Is Tim Burton Directing 'Frankenweenie' for Disney?
Filed under: Animation, Disney, RumorMonger, Fandom, DIY/Filmmaking
During an advanced screening of the upcoming Disney movie Enchanted, it appears Dick Cook, the Chairman of Walt Disney Pictures, let slip some news that wasn't supposed to be out there for at least another month. According to AICN, via someone who attended said Enchanted screening, Cook announced during the Q&A that Disney is prepping a stop-motion feature to be directed by "the creative mastermind behind the majority of stop-motion pictures in the last decade." It shouldn't take a genius to figure out the person he's talking about: Tim Burton. So once this news was out there, folks immediately began speculating as to which film Burton would be directing for Disney. That's when another person emailed AICN with the following: "It's a feature length remake of his short "Frankenweenie." All stop motion. Leave me completely anonymous, please."
For those who do not know what a Frankenweenie is, it's one of Burton's earlier short films (from 1984), and originally Disney was going to release the short. However, some claim the content was a bit too "questionable" for children, and the release plan was subsequently shelved. Eventually, the short showed up as an extra feature on the Nightmare Before Christmas DVD. Did Disney ask Burton to re-tool the film so that it would be more family-friendly, and give him the go-ahead to start planning a feature? It certainly seems logical, but do keep in mind these are all rumors as of now (and Disney seems to be going out of their way not to comment). Based on Mary Shelley's classic, Frankenstein, Frankenweenie follows a boy whose dog is hit and killed by a car. C'mon, you should be able to figure out the rest -- he brings dog back to life, people freak out, blah blah. Has anyone watched the original short? Would you be interested in seeing Burton bring it to the big screen in feature form? Chime in below ...










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-01-2007 @ 3:05PM
totencough said...
Frankenweenie is awesome, but I don't see much reason to stretch the story any longer than what we've already seen.
Not to mention the absence of Barret Oliver would be a pretty big let down. I'm sure Shelley Duvall would be back, and that would be a very good thing.
Reply
10-01-2007 @ 4:18PM
mish said...
Frankenweenie was the the reason I bought the Nightmare Before Christmas DVD. Great stuff. Vincent was pretty good too.
Reply
10-01-2007 @ 4:51PM
Gina said...
Saw some of it; didn't care for it. But I've never been a Burton fan (I know, sacrilege! Blasphemy!), so you can't go by me.
Reply
10-01-2007 @ 6:16PM
tony said...
Tim Burton hasn't made anything interesting since Pee Wee's Big Adventure. He's a one-trick-pony whose essentially been making the same film over and over again for the last fifteen years. Aren't people sick of Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter yet? Henry Selick is the real creative mastermind.
Reply
10-01-2007 @ 8:54PM
Jacob said...
I absolutely loved Frankenweenie as a short piece but I have some reservations when it comes to expanding the story into a feature. It was short and most definitely sweet. I think that's how it should stay.
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 9:15AM
Flit said...
Tim Burton's brain has been shut off since Nightmare. All he's done since is remakes and retooling's of his previous stories and other people's movies. The first FW was only about a half hour, and that felt long and tedious. Isn't a full length frankenweenie "edward scissorhands, BUT WITH A DOG!"
Tim burton fails.
Reply