Cinematical Seven: Reasons Why Summer Movies Keep Getting Dumber
Filed under: Action, Exhibition, George Lucas, Steven Spielberg, Cinematical Seven, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels, Lists

Once upon a time, movie palaces gleamed in the summer light and contained wonder: Raiders of the Lost Ark, or Jaws, or Aliens or The Matrix. But for the past few years, though, going to the movies in the summer has been more lackluster than blockbuster. And I think there are a couple reasons why that can't be dismissed as mere nostalgia, and also why this year's been so especially underwhelming for the fun-seeking moviegoer. Here, then, are the seven reasons summer movies are getting dumber.
1) Effects over Affect
Anyone who watched in awe and wonder as a silver, shifting Robert Patrick ambled out of a burning Big Rig in Terminator 2 knows that special effects are a huge part of a summer movie. But those wonderful virtual visions aren't the only part, and that's being forgotten in the real world of moviemaking. After being told that the transforming in Transformers was so complex, so 'real' that it contained more motions than the human eye can follow, all you can do is sincerely hope that someone out there can remember that the point of a movie is to be followed by the human eye, and the human heart. Yes, Robert Patrick walking calmly out of that fire is a great moment in special effects; but it (and our first sight of the shark in Jaws, or the first dinosaur moment in Jurassic Park, or Trinity's lotus-kick in The Matrix) was also a moment that changed the stakes of the story of the film, that affected people who mattered to us. Nothing this summer's been written with that kind of mythic scale in mind. (300 reached for it, but missed. And, despite my fairly heated dislike for the film, I can almost – almost – respect their attempt.)
2) Marketing Madness
Illegally-embossed quarters; wholly-transformed 7-11 stores; animated rat-branded greens for sale at my local Albertson's. This is just a top-of-my-head list of the marketing events I've been exposed to this summer by various films vying for audiences. Certainly not all of these films (specifically Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, The Simpsons Movie and Ratatouille) are bad. (The one that rhymes with 'Schmantistic Schmour' is, though, and I haven't seen the middle one yet.) But they're all examples of just how much damn co-branding is tied up in our summer movie experience, and how movie marketing has somehow become news in and of itself.
3) Over-Prints and #1 Mania
When did seeing the phrase "The Number One Movie in America!" in the ad become an inducement to see a film? The desire on the part of studios to hit the top of the box office is leading to circumstances where you have movies this summer opening on 3,900-plus screens – week after week. The idea that you have to make all the money in the first weekend and/or set some kind of record has become kind of exhausting, and matched by movies that fall off by 51% (Evan Almighty) or 65% (Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer) the next week. In fact, this year, only two films have held the box office for more than one week since May kicked off Summer Movie Season – Spider-Man III and Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End – with every other Box Office #1 falling off by at least 45% the second week. That's not a release strategy; that's carpet bombing.
4) Anti-Oscar Programming
Conventional wisdom says that if you want a movie to have a shot at best picture, you've got to release it in the last quarter of the year-- which becomes a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy. This summer, the only films to poke their heads up above the sea of toy tie-ins and special effects were Sicko and A Mighty Heart -- but between conventional wisdom and the kind of over-booking we've seen this year, it's hard for good movies to bubble up through the cracks if there aren't, in fact, any cracks. But if that conventional wisdom broke and you had studios releasing more serious dramas during the summer, I can't help but think it might make the purveyors of popcorn pleasure up their game a bit, too.
5) Benched Big Players
Growing up, summertime for me meant you could expect a movie from one of the big three: Spielberg, Lucas, or Cameron. Spielberg's working on Indiana Jones IV, which is fairly good news for next summer, but George Lucas and James Cameron have both benched themselves, through either making bad movies (the most recent Star Wars films) or not making movies at all. (Cameron, outside of some documentaries, has been largely present in moviemaking through his absence since Titanic was released a decade ago.) I'm glad that we've had directors (most notably Sam Raimi) step up to the big leagues, but it would be nice if Spielberg and Cameron could get back to making Summertime Blockbusters; and it would be nice if we could see some of the writers of past summertime classics get gigs, too. I mean, Lawrence Kasdan wrote (or co-wrote) The Empire Strikes Back, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Return of the Jedi and Silverado, each and ever one a superbly-written, massively fun adventure, and, I'm sure, has at least one more romp like the above in him.
6) "Do You Have Anything Original for Us That's Like Something We've Seen Before?"
Close your eyes, think hard; try to remember the last big summer movie that wasn't based on a comic book, a kid's book, another film, a line of toys, or a theme park ride. I have to go back to The Matrix (which is "original" insofar as it spirals out of dozens of prior sources instead of just one) to think of the last time that happened. And while yes, the third film in that series was a bust, the first Matrix film was impressive, exciting, important and, yes, meaningful, and still stands as a great example of what happened when creators with a bold idea are given backing and faith and the resources to make something new. In modern, risk-averse Hollywood, it's hard to imagine a second-time directing duo getting that kind of support (note that the Wachowskis are now chained to the millstone that is Speed Racer -- an adaptation 40-year-old cartoon), and it's hard to imagine us getting a film as jaw-droppingly exciting and fresh as the first Matrix film.
7) We're Not Helping Any
And yes, I mean 'We;' I was part of Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer's opening weekend box office. (I went with a friend; we had a few drinks before, and come on, it's the Silver Surfer. All dudes can sympathize with the Silver Surfer, because he's cool and lonely and his boss is a jerk.) Even as the big summer movies get less and less enjoyable, offering us few pleasures other than watching someone else spend money on the big screen, they still make money -- and until that changes, not much else is going to.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-08-2007 @ 8:17PM
brian said...
James, I really like this post, but I think you ignore the one thing that really makes this post nearly obsolete: the release of movies in the theater is now the smaller part of a movie's release. DVD's are more important and the release in the theater is for, now, nothing really more than for marketing the ancillary revenue streams for the film. Companies want big weekends because that will be etched in people's minds when it's sold to tv, dvd and all other release avenues. I think any article talking on this subject needs to address how the movie BUSINESS has changed since the times of the infant blockbuster. Otherwise...it just doesn't hold up.
Not that your article wasn't good, it just seems...not to address why everything is like this.
Reply
7-08-2007 @ 8:32PM
Scott W. Black said...
The Matrix was not a summer movie. It was released on March 31 in the US.
Reply
7-08-2007 @ 8:52PM
SAP said...
RE: #6
Bingo!
Reply
7-08-2007 @ 9:40PM
mike green said...
"but it would be nice if Spielberg and Cameron could get back to making Summertime Blockbusters"
then this means "world of the worlds" was an indie movie about gay cowboys eating pudding that was realease in january?
Reply
7-08-2007 @ 10:29PM
eugene said...
For all the trendy moaning about how hollywood isn't doing anything original, people really need to get a grip and actually look back on hollywood's history. Many of the most beloved films are remakes or GASP adaptations. Movies like gone with wind, ben hur, ten commandments, blade runner. Even masters such as kurosawa made much of their careers about re-interpreting other movies. GASP!
Get over yourselves. Movies that are made for pure entertainment and enjoyment have just as much of a right to exist as any high brow "art" film. At the end of the day, if you don't like it, no one is forcing you to go see it.
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 2:42AM
mayorjimmy said...
Not only do i share eugene's words but lemme add a few. in fact i'll go down the list.
it's long so here's a link if you're interested.
http://rantvillereborn.blogspot.com/2007/07/7-things-rebuttle.html
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 2:49AM
Justin Dean said...
re: eugene.
Yes, a lot of canonical and classical works are adaptations (I think almost all of Kubrick's works are) but they borrow from a higher culture, with certainly more depth than a theme-park ride.
Besides, this is not a matter of a source material hierarchy, but a more conscious sense of familiarity and franchise. Film companies are targeting audiences with ready-made characters and situations so audiences don't have to risk not knowing what their getting into.
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 2:46AM
Mike Davis said...
I'm not interested in reading your blog, but thanks.
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 2:56AM
Justin said...
*they're
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 6:34AM
eugene said...
@ Justin
I understand where you're coming from, however... These summer movies never pretend to be anything other than a spectacle. It's not fair to sit there and judge a movie against a standard or class it never even pretended to be in. I don't think anyone goes into a movie like transformers, expecting anything more than big robots fighting each other.
My question is, what's wrong with that? Why can't someone go see a movie, just to have a good time?
And just to comment on point 6. Matrix was FULL of borrowed visuals. Bringing this movie up to support the case that Hollywood can do better just doesn't make sense. Many of the memorable scenes were simply the borther's attempt to re-visualize many well known animes. Even the look and feel of the movie was borrowed heavily from Oshii's Ghost in the Shell movie.
Reply
7-10-2007 @ 4:50PM
Antonie said...
Don't worry, there is hope. Summer 2008 Spielberg will be back and summer 2009 Cameron will be back!
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 9:40AM
JC3 said...
The reason why summer movies get dumber?Two words...Star Wars.
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 1:20PM
StormyWaters said...
#6
Finding Nemo.
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 3:08PM
Wayne said...
James, the possesive version of your name is simply James'. Do not add an extra "s" after the apostrophe.
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 4:21PM
Tony said...
Wayne, it's spelled "possessive."
James, it's perfectly acceptable to add an extra "s" after the apostrophe to denote the possessive version of your name.
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 9:14PM
Wayne said...
Tony, the generally accepted "possessive" form of biblical names ending in "s" is to simply add the apostrophe. The end of the names in question have too hard an "s" sound. I find it looks and sounds dumb for a pseudo-journalist to be using excessive punctuation. To each his own I guess.
Reply