Fox News Calls Angelina Jolie a Hypocrite
Filed under: Drama, Celebrities and Controversy, Angelina Jolie, Movie Marketing, Paramount Vantage
Everyone's favorite entertainment journalist, Roger Friedman, is calling Angelina Jolie a hypocrite after she reportedly censored journalists while promoting her new film, A Mighty Heart. The Michael Winterbottom pic is about Mariane Pearl, widow of murdered Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, and it deals with freedom of the press, so the idea that Jolie made reporters sign a censoring agreement before interviewing her is certainly problematic. At the premiere of A Mighty Heart Wednesday night, Jolie's lawyer presented journalists with a contract stating certain subjects that could not be discussed with the actress, including questions about her personal life. Of course, this makes sense, because otherwise some writers would attempt to stray from the topic of the film in question -- which would take away from the promotion of the film, as well as from the purpose of the press' purpose at the event.Still, the contract does seem unnecessary and contradictory to the film's apparent message. If Jolie wanted to reject a question or topic, she could certainly just refuse to comment or leave. Most of the junkets and red carpets I've been to, this has either been addressed or accepted as a given anyway. Instead, according to Friedman, the mode of dealing with gossippy reporters made a lot of people angry, enough to cancel coverage, as USA Today and the Associated Press supposedly did. Eventually Jolie ended up refusing all print interviews because of the outrage. Friedman also claims that Jolie instructed publicists to ban Fox News (for which Friedman works) from the red carpet and any other premiere access. In the end, though, some higher ups at Paramount allowed Fox's coverage. Friedman goes on to criticize Jolie's history of press manipulation and also quotes a disappointed editorial director from Reporters Without Borders, an organization that was supposed to be supported by the film's premiere.
[via Fark.com, which has a good discussion of the article going in its comments section]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-14-2007 @ 5:41PM
Stan Heck said...
Tom Cruise started the no personal questions and contract when he did his junket for Vannila Sky. Tom (when promoating that stinker) was just divorced Nicole Kidman
Reply
6-15-2007 @ 1:18AM
Kathy Fenner said...
Please stick with what you do best and stay out of politics! By the way...why don't you adopt in the US instead of the showy adoptions outside the US!
Reply
6-15-2007 @ 11:08AM
Porcalina said...
What's wrong with her adopting outside of the US? And the only reason they're "showy" is because she gets followed by photographers and interviewed alot on the subject and it then becomes news.
Reply
6-25-2007 @ 8:00PM
PARIS said...
FOR ALL THE EXTENSIVE PROMO'S JOLIE DID FOR THIS MOVIE AND ALL THE GOOD REVIEWS AS OPPOSED TO THE HORRIBLE, FOR POTC3 AT WORLD'S END, I FIND GREAT COMFORT IN SEEING THIS MOVIE TAKE THE NOSE DIVE IT DID AT THE BOX-OFFICE THIS WEEKEND! AS A MATTER OF FACT, POTC3 BEAT THE MIGHTY JOLIE AT #7 AND MIGHTY HEART WAS #10, AND BOY SHE WAS ON EVERY PROGRAM AND NEWSPAPER, (INCLUDING USA TODAY, THE HYPOCRITES THEMSELVES), WHO PLUGGED THIS RELENTLESSLY!! PIRTATES, THEY BASICALLY TORE TO PIECES, THE WEEKEND IT PREMIERED!! HORRIBLE REVIEWS AND 1 1/2 OUT OF 4! I BELIEVE THEY GAVE ANGIE BABY A 3 OUT OF 4! HOW SUPPRISING? MAYBE, HOLLYWOOD SHOULD USE THEIR TINY BRAINS AND THE MEDIA AS WELL, AND FIGURE OUT THAT THE PUBLIC CONSTANTLY SEE'S DEPRESSING NEWS! NOT TO DOWNPLAY THIS TRAGIC EVENT! BUT IF I'M GOING TO A THEATER, AND PAYING THE FORTUNE IT COSTS, TO GO, I SURE AS HECK DON'T WANT TO WATCH SOMETHING, I ALREADY KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT! THIS BROAD IS OVER-EXPOSED, "PEOPLE MAG. AND USA TODAY" AND YOUR THE ONE'S SHOVING HER DOWN OUR THROATS! MOST PEOPLE CAN'T STAND HER! READ SOME OF THE FEEDBACK ON THE BLOGS CONSERNING HER AND HER BROOD! WE'RE JUST PLAIN SICK OF HER AND BRAD! DON'T YOU GET IT?? AS FAR AS "EVEN ALMIGHTY" GOES, HE'S NO JIM CARREY!! FOR ALL THE CRITICS, THAT BLASTED PIRATES, WELL DIM-WITS, IT'S STILL RAKING IN THE DOUGH, IRREGUARDLESS OF THE NON PLUGGING MR. DEPP DIDN'T DUE TO THE EXTENT JOLIE DID DO! I GUESS THAT'S WHY "FORBES"HAS HIM AT #6,AS FAR AS MONIES MADE THIS YEAR AND CLOUT IN HOLLYWOOD!! NO LATE NIGHT SHOWS AND NO LARRY KING, NO DATELINE, YADA-YADA!! AS FAR AS BABEL GOES, (IT WAS I BELIEVE UP FOR OSCAR AND MAYBE IT'S STAR JOLIES BORING SIDEKICK), I DON'T BELIEVE IT FAIRED WELL AT THE BOX-OFFICE EITHER, AND WAS AS USUAL, GIVEN RAVE REVIEWS! TO MAKE A LONG STORY SHORT, THE AVERAGE JOE, MEANING ME, AND THE REST OF THE PAYING PUBLIC, DON'T NEED TO READ CRITICS REVIEWS TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO SPEND OUR MONIES AT THEATERS. IN OTHER WORDS, GET RID OF THE CRITICS! I CAN'T BELIEVE THESE PEOPLE GET PAID FOR THIS.
Reply
7-24-2007 @ 4:46AM
ayda said...
Is that you, Jennifer?
Reply