TIFF Review: I'm Not There
Filed under: Drama, Music & Musicals, Theatrical Reviews, Festival Reports, Focus Features, Toronto International Film Festival, Cinematical Indie

I'm Not There may be a brilliant myth-making exercise, a fearsome piece of pop art, a truly fascinating film. It may also be a hollow jumble of post-modern pick-up-sticks -- a chaotic stack of signifiers and images and in-jokes with nothing at the heart. Part of me wants to see it again as soon as possible; crack its codes, follow the arcs, catch anything I missed. I also wanted to not see it ever again -- to let it be a dream, a blur, like a few notes of music that find you at an unexpected moment and you hear the rest of your life.
Six actors, six stories "Inspired by the Life and Music of Bob Dylan." Well, even as a casual Dylan fan (or, more specifically, someone with a copy of Desire on vinyl), I think you've got a lot to work with. And director Todd Haynes -- who co-wrote the script with Oren Moverman -- puts a lot on the screen. A young African American rides the rails playing folk music. An arch, overgrown juvenile delinquent gives cryptic answers to unknown questioners. A folksinger who walked away from it all in the '70s. A '60s vision of style itself stalking London. The actor who played the folksinger, once, in a movie, dealing with fame and family. A hippie-cowboy-monk in some never-was Old West.
And all the Dylans -- none of whom are Dylan -- cross and connect and clash. The youngest is played by African American teen Marcus Carl Franklin. British actor Ben Wishaw is next, cryptic and dry. Christian Bale broods and seethes through a mockumentary. Cate Blanchett staggers and swaggers through Don't Look Back re-imagined as a Fellini fever dream. Heath Ledger's actor drifts through a very '70s California break-up with Charlotte Gainsbourg. Richard Gere wanders in a carnival-western cosmos shot through a haze of dust and sunlight. Like the blind men and the elephant, Haynes and his cast fumble at immensity and come back with distortions, misrepresentations, textures.
Some of the film -- a lot of the film -- is unsettlingly literal. It's a trainspotter's film in many ways; I'm sure somewhere a Wikipedia page is being updated right now with specific annotations matching scenes in I'm Not There to the life and the work that inspired it. It's audacious, now and then past the tipping point. Drunk on pop culture, and a very specific vintage, I'm Not There engaged my brain more often than it touched my heart. It's a bit brittle, a bit cold.
And any film that combines fiction and pop music is a risk: The ghosts of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band and Xanadu hover close overhead as grim warning. I'm Not There is so sleek and stylish as to nearly disappear from sight as you're watching it. But at the same time, you recognize the pleasure of the cleverness -- the gall of looking at one of America's pop cultural icons through a fractured lens and, yes, at the end, bringing it all back home. Now and then I'm Not There feels like an extended, inventive inside joke with a soundtrack to die for.
But it's a good joke to be inside of, and the music is terrific. Blanchett's getting raves for her turn, but I found myself watching Bale -- hardened, strained, tragic, magnetic. And the supporting cast is either baroque and bizarre with David Cross as a bemused Alan Ginsberg, Bruce Greenwood as "Mr. Jones," Michelle Williams as a retro-pop queen -- or careful and quiet, with Charlotte Gainsbourg's sad '70s wife and Julianne Moore as an ex-artist pouring her heart out into a camera drip by drip. There are great one-liners here -- images, words, music -- that leap off the screen and shock you; there are moments that you want to unpeel and dig into. I'm Not There explains itself as "Inspired by the life and music of Bob Dylan," but it's also a chronicle of his times -- a curt, quick assessment of America in the '50s, '60s and '70s made out of the public image and private life and lyrics and music and album art and movies and work of one man. I'm Not There is not Dylan, but it can't be. I'm Not There is art as entertainment, cultural criticism re-written as spooky carnival show, a study of an artist captured from so many perspectives the artist almost disappears; that's no coincidence.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-13-2007 @ 7:39AM
Willy said...
As a big Dylan fan, I can't decide if I want to see this film or not. Thanks for the cool review. I think I'll go. Now I just need to convince my wife to come with me.
Reply
9-13-2007 @ 10:02AM
G said...
Please tell me it's better than "Masked and Anonymous." If you can tell me that, I might see it; I just can't handle a repeat of that mess.
Reply
9-13-2007 @ 10:59AM
R29 said...
Dylan fans, go see this film. It's clever and thoroughly enjoyable until about the last 15-20 minutes when Richard Gere shows up (even more so if you've seen Don't Look Back).
This is no comparison to Masked and Anonymous. All copies of M&A should be hunted down and destroyed, the sooner the better.
Cate Blanchett IS Bob Dylan circa 1967.
Richard Gere's sequence was utterly unnecessary, though. If you happen to think Basement Tapes should have never been released, consider yourself warned.
Reply
9-23-2007 @ 10:23PM
phil said...
i happen to be a huge dylan fan and after reading all of its reviews ive decided i cant wait t see it but have a feeling that i am going to be dissapointed afterwards. cate blanchett is the only character tht looks remotely close to him, and the whole bob dylan persona is too much of a mystery to exemplify in a lifetime let lone two hours
Reply
10-08-2007 @ 4:44PM
Reese said...
Im tired of movies like this. I only like Blanchett but the rest I dont care for.
I will wait on DVD not waste my money to watch on the theatre.
Reply
10-17-2007 @ 2:59PM
chase said...
I'm really amped on seeing this movie. Haynes is interesting and their is a great concept using talented actors. I love Dylan so I'm either going to love or hate this film.
However, I think I'm just as curious to hear the soundtrack. Eddie Vedder, Sonic Youth, Sufjan Stevens , Yo La Tengo, Jeff Tweedy, and John Doe are all doing Dylan covers! That's insane. I'm really curious to hear it come the 30th of October. Has anyone heard the soundtrack?
Reply
11-11-2007 @ 11:22AM
Amy said...
I saw this movie at a screening last night. Let me just preface this by saying I am not a a huge Dylan fan or am I incredibly knowledgable about film history. I absolutely HATED IT! Maybe one of the worst movies I ahve ever seen. Though visually beautiful it was painful to watch. I felt from the first 10 minutes that it was a self-indulgent romp for the writer /director. After it ended I thought the writer was given millions by the Weinstein company and he was like great I can do whatever I want with it. Don't waste your money if you want to see it rent it or pay per view it when you can.
Sorry to the filmaker but I thought it totally sucked!
Reply
11-28-2007 @ 2:02AM
Dave said...
I guess I can be considered a big Dylan fan, and I saw the movie last night, and I loved it. When I listen to Dylan, I create a mental image of him from the era which the album came from, and there seems to be a different artist behind his first ten or so albums. It's amazing how he morphed continuously. I can't imagine a pop figure doing that these days. But then, these days aren't the Sixties. I've even brushed by him in the flesh, but I've never been able to form a single definition of him. And this film made me truly appreciate that. It explores his myth, deconstructs it, but then adds layers to it by juxtaposing the various lives he's lived. Because there are different actors, different settings, and different realities, meshed together to tell one life story, the film elongates the breadth of Dylan's legend while simultaneously undercutting it by highlighting his personal message often cited in mid-sixties interviews- 'they're just songs, and I'm just a singer.' Of course, any artist who garners fans is not just an anything. They strike chords and resonate an importance to people. Dylan happened to do it to millions on various levels. The film is great because it captures those levels and ties it into Dylan's mystery, then tries to untie it, but creates a bigger, tighter, more unruly, if not more interesting, knot to unravel.
Reply