Disney to Make RomCom About Adam & Eve
Filed under: Comedy, Deals, Disney, Scripts
That pesky Adam and Eve. They get to run around naked and happy, frolicking amongst the trees and animals. But then that devilish, or rather devil snake, had to come along, tempt Eve with an apple and make her tempt Adam. The actions of the pair lead to hari-kari on their Eden paradise, since they broke God's one lone rule. From there, things continued to get worse. They get jiggy, have some kids, and one kills the other one, bringing death to the world, and we all get to suffer because of it the family's dysfunctional ways.Now Variety reports that Disney has put a hefty six-figures into a spec purchase for All About Adam, coming from the sophomoric pen of Alan Schoolcraft and Brent Simons, who already got their Mastermind spec nabbed by DreamWorks. The soon-to-be-script details Adam as he follows Eve "to a modern-day Gotham after they have a lover's quarrel. Adam discovers Satan was behind the breakup." I'm not sure how they'll deal with the existence of Gotham without the whole apple and getting kicked out of Eden thing, or how they can fast-forward so many years, but maybe that'll have to be one of those leap of faith moments. That's all the news that there is for the project, besides the fact that Scott Rudin has signed on to produce the upcoming feature. Since this is Disney, I'd imagine this will be some sort of Enchanted-like story -- equipped with Adam running around with a strategically-placed leaf through the streets of New York City. But maybe Disney will surprise us and defy their convention.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-04-2007 @ 12:46PM
vaginaface said...
Just as an FYI Eve was never tempted to eat an apple! The 3rd chapter of genesis never uses the word "apple" only the term forbidden fruit was mentioned. (ref. http://www.trivia-library.com/b/adam-and-eve-were-not-expelled-from-eden-for-eating-an-apple.htm) So please stop being a perpatraitor of ignorance and remove apple from your blog.
Reply
6-04-2007 @ 2:35PM
pete said...
this guy... lol at u vaginaface!!!!!!!!11111oneone
Reply
6-04-2007 @ 2:57PM
Porchland said...
I just want to point out that someone named vaginaface is lecturing on the Bible. I'm just sayin'.
Reply
6-04-2007 @ 3:11PM
vaginaface said...
maybe I should have posted under a diffrent username but my name doesnt matter. I ask you am I wrong? have you ever read the 3rd chapter or genesis? Do see the word apple anywhere? Its not like a am some kooky athesist trying to spread lies. I am pointing out a fact that you can see for yourself. There is no way you can tell me I am wrong because "apple" aint in the bible, sorry
Reply
6-04-2007 @ 3:53PM
Brant said...
Yeah, but the Bible doesn't say that it WASN'T an apple, either. So it could've been an apple. Or a nectarine. Or a pomegranate. Or a tomato. Because tomatoes are fruits, too. Except tomatoes are native to South America, so unless Eden was located somewhere in Peru, it's unlikely that it was actually a tomato. I guess if God wanted to put tomatoes in the Eastern Hemisphere he could have. Maybe that was part of the punishment for eating the forbidden fruit. "That's it! You guys lose your tomato privileges for the next 4,000 years!"
Reply
6-07-2007 @ 3:10AM
GhaleonQ said...
I'm taking this way too far, but the Hebrew "fruit" isn't the same as the English word for the scientific or agricultural definition of "fruit." Tomatoes wouldn't work.
Reply