Fantastic Fest Review: There Will Be Blood
Filed under: Drama, Paramount, Theatrical Reviews, Fantastic Fest

Oh sure, we've got Paul Thomas Anderson all figured out by now. After four very fine films -- Hard Eight, Boogie Nights, Magnolia and Punch-Drunk Love -- we've surely got the filmmaker's number by now: He makes strangely sweet and slyly witty ensemble pieces, right? So then what's he doing making an adaptation of Upton Sinclair's massive tome Oil!? A straight-faced period piece in which the most recognizable names are Daniel Day-Lewis and Paul Dano? This is not what we've come to expect from good ol' Paul T. Anderson!
And I suppose that's what makes the director's There Will Be Blood such a stunning surprise. It's more than a "departure" for the director; it's a monumental display of "evolution" that'll wow the established fans and impress a helluva lot more new ones. This is a dark, compelling and effortlessly engrossing film, one bolstered by a lead performance that ranks among the very best of Mr. Day-Lewis' impressive career.
The film will most often be compared to Orson Welles' Citizen Kane, so I guess I can get the ball rolling on that particular crutch -- but it's also an apt comparison. Which is not to say that There Will Be Blood will necessarily be dissected and revered 75 years from now, but the stories are certainly similar enough. Anderson's film opens with a long passage of dialog-free footage: A lone man hacks his way through a mine using a pick-ax and some dynamite. The year is 1898, and Daniel Plainview is about to become an oil man. We witness the man's unwavering resolve as he pulls himself from a vertical shaft after breaking his leg in a fall -- and if you think that accomplishment displayed some tenacity ... just wait.
The 160-minute film covers Plainview's journey from rock-scratcher to oil tycoon as it runs over the course of 29 years. And while it might come as no surprise to learn that Plainview loses more of his soul with every package of professional success, the way in which this potentially predictable story unfolds is nothing short of hypnotic. Although our hero(?) struggles through numerous adversities and obstacles, his main combatant comes in the form of a young preacher named Eli Sunday (Paul Dano). The young man seems to be well-aware of Plainview's rather mercenary approach to the oil game, so when the two butt heads over the oil beneath the Sundays' soil -- their battle of wills becomes some sort of epic clash: The rise of wealth and industry versus the sanctity of religion and faith.
Only ... the wealthy industrialist is kind of a crook -- and the preacher is sort of a schemer. So already we're dealing with conflicts, contradictions and a supremely satisfying sense of ambiguity. We should be rooting against the businessman, but we don't. And although it seems logical to side with the aspiring young preacher, there's something about the kid we just don't like. So what I'm basically saying is this: There Will Be Blood boasts one hell of a fantastic screenplay.
And gosh what a beautiful film to look at. The turn-of-the-century Texas landscape has rarely looked this, well, real, and Anderson paints his canvas with some masterful strokes. The establishing shot that introduces the central town is nothing short of stunning, and there are numerous sequences that simply dazzle the eye. Cinematographer Robert Elswit -- a frequent PTA collaborator -- should be preparing his "it's an honor just to be nominated" speech right now. And the musical score by Radiohead guitarist Jonny Greenwood is more than a separate character in the film; the stunning score feels more like an aural Greek chorus.
Which brings us to the lead performance by the force of nature known as Daniel Day-Lewis. One could call his Plainview a cross between Charles Foster Kane and Al Swearengen: Driven to succeed, willing to cast aside anyone who becomes a liability, brutal yet human, undeniable nasty yet somehow worthy of some empathy. And Mr. Lewis delivers an anchor of a performance that's as multi-faceted as it is simply plain old entertaining. And I hate to overuse the Oscar predictions, but if there's a better 2007 lead performance ... I'd simply love to see it.
Easily one of the year's best films (so far), There Will Be Blood presents a side of Paul Thomas Anderson that we haven't really seen yet -- but it's proof positive that he's still one of the finest directors out there right now. You probably won't believe that this film came from the same man who directed (the awesome) Boogie Nights, and I mean that as a big compliment. It's just that different -- and just that damned good.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-28-2007 @ 9:52AM
Steve Vesolich said...
Excellent review. I've been looknig forward to this film for a long time. Glad to see someone giben Daniel Day Lewis the credit he deserves.
Reply
9-28-2007 @ 12:18PM
Peter said...
Good Review, and glad to hear There Will Be Blood is as good as hoped - though there really wasn't too much of an alternative, I'd wager.
I take it this was one of the surprise flicks?
Reply
9-28-2007 @ 1:16PM
Donald Byrne said...
Excellent review. But the lead actor's last name is "Day-Lewis", not "Lewis". Just like his father, the great poet C. Day-Lewis, who also went by "Day-Lewis".
Reply
9-28-2007 @ 4:14PM
Scott Weinberg said...
Thanks for the comments and the correction. I wrote this one at about 5am so I was just a little rusty.
Reply
9-28-2007 @ 6:10PM
jeremy bowditch said...
i also saw the film and wrote up a review the first few moments after seeing it
infy reviews THERE WILL BE BLOOD
Reply
9-28-2007 @ 8:23PM
n. gurewitch said...
Yes. Yes. All eyes on P.T.
this guy knows how to dance
Reply
11-24-2007 @ 7:25PM
Carl from L.A. said...
I remember a couple of years ago reading this screenplay and thinking, man, that was a great read, but it's sure going to take a great acting job to make it work. Well, I finally saw a cast and crew screening of the film last week, and I think Mr. Day-Lewis's performance is just amazing. This film is a real force of nature. I've worked on dozens of films, but I can't remember ever being prouder to have contributed my little bit than I did after seeing this one. I don't know what kind of commercial success you can expect from something this far out of the mainstream, but I sure as hell know that those who do go to see it are going to get their money's worth.
Reply