
"Lighten up." That's what people say when you dare to criticize a big dopey comedy, especially a potential summer blockbuster. Didn't think the Shrek movies were that funny? Were you annoyed by the sexism in one of the guy-centric comedies that seem to be taking over the genre? Didn't crack a smile during Napoleon Dynamite? Then you need to lighten up, obviously, and stop complaining just because the comedy film wasn't very funny to you. And I predict that by the end of this review of Evan Almighty, people are going to tell me to lighten up, and will probably accuse me of having no sense of humor, because I didn't love the film unquestionably.
Evan Almighty, the sequel to the 2003 Jim Carrey vehicle Bruce Almighty, is in fact funny at times, because a cast like this with such superb comic timing and such charismatic screen appeal cannot help but entertain you. You're aware that the dialogue is dumb and the situation is lame and yet, thanks to the actors, you laugh anyway. And after the movie is over you feel almost like you've been conned, and you're not entirely sure what was so funny in the first place.
This is not a movie that entertains with surprise plot twists; if you've seen the trailer, you know pretty much the whole storyline. Evan Baxter (Steve Carell, reprising and expanding his role from Bruce Almighty) has just been elected to Congress, and he and his family move to a lavish house in a new development near Washington, D.C. Evan drives a Hummer, selects rainforest-harvested wood for his home cabinets, and generally doesn't care much about the world around him, despite his political slogan: "Change the World!" One of the senior Congressmen (John Goodman) takes the new politician under his wing ... but the extra work causes Evan to spend less time with his kids. After he and his family have a moment of prayer for change in their lives and help from God ... God (Morgan Freeman) appears. And God has decided that Evan is going to change the world, whether he likes it or not, and requires him to build an ark and get all Noah-fied in preparation for an upcoming flood of some kind.
Sight gags, character quirks and reactions, and one-liners are Evan Almighty's stock in trade, balanced by the warm fuzziness of a guy who learns about the importance of family, and the environment, and spirituality. (Those of you who were relieved that Surf's Up had no pro-environmental message may not be so pleased with this film.) There are lots of jokes about animals, especially animal poop and spit, although my favorite animal scene involved fish in a tank and no excretions whatsoever. Evan's obsession with his appearance in the first half of ths film also provides some good incidental humor -- once you realize this is a guy who attempts to shave his nose hair, you've got his character pegged.
One difficulty I had with the film was during Evan's transformation from obsessively neat and tidy guy into a Biblical-looking personage, which he tries to fight at first, but of course God always wins in these tussles. Evan's hair grows longer overnight and cannot be shaved or cut; he develops a craving for unleavened bread; and he's forced to give up his suits for flowing robes. Is anyone else reminded of Tim Allen's character in The Santa Clause? The sequences are so similar that it is a little disturbing, as if equating religion and Santa -- something that faith-based groups might not find very funny. In fact, they might not like the portrayal of God at all, but of course they just need to lighten up, right? The film may trivialize religion in some ways, but it does avoid veering into any disrespect or sacrilege.
Also, if you were personally affected by post-Katrina floods or any natural disaster, the idea of potentially watching a flood (whether it actually occurs in the film or not) that will wipe away homes and perhaps even people might cause you discomfort while watching Evan Almighty. I realize that most audience members won't be affected by this at all, but personally I had trouble with anticipating whether those kinds of scenes were going to be shown. The ultimate explanation behind the whole "flood" aspect of the plot might in fact have been inspired by the situation in New Orleans, in hopes of teaching us all a little lesson, but that didn't redeem the distaste I felt at times.
The bright spot in Evan Almighty that makes the movie at all worthwhile is the cast. An experienced group of actors and actresses with impeccable comic timing help to gloss over all of the flaws and weaknesses in the script. Carell is especially enjoyable to watch in the first part of the film, when he's a bit of a thoughtless jerk; unfortunately, as the movie progresses and he has to be improved, he's not nearly as funny. Wanda Sykes, as his assistant, takes the dumbest one-liners you'd ever hear on screen and makes them work -- I kept realizing that I was laughing at something cliched and inane, just because she said it. Goodman is the perfect Washington longtime politician, and Jonah Hill, one of the stars of the upcoming Superbad, has a quirky little role as Evan's researcher. Lauren Graham is pretty much wasted as The Wife, sadly. Freeman is a delight onscreen even though he's essentially playing the usual Morgan Freeman character. (I would attempt some discourse about God in this film as one of the "magical Negro" characters Spike Lee rants against, but -- I know, I should lighten up.)
Director Tom Shadyac seems to be trying to balance two goals: a comedy relying on very broad humor, mostly physical; and a sweet movie with a spiritual heart, about family and religion. Unfortunately, the combination of pratfalls and platitudes doesn't quite work. Evan Almighty makes you wish you could watch the cast in something well written, with the snappy dialogue and solid storyline they (and we) deserve, instead of a big-budget, lumbering spectacle that moves about as smoothly as, well, a giant handmade ark. In short, maybe the movie needed to lighten up a little, not me.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-21-2007 @ 9:29PM
Robin said...
Wow, something Wanda Sykes said made you laugh?
Reply
6-22-2007 @ 3:54AM
Ian said...
Yes, "lighten up" -- that is, lower your expectations, turn off your brain, and "enjoy the ride". But what's wrong with expecting entertaining movies to also be original & inventive?
Reply
6-22-2007 @ 7:33AM
Michael said...
Great review Jette. I think my biggest issue with this film (and I had the same issues with Bruce Almighty) is twofold. First, the studio has given us ONE trailer for this film - ONE!!! Sure they may have released a couple of different permutations of it but its still the same trailer. If that weren't enough, the studios beat us into the ground with it. Even if this film turned out to be a masterpiece, I'm so freaking tired of seeing that same trailer over and over again that there's no way I'd go see the full length film at this point.
The second part of this is actually a problem I've had for a very long time now and it isn't exclusive to this film. That issue is the trailer content itself. I absolutely detest trailers that are just mini versions of the upcoming film itself. There are NO plotlines left out of this trailer so I feel like I've already seen the movie a thousand times already. Heck, I even know that there's going to be a flood at the end because I'VE SEEN IT IN THE TRAILER!!! Come on!!! This is laziness at its worst in my opinion. The studios wonder why audiences don't turn out in droves to see these films and I have to believe that it is in some part due to the crappy (read: LAZY) editing so ever present nowadays. A marketing campaign should build interest in a film - not destroy it.
Guess I'm gonna save my money to go see Transformers in a week and a half. At the very LEAST I'll get to see ROBOSAURUS crush cars at the pre-show festivities!
http://www.myspace.com/scoobarama
Reply
6-22-2007 @ 8:23AM
Cincinnati Mike said...
So, will Shadyac officially shut up about getting no publicity? I feel like this thing has been mind-raping me for WEEKS. Reached its peak during the Office marathon last night. Scene after extended scene of humorless desperation. The "hit your thumb with a mallet" montage being a perfect metaphor for how I felt while watching! Mind you, I LOVE Carell, ever since the old Dana Carvey show in the mid-90s. But man, watch out for that deadly, Will Ferrell-type overexposure. This is only one misstep, yes--but a big, bloated, costly, overhyped one.
Reply
6-22-2007 @ 9:10AM
arbee said...
i saw this at a preview, and totally agree. i went into the movie expecting animal poo jokes, but hoping for more. the only other thing i got was cliche, trite, feel good bs. wanda sykes was the only bright spot in the movie. i also thought the whole santa clause parallel was a little obvious and weird. its dumbed down, feel good, teach us all a lesson boredom.
im glad you share my opinion, since the three people i went with all loooooved it, and looked at me like i must work for satan himself to not find it wholesome, heartwarming fun.
Reply
6-22-2007 @ 10:54AM
Richard said...
This film is portraying God as a man. God said there would be no more floods. They are using God for entertainment. There is something very wrong with the entire movie. Bruce Almighty was even worse from my understanding. But, then, maybe I need to lighten up? Gimme a break!
Reply
6-22-2007 @ 11:50AM
Screen Rant said...
I actually had a post on my blog ScreenRant.com recently concerning movie critics needing to "lighten up", but not in the context of your review. If a movie isn't funny, it isn't funny.
Haven't seen this one yet but I probably will since there is such a dearth of films that a responsible parent can take a 10 year old to.
Vic
Reply
6-25-2007 @ 10:07AM
Debbie Schwob said...
Great movie! Entertaining - haven't laughed that hard at a movie EVER! AND, the message about acts of random kindness was important. I am a Christian and was not in the least offended. There are many ways to impart the message of the Bible and this is one of them. Hope we will see several more Almighty movies.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 3:23PM
Misty said...
I really enjoyed this movie! I am an educated person that enjoys complex plot twists when viewing a movie, but I also know when to take something at face value and just enjoy it for what it is. I am a Christian and I was not offended by any of it. I would take my 4 year old to see this movie and have no qualms about it. I think you are waaay off base about relating the flood scene to the Hurricane Katrina tragedy you are reaching just a bit on that one. You do need to lighten up! As for likening this movie to The Santa Claus and saying the studios are equating Religion and Santa---again way off base.
Reply
6-30-2007 @ 7:16PM
Christmas Jones said...
Wow! I suppose you critic your sex partners the same way? Lighten up and see with your eyes and don't try to inject things that just dont matter. Movies are for entertainment and if they can interject a good message. Than we get a bonus for our money. This movie has a very strong message that we are destroying GODS work and our country. Developers are destoying pristine valleys everywhere so wake up people and look with your eyes and your Heart. This is a movie for all ages and I highly recomend it.
This is the only world we have lets remember that once in a while. And I am no religeous freak or tree hugger but a little PEACE would be nice.
Reply