Fan Rant: Nathan Fillion Just Can't Catch a Break
Filed under: Independent, Fandom, Cinematical Indie, Fan Rant
Sometimes you find yourself pulling for an actor like you would for a favorite athlete or politician. (Hey, it could happen.) You know the drill, movie fans: You discover a performer in an early role, you take notice, and you then chart the course of that career as time goes by. Sometimes you're thrilled (like when my beloved Jennifer Connelly won an Oscar) and sometimes you're bummed (like when Jason Lee signs on for not only Underdog, but Alvin and the Chipmunks, too, for cryin' out loud) -- and sometimes you're left wondering just what the hell is going on...Such is my perspective on Canadian actor Nathan Fillion. The way I see it, the guy could (with just a little help) become the next Harrison Ford (or OK, maybe Kurt Russell). On the other side, he could become the next Bruce Campbell -- which wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. Mr. Campbell has always resided on just this side of "the mainstream," seemingly more than content to dole out his genre-style goodies for the established fans who love the stuff while occasionally popping up in Hollywood flicks. And it's not like Bruce Campbell is having trouble keeping his bills paid.
But with only a handful of TV series and just a fistful of noteworthy movie roles, Mr. Fillion's career seems to be at an impasse: In one direction lies box office superstar. In the other ... legions of adoring fans who'll always make Fillion the most popular guy at the comics convention. Not a bad gig either way, but here's how we've arrived at this point:
1993 - 2002: Lots of random appearances in TV series like Spin City, The Outer Limits and (yep) One Life to Live. A few Canadian indies led to small roles in Saving Private Ryan, Blast from the Past and Dracula 2000. A regular role in Two Guys, a Girl and a Pizza Place got the guy some prime-time exposure, but it seems like the actor's recurring role as Caleb on Buffy the Vampire Slayer is what opened a lot of options for Fillion.
The collaboration with Joss Whedon led to Nathan Fillion's Big Break #1: The lead role on a sci-fi western series called Firefly. Fox botched the broadcast rather terribly, and the series was dead even before it got rolling. (Well, not entirely dead.) Then it was time for a few more indies, a couple more failed TV series, and even some video game work before Big Break #2 showed up in the most unlikely of forms: The Firefly series was about to become a movie called Serenity, and here was Fillion's chance to become Han Solo and Indiana Jones at the same time. And while the fans and the critics certainly adored the movie, it didn't exactly blow the doors down, cash-wise. (Note of correction: I've been informed -- 1,226 times -- that Mr. Fillion did Firefly BEFORE Buffy. So thanks for all the corrections. Even the ones with the word "idiot" in them.)
Big Breaks #3 and #4 come as a pair of genre films: One is the sequel to a surprise hit from a few years back and the other is an old-school tongue-in-cheek sci-fi monster-fest that, I don't mind saying, is a whole freakin' lot of fun. The former is called White Noise 2: The Light -- and it's presently collecting dust somewhere in an office at Universal. The latter is called Slither -- and despite it being a pitch-perfect blend of monster mayhem and Mad Magazine, the flick grossed a number too depressing to repeat. So what does this effortlessly likable actor have to do to catch a REAL break?
He opts to co-star alongside Keri Russell in a charming indie comedy called Waitress. His performance -- and practically the entire lovable little movie -- is overshadowed by the tragic murder of its creator, Adrienne Shelly. Then Nate gets to anchor a heavily-hyped action series on Fox called Drive. The series is canceled before its sixth episode. So I guess you could call those Big Breaks #5 and #6. And I think it's a real shame, too. This is a guy who could step into "action hero" roles and comedic parts with equal amounts of comfort. But since his career so far is peppered mostly with "genre" material, Nathan Fillion could just as easily slip into sort of a novelty role -- the guy the movie geeks really love, but nobody else really recognizes. (Then again, he did just join the cast of Desperate Housewives...)
Frankly I'll just enjoy whatever the guy has to offer next, but I'm hoping the big-time casting directors can look past the guy's box office / Nielsen ratings report and find something cool for him to do. It's not like there's going to be a shortage of comedy / action films any time soon -- and I'd sure as heck rather see Nathan Fillion breaking jaws and cracking wise than 90% of the actors I'm subjected to nowadays.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
8-11-2007 @ 4:04PM
Blair M said...
I always thought it was the other way around. IIRC, Nathan Fillion was on Firefly first and then after it was cancelled Joss put him into Buffy. (He also put Gina Torres into Angel) Do I have the timeline wrong?
Reply
8-11-2007 @ 7:22PM
XBaby said...
Who cares about the time line? Chicken/egg. It's all semantics. Fillion's had a notable career and I completely agree with the post. Why can't the dude catch a break?! He's a great actor and the man's hot. I've seen his six "big break" items that have been mentioned, who do I need to start picketing?
Reply
8-12-2007 @ 1:28PM
sister said...
I totally agree. Nathan Fillion is one of those rare actors who, in whatever role he is doing feels "completely comfortable in his skin." I first saw his work in the movie 'Serenity'...for which I am forever grateful as it lead me to the series "Firefly" - WHY in the world that was EVER canceled is so far beyond my pay grade, but that's another story. Then the tragedy of "Drive" that was JUST shaping up to be a really good, original series..again, canceled. I have never watched "Desperate Housewives" but because Nathan is going to be a cast member, I'm going to have to give it a try.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 2:02AM
cerebron said...
I'd like to see him become Indiana Jones eventually.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 1:33AM
Pong said...
@ Blair
Your timeline is incorrect. When Buffy ended after 7 seasons, Joss Whedon started firefly.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 1:42AM
Kevon said...
he was in an episode of lost in season 3 as kate's husband. i'd call that a lucky break.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 1:49AM
Jol said...
@ Pong
Sorry, but Blair is correct. Firefly started in 2002, while Buffy ended in 2003. When Firefly was canceled, Nathan got a role in the last season of Buffy. :)
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 2:09AM
John said...
Perhaps the real truth here is that Nathan Fillion isn't any better than most B-actors, and you're all just Joss Whedon fans. What I don't get is why you're all not dismayed that absolutely none of the other cast members from various Whedon productions have become anything better than B-actors either. Why favor this one over all the others that haven't and won't become stars (and Sarah Michelle Gellar isn't a star - her career tanked)? Face it, Whedon makes B-movies and TV shows with a bunch of B-actors. That's why none of them, with the exception of Buffy the Vampire Slayer's moderate success (# of seasons isn't a measure of success, simply financial adequacy), have managed to stay on the air or make enough at the box office (even when you include DVD sales) to warrant a sequel.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 2:21AM
Scott Weinberg said...
Or perhaps Fillion is better than most B-movie actors and we're also fans of Whedon. (I never watched much Buffy, but I do loves me some Firefly.)
Still, you've given me another idea for a good post. Thanks.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 1:23PM
Ray said...
Regarding the timeline, Firefly aired while Buffy was still on the aire. It was after Firefly was cancelled that Joss put Nathan in the final season of Buffy and Gina Torres in the fourth season of Angel, and the following year that he put Adam Baldwin in the final season of Angel.
Regarding why Nathan hasn't made it "mainstream" yet... well, he's concentrated mostly on High Quality films since Firefly. And high quality doesn't always translate to mainstream hits. Just ask Michael Bay.
But Nathan's career is still young. Remember, Harrison Ford has 11 years worth of obscurity before accidentally landing the role of everyone's favorite scoundrel.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 4:10AM
mayorjimmy said...
I don't think it's just a Joss thing for me. I was really enjoying Nathan in Drive before it was canceled. Then again, Fox always cancels the good shows too early (Titus, Futurama, Family Guy) and leaves certain others out WAY past their prime *cough*simpsons*cough*
and yes i'm aware that family guy is back and futurama is returning. doesn't change the fact that fans had to buy a TON of DVDs and Adult Swim has to get mega rating with them before Fox woke up.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 4:18AM
Alisha Karabinus said...
I'd love to see him in the remake of Escape from New York! Bulk him up a little and he would be pure awesome.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 4:29AM
nate said...
I met the guy once at a reading of a pilot for another tv show that would have been amazing BTW. and you know what? he is just about the nicest guy in a room. not at all jaded by hollywood, he is a fan of the shows he was part of. hell I just want to meet him again and buy him a beer.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 9:20AM
Chad said...
I totally agree. I've been aware of Nathan since Firefly and have followed his career - whereever that takes me - for the past few years thinking each time 'Now they'll see how awesome he is!' only to find out... it's just not going to happen. The same can be said for the rest of the crew for Firefly as well- my friends and I have a 'Firefly scrapbook' email that we all get involved in when another crew member is spotted outside 'the 'verse'. And not one of them does anything less than a GREAT job- but Nathan really has that leading man quality... but not the scipts to go with it!
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 10:46AM
Kevin said...
I REALLY hope he does catch a break. The wife and I are huge fans and love everything he does - we were both so disappointed when Firefly, Drive, etc. were canceled. I thought it was so cool they day I ran into him in Manhattan at the Rockport store.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 1:21PM
Gina said...
As Scott says, it happens all the time, but it's still frustrating. I like Fillion but don't count myself a huge fan, but I've also seen it happen to other actors of whom I AM a huge fan -- they're wonderful but they just can't catch that break. And meanwhile C-grade actors fill the so-called A-list. I wish there were a way fans could nominate their favorite actors for projects. (Of course, then we might end up with every project jammed full of Whedon actors, which -- sorry, Whedon fans -- would not always be ideal. ;-) )
Or maybe we just need more and better writers to come up with the right scripts for these people!
Anyway, as far as Fillion is concerned . . . though I don't personally like "DH," a lot of people do, so I'm sure his time on there won't do his career any harm. And despite the tragedy that haunted "Waitress," it did seem to get quite a bit of positive attention.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 3:54PM
Hollywood Magazine said...
Hmm interesting
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 1:40PM
Duffy said...
Nathan Fillion would make a great Repairman Jack. There. Seed planted.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 7:28PM
Adam C said...
Thank you Scott. I was hanging out with my friends yesterday and we discussed this very thing. None of us could figure it out, he seems perfectly capable. He has had bad luck on TV, and is stuck in genre films.
He was the only thing that stifled my groans at the thought of White Noise 2.
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 10:16PM
Tidmore said...
Nathan Fillion really is amazing. He truly is great in everything he's been in (at least what I've seen) and it's a shame he hasn't been more mainstream.
Hopefully his stint on DH will gain him more fans, preferably some casting agents who will put him in some high profile projects.
Reply