Sparrow, what can I say.... HE IS THE MAN!!! He makes the movie fun and interesting. You never know what is going to happen when Jack is around. All I know is I would rather try to figure out the plot of the movie then know exactly what is going to happen. POTC movies keep you guessing and that's what makes them great!! All the characters are played excellently by all the actors. Keep up the good work! Hope to see more!
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 4:23PM
Amanda said...
This is just something I've noted about most of the reviews I've read for At World's End: Everyone seems to be forgetting it's really the second half of a movie. I mean at the very end of Dead Man's Chest the viewer is like 'WTF? What just happened? Isn't he dead? Why did she do that? GAAHHH!' (I was at the very least) But this movie answers those questions.
Yes, the film is long, bordering on too long, but it does have enough action to keep the viewer interested. You are given more than enough information to figure out the plot, especially if you’ve seen the previous film. I’ll admit at first I wondered WHY Tia Dalma went with Barbossa, Will, Elizabeth, and all the others to save Jack, but then I saw her locket and the light-bulb went off and I was like ‘AHA! She’s connected to Jones’. Then came the Calypso stuff and I was confused for a moment and then I thought back to the sequence in the second film where Jack, Will and the crew are at Tia Dalma’s and are discussing just how Davy Jones came to be all squid-ified, and I realized the ONLY way she could know all the stories were true was to be said woman, and considering the ‘changeable as the sea’ line I was pretty much convinced Tia Dalma was Calypso long before that fact was revealed. All it takes to understand the film is *insert shocked voice here* THOUGHT!
The critc said “Remember the guy who was in love with Knightley's character from early in the first film? He gets a good fifteen minutes.”… Dude, I hate to break it to you, but you apparently slept through the first film, because that ‘guy’ was Norrington, and was a major character in all three films. And I’m not saying that as a deranged fan, because I really, really don’t like Norrington.
Also about the Keith Richards cameo, a cameo appearance doesn’t even have to include lines. So be glad he has lines at all. And his character is supposed to be as old as the hills and then some. What does he do, he finds a passage in the “Pirate Codex” (which was kind of dumb in my opinion, I don’t see pirates compiling a list of rules) and he tells Jack that the trick to living forever is living with yourself. I honestly thought he had a very good cameo appearance; he looked like he’d lived long enough to have seen it all and long enough after that to not care at all anymore. And I can’t be sure, but I think that was the point.
The battles could have used a bit more thought, while the ‘maelstrom’/whirlpool fight was cool, both ships would have been pulled under during the course of the fight, however considering it was Calypso’s doing, I guess she could do whatever in the hell she wanted too. Personally, I found the marriage while fighting hilarious.
The plot is much more cohesive than most critics give it credit for. If you just remember the second film, and pay attention and think the whole thing does make sense. Though, I have to admit, I am confused as to WHY at the opening of the film the group needed a ship, considering Singapore is not exactly next door to Jamaica, but aside from that, which doesn’t REALLY matter all that much (though it is an annoying nagging question in the back of my mind) the important things are explained and connected though often quite subtly.
The film wasn’t great, but it was good and a decent ending to the sequence should they choose to stop it there. I think the writers might be able to turn out another good sequel, but after awhile you start pushing it. Honestly, I think they need someone to tell Jack immortality isn’t always physically living forever… because really all three movies have been about Jack trying to be immortal.
And this part here has nothing to do with the movie, but I think that critics have forgotten the whole point of movies. Movies are a type of escapism. Sitting in a dark room, with the lives of non-existent, larger-than-life, people being played out before you, that’s the whole point. So what if it has more than one thing happening at a time? As much as a movie is escapism, you have to have some reality. Life doesn’t always make sense at the time, so as long as the major questions are answered in the end, why should a movie be like that? Movies are for the enjoyment of the viewers, and if you forget not everything has to mean something, and decide to think about where the movie as a whole is going, I think even critics who seem to lambaste EVERYTHING nowadays, will find that even decent movies can be enjoyed.
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 9:39PM
Movie Master said...
SUCKED -- no happy ending
Reply
5-30-2007 @ 10:23AM
Iris said...
Disney did it again, what a great movie, hope they keep the Pirates going. If you have not seen the movie yet, wait till after all the credits are over with, you will get a big surprise. I had to see it a second time, to see the real end of the movie. So many of us left before the credits, so you never saw the end of the movie. It is a must see ending.
Reply
5-30-2007 @ 12:03PM
cashious Jones said...
Ok, ok..... The movie was ok. But there was too much Liz Swan and less Jack Sparrow!!. They failed to talk about the feud between Captn Jack and the head of the East India trading co. Why did he need Jack when he had Davey Jones in his pocket?? What mark did Jack leave on him?? Why was Jack's father in a couple of scenes.. I'm pretty sure everyone would like to see more.. Ok back to Liz Swan... the first movie she's a priss and now she can stand toe to toe with experienced pirates then they make her King?? WTF!! Disney failed us jus how Hollywood failed us.. That stupid movie formula of theirs... At the end of Dead Man's Chest Jack jumps in the Cracken's mouth.. in the Black Pearl Jack becomes skelleton Jack... He doesn't do anything badass.. Like I said before the movie is ok.. But people we're smarter than this!! The more we cheer crap the more they put out.. Take the Spidey Series for example..... Get over the beautiful cinematography and really open your eyes... It could've been better. It felt rushed...
Reply
5-30-2007 @ 2:19PM
Susan W said...
I disagree with everything in this so called "review". I have seen the film 5 times already and will be going back for more. It is funny and entertaining. I couldn't leave my seat for the entire 3 hours. It is packed with special effects that blow your mind and work perfectly with the story line. Those with no imagination will have problems with this movie. Johnny Depp did an excellent job adding to the uniqueness of Captain Jack Sparrow. The plot is easy to see: Jack wants to live forever, Will wants to free his dad and marry Elizabeth, Davy Jones wants to be rid of Beckett and the EITC and be free agian, Beckett wants to rid the world of pirates to make a buck and Barbossa wants the Pearl back and be free to roam the seas again. It all fits together like a well oiled machine. I do agree that this movie could have done without Keith Richards. I found his performance bland and unimportant to the entire story. I will enjoy all three movies for the rest of my life. I hope there will be a fourth installment.
Reply
5-30-2007 @ 3:22PM
seshygrl89 said...
Anyone who doesnt know what happened to Will or Elizabeth did not stay till after the credits so they have no room to comment on those matters. Now I thought the movie kept me on the edge of my seat and had a lot of action, there were parts that were weird but it was funny. Just about all loose ends were tied up. I if they make a fourth one Will is not gonna be in it and neither is Elizabeth...DUH! But Jack and Barbossa will...but if they don't o=it ended at a good point where since they are pirates and you can expect what might happen. But will happen is to be determined...
Reply
5-30-2007 @ 4:18PM
Jackie said...
yall are some freaks.
this was the best movie.
like things that were hidden were reviled in 3.
it wasnt bad,
but if your slow or went to the bathroom then you missed an important part. it was funny and exciting and you never knew what would happen next.it was a great off the rollercoaster 3hrs and it waws worth it.i hated all the attention elizabeth got though,but i loved the scenes where there was more than one Jack Sparrow. dont listen to Joshua spend all the money you can so they can make a 4.it was like a mystery and action adventure romantic movie all in one.i loved it so much.and Will looked so hott at the end
Reply
5-30-2007 @ 5:55PM
Carm said...
While I wanted to walk out within 20 minutes, the thought of missing out on Captain Jack kept me in the theater seat. I missed him. I missed the enjoyment the cast had with the making of the first film. Depp while always wonderful sold his soul to commercialism in this last endeavor orrr the filmmakers succumbed to his rather offbeat suggestions and took what could have been a great series and made it into a Tim Burton nightmare.
What I have always enjoyed was the good/bad fight in boyJack. I felt they took Elizabeth and turned her into Saint Joan and totally lost Wil in the process.
They were the cast and should have created a plot where they are all working together for a cause.
I would have loved to have known about Jack's history and perhaps a love that comes into his life that challenges his independent spirit, but instead I felt that I had endured three hours of the Twilight Zone. Somewhere in the midst of production I could see the writers going, "ok, let's draw straws or oh what about this?" It was a mish mash of beginnings, endings, subplots and more subplots.
If there is another Pirates........can it please be a little more human? And wait a while until the producers and cast can be excited about doing another movie just for the fun of it so the audience can be caught in the excitement of creation rather than the speculation of making another million bucks.
Reply
5-30-2007 @ 6:10PM
Carm said...
While I wanted to walk out within 20 minutes, the thought of missing out on Captain Jack kept me in the theater seat. I missed him. I missed the enjoyment the cast had with the making of the first film. Depp while always wonderful sold his soul to commercialism in this last endeavor orrr the filmmakers succumbed to his rather offbeat suggestions and took what could have been a great series and made it into a Tim Burton nightmare.
What I have always enjoyed was the good/bad fight in boyJack. I felt they took Elizabeth and turned her into Saint Joan and totally lost Wil in the process.
They were the cast and should have created a plot where they are all working together for a cause.
I would have loved to have known about Jack's history and perhaps a love that comes into his life that challenges his independent spirit, but instead I felt that I had endured three hours of the Twilight Zone. Somewhere in the midst of production I could see the writers going, "ok, let's draw straws or oh what about this?" It was a mish mash of beginnings, endings, subplots and more subplots.
If there is another Pirates........can it please be a little more human? And wait a while until the producers and cast can be excited about doing another movie just for the fun of it so the audience can be caught in the excitement of creation rather than the speculation of making another million bucks.
Reply
5-30-2007 @ 9:22PM
Natasha said...
I felt the last movie left you dangling again not as much as the second one did if you stayed after you would see Will and Elizabeth had a child which was to be hung in the begining of the movie...now i think they should make another one since this was showed. Wouldnt you think Will and Elizabeth would try to save their son? And another group would try to stop the pirates? And wouldnt there be more adventures by Captain Jack and his crew? See more things to think of for another...so in some way they did leave you asking questions not many but there are a few.
Reply
5-30-2007 @ 11:14PM
Jaime said...
I love Johnny Depp. Don't get me wrong but he went from this dashing,sneaky Captain Jack in the first 2 movies and ended up a looney bin case in the 3rd. He acted like he just escaped from the psych ward. And who cares about all the attention Elizabeth got from all the other men. Why couldn't they have ended the series with her and Will together? that wasn't right. What happened to Davy Jones and his love Calypso/tia dalma? did they reunite in the afterlife?
Where did they drop elizabeth off at and just leave her there on an island alone? Why didn't Jack gain immortality and Captain the Flying Dutchman? And we never did find out what "mark" Captain Jack left on Lord Beckott, we only knew of the scar Beckott left on Jack.
Too many loose ends where there should have been answers. The special effects were good, but the plotlines were confusing and bundled into too much at once. I expected a better happy ending for the LOVE birds, after all this was a Disney movie.
I hope they make another one to fix what they messed up. But I doubt it. Very sad for me. I thought the trilogy would have been better. I loved the first 2 and waited all year for nothing.
Reply
5-31-2007 @ 9:32AM
mehreen said...
I think it was best of all 3 movies.The sequences and actions were amazing specially at the end when there was a war between 2 ships in a hurricane, it was extremely exciting. All characters gave an outstanding performance.It will keep you glued to your seat from the beginning to the end.I wish they will make part 4 because Orlando Bloom will look exquisite in a captain's role.
Reply
5-31-2007 @ 2:08PM
Linda Ball said...
I loved the movie and thought it was great. The first is my favorite becasue it was the perfect mix of everything, but this was a very good movie. It was long, but I was not bored for a minute, the plots kept moving along. You just have gotta love Jack Sparrow! If you don't enjoy action, then this movie is probably not for you.
Reply
5-31-2007 @ 7:41PM
Haley said...
I think it was a big Dissipointment and a let down the whole thing with will and Elizibeth not being able to be together is totally f#$^ up there is so many other ways that could have ended a lot better
Reply
5-31-2007 @ 8:56PM
Sean Bermudez said...
By far the best of the three.. It leaves just enough loose ends to possibly continue the story. As well as create new ones for those who were patient after the movie ended..
Reply
5-31-2007 @ 10:32PM
Rockgod08 said...
I completely disagree. I LOVED this movie. I saw it last night and loved every second of it. It was slightly confusing for the first portion but if you pay attention it explains almost everything. The only thing I didn't get was the whole crab/rock creature.
Reply
5-31-2007 @ 10:56PM
Valerie said...
I found "At World's End" to be a loaded and enigmatic film that delivered its share of entertainment. Johnny Depp is an actor worthy of reverence and his "crew" are simply marvelous. The movie was rather lengthy, but superbly enthralling with action sequences leaving little to the imagination and a score and plotline to leave every member of the audience satisfied. When comparing the three films, it is clear that the final segment of the trilogy is the second best (following in close suit of "The Curse of the Black Pearl"). The most disappointing component of the movie was its finality (or lack thereof). It ended hinting toward a possible continuation of this superb saga, which leads me to wonder whether the writers will take a long-awaited vacation before commencing on a fourth segment. I certainly hope so, because this cannot be the last the world has seen of Captain Jack Sparrow!
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 12:19AM
cpeeble said...
i think PC3 is too long and boring. I miss all of the action and comedy from the second movie. This movie was too confusing and they didn't explain how Jack came back to life. This was an average movie. I prefer the second one though. it was too long that i fell asleep. and I wanted Keira Knightly and Orlando Bloom to get married in the movie and stay together.Out of 10, 10 being the best, i give this movie a 5.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 10:39AM
mary said...
This movie set up the next one to get back to the basic premises of the first-- a simple story of one curse being broken and Jack getting back his precious ship. Did anyone notice the ending mirrored the begininng? Jack was without his precious Black Pearl, stolen by Barbarosa as in the origingal. The outcome of Will & Lizbeth mirrored Jones & Calypso's relationship before their falling out. Even the 10 year reunion tip off makes sense. It was ten years that the Pearl had sailed with the cursed crew after the mutiny from Jack. Now I guess the next movie will be set 10 years in the future when Will & Liz hook up again on land. Jack will find the Fountain of Youth and have it stolen by guess who and somehow it will be used in the end to help our lovers.
If there is a next movie, I hope the writers return to the formula that made the first such a sucess. I am one who loved the first because of its obvious references and scenes that brought me back to my youth. The Pirates ride was my favorite at Disney World---cheesey, campy, dangerous, and most of all scary & humorous.
May Capt. Jack have his Pearl returned to him and sail on forever!!!!!
Reply