First Bad Decision of 2008: Maxim Names Sarah Michelle Gellar Woman of the Year
Filed under: Fandom, Newsstand, Images
.jpg)
Quick, tell me what's wrong with this image? I haven't read Maxim in awhile; usually I'll pick up a copy before traveling as it's something easy to read on the plane, but I haven't gone anywhere in a few months and, thus, haven't read any Maxim. I'm not sure if they've always picked their Woman of the Year wayyy ahead of time (like, in the wrong year), but that's neither here nor there. What's baffling to me is why on earth they would choose Sarah Michelle Gellar to represent woman in 2008. For what, exactly? And don't tell me it's because of that image -- heck, you can airbrush me for a few hours and turn out something that makes me look like Brad Pitt. Seriously though ... why her? Of all people, why Sarah Michelle Gellar? And I wonder if she only agreed to pose for sexy pics under the condition they'd give her some bogus prize like 2008 Woman of the Year.
When asked why she decided to grace the cover now, she replied: "I'm 30, and I'm promoting a bunch of different kinds of movies. I like to shake things up every once in a while. It's good to leave people wanting more, but I don't want to leave them waiting too long or they'll lose interest. Besides, how could I not do a Maxim shoot when I have a movie coming out in which I play a porn star?" That movie is Southland Tales, and as of now Gellar has only three roles lined up for 2008 -- two Korean horror remakes (ugh) and Alice. And she claims to be promoting a bunch of different movies? Like .... Southland Tales? Because that's the only movie you're in. (Oh wait, she's also in Suburban Girl, but that doesn't go straight to DVD until January.) Buffy is Back! Actually, technically, she's not back -- Gellar does not have plans to reprise the Buffy character in the near future. So that's a lie. Surely, if it's hotness you're going after, then Maxim could've easily found a better gal to call their 2008 Woman of the Year? I'm a little disappointed. You?
[via Daily Stab]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
11-14-2007 @ 5:00PM
luke said...
agreed 100%. It's just proof that these things are retarded and mean nothing. Personally, I think it's Maxim thinking they have some sort of clout as to how popular someone is and they think putting SMG on the cover is going to inflate her popularity. WRONG!!! Sarah Michelle Gellar is pretty much yesterday's news. The last of a breed of late 90's teen mega-stars that have all either failed consistently or married Tom Cruise.
Reply
11-14-2007 @ 5:00PM
Kaer said...
Am I disappointed? No.
Reason? See pictures.
Reply
11-14-2007 @ 5:08PM
Eddie said...
Dear Cinematical,
As far as we're concerned, SMG could be woman of the year every year. Expect us to break the "most downloaded picture" record yet again.
Signed,
Nerds living in mom's basements everywhere
Reply
11-14-2007 @ 5:10PM
Eddie said...
Seriously though, Maxim is classing it up a little for this one. I can dig it, SMG brings a certain sexy that few women can. I don't think anyone's ever accused her of being sleazy or cheap, but she brings the heat everytime she's on screen.
Kudos for a woman of the year that's...
A) Over 17 1/2 years old and
B) Classy
That's saying ALOT for Maxim. (Until you flip past the cover and see the exact opposite of A and B)
Reply
11-14-2007 @ 5:40PM
Midnight13 said...
These FHM, Maxim WOTY lists have less to do with physical sex appeal (although, they could do a lot worse then SMG), and more to do with how high profile their carrers currently are. Believe me, if Paris Hilton had a new series, and 2-3 movies coming out in the next year, she'd be woman of the year. Its more because SMG will have a number of new projects coming out, not because she's the hottest woman on earth.
Reply
11-14-2007 @ 6:24PM
Ohscrew said...
Check your facts, she doesn't have two Korean horror film remakes coming out. The film that has been remade isn't horror and there aren't two listed on her imdb. As far as I can tell, the films Maxim were referring to were Southland Tales, The Air I Breathe and Possession (the remake).
Maxim's been trying to get her on their cover for about ten years now and now they've got her so of course they're going to give her a title. She represents a certain class of woman and that's what Maxim's trying to achieve with their new direction...a less sleezy magazine. THAT is why they've chosen her for woman of 2008. Though she may not make it in the rags, flash her cooch or survive on a diet of drugs and booze, she's still got projects in the works (including charity stuff on the side) and is still attractive and relevant.
We can agree to disagree on this one.
Reply
11-14-2007 @ 6:36PM
Evan said...
Who's Sarah Michelle Gellar?
Reply
11-14-2007 @ 11:14PM
gio said...
Sarah Michelle Gellar is a very intelligent, well rounded, very caring and charitable person. She has peformed many charitable work left unnoticed. As an actress, she has exemplified utmost professionalism per all the directors and producers she has worked with and she is very talented. Furthermore, she has managed to avoid all the pitfalls of so many young stars of today. Maybe MAXIM realizes that and so what is wrong with promoting a quality actress like SMG instead of the overexposed ones already? Also, to correct your rushed editorial piece, her three projects are Southland Tales, The Air I Breathe, and Possession. Yes, her Suburban Girl is going straight to DVD but that has gained wide attention at the recent Tribeca Film Festival. At least she's been busy working.
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 2:50AM
David said...
Affense INtended Erik Davis,
you are a FUCKIN DICKHEAD Sarah Michelle Gellar is awesome and you are just a fugly retard who is bitter because your such a fucken looser!Sarah Michelle ROCKS and is an awesome oscar worthly actress and by the by she is promoting more then one movie right now (Southland Tales, The Air I Breathe, Possession)!!!!!!!!!!! Also you mother fuckin retard Sarah Michelle Gellar is not making 2 korean horror remakes she is making ONE korean thriller. FUCK YOU ERIK YOU PIECE OF SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 4:53AM
Stephen Pearce said...
I think Maxim is 100% right for presenting Sarah Michelle Gellar with the woman of the year 2008 award...besides it is up to them..and not stupid tossers like Luke who wish she wasn`t around anymore...grow up Luke!!! and as for cinematical..learn to live with it.
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 8:06AM
Evan said...
What's with all the SMG fanatics? Come on, it is wierd for her to be named woman of the year when she has done anything high profile lately... oh, but it's for 2008... which in itself is wierd, because it's not even 2008 yet. Settle down kids.
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 9:55AM
Richard von Busack said...
Buffy saved the world a lot, but in this case it's nice to see the editors of Maxim caught with their pants down instead of their cover models. Some publicist told them "Southland Tales is going to be red hot!" five months ago, and they swallowed the bait...
She looks better in the photo than she does in that badly digitally resurfaced movie, anyhow--
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 9:57AM
kevjohn said...
Maybe she has another Scooby Doo movie coming out next year?
SMG = the epitome of an "Average Chick". I passed 20 better-looking, not to mention more interesting, women walking around my local college campus.
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 7:15PM
Brodie said...
I think we SHOULD keeep talking trash about this woman who pretty much, NONE of us have met. Let's just judge away. No career, Has been, Bad Role Model, ... Oh wait. I'm sorry, I thought this was a Lyndsay Lohan chatroom! Haha. MY BAD! WRONG. No. Sarah has 5 new movies to come out in. And I'm fairly certain, that she is going to get HUGE publicity for her work with Andy Garcia and Kevin Bacon in TAIB. But I guess we'll have to wait.
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 11:24AM
LRS62 said...
Hey, kevjohn.
If that's true, what local college are you speaking about?
;)
I have met her several times and she's a total sweetie.
But even in my my most fanboy-ish dreams I wouldn't name her woman of the year.
Woman of my fantasies, sure.
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 12:12PM
Robert said...
I would. :)
myspace.com/anotherblackseason
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 12:19PM
Glenn Blackwell said...
Most times Maxim will miss the mark. Trying to pick the impact woman for the next year. This time they got it right. Instead of selling cover with the latest air-head pseudo celebrity, they went for quality and a below the radar pick. Southland Tales, Sububan Girl, and korean horror movies, that's diverse. Should she bring "Buffy" back? Only to the big screen.
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 12:35PM
Momto4 said...
I think that SMG is a good choice. She is at least sane, beautiful and true to herself and her marriage. She may not be who you want to see but that is what's great about this. Maxim choose who they thought should be woman of the year. I only wish that I looked half as good as she does. I think someone needs to put you in your place, and you are???? My point exactly.
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 12:37PM
E raymond said...
What's the mattr Erik - her breasts aren't big enough for you???
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 12:41PM
ninky said...
let me guess who you guys want. angelina jolie, right. she sucks!! at least sarah michelle gellar
isn't always trying to get her face in the news like a big fat show off.
Reply