Review: A Mighty Heart
Filed under: Drama, New Releases, Mystery & Suspense, Paramount, Theatrical Reviews, New in Theaters
.jpg)
A Mighty Heart takes an enormous gamble, and sinks or swims by it -- it tries to engage us in a meticulous police procedural, the outcome of which is already known to anyone watching the film. The film begins its action about an hour or so after Wall Street Journal South Asia bureau chief Daniel Pearl leaves his pregnant wife Mariane alone in their Karachi apartment to go to a meeting with a shady figure known as Sheik Gilani, who he suspects may have information on the 'shoe bomber' Richard Reid or may himself be a key terrorist figure. Like Daniel, Mariane is a journalist, and the two of them follow a strict procedure of regular call-ins when the other is off on a dangerous assignment. When Daniel misses one of these check-ins, Mariane springs into action, first reporting him missing to Pakistani authorities and later, to American agencies and the Wall Street Journal. Various players begin to flood into the apartment and the story, each of them taking somber mood cues from the tightly-wound, no-nonsense Mariane.
As Mariane, Angelina Jolie totes around a giant belly and a big pile of hair and sinks into the role of a traffic coordinator, constantly gauging the progress of the ad-hoc investigation into Daniel's disappearance and shuffling the other characters in and out of the main action. Early on, she creates a tree diagram on a blackboard to get a sense of where Daniel was going when he was abducted and who might have knowledge of his whereabouts. Pictures of 'persons of interest' are slapped up and yanked down. The movie demands your full attention as it unspools reams of information: names, places, events, and questions that must be answered if the crime will be foiled. I'm sure this is a true reflection of those sleepless weeks as Mariane Pearl remembered them in her book, but the sheer tonnage of investigative info A Mighty Heart presents us ends up crowding out Mariane and Daniel as people: their habits, their convictions, their unusual way of life. I know as little about those things now as I did before seeing the film.
There are two scenes that stand out from the clutter, the first of which is a tense interrogation session between a seasoned Pakistani investigator and a captured terrorist suspect, who he believes may have information as to the whereabouts of Daniel Pearl. The way the scene is constructed, director Michael Winterbottom almost seems to be trying to convince us that the brutal treatment the suspect receives is necessary because of his calm, articulate, ready-to-die-if-that's-Allah's-plan demeanor. In a ticking bomb scenario -- which isn't exactly far-fetched if you're a criminal investigator in this part of the world -- how else do you get a religious fanatic to talk if not through the overt threat of violence? The other memorable scene is one that has already inspired a lot of debate as to its merit -- it's the scene in the third act when Mariane learns that Daniel has been decapitated, and she responds by letting out an endless succession of pained screams. It's a moment that's designed to shatter the audience.
As is often the case with my job, I probably know too much about the scene in question and how it was filmed in order to be a fair judge of whether it works on an emotional level. I know that it was shot many times in many different ways, and tweaked to within an inch of its life, so it's hard for me to perceive how it could have come from a true emotional place. It certainly seems to show us the raw, animalistic Angelina Jolie who hasn't really existed on screen since the days of Gia and Girl, Interrupted, but is she a good enough actress at this point to turn it on and off? Is screaming necessarily a tall order for an actor? It's standard operating procedure for horror films -- I doubt anyone ever asked Jamie Lee Curtis if she was dredging up the pain of life when she screamed her lungs out. Does it even matter if the pain is real? Needless to say, I haven't really made up my mind about the scene -- I need to see it again.
A Mighty Heart makes no claims to be a biopic of Daniel Pearl, so we can't really fault it for giving nearly no screentime to Dan Futterman's performance as Pearl. That said, starting the movie with Mariane and leaving it there, dramatically, puts a huge burden on the filmmakers to come up with something truly solid to fill the void, and the film doesn't quite come through. It's not really a portrait of a woman dealing with spectacular stress, or the sudden onset of extreme loneliness or fear of her partner's imminent death. It's closer in tone and spirit to CSI: Karachi. It basically asks the viewer to accept Mariane and Daniel as whole characters right from the get-go, and then speeds forward with the pace and timing of an action thriller, hopping from clue to clue and lead to lead, while sometimes cutting back to stoic, stone-faced Mariane as she marks up her blackboard or tacks another wallet-sized photo onto it. And that's pretty much it -- I guess I was expecting something a little braver.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
6-22-2007 @ 11:12AM
winslutty.daylewisian.86 said...
This is basically what I expected from Michael Winterbottom. I'm sure it'll be one of his more enjoyable flicks as opposed to, say, the kitty litter that was 9 Songs. But I understand where you're coming from and hope to gather my own perceptions next week.
But how about the primary question at hand: Will Angelina Jolie get another Oscar nomination from this performance? I, at this point, say absolutely not, because I've read the audience is always aware it's Jolie, not Mariane (generally bad news for awards hopefuls), and there are already two, if not three, major early-year contenders that cannot be ignored. Marion Cotillard is looking pretty solid--hopefully AMPAS takes notice =). After her, Julie Christie seems to have favor on her side. And then there's Keri Russell, the possible surprise/young ingenue nominee (not as likely as the previous two, but perhaps Globe-wise). So I have reservations about Jolie. But what do you think?
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 12:53AM
SOS said...
Ms. Jolie is a little too glittery and a distraction. Fine as she could be in another movie, what distinguishes her close-ups in ‘A Mighty Heart’ is a pair of lips (not noticed before) that appear to have been smacked real hard with a cricket bat. Flattened. Her lips are somehow smashed up looking and wrinkly, which cause her to look disturbingly disfigured and old.
Was someone messing with the close-ups of Ms. Jolie? The close-ups won‘t stay down: they bob to the surface, go down, bob to the surface, go down, bob to the surface, go down, etc.---damn I hate that! Either give us one good elongated look at those cricket bat flattened lips -- or don’t -- but don’t disturb us mercilessly with sneak-peaks of her smashed flat lips.
There’s a great distance between the experience of Ms. Jolie and Mariane Pearl, which may remain a gap too wide to cross. Playing the role of Mariane Pearl, Ms. Jolie, never gives you the feeling she has actually experienced any of the experiences of Mariane.
While cricket bat smashed lips are a good enough gimmick or ruse for convincing an audience that she is an experienced person, those lips are unconvincing and won’t do the job of conveying the experiences of Mariane Pearl.
I don’t know. This may just be me, but, does anyone think, say…. Paris Hilton, would be able to play a convincing President of the U.S.? I mean if you dressed Paris a different way. Taught her to walk right. Taught her to talk right. Wouldn’t she still come off as an air-head with no idea of what’s up?
See what I mean?: at some point if you dress Paris as a President, one would still get the feeling that, they are being lectured to, by an idiot. And as much as I wanted to get into ‘A Mighty Heart’ Ms. Jolie left me with a feeling that I was being lectured to by an idiot.
As much as I like her, Ms. Jolie is still too young and too inexperienced and too glittery to come off as experienced or profound or poignant.
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 7:41AM
steve said...
Who cares? "Angie" is nothing but a slutty, HollyWeird Whore. These people should go to Iraq and fight. Then maybe they would be worth something.
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 2:23PM
mary said...
Gad Zooks she is one narcassistic woman.
Look, it's only pretending Angelina, not brain surgery.
Does anyone else find her self fawning a little embarassing? News flash Angie, ITS ONLY A MOVIE ! You aren't doing any good work here, just play acting.
Another disturbed "Actress" that buys her own PR, and I mean that literally since it seems she has many "rules" that reporters must follow to enshrine the Angelina.....hysterical.
Im off to help a dying person, so I'll have to pass on this silly movie..
AJ, good luck with all that.
And I agree her lips look like deformed parachutes...
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 7:51AM
Kathy said...
|would pay a penny to see anything with her in it...
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 8:22AM
Baylee said...
z z z z z z z . Can this woman be any more transparent in her need for attention? With her tattoos and her obvious need to be different and glorified, I am getting more and more bored. Her baby collecting borders on the insane - kinda like a cat collector for the rich and famous. Maybe she should have hooked up with Tom Cruise instead of Brad. Poor Brad is coming off as a hanger-on and a Mr. Mom. Sheesh. Lady Di she isn’t.
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 8:28AM
Barbara Borden said...
Wonder what Daniel thinks about this little terrorist-sympathetic ditty? Oh wait, he can't think--they cut off his head.............
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 9:39AM
Candy said...
She forgot to Thank Jennifer Aniston. She and Brad were Married and they bought the book rights together. Brad intended for her to do the part. I am sure Angelina had great pleasure giving her the shaft again. Angelina knew this story would guarantee her an Oscar. I hope not. She has collected enough trophies with her adopted children, husbands whom she has broken up relationships.
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 3:40PM
Dotty said...
What ever Angelina was and is, you can't take away from her what she has done for children and putting the spot light on what is going on in the world. Give her some credit.
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 9:52AM
Sheila Rose said...
Angelina Jolie is a wonderful actress. I look forward to seeing this movie. Her personal life is personal. I say walk a mile in her shoes before you tear her apart.
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 9:52AM
Dianne said...
So glad others agree that Ms. Jolie is over rated in acting and humanitarian acts. All of us could adopt a ton of babies if we had money and nannies to watch them. How many times did she get up during the night to check on these babies or feed them? Isn't she the same skank whore who broke up Billy Bob's marriage and wore a vial of his blood around her neck?
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 3:04PM
jeff said...
I actually saw the movie last night, although the issue is a serious one, I can't stand watching Angelina Jolie. Luckily she not in it that much
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 10:13AM
Crystal said...
It's amazing to me all the comments made before actually having seen the movie! The movie was well done by all involved including Angelina who stays in character and accent unlike so many of todays actors.
A few minutes into the show I no longer felt like I wwas watching Angelina Jolie! Again, kudos to all involved
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 10:43AM
joe r. taylor said...
in hollywood, talent is more sacred than morality and i think, we should attack back because hollywood has flooded the media with their sense of value.
jolie is bisexual, by her own admission, and she doesn't believe in God; again, by her own admission. she is raising children to be like her.
i am not a christian; but, i do believe in the CREATOR OF ALL THINGS. i believe in my bloodline and i will not dilute it with other bloodlines.
jolie has no sense of basic value and she hates her father (jon voight)so much, she is willing to dilute her weak bloodline.
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 10:54AM
PD said...
I won't bother to see this movie. She comes with too much baggage. Not worth spending money on trash.
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 11:03AM
don said...
Old BIG LIPS is repulsive. I would never consider seeing her in any movie.
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 11:14AM
alfryda jens said...
Hey Haters....GET A LIFE, it's not too late! Why is it when a woman is beautiful (or in Angelina's case..."Beyond Beautiful") you all have to hate????
Have you ever even thought of supporting another woman and encouraging one another in this messed up world? Stand up and walk away from your dark little hallways you are obviously living in and step out into "A LIFE" of some sort....you might be pleasently surprised and actually find some pride in yourselves for once.
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 11:41AM
Wendy said...
Angelina where to start. First off I will not see this movie because she's in it and thats sad because I am sure it's a good movie but I refuse to watch anything with her in it. Second Jennifer was suppose to play the role and she would have been so much better than Angelina.
She is a home wrecker and thats all she will ever be in my opinion. I have lost all respect for her and Brad.
And another thing quit getting all these babies. If you are going to get them then get married.
Reply
6-23-2007 @ 11:50AM
Ruth said...
I just saw the movie. The acting should not warrant any discussion of oscar nominations for anyone in that movie. I saw it because I love foreign countries, etc., but I didn't think it was that good. Would I recommend it. Probably not.
Reply
7-06-2007 @ 5:07PM
JUDY said...
WELL, THE WAY I SEE IT. ANGELINA JOLIE IS A GREAT PERSON. SHE IS RECONSIDERING TO BE WITH HER DAD(JON VOUGHT) NOW. WAKE UP & WATCH E!NEWS INSTEAD OF JUDGING SOMEONE YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW. ONE MOVIE YA'LL ARE HATING ON HER. HER LIP'S ARE STILL BEAUTIFUL THAN EVER. IT WAS JUST THE MOVIE THAT SHE HAD TO CHANGE HER LOOKS. IF YOU WERE A CELEBRITY, YOU WOULD DO THE SAME. SHE'S HELPING THIS KID'S JUST LIKE BRAD PITT IS. SO SHUT UP UNLESS YOU LIVE WITH THEM AND KNOW WHAT GOES ON BEHIND CLOSED DORES. SHE ISN'T A WHORE. IT'S PROBLY YAW THE WHORE'S, 'JEALOUS' THAT SHE HAS GOTTIN' HER LIFE BETTER NOW !!!!!!!!
Reply