Cinematical Seven: Best Films for Gratuitous Male Nudity
Filed under: Cinematical Seven, Lists

Cinematic nudity has always been a mainly female phenomenon. Heck, naked women bits are all over the place -- we see it on screen, television, billboards -- you name it. If you're a man who likes womanly skin, or happen to be someone who saw Knocked Up, you know about Mr. Skin. The entire website is dedicated to noting female nudity in film -- down to the type of skin displayed, the length of the nudity and part of film that it is shown in. Since its mention in the Judd Apatow comedy alone, the visitor count jumped 35%. But what about the male bits?
They're just not there. It's as if all boys are just treasure-trailing Ken dolls. In an article a few years ago, pop culture expert Mark Kingwell rationalizes: "Guys don't like to see penises in film, because they are either too small (in travel mode) and therefore not worth all the fuss, or too big (in action mode) and so threatening to self-esteem." Ah, the fragile male ego! Although male genitalia has been pretty scarce, it's increasingly finding its way on the big screen, and luckily for us, it's not just the Bad Lieutenant, Harvey Keitel variety.
While researching this Seven, I hit the video stores to see some of the more infamous examples of male nudity on film. At the top of the list is Ewan I Don't Mind Showing My Bits MacGregor's The Pillow Book. Unfortunately, I couldn't find it anywhere. I even tried Blockbuster, where the man behind the desk said: "The movie where Ewan MacGregor gets naked? No, we don't have it." In honor of the actor's most infamous de-robing, which I can't find to rent, you won't see the Trainspotting star on this list. And for that matter -- I could make another list with equally shocking or notable male nudity, but instead, I give you these seven. They span time, rationale, situations and levels of gratuitousness. Enjoy!
Wild Things
I had to start this list with the film that not only marks the first time I saw male genitalia on the big screen, but the shocking show of Ren McCormack's naughty bits. The murder mystery trucks along like any would, throwing a million twists between Kevin Bacon, Matt Dillon, Neve Campbell and Denise Richardson. The big scene is 100% gratuitous, and in no way furthers the plot. Dillon follows a trail of muddy footprints, opens the shower door and exposes Bacon's bare butt. It looks like any other scene with a carefully-placed towel, and then there he is, in all his full-frontal Bacon glory. As if that wasn't enough, the dialogue soon slides on to pun: "to large accounts and no loose ends." Indeed.
The Brown Bunny
Perhaps the most infamous penis to ever hit the screen was Vincent Gallo's in his self-indulgent, dysfunctional love story, The Brown Bunny. After viewing a number of scenes where Gallo's Bud Clay either hits on women or drives (usually in the rain), the infamous scene finally strikes. Some say it was completely gratuitous, and some, even Roger Ebert himself (who had a famous battle with the director over the film) says it is not. Either way, it's definitely the product of Gallo's self-indulgence, which has led to many a penile offer on his website -- from offering up his sperm, to offering up stints of sex.
Quills
Of course, any story about the Marquis de Sade would include some sort of nudity -- his name did produce the term sadism, after all. However, while one might think that the story would lie on a sea of gratuitousness, the shots of Geoffrey Rush as de Sade are used to show him at his most desperate -- when even his clothing was taken from him. Where he was seen as a powerful and lascivious man in his threads, the removal of his last bits of clothing seemed to break him, making for one of the most telling and expressive uses of nudity on either spectrum.
Shortbus
And then come John Cameron Mitchell's real sex shindig, Shortbus. It's the one American film that displays pretty much every type of physicality in sex without being labeled pornography (at least by many). It helps that it comes from the man who already made a big name for himself with Hedwig and the Angry Inch. The wild orgy scene even has Mitchell himself taking part -- if you want more details, that wonder-search that is Google can lead you to a clip of it -- big, small, black white and everything in-between. While you might love, hate or feel indifferent about the film, you have to give the director props for practicing what he preached.
Kinsey
Peter Sarsgaard has done it all -- sold SAARS Guards, collected Desert Storm trading cards, married Maggie Gyllenhaal and even let his bits hang out to seduce Liam Neeson in Kinsey. It was another film where nudity was inevitable. You really can't demystify stigmas surrounding sex while not feeling comfortable enough to display the organs that make it possible. As for the scene between Sarsgaard and Neeson -- it allowed the audience to believe that Kinsey could make the jump into exploring his interests in men. You really couldn't expect him to dive in if Clyde Martin was wearing flannel pajamas and a robe.
Sideways
Perhaps the most gratuitous and cringe-worthy nudity in recent memory is the moment M.C. Gainey runs out of his house after Miles, 100% buck naked, chunky and flinging about. What's funny about this scene is how many people seem to have blocked it from their memories. I mentioned that I was going to include Sideways on the list to a few friends, and each said: "There's no penis in Sideways," having successfully blocked the memory from their fragile minds. Yet there the scene stands -- over-the-top and worthy of a few laughs, but also begging for the question: "Why did he have to run out nekkid?"
The Dreamers
I'm cheating a bit by including a French film, but it is particularly notable since it included Michael Pitt. Only a few years before the film, he had been a regular on Dawson's Creek. Straight after his by-the-book thriller Murder by Numbers, Pitt starred in Bernardo Bertolucci's film about a young man who gets caught up with a set of dysfunctional, incestual twins (one of which is Eva Green) during Paris' student revolts in 1968. While it can be hard to get past the troubling love between the brother and sister, it does a lot for normalizing nudity.
As Pitt has said: "There's this double standard with nudity. You can show a woman's full anatomy, but it's threatening and uncomfortable with guys. Gay, straight, bi or whatever, these particular people who run the country are afraid to see the beauty in things that aren't necessarily what they think is right or whatever."
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-31-2007 @ 9:21AM
quartempty said...
I know this is a film site, but I just finished watching HBO's "Oz", and man oh man, was that ever a dick party.
Also, to see Ewan McGregor's junk, you need go no further than "Velvet Goldmine", also likely to be missing from your local blockbuster.
for a pretty full list, hit up the imdb tag for "male full frontal". 575 titles, 2/3 of which are foreign. http://imdb.com/keyword/male-frontal-nudity/
Reply
7-31-2007 @ 12:23PM
leo said...
You should emphasize that your list is based mostly in American movies since in most other countries any time that there is female nudity there is the counterpart male nudity
Reply
7-31-2007 @ 10:43AM
Becky said...
Netflix has The Pillow Book.
Reply
7-31-2007 @ 11:09AM
barberoux said...
How about Harvey Keitel in "the Piano"?
Reply
7-31-2007 @ 2:27PM
greyhoundverona said...
ROOM WITH A VIEW. Seriously, you've got three for the price of one.
Oh, and THE SIMPSON'S MOVIE, of course.
Reply
7-31-2007 @ 12:51PM
Lee said...
How can any list of gratuitous male nudity be complete without Borat?
Reply
7-31-2007 @ 12:51PM
Lee said...
How can any list of gratuitous male nudity be complete without Borat?
Reply
7-31-2007 @ 7:48PM
Megan said...
Was it just me and my friends who never stopped talking about the last scene in Boogie Nights? WAS THAT REAL OR WASN'T IT?
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 11:25AM
Roy said...
Megan: The dick that Marky Mark pulls out of his pants at the end of Boogie Night was indeed a prostetic (though if real, it would have explained his music career). This was by no means a secret... so yes, it was just you and your friends.
Reply
10-14-2007 @ 5:56PM
Kelly said...
I am so tired of hearing the TOTALLY INCORRECT opinion that "There's this double standard with nudity. You can show a woman's full anatomy, but it's threatening and uncomfortable with guys." This is absolutely not true! Hollywood does NOT show the entire female anatomy. They usually only show a woman's breasts in mainstream film; which is no big deal and certainly not comparable to full male genetalia. In many countries, female breasts are not even considered "nudity" and women regularly go topless on beaches.
Also, Hollywood virtually NEVER shows the entire female anatomy; the full female genetalia is not seen. There will sometimes be a film showing female frontal nudity but this does NOT reveal the entire female genetalia. The female genetalia is located underneath and between a woman's legs. So when you see frontal female nudity you DON"T see the genetalia, only the pubic hair. When a male is frontally nude, then everything is revealed. This is why male frontal nudity is different from female frontal nudity; it is far more explicit. The only equivelant of male frontal nudity (which shows a man's entire genetalia) would be female spread-leg nudity.(which would reveal the entire female genetalia) But guess what ? We NEVER see that ! Whenever a woman is fully nude, great care is taken to ensure that the audience can't see between her legs. Showing her actual vagina is considered too explict. Hollywood will show the entire male nudity (pubic hair, testicles, penis) but won't show the entire female nudity (pubic hair, vagina, anus) Why not?
There are HUNDREDS of mainstream films which have been made that show the penis on screen, but you can't even name five that show a vagina. So you are completely wrong in your premise when you say that more penises should be shown. I disagree. If we really want to even things up, we need to show more vaginas in mainstream cinema. It's about time female actresses are required to show everything; male actors have been doing it for years. Why don't you research and write up a story on this double-standard?
Reply
10-25-2007 @ 8:57AM
James said...
I totally agree with Kelly.I have never seen a womans vagina in a mainstream movie,however I have seen numerous shots of full frontal male nudity.Women just keep saying that there is a bias towards showing the female - no way. A lot of female directors are hell bent on getting male full frontals into movies as a type of revenge. Why is there no display of the vagina? Firstly the vagina is too ugly with its folds of skin, fluid, and a clitoris which can not make up its mind whether it wants to be in or out. The entire vulva is just too ugly. Catherine Briellat loves to show the erect penis but when it came for the actress to display her vagina she said that it is too ugly and got a stand in.A guy told me that the stand in's vagina was ugly so who knows what the original was like.The second reason is that a shot of the vagina would activate that putrid fish smell that all men know, it can make you want to vomit when at its worst. The stink is overbearing.All in all the vagina is too ugly and smells too bad to be in movies but the girls want equality so men should have to put up with looking at the ugly smelly thing
Reply
10-25-2007 @ 12:55PM
James said...
Monika Bartyjel you are just like all other women who continually scream injustice,inequality, bias etc.I have, without huge research documented over 150 mainstream films that feature male genitalia or erections. Where in earth do you find over 150 mainstream films with vaginal presentation?
Men are not ashamed of their genitals, women are ashamed of their vaginal area, and good reason to be.
Nobody want to see ugly so we wind up viewing the male.
Reply