Review: Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, New Releases, Theatrical Reviews, New in Theaters, 20th Century Fox, Remakes and Sequels
.jpg)
The Strause Brothers -- or Brothers Strause, as the directing duo insists on being called -- have created a weirdly meta film in Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem. I can't recommend it as a good movie on its own merits, stocked as it is with cardboard cutout characters and a barely coherent plot, but it's miles more interesting than the last Alien vs. Predator film and fans of the Alien and Predator film series may find it so strangely reference-heavy as to be entertaining on at least one level. This is a movie that starts out with the premise of 'Several Aliens and a Predator invade a small town' but ends up as a partial rehash of Aliens, complete with undisguised Ripley and Newt clones trying to escape an impending nuclear explosion via air transport and military guys getting picked off one at a time. It references entire shot sequences from Predator and a major plot device of Predator 2. It even references Yutani (!) in such a way that if you don't know what that is, you won't have a clue what's happening in the scene.
The first five minutes of the film that were released online before opening weekend turn out to be a poorly edited version of the film's first ten minutes -- that 'plot stuff' is trimmed down considerably -- and we get to see an Alien-infested Predator ship crash into the woodsy hills of Colorado while a father and son on a hunting trip look on in wonder (wouldn't you?) Pretty soon Dad's arm is being melted off by Alien acid blood and Junior has a face-hugger attached to his face, in a nice bit of non-family friendly killing. The main idea of the film will be to have one Predator arrive in Colorado to face off against several Aliens. It's a good choice, since the Predator is easily humanized, but once that decision has been made, why do the Strauses devote so much of the film to setting up bland human interactions? The title isn't Aliens vs. Predator vs. Humans, after all. If the film was truly brave, it would eschew a human perspective all-together, and simply deliver what the title promises.
The Strauses come from a special effects background, having supervised effects on such blockbusters as Terminator 3, 300 and Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, and the effects in this film are above par, even though the action is shot too close and with too much lightning-quick editing. I'm not asking for some wrestling-match style establishing shots, but when you're filming in the dark to begin with it's already hard to tell who is slicing and dicing who, and the Michael Bay style cuts don't help me get a clear picture of who is winning an Alien vs. Predator battle. Also, the Predator's bag of tricks isn't much improved, as one might hope. The Alien pretty much is what it is -- if you're going to innovate, you need to do it with the Predator, giving him all new tools and new capabilities that we haven't seen before. There are a couple of things on that level, but mostly what you get in this film is the same Predator you've already seen in three movies prior.
Give the Strauses credit for throwing in an unexpected kill here and there -- one in particular involving a lead character that I really wish the red band trailer hadn't given away! -- but the R-rating isn't really taken for a test-drive nearly as much as it could have been. There's one scene in particular that screams out T&A but then inexplicably backs off just like a PG-13 film would -- was there some tussling over exactly what the rating would be that far into production? Apparently so. Also, the Alien is starting to get a little boring in general, and this film does nothing to halt that decline. It hisses, it hops around, it squawks and snaps its wet jaws -- okay, I think we got the idea by Alien 3, didn't we? As I said before, I realize that this character can only suffer a little bit of development, but as an audience member I'm perfectly within my rights to ask: why should I continue to care. If the Aliens ever return, I want to see them domesticated or something else outrageous.
Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem -- what a lumbering title -- falls squarely into the category of 'could have been a lot worse and I liked the part where X, Y, Z.' There are enough good moments sprinkled throughout to keep you from feeling like you've been ripped off and the mega-serving of references -- I kept waiting for Bill Paxton to lean into the screen during the end credits and say "Movie over, man. Movie over!" -- to keep franchise fans moderately entertained. That said, I'm ready to call time on this whole series. There aren't going to be any more stand-alone Predator movies and the Alien doesn't deserve any more stand-alone movies, and the monster battle idea has now been played for all its worth. It's time to put these two franchises to bed for at least the next twenty years, unless someone can somehow get Sigourney Weaver and Arnold Schwarzenegger to agree to co-star in the next installment. If someone can swing that, I might be willing to invest another ten bucks.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-28-2007 @ 10:08AM
Luke G. said...
What's Yutani? My quick imdb check turns up nothing.
Reply
12-28-2007 @ 10:56AM
brian said...
yes! alien vs predator vs terminator vs robocop vs ash!
Reply
12-28-2007 @ 10:33AM
Douglin said...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weyland-Yutani
Reply
12-28-2007 @ 10:50AM
Kelly said...
Sadly, I agree almost 100% with what this guy is saying. I saw the movie in theaters the other night and thought is going to be a very appealing, better-than-the last-movie kind of thing. But consequently, it didn't seem to blow me out of the water. I agree with what was said about the editing and special effects and the 'lightning-quick' cut-to shots of each villian. The individual story of each human character was totally bland and pointless almost to the fact I could care less which or when the characters were killed.
Before jumping into conclusions about my own personal review, I am indeed a fan of the 'Predator' and 'Aliens' classics. I am more than proud to have such talented directors and storywriters revise these timeless monsters after almost a decade since the last ones was made. I only hope the magic and characteristics of these Sci-fi characters doesn't get demenished by horrible plots and bad editing in future references.
Reply
12-28-2007 @ 11:24AM
Brian Jacks said...
I don't understand why nobody can get the AVP concept right. I want to see "300" but with a crapload of Aliens and Predators, not one Predator who sporadically tussles with a few in the dark (seriously, why were the fight scenes so damn dark? We could barely see what was happening).
Agreed that all the human stuff was totally lame; Steven Pasquale told me it was going to be a "true-blue horror movie" but it was more like a SCI FI Channel original. Right from the beginning they should have made the decision for a hard R and planned for balls-out bloody scenes of mayhem and destruction and some totally gratuitous nudity.
Totally disappointed. I actually enjoyed the first one more. At least we had Lance.
Reply
12-28-2007 @ 1:04PM
heyes said...
this movie flat out sucked
Reply
12-28-2007 @ 1:51PM
Scott K said...
More interesting than the first AVP? Although the first AVP had some lame things and was watered down, AVPR was the worst movie I've seen in years. All of the Alien, Predator, Terminator and Robocop movies are far more watchable than this was. I honestly thought I had been sitting in the theater for over 2 hours and was shocked to learn afterward that it was under 1 1/2 hours. There is nothing remotely entertaining about this movie except some of the kills. Save yourself the money and watch the red band trailer, it has every part worth watching for free.
Reply
12-29-2007 @ 12:00PM
Derek said...
The setting and the characters were straight out of a bad 80s horror movie. There was no tension - only gruesome death scenes. And why did only one predator answer the distress call?
I never thought I would say this, but I liked the first AVP better.
Reply
1-03-2008 @ 5:30PM
kevjohn said...
I just saw this on New Year's Day. I did indeed think it that, although it wasn't a great movie, it was better than the last AVP by leaps and bounds. Yes it did do its best to copy "Aliens," but it could do a lot worse than to try and copy the best film from either franchise.
I was surprised, and thrilled, by the the deaths that took place in AVP:R. Typically a movie like this will shy away from killing innocents. I actually offered to bet my friend $20 that the little kid (from the beginning of the movie) would make it to the end alive. I'm glad he didn't take me up on it, because we were both shocked when the face-hugger got the kid. Yeah it did have those sewer-dwelling bums, and super-annoying school bully guys who were all clearly dead men walking, but other than that the rest of the characters weren't horrible or anything.
This movie doesn't come anywhere near any of the original films, but it was watchable and mostly entertaining. Of course, that little bit of T&A we were deprived of would have helped. heh
Reply
1-07-2008 @ 2:17PM
max said...
dude how could it have been better than the first movie? watch the 1st movie again. avpr looked cheap. it seems the constant darknes/gloomines and rain pouring down was there to aid the makers of the film in hiding detail. the first movie had long clear shots of the action. you could see exactly what was going on and there was at least one really good, creative fight! alien and pred were both dexterious and it was interesting to watch. not to mention that it looked MUCH more realistic. so much for the creators of Fant 4 and 300. it was plain cheesy. and cheap.
Reply
1-14-2008 @ 5:03PM
JASON said...
Yutani is 1/2 the name of "The Company" that ripley works for in the Alien movies. The other half being Wayland, the name of Lance Henrikson's character in the first AVP movie.
Reply