Review: September Dawn
Filed under: Theatrical Reviews, Religious, Cinematical Indie, Western

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. --Voltaire
September Dawn may or may not be well-intentioned; it's a lot easier to state that it's not well-made. Directed by Christopher Cain, September Dawn tells the story of an 1857 massacre where a group of settlers en route to California were attacked and slaughtered in Utah by a group of local Mormon residents. It also includes a Romeo-and-Juliet love story -- and yes, I'm taking that cliche phrase directly from the press notes -- between the young pioneer Emily (Tamara Hope) and Jonathan (Trent Ford), the eldest son of the local Mormon bishop (Jon Voight, sporting the requisite evil goatee). At first, the Mormon community offers the pioneers land and supplies so they can rest for two weeks before moving on; in time, though, inflamed by the words of Brigham Young (Terence Stamp, with an equally ominous set of whiskers) and paranoid concern that the settlers may be planning to strike out at them, Voight's followers decide to save the damned souls of the Christian group -- by cutting them down so they can sin no more.
September Dawn's been the focus of some controversy -- not because it's invented the climactic bloodletting; the events of that day, now known as the "Meadows Massacre," are a matter of historical fact. The controversy around September Dawn comes from its assertion that Young, the supreme leader of the Mormon church at the time, knew about the massacre before it happened and explicitly approved of it. The central question September Dawn wants to answer is simple: What did Brigham Young know, and when did he know it?
But controversy aside -- and that's a big aside, considering how September Dawn accuses a founding father of a major American religion with mass murder -- Christopher Cain's film is more substandard than it is scandalous. The dialog feels like it was taken from a school historical pageant -- heavy on factual exposition and bound up in stiff, flat language. The locations (the film was shot in that conveniently cheap Canadian simulacra of the American West, Calgary, Alberta) are attractive, but the basic cinematography -- the grammar of shots, scenes and edits -- is fairly ham-fisted: When the Christian settlers pray, their calls to God are shot from straight-on in warm firelight; when the Mormon congregation gathers to speak in the fiery tones of an angry Lord, they're shot from crazy angles in dim, spooky light. Director Cain also co-wrote the film alongside Carole Whang Schutter, but the script feels like it's just there to follow one path -- bad guys bad, good guys good -- on rails until the concluding massacre.
And oh, what a massacre it is. Gunshots, arrows, hatchets; there's a good, old-timey bloodbath at the end of September Dawn, which not only seems unsubtle (including one killer literally dripping with drool at the height of his bloodlust) but also somewhat at odds with the tastes of a large portion of the possible audience for September Dawn; You wonder if Christians will want to see a true tale of persecution and tragedy that comes wrapped in so much blood and grisly violence; then again, that didn't keep the Christian audience from seeing The Passion of the Christ. ...
On a performance level, September Dawn is also pretty barren. As the young star-crossed lovers, Tamara Hope and Trent Ford both have to deal with jaw-breakingly clunky dialog -- this is a film whose big courtship scene involves Hope and Ford walking through a meadow quoting scripture back and forth. While Ford's got a certain charisma, Hope looks slightly lost in her role, as if the thinness of the character seeped the energy out of her very flesh. Voight's fallen prey to Pacino's Syndrome recently -- the wasting disease that afflicts older American actors where they become deluded that showing up and shouting somehow counts as acting -- and, again, the script takes his character from gentle charity to homicidal lunacy so fast there's no sense of a person under Voight's busy, bewhiskered race through the plot points. Stamp also intones his way through his performance as Young -- he's displaying the symptoms of McKellen's Syndrome, the wasting disease that afflicts older English actors where they become deluded that showing up and enunciating is acting.
September Dawn is stiffly written, twisted by flashback upon flashback (and often by flashbacks-within-flashbacks) and shoddily made -- and that's putting aside the issue of whether the film's an insightful expose of a forgotten part of American history or a blatant libel against a forefather of one of America's more singularly American religions. There's no doubt that somewhere along the line, someone was passionate about making September Dawn -- there's too much money on-screen with the period costumes and sets for that not to be the case -- but passion's not necessarily the same thing as competence.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-24-2007 @ 3:48PM
KingofBigScreen said...
The actual founding father of Mormonism is Joseph Smith
He was a con man, a guy who talked to angels and salamanders, who fought AGAINST the United States and was lynched for stealing people's wives.
The founding father Scientology Hubbard was a con man, a bigamist, an addict, a man who tried to push his second wife to suicide, and a tax cheat.
The founding fathers of Christianity, the Popes, were adulterers and murderers and con men
Seems to be a trend.
Reply
8-24-2007 @ 7:08PM
blah143 said...
If Voight had Al Pacino Syndrome that would be a good thing because that would mean he was giving inspired and brilliant performances like in Angels in America and Merchant of Venice in his 60s. I think you meant to say Chis Walken Syndrome.
Reply
8-25-2007 @ 1:06AM
hthalljr said...
The review by James Rocchi was excellent. The comment by "KingofBigScreen" is not. I am tempted to dismiss it as "same old, same old," but I just can't stand to allow such lies about the prophet Joseph Smith to go unchallenged.
"The actual founding father of Mormonism is Joseph Smith."
We refer to him as our founding prophet.
"He was a con man,"
Apparently, so was the angel, who showed the plates, in the presence of Joseph Smith, to three other witnesses. Their testimony has been in the Book of Mormon since 1830. Each remained true to his testimony throughout his life.
" a guy who talked to angels"
Yes. Please read the testimony of others who talked to angels in the Book of Mormon. Of course, this allegation also "discredits" many of the prophets of the Bible, so this slur applies to Jews and Christians alike.
Joseph Smith also showed the plates from which he translated the Book of Mormon to eight other witnesses, under natural circumstances. Their testimony is also printed in the Book of Mormon, and they, too, remained faithful to their testimony throughout their lives.
" and salamanders,"
This nonsense was exposed decades ago as the forgery of a convicted murderer, Mark Hoffman. Please get some more up-to-date lies.
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635153542,00.html
" . . . who fought AGAINST the United States . . ."
How can you write such nonsense? Joseph Smith taught that the constitution of the United States was divinely inspired. (Doctrine & Covenants 101:77,80)
http://scriptures.lds.org/en/dc/101/77,80#77
Article 12 of our 13 Articles of Faith, written by Joseph Smith, states: "We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law."
Joseph Smith repeatedly sought the protection of the Federal Government against official state-sanction persecution, to no avail. Mormons were driven out of the state of Missouri by mobs and militia upon authority of governor Lilburn Boggs (Executive Order 44, Oct 27, 1838).
At the time he was murdered, Joseph Smith was a candidate for president of the United States. So much for the charge that he "fought against the U.S."
". . . and was lynched for stealing people's wives."
The mob that murdered him blackened their faces to hide their identity. It's amazing that after all these years you have channeled the minds of these anonymous cowards to discover their righteous motives!
Joseph Smith did have plural wives, but no man ever charged him with stealing his wife. The historical facts are reviewed here, for anyone interested in facts.
http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=review&id=290
As for the rest of your rant, I'll let Scientologists and Catholics speak for themselves.
Tracy Hall Jr
hthalljr'gmail'com
Reply
8-25-2007 @ 12:19PM
liya said...
Hey, don't knock Christopher Walken. He delivers every time. He just hasn't been cast in anything lately that really shows off his acting skills, at least not since Catch Me if You Can. I'd like to see him break out of the bizarre cameo roles, but there's a certain audience that likes that.
On a different subject, I'm feeling uneasy about the portrayal of Mormons in American media. I get that this was a true story and everything, but it doesn't help the fact that a lot of people associate Mormons with separate fundamentalist Mormon off-shoots--the groups that endorse polygamy, etc. Mormons are hardly ever portrayed in a positive light. Jehovah's Witnesses and Scientologists never are. Regardless of whether or not you think a belief system was founded by "a con man", remember that this is someone's faith you're ridiculing. This is something that is a part of someone's identity. At a time when positive pictures of Mormons in mainstream media are severly lacking, a movie like this one certainly doesn't help.
For what it's worth, I'm Catholic.
Reply
8-25-2007 @ 3:12PM
m said...
Thank you hthalljr, it couldnt have been stated better.
Reply
8-25-2007 @ 3:57PM
BDUB said...
Great review James. I thought your comment on the differences between the prayer scenes was dead on.
Reply
8-25-2007 @ 9:44PM
Terryeo said...
KingofBigScreen appears as a Master of SmallMind; a singular and bigoted, but intensive view that any religion, faith or belief is but an effort to con him, personally. And LO! he hopes to save us all with his criticism.
Reply
8-26-2007 @ 12:11AM
David Taylor said...
Brigham Young's guilt regarding the Mountain Meadows Massacre lies in his incitement of his people to take human life, regardless of whether he may have specifically sent a messenger to spare those particular lives. The degree of his guilt must be levied against the three seperate responsibilities he played in this tragic event. His guilt is lowest as the head of an incipient sovereign nation, peopled by imigrants from European countries, with little or no love for the United States. His guilt becomse more severe as the Governor of Utah Territory, substituting Mormon law for U.S. law and inciting American citizens to make war on other Americans. His guilt is unfathomable as a purported prophet of God, which lofty calling would have enabled him to act as His holy representative of love, peace and goodwill instead of vengeance and murder. I and others grieve that, capable leader as he was, he was incapable of being inspired by God himself, as the tale relates all to tellingly.
But then, as current LDS leaders say, Brigham Young cannot be criticized, even if the criticism is the truth.
Reply
8-26-2007 @ 10:01AM
Brad Mason said...
Stop getting all upset about your religion being exposed. It isn't like everyone elses doesn't have problems for what they did in the past. And yes, what a religion does in its past DOES MATTER.
They were nothing more than sexual deviots posing as a religious order. It isn't like these things don't go on all the time and yes, even become and are major religions with deviots all within. Of course, they are not MY choice of a religion but hey, what ever you are happy with ignoring, so be it.
I read a statement by a member relating "Why would someon give their life for a lie?" referring to JS. I say...Dave Kouresh and Jim Jones. That is just a start of nuts who gave their lives for their beliefs as well as a happy crowd of followers that went right along with them.
And this religion isn't the first to have a movie that can be insulting yet, everyone put up with it. How about the 10 Commandments? Were Egyptians outraged? All the movies about Jesus, the Catholic Church, Christianity? There was Joan of Arc, DaVinci Code, Passion of the Christ. Some true to history and others questionable. Jesus was put to death by Jews and Romans but hey, I don't see modern day Jews or Italians getting all bent out of shape.
People don't like Mormons. They have never been very fond of everyone else unless they are shoving pamphlets at you. And THAT is why they are not liked. Self righteous and rude, having the nerve to tell us about THEIR beliefs and what is right and wrong and then, like everyone else, not living up to their own standards. The difference is they are doing the "mission" and behaving badly. At least those in other religions are not on a mission while behaving badly.
Let's face it. The only time we like our Mormons is when they sing and dance for us and shut their mouths about their faith. Can you say "Osmond's?"
Reply
8-26-2007 @ 12:13PM
Jay Allen said...
Joseph Smith did have plural wives, but no man ever charged him with stealing his wife.
Maybe true, maybe not. But his own wife left him for his polygamy, and even went so far as to set up a rival church. Read Krakauer's UNDER THE BANNER OF HEAVEN for some interesting history, including info on the Mountain Meadows massacre.
Personally, I think KingOfBigScreen had it about right. It's like L. Rob Hubbard said: if you want to get rich, start your own religion.
Reply
8-26-2007 @ 12:41PM
Will said...
Incitement. Oh yes, absolutely guilty. People in the U.S. and around the world believe this of George Bush. There are many, many within religious orders and government powers of all kinds that have done the same. And they are considered guilty by many and others feeling it is justified. But for the everday Christian I agree the problem with Mormons is they do missionary work and yet go to war or in 1857 unwarranted slaughter. Perhaps religious leaders in Christian Religions are wrong for agreeing with wars and such but at least their flocks are not preaching and going to war or for it. And the guilt of slaughter of innocent people cannot be forgiven of any Christian and this is exactly what Brigham Young was involved in when he gave his "blessing" to go ahead and murder in the name of God.
Reply
8-26-2007 @ 1:48PM
Maria said...
This movie was terrible and a waste of my time. Certainly, there must be a better way to tell the historical fact of the MMM.
Reply
8-26-2007 @ 3:53PM
robert said...
Joseph Smith was a murderer, rapist, CONVICTED con artist, tax cheat, adulter, and religious charlatan.
Some questions for you brainwashed cultists:
Did you know that Joseph Smith's father was in the shipping business, and had dealings with companies in a city called MORONI, capital of the COMOROS Islands? Interesting, because years later, Joseph cooked up the Book of Moron, featuring wild tales about Hill Cumorah, and the angel Moroni.
Speaking of Hill Cumorah, where are the remains of the hundreds of thousands said to have dies there? What of the swords and shields?
Back to the Book of Moron - why, if Joseph really had a meeting with divine beings in the grove at age 14, did he NOT TELL ANYONE ABOUT IT until a full 18 years later, at age 32? Seems to me, if you meet God in person, it would be hard to keep quiet about it.
Did you know that Smith was NOT wearing his own garments when he was killed? He also was without his copy of the BoM. Funny, he DID have on his person his Jupiter Talisman, a token of his life long fascination with the occult.
Here's one - look up Helen Mar Kimball. She was only 14 when Joe banged her. Sorry folks, Joe Smith was a dirty PEDOPHILE.
As for the previous posters comments that Joe Smith was a patriotic American, this is patently untrue. Any amount of simple research will prive this. This trend of operating outside the Federal laws was perpetuated by Bring 'em Young. Right up through the MMM. If Joe was in line with the US, why did he start his own currency? Why did he form his own governement and proclaim himself king?
Speaking of Mormon currency, what of the Kirtland Banking Scandal? That would make another great movie. Joe Smith, so-called man of God, RIPPED OFF HIS OWN FOLLOWERS when he started printing his own currency, made everyone in Kirtland exchange their REAL American currecy for his CONTERFEIT money, then skipped town on them, leaving them all FINANCIALLY RUINED. What an ass.
Then there's the humorous matter of all of Joe's FAILED prophecies. Like the one that said Jesus would return to earth before Joe died. WRONG. I could go on and on with those, but you can find out for yourself. Just do a search for 'Joseph Smith failed prophecies' next time you have a couple DAYS to kill. There's a LOT to read about.
Also, remember what Jesus himself said in the Bible, (in *numerous* places) about FALSE PROPHETS. He warned that there would be many, and the simple test for identifying one is if they prophesy something that does not come to pass. Well, folks... Joe is a FRAUD.
Some more great topics to investigate -
Polygamy STILL practiced in the Mormon afterlife, D&C 132
the Kinderhook Plates
the Book of Abraham translation
BY's 'Men on the moon, dressed as Quakers'
Over 4,000 changes to the Book of Mormon, supposedly the 'truest and most correct book on earth'.
Conflicting Mormon doctrines
the Adam-God theory, proposed by Brigham Young, that asserts God came down to earth as a man, had SEX with Mary, and produced two siblings - JESUS, and LUCIFER --- BROTHERS!!
Good luck to all of you still caught up in the snares of this evil cult. I made it out. You can too, but it won't be easy. For assistance and more information for this process, visit exmormon.org, and any number of other great resources on the web.
I already know how you Mormons will react to all this, with stauch denials and name calling, and that's fine. The bottom line is this - deep inside, you know it's all bull. The truth will gnaw at you until you come to terms with the harsh reality that you've been misled, just as I had to do, just as millions of others have other the decades. Mormonism now LOSES over 100,000 members per year, and that number is rapidly growing, AND... doesn't even count those who simply stop believing or showing up without ever officially resigning. Face the truth. It is in facing your greatest fear that you will achieve your greatest victory. God bless.
Reply
8-26-2007 @ 4:07PM
Karen said...
In every review I read there are Mormons commenting on how they are looking bad because of how this movie portrayed one of their leaders and that it was never proven he was even involved,I just dont understand why one of their very own Mr.Lee in his own statement of the facts confirm this involvement and keep saying that he was a scapegoat for all of the leaders of the Mormon church at that time, what was he to gain from it considering he was to be put to death shortly afterward. And how can Mormons be so upset at how they look when innocent lives were taken, they just dismiss the lives of the emigrants so easily, without even a mention of them, what they suffered or the continued suffering of there ancestors not truly ever knowing what happened that horrific day:Yes September 11,1857!! Lets not forget what happened September 11,1857 as it is just as terrble as September 11,2001 for many who lost loved ones, it's just not as prominent in the hearts and minds of many of those in this generation but it certainly is as important to those of us who lost loved ones just the same, in a unfathomable manner. In the end no matter who did the actual killings, the result is the same the pain still remains in the hearts of many.
Reply
8-26-2007 @ 9:39PM
GLA said...
Message from Young a historical fact-
A Church leader in the Cedar City area sent an express rider to Salt Lake City, a 250 mile ride, to counsel with Brigham Young concerning this group. The rider, James H. Haslam, returned with a letter from Young ordering that the emigrants not be harmed, but did not arrive in time to prevent the attack and moreover, after the siege had started Haight had fully resolved to murder any adult witnesses.
President Young’s message of reply, dated September 10, read: "In regard to emigration trains passing through our settlements, we must not interfere with them until they are first notified to keep away. You must not meddle with them. The Indians we expect will do as they please but you should try and preserve good feelings with them. There are no other trains going south that I know of[.] [I]f those who are there will leave let them go in peace..."
(Brigham Young to Isaac C. Haight, 10 September 1857, Letterpress Copybook 3:827–28, Brigham Young Office Files, LDS Church Archives.)
According to trial testimony given later by express rider Haslam, when Haight read Young’s words, he sobbed like a child and could manage only the words, "Too late, too late."( James H. Haslam, interview by S. A. Kenner, reported by Josiah Rogerson, 4 December 1884, typescript, 11, in Josiah Rogerson, Transcripts and Notes of John D. Lee Trials, LDS Church Archives).
Concerning criticism of Brigham Young as well as any other Church Leader
Reply
8-26-2007 @ 10:58PM
GLA said...
I ended my last comment with:
Concerning criticism of Brigham Young as well as any other Church Leader...
The truth is that Brigham Young did not order this horrible massacre.
Clearly there were many LDS people including local LDS leaders who did participated in this unspeakable act.
My heart goes out to those who have suffered because of this massacre and it's effects on their lives. There can obviously be no excuse for it.
Trying to understand this horrendous event requires that we find and use the truth. Unsubstantiated claims or exaggerations will not help.
James Sanders is a great-grandson of Nancy Saphrona Huff, one of the children who survived the massacre. “I still feel pain; I still feel anger and sadness that the massacre happened,” said Brother Sanders. “But I know that the people who did this will be accountable before the Lord, and that brings me peace.” Brother Sanders, who serves as a family history consultant in his Arizona ward, said that learning his ancestor had been killed in the massacre “didn’t affect my faith because it’s based on Jesus Christ, not on any person in the Church.”
Some making comments have not studied this nor many of the issues they are commenting on. As a result they do not add anything that is very useful, helpful or truthful.
Reply
8-28-2007 @ 1:06PM
joseph said...
What happened to my last comment?
Reply
8-28-2007 @ 7:04PM
Poncho said...
This is fascinating...people up at 4:30 am with such passion and ignorance is almost impressive...but when is someone ever going to come up with something new or original about JS and BY than the run of the mill every-day accusations riddled above? You can't even get the Adam-God theory correct. But that would mean you actually read a copy of the original manuscript, instead of Walter Martens “I’ll edit if I feel like it” Kingdom of the Cults. The things you guys will believe are absolutely amazing.
The funniest thing is John Lee's book on the Mountain Meadows has more credibility than even non-Mormon historians. That's like buying "How to Breed a loving Pit Bull" by Michael Vick. Some of you guys are painfully obsessed with Religious Terrorism...Hope they never make a "true" movie about Moses and Joshua (who didn’t even let the little ones live like Lee did), or Abraham, or that deceiver of all deceivers...yes...that prophet Jacob. The nerve of getting the priesthood birthright and becoming father of all nations by dressing up like your brother! Oh…and the wives…the hundreds of wives and concubines. Joseph and Brigham were rookies compared to those guys. You can pretend all you want that Hagar was and an adult (Hebrew hand maidens were yuuuuung)…or know your facts like up to 1850 30% of girls under 15 were married.
What primary teacher taught you that the battlefield Cumorah was in NY? That was in Central America…Moroni just ran out of names (Like evidently King Joseph did) for hills when he got to NY. I hope you or your friends didn’t actually go to NY and look for arrowheads!
And please, please learn some math...400,000 minus 100,000 (the supposed mass dissention of Mormons) is a net 300,000 plus. And removing “And it came to pass” 835 times is almost 4200 changes…how dare you understate your facts!
I'd tell you to change your URL to exmorons but that wouldn’t quite apply. Obviously I should be more Christ like...just can't always ignore the purposeful deception from the anti's...they believe our stuff is half truth...but they KNOW theirs is! Sorry...this was supposed to be about the movie. I'm not allowed see R rated movies without getting publicly flogged by the Danite Elders Quorum that is supposedly still running around.
But the massacre (yes…massacre) was a horrible event…and the Lord will ultimately judge those who were ACTUALLY involved, without speculation. Unfortunately…many will have to answer for the deaths of millions by the hands of religious crusaders (i.e. Christian, Muslim, Mormon, etc.) through history. So if you have real faith…no need to worry. Those who should be punished will be. Just try and get over your hatred…it’s a painful way to live.
Reply
8-29-2007 @ 2:59AM
joseph said...
This movie was a total let down. I looked forward to this film hopping that it would expose the Mormon cult for what it really is and what it has done. Instead it wasted time on a love story when it could have revealed Mormon beleifs and crimes. In no way are Mormons Christians, and exposing their beleifs would have shown that.
You can find all about what the Mormon's did at Mountain Meadows in the book (Mormonism Unveiled) that John D. Lee wrote prior to his exacution for his part in that crime. The book (American Massacre) by Sally Denton also does a fine job revealing the historical facts of the massacre.
Lee's book reveals many points of interests from the fact that anyone who deneigs the posibility of the book of Mormon is exceptable to be targeted for death, and hinting at the posibility that Brigham Young may have been involved in setting up Joseph Smith final end.
In short, John D. Lee's book exposes himself and the others involved in the Massacre for what they were; cowboy gangsters who ran land schemes and extorted money from fellow Mormons as they moved from state to state. Then staging ambushes with Indians to rob wagon trains that they were hired to excort to California, all leading to the Mountain Meadows massacre on September 11, 1857. These are all Mormon accounts and not my opinion.
Reply