Retro Cinema: Christine
Filed under: Horror, Retro Cinema

Stephen King was a pretty hot commodity back in 1983. That year saw the publication of the novels Christine and Pet Semetary, as well as the release of John Carpenter's film adaptation of the former. I myself was a big fan of King's work, having read all of his novels and many of his short stories, and news that Christine was being directed by John Carpenter of The Fog and The Thing (I hadn't yet seen Halloween) fame was exciting news indeed. John Carpenter teaming up with Stephen King? How could we lose? I saw the film during its theatrical run and it proved to be a bitter disappointment. I hadn't seen the film since, so when I watched Christine again for this review it was my first viewing in twenty-four years.
Christine is a '58 Plymouth Fury, and since most of the film takes place in 1978, the car has just passed the 20-year mark, making it an antique car. The film actually opens in the 1950s as Christine is coming down the assembly line. Even at that tender age this is one bad ass machine, and the fact that "Bad to the Bone" is playing on the soundtrack is no coincidence. One worker has his hand smashed by Christine's hood, giving the appearance that the car has bitten him, while another dies mysteriously inside the car after having the audacity to drop cigar ashes on her newly minted seats.
Twenty years later, we meet the nerdy Arnie Cunningham (Keith Gordon) and his best and only friend Dennis Guilder (John Stockwell). Between the torments inflicted by school bullies (a theme King has used off and on since his first novel Carrie) and his domineering parents, Arnie's existence is not a happy one. When he and Dennis come across a piece o' crap '58 Plymouth Fury for sale, Arnie immediately and inexplicably falls in love with it. George LeBay (Roberts Blossom), the creepy old guy who is selling the car explains that it belonged to his brother and goes by the name Christine.
Since Arnie's parents won't allow him to park a junker like Christine at their house, he takes her to Darnell's Do It Yourself Garage, where he sets about restoring her. A glitch in Christine's wiring has the odometer moving backward, more or less mirroring the fact that Christine is getting younger with each mile. At the same time Christine induces a personality change in Arnie. He's able to stand up to his parents now, violently at times, and he's now dating Leigh Cabot (Alexandra Paul) the pretty new girl in town who said no thanks to all the jocks who asked her out. Christine has a jealous streak, though, which does not bode well for Leigh, and when a gang of high school thugs demolishes the car, they have no idea what kind of hell they've unleashed upon themselves.
The past twenty-four years has done little to alter my opinion of this movie one way or another. While this is a more or less faithful adaptation, the spirit of King's book is lost through the over simplification of the characters, particularly Arnie. In this respect Christine fails on the same level as Stanley Kubrick's The Shining. In Kubrick's film, Jack Nicholson takes his character from level-headed family man to axe-wielding lunatic without showing the gray area between the two. Carpenter and Gordon make the same mistake, having Arnie go from put-upon nerd to confident lady's man and slayer of bullies in the blink of an eye. I think the key to making Christine at least moderately more watchable would be to re-cast the leads. Stockwell has the acting range of a two by four, while Gordon goes in the opposite direction and overdoes both his uber-dork and tough guy personae, giving neither any degree of subtlety or believability.
In the plus column the film has the always interesting to watch Harry Dean Stanton as Detective Rudolph Junkins. The effects scenes in which the car regenerates itself after being demolished are really good, and since they were done in the pre-digital age I found myself wondering how they did it (Carpenter explains it on the commentary track). In particular, the scene in which Arnie first learns that Christine can repair herself is powerful and downright chilling. Ultimately, though, the film doesn't work.
The DVD sports an audio commentary with John Carpenter and Keith Gordon. Some of the discussion of the special effects is interesting, but generally the dialogue between the two doesn't add much to the experience. There are also quite a few deleted scenes included on the disc.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-27-2007 @ 2:21PM
dwayne said...
The film does work! In any adaptation of a novel, especially one by Mr. King, the movie inevitably fails to live up to the book. Insert "Duh" here. Look at the hack job they did with the movie "It". That was atrocious. So in my humble opinion, considering the actors involved and the limited special f/x (which I thought were great), the movie did work for the time period.
Reply
8-27-2007 @ 2:46PM
Gina said...
If you don't mind my going off on a rabbit trail -- I know what you mean about "The Shining," except I'd go a step further and say Nicholson's Torrance seemed like a little bit of a lunatic from the very beginning. I'm certainly not running him down as an actor, but the book handled Torrance's characterization so much more touchingly and realistically.
Haven't seen or read "Christine" so I can't comment on that!
Reply
8-27-2007 @ 4:26PM
James said...
I have to kindly disagree with you about Christine not working. I mean a car that is alive is certainly not original (Herbie), but the emotional pull between Arnie and His car is palpable. He is possessed by her spirit as soon as he sets eyes on her. "Go back I want to see HER!" And sure the acting could use some sprucing up, but what about the brilliance that is Robert Prosky? IMO he is a Stephen King character come to life if ever the was one. "You can't polish a turd" John Carpenter could not pull this movie off now, he was at the top of his game and made one of the most under-rated King movies ever. I read the book before I saw it in theaters (I was 8) and did not get the book until after I saw the movie. And I still did not ID with the story until my teen years, but I think that the movie does what it was supposed to do. Tell the same story visually.
Reply
8-27-2007 @ 6:11PM
AutomagV said...
I saw this as a kid when my family first got cable and instantly loved it. Maybe I'm a sucker for revenge films, but this movie hit all the right points. Bullies get brutally killed by a beautiful classic seemingly fueled by hellfire? Sign me up! We have a Charger, a Camaro, and this Fury exuding enough personality that satisfies my need for eye candy. Every time I read a bad review I can't help but to wonder how a connection isn't made with the viewer. One of my favorite films of all time.
Reply
8-28-2007 @ 1:03AM
Scott Weinberg said...
Matt, you make some VERY good points about the actors and their near-instant 'tonal shifts' but I also have a real soft spot for this one.
Plus it was the first time I ever heard the phrase "You can't polish a turd," and I freakin' love that quote.
Reply
8-28-2007 @ 5:37AM
Matt.Bradshaw said...
Scott,
A few comments back James made the same point about Will Darnell's turd polishing line. I must admit it is the sort of line that stays with you:)
Reply
8-28-2007 @ 5:40AM
Dave said...
I agree with your comments about Christine. I saw the movie in the theater too (opening night) and I had loved the book. It was a bitter disappointment to me, and looking back, it was probably the first time I realized the difference between books and movies (I was just a kid after all). I like it OK now, strictly on a B-movie level.
Reply
8-28-2007 @ 2:38PM
Kimmie said...
I also think this movie works, the problems it has are just from not being able to stand up to King's tremendous novels....but otherwise, it's a good flick with some creepy moments, not all-out horror but all-out fun.
Reply