Review: Transformers -- James's Review
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Paramount, Theatrical Reviews, Dreamworks, Steven Spielberg, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Games and Game Movies
.jpg)
When Michael Bay was announced as the director of Transformers, a big-screen version of the '80s cartoon franchise about alien robots who hide among humanity disguised as vehicles and other machines, it seemed like the perfect match of director and subject; whether that's a compliment or an insult is a matter of your perspective. Bay's movies (Bad Boys II, Armageddon) have always looked like a bizarre hybrid of truck commercials, Army recruitment ads and country-music videos: high-gloss, quick-cut, back-lit visions with an emphasis on surface sheen and a minimum of scripting or storytelling to get in the way of the next explosion or action moment. Transformers may represent the ultimate symbiosis of director and subject: Transformers is, in many ways, a long-form commercial, co-produced by Paramount, DreamWorks ... and toy manufacturer Hasbro.
Transformers, the movie, may sell Transformers, the toys, but it doesn't do much of anything else. You can't go into Transformers expecting it to make a lot of sense, or to work as science fiction (it is a movie about giant robots who shift shape, after all) but I don't think it's too much to ask that it could, at least, be competently and coherently made, which it isn't. There's no rhythm to the big moments of action -- they're too quickly-cut and closely-shot to be clear or comprehensible -- and the script, credited to Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, is littered with failures in both simple taste and basic storytelling.
The human characters are as stiff and inhuman as the robots; they include Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf), a young man who we first meet when he's presenting his explorer grandfather's personal effects as part of a high school genealogy project, and trying to sell them to finance his first car. Sam's great-grandfather explored the North Pole, but came back home a shattered man, ranting and raving about some "Ice Man" he'd seen in an underground crevasse. Sam's search for wheels brings him to a low-rent used car lot, where a older Camaro catches his eye -- and, it turns out, vice-versa: The Camaro's, yes, a robot in disguise, there to protect Sam and help find one of the film's central plot devices. Meanwhile, an Army base in Qatar is approached by a helicopter -- which all records say was lost in Afghanistan three years ago. The helicopter then reveals itself as one of the bad robots, blowing up the base as part of an effort to hack into the Defense Department's computer networks.
This all comes after a thick, gravy-like serving of exposition that opens the film, explaining where the good and bad robots come from, and how they're all hot on the trail of something called the "All-Spark," a huge, massively powerful whatsit that gives the robots something to fight over. And again, I don't know how you could come up with any plot that could make Transformers plausible, but the problem here isn't the plot (or, more correctly, isn't just the plot); it's in the execution, in the dialogue, in the tone and feel and shaping of the film. There's not a single scene in Transformers that doesn't contain either some leaden, limp cliché or some basic failure of good storytelling. Of course, Sam's unattainable dream girl Mikaela (Megan Fox) is a stone-cold hottie who knows cars and engines inside and out; of course, our group of soldiers under attack in Qatar is led by the dedicated Sergeant Lennox (Josh Duhamel), who only wants to get home to see his wife and baby girl.
But complaining that a multi-million dollar summer movie contains clichés is like complaining a multi-million dollar house contains bricks; the problem isn't the material but the shape of the construction -- and the mortar of dialogue, character and scripting that's supposed to make the cliché's connect. When we first meet the good-guy Autobots, a big moment in a big movie clearly aimed at kids, why does the first thing out of the mouth of the Porsche-robot Jazz have to be "What's up, little bitches?" When our hero-bot, Optimus Prime, destroys Sam's family's bird bath, why does he say "Oops -- My bad," as if he were a 16-year-old mall girl instead of a 16-ton robot? When the requisite shadowy government agency who knows about the aliens (see also Predator 2, Independence Day, Men in Black) shows up, why does the film have to neuter any sense of menace or suspense by having their leader played by John Tuturro, giving a goofy, goony performance that punctures scenes before they even start? When the shadowy government agency has captured Sam's car, Bumblebee, and Sam insists on seeing him before he'll help save the day, why does Duhamel's soldier pull his gun to back up Sam's request -- despite Duhamel and LaBeouf not having shared so much of a line of on-screen dialogue? And why does the film have to have the faintly racist idea that comedic relief consists of, mostly, Black men (Bernie Mac, Anthony Anderson) shouting at women?
None of the elements above are unexpected (or even unappreciated) in a mega-million action thriller: Snappy introductions, threatening agencies, heroes bonding and backing each other, a smattering of comedy. They're all part of the muscle and marrow of genre entertainment. But they're so badly handled here (and bear in mind that this is just a top-of-my-head list) that they feel like watching a drunk figure skater weave and stumble through the compulsory exercises, hoping they'll pull it together for the big finish. But then again, I heard someone outside my screening of Transformers say – without irony or sarcasm – that "It's not about the script; it's about the CG." That may be one of the most chilling things I've ever heard from a moviegoer, suggesting a world view where, to paraphrase 1984, if you want a picture of the future of entertainment, picture a CGI boot stamping on a human face – forever.
But the fact is that the effects in Transformers, even in the film-ending robotcalypse, are poorly-shot and framed. There are precious few long, stable shots of the transformers, uh, transforming; They're mostly done fast and up-close as if trying to distract us from how clumsy the effects are. And the long-shots commit another cardinal sin of computer-generated effects, where the massive, metallic good and bad robots move with no sense of gravity or inertia, just the hollow flimsiness of a Mylar balloon. Just as Peter Jackson's King Kong was hurt by moments where the title ape moved like a blow-up doll and not a flesh-and-bone mammal, the robots here feel like hollow shells made of tinfoil and fishing line, not huge hulks of alloy and metal.
I am not predisposed to dislike summer entertainment and genre films; in fact, I'm predisposed to like them a little too much. I could watch Spider-Man II or The Empire Strikes Back or X-Men 2 or Aliens (all huge franchises, all huge sequels, all heavy on special effects) over and over again. And I have, because for all of their money and gloss, they're well-written, well-constructed, well-made movies about human beings, made by people who understood that all the groovy effects and high-concept ideas you can imagine fall flat and lie there rotting without a structure of human feeling and intelligent writing to support them. Transformers is supposedly about robots who turn into cars and back again; what it's really about is big Hollywood turning money into stupid and back again – because as bad as Transformers is, it's going to make cash hand over fist as long as audiences want their major motion pictures giving them spectacle instead of storytelling and junk effects instead of real entertainment.









Reader Comments (Page 2 of 4)
7-03-2007 @ 1:04PM
mayorjimmy said...
What the hell is wrong with you people? I'm not QUITE sure if you knew but let me clue a few of you in on something most of the movie-going population already knew..... not every freaking movie has to be contending for an oscar. not every plot has to be intricate, plausable, and solid. not every actor has to be Marlon Brando or Al Pachino.
If you want plot and story and all that boring crap then just sit thru the Sundance film festival like the rest of those artsy hollywood tards. I'm going to going to watch explosions, hot chicks, fast cars and giant freaking robots beating the hell out of each other. I go to the movies to get AWAY from what's "real". I'm pretty sure the rest of us normal people do too.
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 1:07PM
mayorjimmy said...
for those of you crying about all the autobots being GM carts. Bay opened the floor up to all the automakers out there. GM was the only one to step up. So if you wanna throw a fit about bumblebee not being a beetle, go cry to Volkswagon.
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 1:09PM
Muchacho Chewbacco said...
"What pathetic comments. The notion that a film reviewer should like a movie because it is going to be successful is so asinine as to defy comment. Should I like a politician just because he is going to win?"
No, but how would one ever be able to explain why NY Yankees fans exist?
I love Transformers and I am going to go see this movie. Dave, its too bad you've lost the touch, you've lost the power. Yeah!
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 1:30PM
Screen Rant said...
"Stop having expectations and just have fun. Let loose."
That was my argument in FAVOR of Die Hard 4, however I'm sorry, but I didn't feel that way about this one beyond the first hour, which for the most part WAS fun.
Vic
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 1:39PM
Becky said...
Ah James, you had your mind made up about this movie long before you watched it. I listen to you just about every Thursday on 93x in St. Paul/Minneapolis, MN. You didn't sound very excited at the prospect of seeing this movie in the first place, and your review pretty much reflects what you had to say about it last Thursday before your screening.
Sure the movie had some flaws; I thought Optimus Prime's "Oooops, my bad" was a little lame as well, but I loved the movie. I grew up watching the cartoon, and I couldn't possibly have imagined the movie to be as awesome as it was.
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 1:47PM
Richard Harrison said...
Saw the movie last night - there s no age group this movie is geared to - I thought 10 year olds, but references to masturbation took that idea out... turns out after 2 hours we walked out - both with headaches it was soooo bad... don't know how it ends - don't care. It's as if after the first 10 minutes (the initial attack was good- real good) the writer for the three stooges took over.... bad - not not bad - awful!
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 2:48PM
Adam said...
To those of you negating this film because of your interpretations of lack of substance; please, go home, rent an old copy of "On Golden Pond" or something similar and please stop taking the seat next to me from someone who is capable of enjoying a good action flick. I think I would be correct in assuming that you had set the tone of your thoughts on the movie prior to even seeing it. Weak.
I did indeed grow up on Transformers, so yes there was a very high bar to hit. And hit it Bay and Spielberg did. I thoroughly enjoyed the way they managed to capture the same sort of campy humor that prevailed in the original cartoon series. The action sequences were phenomenal and the presence that Prime brought to the big screen made me giddy. I have already purchased my tickets for a second showing today.
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 3:02PM
Dave said...
When did this site become Joystiq? Oh right, when a review for a movie as shallow as a FHM cover girl appeared. Make sure you turn off your brain when you vote next year, too! Expect less, America.
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 3:17PM
sammy said...
its funny how serious you "critics" get when reviewing action films. You should honestly give up reviewing movies if you are going to go into movies thinking its "The Godfather".
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 4:10PM
David said...
For god's sake you morons, he is allowed to dislike the film! I find it incredible that some of you are unable to take any criticism of this film without resorting to this juvenile argmuent of "its not meant to be the godfather, or some boring indie film its just meant to be fun"... can't you understand that there ARE GOOD POPCORN FILMS, AND THERE ARE BAD POPCORN FILMS? A good summer blockbuster still has to be well written, have an engaging storyline and interesting characters. By the logic of some of you clowns, I can't criticise Wild Wild West or Men In Black 2 or Norbit or League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen because they are "not meant to be Shakespeare, youre just meant to swicth off and have fun, your inner child is dead, etc etc".
Now I haven't seen Transformers, but I'm looking forward to it and I'm crossing my fingers that I enjoy it, but for god's sake some of you guys need to stop throwing your toys out of the pram every time someone dares to criticise a film that you decided you were going to love months ago.
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 4:17PM
Rafael said...
"There's no rhythm to the big moments of action -- they're too quickly-cut and closely-shot to be clear or comprehensible --"
I already knew Bay wasn't going to deliver a masterpiece in terms of story or acting, but wanted to see the movie only for it's action scenes, but this comment in the review ruin my hopes. I hate this kind of directing, is cheap and lame.
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 4:47PM
Britboyj27 said...
Raphael - VW declined to be part of the movie as it would associate them with "Weapons of Mass Destruction."
I saw it last night, and it was, easily one of the best "Summer Blockbusters" I've ever seen. It's nerd porn. Get over it. Kids will love it, and so will kids-at-heart.
I hope your kids (if you happen to have any) drag you to it again and again because it's FUN TO WATCH.
Shia Lebouf is a genuine talent, someone who will, one day, be a great, great actor without being a stupid teenager who is more famous for their personality than their performances.
And if you didn't play with Optimus Prime as a child, you have no right to critique a film about him as an adult.
Michael Bay made what is, essentially, a passable Transformers movie, all of James' critiques are the oh-so-fashionable hatred of a blockbuster. You expected the movie to be bad, so it was.
Is it Citizen Kane? No. Is it better than anything else on release right now? You better believe it.
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 8:52PM
Ogami Itto said...
"There's an entire generation of 80's children...that are now adults..."
And hopefully the vast majority of those stupid motherfuckers won't breed.
We're talking about a shitty movie by Michael Bay, based on a shitty 80s cartoon for God's sake. Is anyone with an I.Q. above 80 actually looking forward to this garbage? I watched the cartoon when I was a little kid, and even back then I knew that "The Transformers" was shit.
So when can we expect a fucking "Go-Bots" movie?
Reply
7-04-2007 @ 4:19AM
Zeke32 said...
Come on James, it wasn't that bad a flick. Granted it's not a movie with any deep meaning behind it or cracking script even for a summer tent pole blockbuster, and making autobots sound like teenage dudes was a little lame. But action sequence and CGI was great, you can see where the budget went. Well worth my $9(matinee).
It always bothers me when professional critics get the details wrong, Josh Duhamel character was a captain and Jazz was a Pontiac. Maybe you just couldn't bother to pay attention because you dismissed the film before seeing it?
Reply
7-04-2007 @ 8:22AM
James Rocchi said...
Zeke:
IMDB lists Duhamel's character as "Sergeant Lennox." As for Jazz being a Porsche or a Pontiac, I guess that he didn't make enough of an impression to be remembered, outside of his truly inappropriate and insipid first line.
James.
Reply
7-04-2007 @ 8:22PM
sam said...
my friend put it pretty well when he said that the special effects were basically "ejaculated" onto the screen. the plot of this movie was awful. and of course the "hip hop" (most likely black) robot, is the only good robot to die. there was also another token black dude in the marine squad. these movies keep getting dumber and stupider
Reply
7-04-2007 @ 9:08PM
MattSD7 said...
I think I would have forgiven this movie if it were entertaining. But it wasn't. My friends and I spent the entire time exchanging looks of boredom, and disgusted disbelief. In the Monday night showing in San Diego, half the audience booed at the end of the movie. BOOed.
I love a good summer block buster. "Independence Day" is one of my favorite movies. Michael Bay in not only inept to fail at telling the simplest story, but pretentious enough to expect us to thank him for it. I will never watch another film of his.
Reply
7-04-2007 @ 11:11PM
BKDBL R said...
OMG! you can`t be serious!!!!! for all of you lames that trashed the movie because of the story xoxoxoxo you bitches need a hug, I mean damn its a movie about robots that trans freakin form, you guys complain about the story ark in "all my children" don`t you.....it`s a summer movie I happen to love Bay`s movies, I know what I`m paying for...if this movie happened to star Nathan Lane and Prissy Priccila No-Prick then I would complain about the story.... Shut the f%$^ up or stay home and watch "greys anatomy" while drinking a spot of herbal tea, now for all my "Red Bull" drinkers with eclectic taste and want to see azz kicking robots buckle up for the ride....not to sound like a commie but you bitches have to many rights, I know this is the land of the free but you cats whine to much, freakin lactose intolerent (you think a 3rd world person starving in the bush have problems with cheese???) but its all mental and you creeps try to impose your views on the masses because you love to hear yourself speak of type for that matter....bottom line i`m ranting and have not even watched the movie yet but guess what?....I know what i`m paying for and will enjoy every minute of it ...leave the movies call one of my chicks and transform on her, some of you dudes need to get some ass instead of placing stick`s up them....(f&%King mo`s).....p.s. James is waitng for the "go bots" movie written by woody allen
Reply
7-05-2007 @ 11:08AM
john said...
the racism doesn't stop there. all the speak english jokes. i thought it was funny and didn't think much of it at first. but in combination with these other things.. why did they have to make the only black robot so ghetto? and why did they have to kill the black robot. its almost cliche. either michael bay has really sophmoric humor from jr high school. or he is an innate racist.
Reply
7-05-2007 @ 2:51PM
guyanakoolaid said...
The biggest dissapointment is that these two writers are slated to write the next Star Trek movie. They've worked with JJ Abrams (Lost, Alias) before, who is directing it, so maybe it'll be alright.
Reply