Review: I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry
Filed under: Comedy, New Releases, Universal, Theatrical Reviews

Wayyy back in seventh grade, there was about a two-week period where a group of kids were calling me Gay-vis, instead of Davis. There's an unspoken rule amongst teenage males that states you must call your fellow peers by their last name only. And, since I was always an easy target for gay jokes (not because I was gay, mind you, but because I was weaker than a wet tissue), the boys had a grand time at my expense. I grew up in Staten Island; a borough of New York City full of tough Italian-Americans who used the word 'gay' to describe anything or anyone that wasn't worth their time.
Watching I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry was like taking a trip back 17 years -- back to a time when you couldn't step foot inside a school cafeteria without hearing someone blurt out another unoriginal gay joke. And that's exactly what this latest Adam Sandler comedy is -- a long, 140-minute version of those stereotypical gay jokes that were popular during my youth in the early '90s. Problem is, it's 2007. But if blatant, in-your-face homophobia tickles your funny bone, and you're the type that feels Sandler can do no wrong, then Chuck and Larry should definitely get you off -- but not in a, ya know, gay kind of way.
Positive reviews of this film will probably preach about its "message" over anything else. What message? That it's okay to produce one godawful stereotype after another for two straight hours if, in the end, your lead character stands up and tells the audience he's not going to use the word 'faggot' anymore because it isn't nice? I'm sorry, but the last place I'm looking for a message is in a silly, outlandish Happy Madison production -- where the only message I usually walk away with is one that's scribbled in black magic marker on the forehead of everyone who paid money to see the film; it reads, "Sucker." But apparently gay jokes are big right now, as one successful comedy (Wild Hogs) this year utilized them with great success, box office-wise. So the majority of audiences will probably love Chuck (Sandler) and Larry (Kevin James) -- two relatable, Brooklyn-born firefighters who love their city just as much as they love their families. And they'll probably sympathize with Larry's unfortunate dilemma, while rooting for Chuck to sleep with the entire staff at Hooters ... at the same time (literally). Because it's fun. Because it's silly. Because it reminds us of the jokes we told in seventh grade. But whether or not those jokes are still funny is entirely up to you.
The most depressing part of I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry is not the acting, or the premise, or the directing -- it's in the fact that this script was apparently "re-vamped" by the Oscar-winning writing duo of Alexander Payne and Jim Taylor. You'll hear a lot about those two guys in the reviews you read; you'll hear how they wrote Sideways, how it was nominated for Oscars (winning one for Best Adapted Screenplay) and how it's surprising to see them affiliated with this flick. But what you won't here is the name of the drug(s) they were on when the decision was made to take on this project. The remnants of their superb skills (see: Election, About Schmidt) predominantly linger in the relationship between Chuck and Larry. Early on, we're clearly shown that either man would easily risk his life for the other, without hesitation. This is why Larry, a widower, has no problem asking Chuck to be his pretend domestic partner so that, in the case of his death, Larry could leave everything to Chuck; a man he knows would do right by his two kids. The chemistry between the two actors is there, sure, but it's at this point the film reverts back to its one-joke premise, and not even a bunch of bizarre cameos can save it.
And when I say bizarre cameos, I'm not talking about the obligatory Rob Schneider appearance. Here, he plays the wacky Asian minister who marries Chuck and Larry in Canada. There's no originality there; it's basically the same Asian comic stereotype we've seen in countless films over the years. David Spade also pops up as one of many in-your-face gay men; the kind of guy who dresses up in outrageous outfits, licks his fingers and winks at every penis that walks by. The most random cameo has to be awarded to Dave Matthews, of The Dave Matthews Band. I won't ruin his lame appearance for you, but let's just say it's not much different from the rest. Problems arise for our newly gay couple when The Government becomes suspicious of them, sending out an awkward homophobic investigator (Steve Buscemi) to dig up some dirt on the two. It's at that time Chuck and Larry visit an attorney (Jessica Biel), but things become complicated when Chuck (a self-proclaimed man whore) realizes -- holy crap -- our attorney is hot. Thus begins a fairly comical back-and-forth between a guy who's falling in love with a girl who thinks he's gay -- another aspect of the film that was clearly helped by Payne and Taylor's writing.
Slowly but surely, the film goes from "hiding gayness" to "defending gayness" when word gets out that two of New York's hunky firemen play for the other team. Their Fire Chief (Dan Aykroyd) is probably the most suspicious, but his views on the situation don't come into play until it becomes time to wrap things up. But things don't really "wrap up" -- like with most Sandler comedies, everyone basically has a good laugh about the whole thing and fireworks go off. You know things are pretty bad when the most enjoyable set piece in the film revolves around the age-old "don't drop the soap" gag. It's at that point when you will never look at Ving Rhames (who plays a fellow firefighter hiding his own secrets) the same way again. All that being said, I'm fully aware that I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry will hit each audience member differently. Some might feel it presents a fresh take on homophobia, and that those men who steer clear of anything gay-related for fear it might make them less of a man should be ridiculed. But the film is so over-the-top -- to a point where there's not one gay character who isn't dancing, singing or eye-f*cking the nearest pedestrian -- that whatever real message it's trying to send gets lost. And everything in between is just typical Sandler-esque filler. While it might be enough to make you laugh -- like with the majority of his films -- it's far from memorable.
Man, am I glad seventh grade only happens once.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-20-2007 @ 10:09AM
Bob Jones said...
Ever wonder, just a bit, if these movies aren't so much making fun of gays (which is clearly a boring subject), but the dim witted homophobes behind the jokes?
Reply
7-20-2007 @ 10:26AM
Dustin said...
Or maybe is all in the name of Laughter and fun, what they do for a living. They are comedians, meant to make people laugh. Now, granted not even views certain things as funny, and if you don't like gay jokes, because thats all they are, "Jokes."
They have no other merit other than to make people laugh.
I read, I believe here on Cinematical, that they cut out a part where Sandler and James kiss, yep sounds like they are total Homophobes to me.
Most movies are meant to be entertaining, nothing more, and this is a prime example of just entertainment.
Reply
7-20-2007 @ 10:26AM
Stan Heck said...
there is lots of straight people out there that are homophobes. In fact there is enough of them to make this movie a hit. Of course these are the same people that go to church on Sunday mornings!
Reply
7-20-2007 @ 10:50AM
John said...
In Iran and Saudi Arabia they stone homosexuals, and they don't go to church on Sundays.
Reply
7-20-2007 @ 11:05AM
Bishop said...
I go to church on Sundays, yet I'm not a homophobe. Great stereotype. Now get your hippy head out of your hippy ass....thought I'd throw my own out there... oh, and just because I'm Christian doesn't mean I won't treat you like the little prick you are. On a lighter note, I can't wait to see this movie.
Reply
7-20-2007 @ 11:31AM
Pete said...
Where on Staten Island did you go to high school? Not much has changed.
Reply
7-20-2007 @ 2:11PM
Don said...
Erik -- I grew up on Staten Island as well, wasn't much of a fighter or "tough guy," and had my last name twisted to sound "gay" also. Amazing that thinking, literate people can escape from that hellhole!
Reply
7-20-2007 @ 5:12PM
Max said...
I just returned from seeing this. So much fun. Sure, it pokes fun at the gay lifestyle but it also calls for it's ultimate acceptance as well. Adam Sandler is a consistent talent who very rarely let's me down. This was no exception. Kevin James only made things funnier. David Spade, who I'm not usually a big fan of, cracked me up in this. And the black dude from the Mission Impossible movies sings a song you just have to hear for yourself.
Reply
7-20-2007 @ 10:09PM
newmark said...
I dislike gays. They are disgusting. I don't hate them, I am just disgusted by them. Just like I am by scat lovers who eat excrements. Or people who eat from the garbage. Or piss drinkers. If I am a homophobic, I must be also a scatophobic, a garbageophobic and a pissophobic.
The problem with supporters of gay people is that they don't understand a simple emotion like DISGUST. They see it as something different, when in fact what most straight people feel towards gays is DISGUST.
Sometimes, the disgust leads to anger and hate. This happens when people get fed up with gay propaganda. Imagine if scat lovers would start fighting for recognition and acceptance; there would be parades, people discussing on tv about this, scat lovers popping up as characters in your favourite TV show eating excrements, people insisting on telling you that it's normal to eat them, people fighting for the chance to eat crap in the same restaurant you eat your dinner, your children coming home from school telling you that they want to taste sh1t because Jimmy's parents do it all the time etc. All in the name of tolerance. Wouldn't you get fed up at some point? I think most people don't really care what other people do in their homes, but when it gets in your face sometime it's really too much.
Reply
7-22-2007 @ 1:33PM
Robin said...
Perhaps it is assumed that Christians are homophobes (or hate gay people) because the Bible says that being gay is an abomination? And most Christians believe the Bible is infallible?
Anyway, we looked at boxofficemojo yesterday to have a good laugh at how badly this movie was tanking, and surprise, it's #1 for Friday. I can't believe the crap that the American public pays for nowadays.
Reply
7-22-2007 @ 4:17PM
Shawn said...
While I certainly can't tell newmark that s/he shouldn't feel disgusted about gay people, or scat lovers, or whatever s/he names (De gustibus, no dispudantum est), I think most people can recognize a fundamental difference between people who are emotionally and sexually attracted to people of the same sex and those who are sexually aroused by the various kinds of fetishes s/he names. Sexual orientation, in my view, deals with the deep-seated desire for one human being to be emotionally and sexually involved with another human being, and it has nothing to do with animals or defecation or urine or whatever else people like to equate homosexuality with. I would argue that most people feel a strong desire to love and be loved by another person, and the only difference between people of varying sexual orientations is the sex of the person that this desire is directed toward. So to place on the same level homosexuality, and scat, urine, and garbage fetishes, I think it demonstrates a real lack of understanding as to what the issue is. And like I said, I can't tell you want to be/not be disgusted by, but please don't confuse the issues.
Reply
7-22-2007 @ 6:41PM
jaz said...
Newmark you are very disturbed. I am disgusted by you.
Reply
7-22-2007 @ 9:43PM
RyRy said...
wow newmark, I feel the exact same way about heterosexuals.
and it's people like you that make me feel that way.
people like you always try to turn anything about Homosexuality to be comprable to things that are NOTHING like it... I can guarantee, as a (gasp!) homosexual, that Scat disgusts me, eating trash disgusts me, most sexual fetishes disgust me, christianity disgusts me, vaginas disgust me. But they're all different things and comparing them to one another is just stupid and always an invalid, uneducated argument (though homosexuality and disgust of vaginas can be put together)
This movie and Blades of Glory use homosexuality as a punchline. "oh my god they're in a gay situation, eew, that's funny though"... just like when I saw "Hairspray" everything John Travolta did as a woman was hysterical to the audience for some reason, I didn't understand it.
Just as Shawn above me states... those other things you mention are sexual fetishes not orientations, and there's a huge difference.
you disgust me just as much as I apparently disgust you.
Reply
7-23-2007 @ 1:08PM
Noodle said...
Meh, I hear gays are born gay... So people shouldn't blame them for what they do. Though it's fine to have personal opinion about gays too.
Reply
7-25-2007 @ 1:17PM
kc said...
((They see it as something different, when in fact what most straight people feel towards gays is DISGUST. ))
newmark, YOU are disgusting for saying that. and do not talk for "most straight people", talk for yourself since you are obviously a close-minded bastard and do not share the same beliefs as "most straight people" who i hope to god, are nowhere near as horrible of human beings as you are. you are a disgrace to mankind.
kthnx.
Reply
7-26-2007 @ 7:25PM
cmr said...
I'm glad I paid the matinee price to see this movie; I was concerned that it would live up to the Sandler usual and sadly it did. What a waste of two hours. Even sadder, it has generated such unkind, hate-filled comments as above.
Reply
8-10-2007 @ 4:46AM
Craig said...
Wow...this movie was perhaps the most offensive blockbuster I've seen in years. Not only was the audience eating up everything served to them, mainstream america still doesn't understand why minorities still pull the race card. I refuse to let racism or bigotry of any form go unnoticed. Not only was the film unfunny (aside from the son who did the splits of course), but the Asian guy is again a stereotype with an extremely offensive yellowface routine from Rob Schneider. Not to mention the only other Asians in the film are fetishes. America is so fucked up. I wanted to punch everyone in the face for laughing at that shit.
Reply