Note to 'Poughkeepsie' Director: Get a New Marketing Team, Immediately
Filed under: Documentary, Horror, Tribeca
The big talk of the past couple days is the overtly hostile audience reaction that greeted The Poughkeepsie Tapes at Harry Knowles' Butt-Numb-A-Thon this past weekend. For those who haven't seen it, Poughkeepsie is a horror-mockumentary, a "found footage" movie like The Blair Witch Project, in which we're told about and shown clips from the 'found' video library of a prolific serial killer who terrorized Poughkeepsie, NY for years. At BNAT, the audience greeted the film with boos and hisses and the mood was so hostile that a planned Q&A with the filmmakers was cancelled on the spot. Today, AICN and other sites are running advance reviews that spoil the movie's secrets and trash it as a completely failed project.
Here's where I come into this -- I saw The Poughkeepsie Tapes at Tribeca and I enjoyed it, but only because I was seeing it on a completely different wavelength than the filmmaker. You see, the director actually thinks his movie works as a faux-documentary. He thinks the audience is fooled. Not only is it not fooled, but when watching the film at Tribeca I never even imagined a serious attempt was being made to trick me into thinking this was real. It was only later, when I conducted an exclusive interview with John Dowdle, that this came to light. See, I thought it would be perfectly okay to talk about the film not being real during the interview, and I happily pointed out all the 'cues' that clued me to the fact that it was phoney. This caused John great agita and weeks after the interview was published, I started getting frantic, panicked emails from the film's publicity people asking me to cut out the passages where I talked frankly about the film being fictional.
John, get a new marketing team. No human being with a third-grade education or higher is fooled into thinking your movie is a legit documentary. Again, I didn't even know I was supposed to think that. But the point is that I didn't care -- I thought the movie actually worked as a horror-comedy and I gave it a positive review, and I certainly wasn't the only one. That's the direction to spin this thing. Otherwise, you're just pissing people off by insulting their intelligence.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-12-2007 @ 1:17PM
thejamminjabber said...
I also saw this at Tribeca and really liked it. I was never under the impression it was actually supposed to be a documentary and the director's went as far as to say so in the Q&A that followed. They said they thought about it and decided against it. It was obviously the studio's idea. This is a good movie. The studio is fucking things up.
Reply
12-12-2007 @ 3:08PM
smallerdemon said...
"he audience greeted the film with boos and hisses"
Actually, it was greeted with dead silence at the end when the credits rolled. I don't recall booing or hissing. The BNAT audience is definitely unrepentant in its movie geekiness, but we are rarely rude. :)
I could only stomach about 20 minutes of Poughkeepsie Tapes. The most common complaint that I heard wasn't that it was violent or voyeuristic, but that it was boring. That nothing happened. Just long talking scenes with the "experts" that only approached humor (rewrites were in order) interspersed with these bizarre torture scenes. The other complaint I heard was about how awful the acting was. Basically, this tries to be a torture porn movie made by members of The State and trying to play for laughs and there were no laughs coming up at all. I peeked in and out every 15 or 20 minutes, and nothing changed. Still violent and bizarre (this being said from a guy who owns three different versions of Haute Tension) and still really, really boring.
Reply
12-17-2007 @ 2:30AM
Bloody Mary said...
It looks like they even mocked-up this website to play it off as factual: http://www.documentaryfilmpartners.com/ Not a very convincing job. You get redirected there when you go to poughkeepsietapes.com.
I think as soon as anyone heard "found tapes" they thought of Blair Witch and knew it was fictional.
Reply
12-18-2007 @ 11:10PM
dewf said...
if you go to the films website and hover over the learn more about the movie link, it directs immediately to the /busy.html page... where it is explained that "SERVER BUSY DUE TO NETWORK CONGESTION, PLEASE TRY BACK LATER." good marketing i suppose... i believed it for a few minutes and clicked it a few times thinking... maybe... just maybe... film page getting alot of attention... NOT! (that's right... Borat reference)
Reply