Review: Saw IV
Filed under: Horror, Thrillers, New Releases, Mystery & Suspense, Lionsgate Films, Theatrical Reviews

Outside of the Baby Geniuses pictures, I can't think of a more joyless, humorless, lifeless movie series than the Saw films. I watched the previous three alone at home, and each just sucked the life right out of me. But since I'd be seeing Saw IV with an audience, I expected to finally understand why people love these grisly flicks so much. I thought I'd hear yelling, cheering, people shouting "Gross!". I thought it would be fun. But the crowd remained completely silent until the credits rolled. Then everyone quietly got up, quietly walked to the doors, and quietly headed for their cars. How has this become the most successful horror franchise of all time?
Jigsaw is dead, and the film opens with his naked corpse laid out on a slab. Yes folks, I don't know why this hasn't been mentioned more in the marketing, but you do get to see 65 year-old Tobin Bell's genitals. That oughta sell some more tickets! What follows is an autopsy scene so astonishingly graphic that I removed the organ donor sticker from my driver's license. Seriously, if you had trouble with the brain surgery sequence in Saw III, get to Saw IV 15 minutes late. A new cassette recording is found in Jigsaw's stomach, and the games begin all over again. Two FBI profilers (played by Scott Patterson and Athena Karkanis) join Detective Hoffman (Costas Mandylor) to put together the Jigsaw puzzle (nice little play on words there, if I don't say so myself). SWAT Commander Rigg (Lyriq Bent) is abducted and has 90 minutes to overcome the usual series of traps and save an ex-New Kid on the Block (Donnie Wahlberg). In other words, it's exactly like the other Saw flicks.
The Saw series does have one major strength in Bell, who is seen here (fully clothed) in flashback. No matter how ludicrous things get in the movies around him, Bell always commands your attention. In Saw IV, we learn a lot about his back story, and he makes those scenes a lot more interesting than they deserve to be. Aside from Bell, the makers of Saw always seem to conduct nationwide searches for the blandest actors imaginable. Saw IV is certainly no exception. It's a "who's who" of "who cares." Bent can barely muster the energy to say his lines audibly. Mandylor does a lot of grunting. Former scream queen Betsy Russell adds nothing in what should have been a revelatory role as Jigsaw's wife. Patterson (a long way from Gilmore Girls) fares a little better, at least he appears to know he's in a movie.
Darren Lynn Bousman directs, as he did the previous two entries. It is time for some new, ahem, blood. The guy shoots every single scene in the same dark, dank, murky style, and clearly doesn't have a way with actors. Though it's hard to blame actors when the screenplay is as utterly ridonkulous as Saw IV's. Written by Patrick Melton and Marcus Dunstan (Feast), it seems the script was made up on the spot. And considering a new Saw is rushed out once a year, it probably was. The events of this film overlap with the events of Saw III in ways that never really add up. We see characters from the previous film walking around in this one, characters from this film walking around in that one, and the story just keeps doubling back on itself until you half expect Marty McFly to come strolling into frame. The plot has more gaping holes than an orgy in a donut factory.
But you don't care about that, do you? You really want to know about the traps. I will say that nothing here made me gag like the pig scene in Saw III. That will be a comfort to some of you, and a disappointment to others. The opening trap sequence is genuinely exciting, creative, and refreshing. It's not someone sitting in a chair yelling, it's a full-on action sequence. Two men, one with his eyes sewn shut and the other with his mouth sewn shut, are chained to opposite sides of a device. The "eyes wide shut" gentleman has the key to their freedom attached to the back of his neck, but is unaware. They have weapons, and they fight to the finish. The sequence got me really charged up, but the feeling didn't last. Everything else trap-wise is more of the same, people sitting and screaming as they get scalped or stabbed or ripped apart. There is nothing as creative or disturbing here as in the previous films.
And I know you've heard that there's a mind-blowing twist to be had in Saw IV. Like Public Enemy said, "Don't believe the hype." The original had a really neat ending, I'll give you that. The twist in Saw IV is one of those utterly random "surprises" that is forced upon the film for no other reason than the desire to have a surprise. Like everything that came before it, the finale doesn't make a lot of sense.
What can I tell you? If you liked the other movies in the series, you'll probably like Saw IV. As for me, I wish I had Saw something else.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-26-2007 @ 10:41PM
Jeff said...
If y'all don't like a certain type of movie genre, why do you insist on reviewing them?
Reply
10-26-2007 @ 10:58PM
milleraly1113 said...
I won't spoil anything for anyone anticipating this chapter of the Saw series, but after spending ~$20 to see this I feel this needs to be said. If you're expecting the greatness of the previous Saws prepare to be disappointed. In a nutshell, the plot was fickle (expect a lot of random half-thrown together flashbacks, that leave you wondering wtf did that have to do with the other Saw movies), the "test" devices that gave the series its previous success greatly lacked its notorious creativity and effort and the ending (although the highlight of the whole thing) will leave you absolutely baffled and thumbing through your Saw DVDs trying to find what it is you think you missed to try and find some common thread so Saw 4 is relevant. I tried my best to enjoy this movie and find some good in it but I've never been one to ignore the obvious.... This was no Saw 1-3. The makers should enjoy cashing in on the high hopes of Saw fans and let the series end here. It's not a high note but no sense in letting one of the better horror flicks of the decade crash and burn. In closing, I'm aware this is just my opinion but unless you want to leave your local movie theater confused and a little PO'd, wait for the DVD release so you can rant and swear in the privacy of your own home.
Reply
10-26-2007 @ 11:09PM
Blair M said...
I gotta say Patrick, you've really created your own voice. The second I read the line "more gaping holes than an orgy in a donut factory" I scrolled right back up and saw your name. But I didn't need to check. I knew right away.
As for the Saw series, I really enjoyed the first one, but the first sequel was quite distasteful and I haven't watched anything Saw related since.
Reply
10-26-2007 @ 11:36PM
Corva said...
I just got back from seein this movie and i thought it was awesome. Way better then Saw3, for a sequal of something, i thought it was pretty sick
so def go check it out and don't believe all the bad reviews because they're being a bit too harsh
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 12:22AM
Troy said...
Just ran across the trailer for Saw IV here:
http://www.mymoviefriend.com
I keep saying I'm not going to see the next one but...I know I will anyway!
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 1:07AM
Mike said...
I saw Saw IV today. Have been a big fan of the series and own all the previous DVDs. I will note that as far as surprise endings, I think Saw hit their peak with the first movie. It was an amazing twist in my opinion. The twists in the following two were still surprising, but were a little easier to pick up on. Perhaps that's because we've come to expect the twist and I've found myself trying to figure it out before it happens. The twist in Saw III was much better than the second and I'm glad that Amanda died in that movie. She was awful. Saw IV I thought offered exactly what you want if you dig the gruesome scenes (like I do!). I will agree with the critic Patrick Walsh that you'll probably leave the theatre confused at the ending. I did. But when your main culprits are dead, where can it go from there? The only problem I had with the ending was that there was no closure that tied the "new Jigsaw" to the continuing story except for some random flashbacks of that person in the previous films. When Amanda turned out to be an accomplice at least it made sense and was explained. This one seemed a little far out.
So, if you're a fan of the series, you'll likely go see it. I did enjoy the movie with my one disappointment. I hope you enjoy it as well. They always leave the door open for another sequel and I'm sure it will continue.
By the way, to respond to Patrick walsh's criticism of the audience not gasping or squirming: it's common courtesy to be quiet during movies. The only sound I ever want to hear in a theatre is laughter during a comedy. Besides, most of the people that watch these movies enjoy the gross parts, so what should I be so surprised to see that could possibly make me gasp out loud in a theatre? It's not like we walked in expecting to see "Over The Hedge" and see a man's scalp removed.
And finally, don't ever listen to a critic's review of a movie in a genre that they don't seem to enjoy. Their opinions will always be biased by their own likes and dislikes. They're always calling for big changes when the writers know what works and what has been popular. That's why these guys get paid (I can't believe they get paid!) to watch a movie and write about it, while people with real skills get to write and direct movies.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 11:46AM
Shawn said...
The movies get gorrier and gorrier as they go on. I threw up watching this. : ) Other than that, it was f***ing awsome
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 12:16PM
bob said...
im a big fan of the whole saw series i seriously thought the movie was insane until the end me and my brother couldnt figure it out how is he having an ottopsy done to him then after that the detectives go and try to find Rigg and then he is back in the room that he died but this is all supposed to be after he had the ottopsy
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 1:30PM
Bob said...
One of the best and this definitely sets the stage for the future movies. I think this was more of a transition movie and alluding to the fact that someone else is continuing Jigsaw's work. The fact that its a cop makes future plot lines very interesting. It closed loose ends in previous movies and started on new ones...I loved it
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 1:43PM
John said...
HELP ME! I need help explaining the ending of the movie to me. I'm really confused on how Jigsaws body is at the end??? in the beginning his body was split open but at the very end of the movie there is his body again in that room with the cop and he gets locked in there with it. Now how is that?? Please someone answer that for me..Thanks but overall good movie
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 9:47PM
OM said...
One must realize that this movie was just one gigantic flashback. The autopsy scene was in the present, and everything else (other than the flashbacks within a flashback) took place at the same time of Saw III.
Regardlessly, I'd like to answer one of your questions, Patrick. I watch these movies to analyze, and not to gross myself out, or to scream. One probably shouldn't watch this movie if they fail to think past what is presented in front of them.
Reply
10-28-2007 @ 12:40AM
Douglas Frinquelli said...
I just saw the film, and this is one of the most dissapointing sequels in awhile. I'm a huge horror fan. I loved the first three films. I was sooo looking forward to this and then got kicked in the ####. This is a bad movie. I don't know if this is it for the SAW franchise but, I'm not unhappy I bought the DVD trilogy. The most glaring mistake is that they killed Jigsaw in the 3rd film. That was really stupid! Regardless, they could've come up with some creative way to bring him back. If Spock, Jason and Michael Myers can come back he can come back! There have be much more ubsurd premises than this. First, there are really no lead actors. This is astounding. There is no "hero" figure that is in every one of these types of films. The last 15 minutes are interesting, but thats it. This is a disgrace and I'm not happy. After this catstrophe many horror buffs will turn to the third Hostel. What stinks is that the SAW premise could've gone on for so long. The Hostel premise is pretty limited.
Reply
10-28-2007 @ 6:03PM
jorge said...
the reviewer didn't see the first film because this film is different than the first, and therefore his statements are erroneous and stupid.
Reply
10-29-2007 @ 10:24AM
Laci said...
I'm so relieved to read that I wasn't the only one that felt this way. The only difference is that I AM a die-hard SAW fan. I always start getting excited about a month before this weekend every year, because I know another SAW is on the way. However, I was sorely disappointed by SAW IV. I was relieved that there was less gore than the last two, but at the same time, the whole movie didn't make sense. People died (like the great scene at the beginning with the 'eyes wide shut' guys) and it never explained what their part was, or what they did .. Like you said it was full of holes. And then when it wrapped back around to the end of SAW III, it left me wondering if I totally missed something. I was so confused when I left, I didn't even know what to say. They lost something after the first scene. If you're going for a random, "scary" movie .. you might like it.. but if you are a SAW fan, for the psychological part of the movie, this movie is nothing but disappointments-all around.
I just hope they step it up next year.
I did like the background it gave on jigsaw though. It's amazing to me that they can take a psycho like him and make you almost feel for him.. make you FEEL for what he does. That's insane.
Reply
10-29-2007 @ 1:01PM
warrior88 said...
Let me get this out in the open; I LOVE the films. Very original and mind-bending. However, I felt as though Saw IV went backwards in the sense that the ending didn't close any doors for me but open a house load more. I left the movie with more questions than answers. I have a ton of them and would like anyone to answer some or all of them for me. 1)Is Saw IV actually happening during III?
2) If NOT, then how did they get Jigsaw's body IF they didn't even know the address to Gideon (work shop building).
3) Why show the Glass box if b4 the movie was finalized they released a pic of that box with some guy already in it?
4) They found a bullet in Kerry? And if was from Rigg's gun? How? Why?
5) KEYS? Whats the point to Amanda's key she puts on her neck in III? Jill's key on her neck? The key given to the "bad cop" from the FBI guy?
6) Amanda's envelope? Was it a paternatiy test or something like that saying she lost Jig's baby as well?
7) How long then has the "bad cop" been helping Jig?
8) There is no back story to Skull sculping girl or any of the victims for that matter yet they are all "bad people"?
9) Why does the bad cop help? Whats his story? And why the scar on his chest?
10) What does the "bad cop" pick up in the classroom for Troy? Or has he always been stealing evidence to cover HIS tracks in the games?
Finally, 11) Why is this cop so mad when they call the games "un-winable" or find small flaws in them or even clam they are NOT made like Jigsaw would have done?
PLEASE HELP!!!
Reply
10-29-2007 @ 6:41PM
Ed said...
I've seen Saw and Saw II missed Saw III but decided to go and see Saw IV regardless. Storywise this is a very clever idea, as we find out Why Jigsaw is the way he is and this when viewed makes perfect Sense. The twist at the end we've all become accustomed two espically If "Bruce Willis" is envolved, its the current movie flavor of the month and in this one serves its purpose to drive the Franchise on.
After Leaving the Cinema I did have to think hard about the ending as you really need to see Saw III but 2 days later it all makes sense. As for Plot holes, well these can be plugged in the remaining two films, as I get the feeling we have maybe two Trilogys here as in the Star Wars Movies.
Saw IV is for it's genre a decent movie and worth a look.
Reply
11-06-2007 @ 8:27AM
warrior88 said...
I almost forgot; one more question. IF SawIV (besides the first 15 mins) Is happening during Saw III, then who knows of Jeff's lil girl's whereabouts? Is that why the "bad cop" has the teddy bear and says "I'm not married, but have a lil girl from a short story believe me"? He has adopted the lil girl since Jeff and his wife have already been killed?
Reply