Lohan's Latest Director Talks About His Failed Flick
Filed under: Drama, Mystery & Suspense, Sony
And by "failed," I mean box-office-wise, although the filmmaker might disagree with that assessment. My opinion that I Know Who Killed Me is a fairly laughable film is just that: one guy's opinion. (Jette didn't care much for it either, but she's not a guy.) But director Chris Sivertson doesn't seem to be stewing in his juices regarding the box office numbers, his leading lady's tabloid appearances, the scathing reviews or his future projects. And since his previous film (The Lost) debuted at SXSW, festival producer Matt Dentler thought it might be a cool idea to ask Mr. Sivertson a few questions regarding his latest flick's fate.Here's what Chris had to say about I Know: "Well, what can you do? We try to get well-known people in our movies to get some awareness going and to get attention, and then I guess you can't really complain when the attention takes an unwanted turn. The only thing that bums me out about the entire experience is that it didn't make more money. I don't mind being hated by the critics. It's interesting to see how the press covers it. After the opening weekend, they were happy to proclaim that we had "tanked." Bratz and Hot Rod came out the next weekend and when you look at the amount of screens they were on, they basically had the same box office results we did. But come Monday morning, those films "had difficulty finding an audience in a crowded marketplace." Well, at least they didn't tank! But whatever, you know, press and publicity is so fleeting that it's hard to take seriously whether it's positive or negative. The only thing to do is ignore it and make more movies." (For more between Dentler and Sivertson, click here.)
Well said, Chris. While I was definitely not a fan of your new movie, I'll certainly look forward to what you have coming next. Regarding The Lost, which is an adaptation of the horrific Jack Ketchum novel, it looks like Anchor Bay has come to the rescue. According to the director, AB will deliver the flick in a limited theatrical release (and uncut DVD release) some time in the near-yet-undisclosed future. Regarding I Know Who Killed Me, Sivertson seems more than happy to chalk it up to a learning experience and move on to some more indie-style flicks -- which will undoubtedly play at SXSW whenever they're ready.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-11-2007 @ 5:49PM
Jane said...
I think anything with Lohan in at this time will be a flop, maybe once she conquers her demons she might get some respect from the public.
Reply
8-11-2007 @ 6:03PM
danzinski said...
It's not a good movie, but it's not as bad as it was made out to be. I give Sivertson credit for trying something a little more far-out stylistically, rather than just doing the icky sewage-toned torture porn crap. It's not a big-audience movie - it's a cult thing that got an alleged star attached to it, and the expectations got blown out of proportion. They would've been better off without Lohan, that's all there is to it.
Reply
8-11-2007 @ 6:09PM
wehttamredliw said...
I KNOW WHO KILLED ME is actually a terrific movie that was inexplicably smacked about in the wake of Lindsay's DUI. It's a hard-to-decipher grindhouse riff on MULHOLLAND DRIVE, but I was absolutely riveted by it...and LiLo is terrific in it. It pisses me off that nowadays people review the marketing materials (and all the attendant good or bad buzz) instead of the Thing At Hand. I have a feeling in a while this movie will revive...but then, I still think people are going to come around to CONFESSIONS OF A DANGEROUS MIND.
Reply
8-11-2007 @ 8:18PM
Gina said...
I don't know . . . when I saw the box office results for "Bratz," "tanked" was the first word that came to mind. I didn't read the press reports, but I find it hard to believe that NONE of them would it put it that way.
Anyway (spoiler ahead), I didn't see "I Know," but when I read about the whole "twin stigmata" bit, it was extremely difficult to keep a straight face. I'd think the idea of someone's arm falling off because their twin's arm was removed would sink a movie -- unless it was a comedy -- regardless of tabloid headlines.
Reply
8-12-2007 @ 8:54PM
Bubba8193 said...
'I Know Who Killed Me' was pretty bad. But the film didn't have any help with a couple things. Lindsay Lohan's DUI arrest, bad marketing, and the whole thing with women getting toutured isn't do well at all.
btw, horrible ending.
Reply
8-12-2007 @ 9:20PM
Dan Combs said...
People that don't understand the movie "I know who killed me" here *spoliers* I'll explain it to you.
CobaltDuck explains - The Movie is not about a Twin finding her sister like some psychological mystery crime drama. ITs not really torture porn. Its a Psychological thriller. The movie a about Aubrey using her imagination to try to solve the mystery of who is killing her. Aubrey doesn't make it. Aubrey is killed. Aubrey is captured, tortured, buried alive, and the mysterious killer gets away with it. Aubrey doesn't know who is killing her, so she retreats to her mind and to avoid the pain and try to make sense out of why this is happening to her. That part where Dakota lays down next to Aubrey isn't a tired Dakota taking a quick nap its Aubrey finally dieing.
The MOvie on the very first viewing is suppose to confuse you...it leads you in many directions and possibilities.. Does Aubrey has multiple personality disorder, or maybe she is an engineered twin for an experiment (take note of the similar faces of the 2 previous girls maybe they were both engineered twins and killed as well), or Dakota really is a twin... These are just decoy plots. Every time Dakota feels pain..thats not Dakota thats Aubrey feeling it. Every vision Dakota has is not a vision .thats Aubrey seeing the situation. The movie's first viewings purpose is to make you think the story is going in a different direction. Only at the very end does it become clear and the movie comes into focus. It should hit you in the gut that Aubrey didn't make it. Its sad. It should make you angry because Aubrey is strong and not weak but she never had a chance to fight back.
The 2nd viewing you have the time to look at all the clues, because maybe the Piano teacher wasn't the one that killed her maybe thats just Aubrey's best guess before she died, its probabley the gardener. Maybe it was the strange man on the bus. Maybe its the psychiatrist. Maybe the killer is hidden in her mind. Maybe no clue in her mind will help her solve the mystery. Even Aubrey herself doesn't understand why she is doing this. I like to think Aubrey got it right and figured it out and gave her self some comfort for solving the mystery.
People that criticise the movie, including newspaper critics, just don't get the point of the movie. It goes right over their head. They can't see it even though its right in front of their eyes. One could start to suspect where the movie was heading when the "strange" explanation for Dakota losing body parts was explained by "Twin stigmata". This is a fantasy, they could of equally used Voodoo or witchcraft or alien invaders as fantasy substitutes. Then when Dakota decided to drive with her father to the piano teachers house (with out back up or calling the police i might add) the direction of the story should of become suspect. When Dakota said "I think i know who killed me" the audience should of started figured it out, because why would Dakota say "I think i Know who killed me" it doesn't make sense, Dakota was never touched by the Piano teacher, nor was she being killed, she said it because she was Aubrey and Aubrey was close to death and wanted to figure it out. Then Dakota finds Aubrey... it should become obvious that all of this is in Aubreys head. Dakota joins Aubrey because Aubrey is in her last breath. The movie ends and goes no further because Aubrey is dead. If it wasn't in Aubreys head then the next scene would show the next day at her dads funeral with both sisters on crutches. But, Aubrey is dead.
The movie isn't suppose to make you feel good. It should make you feel sad/angry/depressed/uncomfortable. It is not a normal happy Holloywood movie. But its tragedy will keep you thinking about it for a long time. the stripper scenes make you feel like the movie you see is real. If the ending was a happy ending the effect would not be the same. Aubrey dies... and its really sad and such a waste.
I know who killed me is a good movie.
Dan Combs
Reply
8-12-2007 @ 9:22PM
Scott Weinberg said...
Dan, I'm fairly certain that all (or at least most) of the critics who saw and disliked IKWKM completely understood it. Just because you are able to decipher the film in some way ... doesn't make it a good film.
Still, glad to see you going against the tide and coming to the defense of a movie you liked. Thanks for the comment.
Reply
8-12-2007 @ 11:09PM
Eugene said...
Dan, who are you and why do you keep posting your little "I know who killed me is a good movie" rant? If you have some sort of vested interest in that flick, you should come clean.
Reply
8-12-2007 @ 11:23PM
Dan Combs said...
I'm not the only one saying it. Many people are. Some critics are as well. The more people that see this movie the more you will see it said.
I know who killed me is a good movie.
Reply