How Close is 'Becoming Jane' to Historical Fact?
Filed under: Drama, Independent, Romance, Newsstand, Cinematical Indie
When films based on real people are released, questions always arise about the fact and truth behind the drama on the screen. Becoming Jane is no exception. The movie, which was released this week, is giving us a twist on Jane Austen. Instead of being treated to the millionth adaptation, we're getting a look into an imagined version of what might have happened in her own life. Skimming reviews, it seems that the film is a run-of-the-mill romance that you might enjoy or find predictable. But what of the movie's accuracy?
The article outlines how Austen's work has, more than once, become fodder for her personal life. But that seems pretty sad and reductive. Whether you're a fan of period romances or not, it's hard to refute her success, so why can't she have the ability to create rich, fictional worlds without having a specific boyfriend or almost-husband? As Lynch says: "We can't bear to think that her wisdom was not based on experience."










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-06-2007 @ 2:42PM
Noam Sane said...
I won't be seeing this, but the title kills me. It's right out of Seinfeld. Maybe it should be a double-feature with "Rochelle, Rochelle".
Reply
8-08-2007 @ 3:31PM
targ8ter said...
Nevermind the fact that her parents seem scandalized that she wants to be a writer, when both of them were, in reality, published authors before she was.
Reply
9-13-2007 @ 7:21PM
movie-lyrics.com said...
"We can't bear to think that her wisdom was not based on experience."
ha, Jane Austen was inborn. Not everyone can become Jane, as everyone can write Love Story.
Reply