Cinematical Seven: Hollywood Trends That Need to End
Filed under: Animation, Horror, Music & Musicals, Thrillers, Mystery & Suspense, Family Films, Cinematical Seven, Remakes and Sequels, Lists

Oftentimes Hollywood's lack of originality leads to overexposed trends. Remember when every action movie seemed to be easily defined as 'Die Hard on a ...'? Remember when disaster movies were all the rage? And then twenty years later when they were all the rage again? Remember when there were like a hundred body-swapping comedies? Well, there appear to be fewer trends these days, or maybe it's just that Hollywood turns trends into full-blown practices, as in the case of sequels, comic book movies and fantasy films based on literary franchises. Nowadays even a promised trend, like the one involving religious Passion of the Christ copycats, isn't necessarily going to happen. But despite there being so few here-today-gone-tomorrow film fads, there's at least seven bad ideas currently in vogue in Tinsel Town, and all of them need to disappear soon, lest they too become permanent.
1. Torture Porn
I'm going to start with an easy, surely obvious one. Torture porn is the latest trend in horror, a genre that changes its predominant style every few years, and it may be the most despised -- at least by us non-horror junkies. I miss the days when a friend, an actual junkie, could drag me to a harmless scary movie that provided a few screams, a few laughs and afterward, at the most, a few silly nightmares. Now, with each new horror movie there's promise of a seriously depressing experience. After watching The Hills Have Eyes, I realized I hadn't been frightened at all. Instead I wanted to cry my heart out. I haven't been to a horror flick since, and my friend is going solo. Sure, I hear that Eli Roth's movies are a lot more enjoyable than watching a young woman raped while watching her father burned alive and her mother raped and then shot in the head, but I just haven't been in the mood to find out.
Apparently the torture porn trend is already on its way out. Hostel II performed poorly at the box office and Captivity may have peaked too soon, reaching maximum tastelessness before even opening in theaters. So what will be next? I'm rather looking forward to when slasher movies are in fashion again, when I can delight in seeing sinful human beings killed off quickly and deservedly by an implausible maniac. Which brings me to the next trend ...
2. Horror Remakes
Yes, I want slasher movies to come back. No, I don't want them to be the same slasher movies. I'm perfectly fine with the umpteenth sequel to Halloween, but there's no need for it to be redone and rebooted. The thing that I don't get about horror remakes, particularly slasher remakes, is that they're all pretty much the same to begin with. So why not just start a new, 'fresh' franchise? Hollywood may think it's cashing in on recognizable titles, but the reason Halloween and others are familiar is because they're memorable. The die-hard fan doesn't want to see a new version of his favorite film, especially since it probably won't be as good as the original. Sure, unproven horror titles can have trouble finding an audience, but there's plenty of unseen villains out there just waiting to be conceptualized well enough to be the next Michael, Jason or Freddy.
(For seven horror remake that were actually worth it, check out Scott's list)
3. Prequels
Sequels are here to stay, and many of them are actually pretty good, but their young step-brother, the prequel, is something of a problem child for Hollywood. The worst thing is, like a clueless John Ritter, the studios don't seem to notice that prequels have been bad, bad, bad since they arrived on the scene. And so they keep coming. You could possibly argue that Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is a good prequel, or even that The Godfather II works as a great prequel within a sequel, but neither rightfully fits with the current trend. No, the prequels of today are specifically made to provide an explanatory origin for popular characters, mostly bad guys like Darth Vader, Hannibal Lecter and Leatherface. The thing is, prequels can't give us anything useful in terms of entertainment. If they show us a villain as an annoying kid, then we're left with that impression of him when we return to the original, and it potentially ruins that villain's credibility as a bad ass. Plus, if we already know what that character is going to be like and what he's going to be doing in the future, then there's not much chance for either suspense or surprise in a prequel. Basically, prequels are themselves devoid of mystery and they diminish the mystery of the films they are meant to set up.
4. Expository Endings
I've long accepted the fact that twist endings are now common practice. I even like them once in awhile, as long as the shocker isn't that all the film's characters are in one mental patient's head. Of course, thanks to M. Night Shyamalan, twist endings have become an overused convention these days, but not even The Village did as much damage to the practice as the expository ending could do. Still only a fledgling trend -- I can only really think of Lucky Number Slevin and Smokin' Aces as prime examples -- the expository ending movie is one in which the twist takes about twenty minutes or so to explain. The expository ending is fine for old mysteries, but in movies like the two I've cited, they bring the energy to a disappointing standstill, leaving us so confused and bored that we don't even care what the twist is. Sure, both Lucky Number Slevin and Smokin' Aces would have been more confusing without the explanation, but they also would have been more consistently entertaining. Anyway, sometimes its actually fun to be lost if the style of the movie is worth it. Hopefully this young trend-in-the-making doesn't grow any further, but I guess if it does, some of us will find it worthwhile to leave the theater a few minutes early.
5. Movies Turned Musicals Turned Movie Musicals
This one doesn't need too much explanation. Broadway is ridiculously overpopulated with musicals based on movies. Some of the most seemingly logical choices (Footloose; High Fidelity) have shown us why the trend should die. Then there are the ones we couldn't have imagined (Grey Gardens; Xanadu) that actually make it all seem like a good idea. Either way, it doesn't matter, because Disney is turning the trend into common practice more and more each year. But the related trend, the one where these musicals are turned back into new movies, really needs to be stopped. It wasn't learned with The Producers, so hopefully it will be clear with the release of Hairspray. Because we never should have been subjected to John Travolta in a fat suit and a dress.
6. CGI Versions of Popular Cartoon Characters
The title character of Scooby-Doo and its sequel at least somewhat resembled the cartoon dog. Later, the computer generated lead in Garfield and its sequel were more difficult to accept. This summer, a totally unrecognizable Underdog makes his way into theaters. Personally, I would much rather see a 2-D animated character mixing it up with live-action humans (except in the case of Transformers, I guess). Unfortunately, this trend is not going away, and I'm downright scared to see what computers have done to Alvin and the Chipmunks.
7. Numberless Sequel Titles
They've worked for Dirty Harry, James Bond, Nick and Nora and countless others. So why do I think this is even a trend, let alone a bad one? Well, from what I can tell from the reviews of Live Free or Die Hard, the clever usage of numberless titles these days is more about duping uninformed moviegoers rather than establishing a library of unserialized, watch-them-in-any-order sequels. So, we get a sequel that, yes, could be a stand-alone pic, but one that didn't need to necessarily be linked to a familiar franchise. As Erik has pointed out in his review, the latest Die Hard feels like just any other action movie more than it feels like a return to the crazy, coincidental life of John McClane. Some of the upcoming numberless sequels, including The Dark Knight and Indiana Jones and the City of the Gods, won't have the same sort of compromised feel, but if Live Free or Die Hard does good business this weekend, and it surely will, then Hollywood will probably make this trend a full-blown standard (if this study hasn't already done so). And when that happens, I'll almost be wishing the 'Too' sequel trend (Teen Wolf Too; Splash, Too) would return.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
6-28-2007 @ 9:29AM
Gilbert Davis said...
In the immortal words of Chevy Chase, "Well said, well spoken." The only Ox of mine in the well reasoned essay is the movie, The Producers. I loved that movie. I loved the first one and was suspicious of the second but went to see it in the theater and you know, I laughed and completely enjoyed it. As for the rest of those musicals I agree. A large steaming pile of tap shoes.
My main anger in the whole thing is of course the torture porn. Just despicable stuff and I was very happy to see Hostel go down in flames and hopefully taking Roth with it. I enjoy a good horror movie and torture porn isn't in that mix. I'd go so far as to say that it would be a good use of police research to go to those movies and take a gander at those going into those movies because it would be nice for them to have a head start on suspects for the next missing girl in their neighborhoods. In fact I think that some police are doing do. I mean, as far as internet rumors go that one sounds like a nice one to start. At the very least the ratings boards should make them X rated and make them uneconomical to create as is finally being done with video games, I think 'Manhunter II' has been pulled because retailers won't stock it and it's target audience won't be allowed to buy it. It's good to see society turn back toward the light.
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 9:35AM
colby said...
"I'm perfectly fine with the umpteenth sequel to Halloween, but there's no need for it to be redone and rebooted."
Oh gawd no. I'm on the complete opposite end of the spectrum on this argument. This is coming from a die-hard fan of the series ... someone who actually enjoyed the heck out of four and five. Six left a bad taste in my mouth, H20 was a nice breath of fresh air, but the last one simply made me angry. I would much rather see a remake than another gawdforsaken sequel.
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 9:53AM
techstar25 said...
Let me give you a good example of a recent movie with a good expository ending: Brick (2005). Of course you could say that it fits into the category of "old mysteries", like you referred to.
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 9:54AM
MosquitoControl said...
Torture porn...
I've defended Roth's Hostel movies here, to an extent, because at least he is trying to add a plot and give you decent characters.
The others don't do that, or at the very best fail at their attempts. I've seen most of them, and been bored to tears by them all. The same things always happen: obnoxious and/or bland people bump into hillbillies, hillbillies try to kill them, obnoxious people find collection of driver's licenses of other people killed, final showdown, everybody loses.
The movies are just lazy from the concept on. Horror fans love gore, there's no denying that. But we love gore that comes in interesting ways. Torture movies miss this key part. We want to see someone get splattered, or the remains of someone stupidly ripped apart by dogs. But basing the movie around that solely, chaining them to a chair and doing it, loses the fun. It's sloppy. And it's painful, because the character has no hope. Gore is always more fun when the character has a fighting chance, or when the character does something really dumb and asks for it.
THHE was one of the worst. It wasn't exactly torture, although it was to watch. Every character sucked. The rape wasn't as "awful" or "shocking" as fans liked to say. It was annoying and gratuitous without adding anything. The movie ended up mostly gore free, too. You got blood, but nothing interesting. But the biggest problem was just the total lack of a likeable character or interesting enemy.
Horror movies can be so easy to do well. Give us likeable protagonists. Close your plotholes. Make at least one character intelligent with solid instincts. Give us some interesting deaths. And, if you fail on any of the above, at least cover it with gratuitous nudity and close-ups of corpses as a throwback to the Sleepaway Camp movies! Eli Roth is getting closer to doing this well. I give him credit for decent characters. Good cinematography. A backstory that mattered to the plot. A bold use of more wingwangs than bazongas. And Hostel 2 really had no torture. He kept everything interesting. No innocent characters really had anything that didn't make you smile as you cringed because it had a bit of humor in it. The movie really moved away from torture.
Wasn't good, but a strong step in the right direction.
And, before anyone says it, the movie was much harder on men than women. In no way was it misogynistic. It had misogynistic characters, but they were proven to be demented morons. The women were the strong, intelligent ones.
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 9:56AM
sunny said...
There should be a moratorium on male actors donning fat suits and playing women. Get a zaftig woman to play the role, godammit. There is no point at all in this trend. It's not funny,just plain stupid. And that goes for Martin Lawrence playing a guy who dresses up in a female fat suit. Enough already!!
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 10:32AM
Espy said...
All really good points. I thought the expository ending of Ocean's 12 ruined an otherwise interesting flick.
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 11:05AM
Eklen said...
How could you leave out The Number 23 as an example with your expository endings?
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 11:10AM
kel said...
No more prequels please (I'm looking at you Star Trek) and let's halt the reboot trend before a starts to suck. Batman and Bond were good, but the Hulk already?
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 11:24AM
YouFaceTheTick said...
Numberless sequels must stay FOREVER. There is nothing worse than seeing a numeral following a film's title. Sequels generally suck, reminding us it's a sequel with a tacky number...there's no excuse for that.
Did the writer forget that Indy's stories went from Raiders to Indy and the Temple to Indy and the Last Crusade? No numbers. Harry Potter films don't have sequel numbers. Batman films have NEVER had numbers. What about Star Wars? Yep, no numbers. George "I re-write the past" Lucas tacked on his moronic Episode crap at the beginning but the reality is, only guys with stained tighty-whiteys say "Episode 4".
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 11:46AM
Pat Miller said...
OK Horror=GORE is a mis-statement. Some gore maybe, like David Warner's head in the original OMEN, but gore for gore sake no. Someone once told me that if you see someone slip on a banana peel that humor - and if you slip on a banana peel it horror. The creeping realization that it COULD happen to you is what makes great horror. i.e. you COULD go crazy trapped in a Mountain Hotel (THE SHINING), A child COULD be disturbed and kill people (HALLOWEEN) and of course, there COULD be something in the dark -"the dark has a life of its own."
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 11:53AM
mike green said...
the worst expository ending is on vanilla sky, literally 30 minutes to explain what the director was unable to in the first 100
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 11:59AM
Ray said...
The writer didn't forget the sequence for Indy films - if you read IMDB, it says that TOD was set in 1935, while ROTLA was set in 1936, making TOD a prequel - a Nazi-free, suck-ass prequel.
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 1:27PM
Ryan said...
Are you sure Travolta is wearing a fat suit and he isn't just that fat these days?
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 1:59PM
AJ MacReady said...
I agree with most of your sentiments, but the idea of "numberless sequels" is mostly retarded, sorry.
I agree with #9, seeing a numeral after the title sucks a whole lotta ass. I'd rather they show some creativity and just give it a different title.
How many novels are titled ". . .Part 2"?
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 3:35PM
Patrick said...
"Torture porn is the latest trend in horror, and it may be the most despised -- at least by us non-horror junkies."
Clarification: many horror fans despise it as well, such as myself. I love horror movies, but Hills Have Eyes, High Tension, and Hostel did almost nothing for me. I'd rather see more original, quirky stuff like The Descent, Severance, Behind the Mask, etc.
Reply
6-28-2007 @ 5:11PM
Guffin GacGuffin said...
Um...Chicago won the Oscar for best picture. So, no, I don't really think there's a "lesson" to be "learned."
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 12:51AM
Ryan said...
I generally agree with you except for the numberless sequels. I love when they do that. I think just adding II or III is just really NOT creative.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 2:19AM
quandmeme said...
Doesn't the 'Ocean's 12' fit into the bad expository ending faux pas. It totally worked in 11, but 12 was just like Mike Green @11 says, takes too long to say what they weren't able to say in the first part. Even in mystery there is a good way that connects the dots and a cop-out way that introduces totally new details or even characters to explain, even contradict, the flow of the corpus.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 10:11AM
HandMade said...
wah, wah, wah. The industry criticisms listed above are nothing new. Not too mention somewhat uninformed.
take the underdog snub. I'm tired of reading and hearing people complain about the CGI interpretation of UNDERDOG and other cartoon-based films. In this one, I believe the only CGI used on Underdog is on the dog's mouth, but you slam the film regardless. Get your facts straight. And just in case you didn't realize it, the UNDERDOGs and cartoon-based films of the world are made for mainstream audiences, not the alpha film fan/fan boy intent on slamming things.
Reply
7-06-2007 @ 10:06AM
Emily said...
I absolutely must comment on movie-musicals. I just saw "Legally Blonde" on Broadway, and it was totally hilarious. The star was no Reese Witherspoon, but she was cute and convincing as a blonde bimbo-turned-law-student. The biggest laughs, though, came from a ridiculously contrived dance sequence in the middle of the whole thing, during one of Elle's frequent visits to the salon and her stylist friend Paulette. You can almost see the writers and producers struggling with it: "We need a dance number here that involves the entire cast! Any thoughts?" "Gee, how about something in the style of Michael Flattley?" "Okay, we're going with River-Dance...now we somehow need to make it fit the storyline." "I have an idea...make the UPS guy Irish--and have Paulette say something about dancing without moving her arms!" And...they left out Professor Stromwell, who pretty much inspired Elle to get through law school in the first place.
Reply