'Halo' Movie is Officially Dead
Filed under: Action, Universal, Fandom, 20th Century Fox, DIY/Filmmaking, Newsstand, Peter Jackson, Games and Game Movies
So now that Halo 3 has officially hit stores (in a ginormous way), folks are probably wondering whether Halo: The Movie would start picking up some pre-strike steam. I swear, it's the oddest project I've ever come across. The friggin' video game is a monster -- I mean a real whale here -- and yet Hollywood is avoiding the movie as if it were the plague. I shouldn't really blame all of Hollywood; primarily we're talking Universal and Fox, both of whom originally attempted to team up on the project. But after months of arguing over who really took the cookie from the cookie jar, the project was put to rest. Now, Neill Blomkamp, the relative unknown who was originally tapped by Peter Jackson to direct the Halo film, speaks out about what happened, where the project is now and what his Halo movie would've looked like.
Blomkamp spoke to Creativity Online, and among other things in the interview, he says, "The film is entirely dead. Whatever happens with that movie, assuming that movie gets made, will be a totally different configuration. It's not so much me as the entire vessel sank. Basically, it was a combination of; there were two studios involved that weren't getting along in the process of making it, Universal and Fox. That kind of stuff happens, it's a fragile industry. So the film collapsed at the end of last year, and it's been dead, ever since then. I'll be curious to see what happens." Blomkamp also talks about the three promotional shorts he made for Halo 3, and how none of them had anything to do with a potential movie. Those were made specifically to promote Halo 3, although fans (like me) looked at them as more of a tease.
It really is a shame, and I hope people from Universal and Fox read this, because this dude Neill Blomkamp would've made an amazing Halo film, unlike any video game adaptation out there. Just check out some of the things he says about his vision: "I wanted it to feel like the most brutal, real version of science fiction in a war environment that you've seen in a while. And Universal was on board with that. I don't really remember what Fox thought about it, but Universal seemed down with it. It would have been cool, it would have been a unique take on things, science fiction in a dirty, organic way." So then what the hell happened? Why couldn't they get this done? Apparently there were budgetary concerns, but I would've taken the chance. Who knows what will happen from here, but rest assured Halo: The Movie directed by Neill Blomkamp will soon join the growing list of films that should've been made, but never were.
[Thanks to Shawn for the tip]










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-05-2007 @ 3:36PM
mish said...
Yeah that really is a shame - I'm a fan of the dude. His aesthetic is in some ways obvious but in others so unique in an approach to sci-fi. Here's hoping he's talking about a feature adaption of "Alive in Joberg."
Here.
Reply
10-05-2007 @ 3:37PM
mish said...
sorry...i forgot - no html:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9196191076240797302&hl=en
Reply
10-06-2007 @ 2:50AM
Dwayne Conyers said...
Considering that the Doom movie was an absolute waste of money and time... it is prolly good to not repeat that...
Reply
10-06-2007 @ 7:01PM
Tan The Man said...
Thank God.
Reply
10-07-2007 @ 11:28PM
Britboyj27 said...
I hereby pronounce the formation of "Microsoft Movie Studios."
Seriously, it's not like they can't afford it and the film would rake it in - Halo 3 topped the sales list in Japan, the land of the sinking Xbox FFS, why would someone not take this risk?
You have the guarantee of every male college student in the US going to see it, at the very least.
Reply
10-08-2007 @ 8:50AM
superpixel said...
don't be so hasty. you think hollywood is going to walk away from a multi-billion dollar game franchise? give it time.
Reply