When Filming Locations Confuse
Filed under: New Releases, Universal
Last week I went to see American Gangster and had a terrible problem figuring out where certain scenes were supposed to be taking place. Basically, I kept seeing familiar Brooklyn locations and assuming the scenes took place in Brooklyn. But in reality these scenes were supposed to be accepted as being in New Jersey. So, throughout the first half of the movie, I didn't get that Richie Roberts (Russell Crowe) lived and worked in the Garden State. Instead, I kept associating him with McCarren Park and other Williamsburg locales. The main confusion, though, stemmed from one early scene in particular, which features the Williamsburg Bridge prominently in the background. Where in New Jersey could this be intended to be? Sure, I can understand filming in Brooklyn and pretending it's elsewhere, but to use such a glaring landmark seems strange. Had the scene been shot from the opposite direction, the bridge wouldn't have been there. And this is a film that apparently used a computer to digitally add in the World Trade Center. So, there had to be some seriousness when it came to the film's locations.Many of us have watched movies where we know the exact filming location of a particular scene. Often, we notice the movie has taken liberties with the location, such as when a character leaves a familiar building and then appears to walk across the street, yet the other side of the street is (known to us to be) actually somewhere across town. Whatever, that's the magic of the movies. But it's different when the movie is substituting one location for another yet includes a well-known structure such as a bridge. On an elevated level, it'd be like filming in San Franciso and calling it Seattle, yet clearly featuring the Golden Gate Bridge in a number of shots. Okay, that is obviously a too extreme case, as everyone recognizes the Golden Gate and maybe only us New Yorkers recognize the Williamsburg. In any event, I ask you: when have a movie's filming locations been so off that they disrupted your whole sense of setting?










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-13-2007 @ 10:25AM
Ronan said...
Living in France, pretty much every foreign movie where the action is supposed to take place in Paris, just because every room of every building seems to have a window with view on the Eiffel Tower.
Reply
11-13-2007 @ 11:02AM
Cincinnati Mike said...
Two films come to mind:
Eyes Wide Shut...London subbing for NYC
The Machinist...the insomnia film that takes place in a nameless but obviously American city, but which was filmed in Spain (I think.) But...since both films were deeply weird, and had disorientation as part of their themes, I think the distraction actually worked.
Reply
11-13-2007 @ 11:24AM
Jette said...
I was confused during the second half of "Death Proof" -- the first half is obviously set in Austin, but the second half is supposed to be set elsewhere, even though many of those scenes were obviously shot in Austin. In fact, I think the drive from the airport was partially along the road where I commuted to/from my last day job. Weird and a little distracting.
Reply
11-13-2007 @ 11:58AM
Wayne said...
On the other side of the coin, Ben Affleck did a superb job using authentic locations for "Gone, Baby, Gone".
Reply
11-13-2007 @ 12:11PM
Misty said...
The Big Chill. At the beginning, when they are driving to the funeral, they drove out on the island, then back onto the mainland, and back onto the island again. It was as if they were lost, and retracing their steps over and over. Very pretty scenery but entirely silly.
I should have stopped watching right there, because I hated the rest of the movie, too.
Reply
11-13-2007 @ 12:46PM
George Simian said...
I thought that was the GW bridge in the background in that scene, and others, so I thought it must have been Washington Heights. I didn't get that is was supposed to be NJ until later. I guess it could have been Englewood, which I think is right on the other side of the GW bridge.
Reply
11-13-2007 @ 1:09PM
badMike said...
I used to live near McCarren Park, so I was confused by American Gangster, too. I didn't understand Crowe was a NJ cop until he was confronted by Josh Brolin.
I live in L.A. now and I love watching Swingers when they all drive from the party in the Hollywood Hills to the Dresden on Vermont Ave. But to get there, the boys drive all the way down Fairfax by Canters, then go down Santa Monica Blvd. by the (now demolished) Hollywood Bowl bowling alley. It's a weird roundabout journey. Also, the gun scene behind the Dresden is obviously actually filmed in the lot behind Musso & Frank's restaurant on Hollywood Blvd.
Reply
11-13-2007 @ 1:16PM
John said...
It happens to me all the time when the setting is supposed to be New York. The obvious winner is Jackie Chan's 'Rumble in the Bronx". Set in that borough but you could see snow capped mountains in the distance (Vancouver).
Reply
11-13-2007 @ 1:34PM
Derek said...
The headquarters of the Umbrella Corporation in Resident Evil Two was actually Toronto City Hall. The fact that they used one of the most famous buildings in the city, and then blew it up (with digital effects), was hilarious.
Maybe they were making some kind of political statement...
Reply
11-13-2007 @ 2:17PM
Liz Newcomb said...
John, you beat me to it but I was going to mention "Rumble in the Bronx" as well...and I didn't even live in NYC when it came out! It was so obviously fake.
Reply
11-13-2007 @ 3:42PM
Kevin Archibald said...
Who knew that half of US activities occurred in....Canada??
Reply
11-13-2007 @ 4:05PM
Steven Santos said...
The ending of War of the Worlds was supposed to be Boston, but it was clearly Park Slope in Brooklyn, which makes the journey from New Jersey a little less dramatic. It was like Spielberg got a two for one deal that year because Munich ended in Brooklyn as well, although it was supposed to be Brooklyn.
Reply
11-13-2007 @ 6:50PM
Ryan Beesley said...
As a former Las Vegas resident, I get that every time I see a movie or show based there. How many times have we seen someone stumble out of a casino along the strip only to wind up in the middle of the Fremont Street Experience? You get the same thing when they drive up and down the strip driving away from casinos they claim to be driving towards or even switching between north and south-bound in the same shot.
I've only been to New York once since I've been old enough to remember. I was born in New Jersey, but I wouldn't be able to recognize one place form another. I haven't seen American Gangster yet, but I can be fairly certain that I'm not going to spend 3 seconds questioning the filming locations.
Reply
11-14-2007 @ 12:02AM
Lola said...
Just imagine if this film were made in Canada.
For once a film is made on location and now people complain that all the landmarks don't match up.
There is just no pleasing some people. But at least all the "runaway production" crybabies can't pin one one this film. Now it's just down to they didn't film at the exact intersection with the correct bridge or building in the background.
Reply
11-14-2007 @ 11:53AM
shannon said...
Also from Nevada, but Reno. Anytime any film shows "Nevada" and has trees and lawns and lushness, it just seems wrong. Sure, we may have pockets of that, but in the background, there are always those high desert mountains. Best use of location for a Nevada film: The Cooler. Shot in Reno, supposed to be Vegas, but it captures the heartbreaking beauty of my hometown like no other movie I've seen.
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 8:23AM
Darren said...
A recent example that bugged me a lot more than it should have was the car chase in SHOOTER. The car chase is supposed to be through downtown Philadelphia, and the beginning and end locations seemed like they were actually in Philadelphia, but part way through they go down a very steep hill next to the river and there is no such hill in the Philly area...
Reply
11-16-2007 @ 1:05AM
Mom said...
This is more a "mistake" than a wrong location, but...
I was living in San Francisco when The Graduate came out in movie theaters.
There is a scene in which Dustin Hoffman is going to Berkeley and he's driving on the upper deck of the Bay Bridge, which only goes in the direction towards San Francisco. I remember right then, everyone in the theater began laughing and making comments about it.
And at the fact that he's driving from Los Angeles to Berkeley in a huge hurry and crosses the bridge again (in the wrong direction).
The most direct and fastest route from L.A. to Berkeley doesn't require you to cross the Bay Bridge in EITHER direction.
Mom
Reply