'The Hobbit' Gets Healthier
Filed under: Deals, RumorMonger, Celebrities and Controversy, Box Office
Picking up a ring and frolicking with hobbits made Peter Jackson a mega-star director, and everyone wondered if he would go back to the days of the The Hobbit after finishing The Lord of the Rings. Not quite. As I'm sure you remember, he doesn't think he was paid all that he should, and he and New Line started warring. From there, things went all over the place and everyone weighed in. Here are some of the reports -- he was blacklisted, he responded, Bob Shaye calmed down a little, Hobbit plans went bye-bye, Saul Zaentz would have none of The Hobbit without Jackson, Greg Wright also spoke up for Jackson, as did James Cameron, but Sam Raimi was a possible alternate, then Jackson said the possibility of him working on The Hobbit was remote in May, but to make things interesting, New Line starts having problems and Shaye sings a different tune.What could there possibly be to say after all of that? According to EW, the war has come down to a simmer, and sources say that things are looking good for the Hobbit project -- of course this is second-hand, as the main players are now tight-lipped. There's nothing like appeal of money to calm tensions! But I imagine that if this goes through, Jackson will be a stickler about his contract, and there's going to be a lot of eyes watching New Line's accounting. God, can you imagine what they can rake in if they make films comparable to the Rings? Sweet, merciful crap!
Since this is all just gossip, which doesn't leave much to discuss, EW also dipped into the background behind the first films, and has a great primer about the quest to make the Rings, and what has transpired since then -- from Jackson trying to get three films made about the rings, rather than two (can you imagine how much they would've had to cut with less movies?!), to the money, the tensions, and the raving words. So the future might once again be bright. Will we see more hobbits on the screen? Do we care? And when will Jackson even have time? He's got The Lovely Bones and Tintin to worry about!
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-05-2007 @ 1:37PM
tikirob said...
I hate this kinda of crap...this movie will make insane amounts of money, they all know it. I feel Jackson needs to do it and he should be paid. New Line is shooting themselves in the foot...they want all the money...poor business. I think there are a few directors that could do OK but I think they would loose a little of the character and look that Jackson brought, but what do I know really, nothing. Just make the damn movie already!
Rob
http://www.movie-cat.com
Reply
10-05-2007 @ 2:39PM
Akbar Fazil said...
My main concern is I wouldn't want ANYONE at this point but the awesome Ian Holm to play Bilbo and he is getting pretty old.
Reply
10-06-2007 @ 2:03AM
Sara said...
I agree with tikirob- NewLine is shooting itself in the foot by dragging this on, because they stand to lose a lot more if they mess up with a new director. It would make the amount at stake now look like peanuts.
I personally would prefer to have Peter Jackson doing the Hobbit, and I bet there are many, many others who feel the same way. Lots of us will go to a Jackson-made "Hobbit" just because we like his track record with "Rings" (you could almost call it loyalty...). Any other director is a gamble, not least because people will be looking for some sort of continuity between "The Hobbit" and "Rings". I'd say it's NewLine's turn to ask themselves if the gamble is worth it.
Reply