Netflix Wants to Take Over Your TV
Filed under: Tech Stuff, Home Entertainment
Downloading movies to watch on your personal computer has been a viable option for several years, but getting those downloaded flicks to play on your TV has been problematic. I thought Apple TV would provide an easy solution, but it's been described as one of the worst tech products of the year and even its defenders acknowledge that it's limited in its capabilities -- it's more for piping your own music, images and videos to play on your TV. That may change if Apple makes it possible to rent movies directly from the device, but the battle for control of your TV is just heating up.Online rental power Netflix has announced that they are working with LG Electronics to "develop a set-top box for consumers to stream movies and other programming from the Internet to HDTV's." Delivery is expected in the second half of 2008 with more details expected to be announced at the Consumer Electronics Show next week. The statement claims that more than 6,000 movies and TV episodes will be available to be "delivered instantly" over the Internet, but also indicates that high definition content is a future component of their plan. In reporting on the press release, the Associated Press notes that similar devices from Apple and Vudu run from $299-$399, but no prices have been announced for the Netflix/LG box.
To my mind, the competition for Apple TV and Netflix/LG is more with set top boxes from cable and satellite providers than with personal computers. Apple TV and Netflix/LG both require up-front payment for still another box in your living room, while cable and satellite providers do not. Netflix says subscribers will have a certain amount of access, depending on their subscriber plan, while everyone else appears to have a pay-per-view model. Potentially, though, Apple and Netflix could offer much greater choice of content. Still, no one's talking much about offering more high-def content this year. Will that wait until the great "analog to digital switch" next year for broadcasters and content providers?









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-04-2008 @ 12:30PM
DAVID F said...
I read about this earlier today. Is this just to placate to people's sheer laziness? Is it really that hard to receive a movie in the mail, open the mail and inser the disc into your player? Am I just too old school?
Reply
1-04-2008 @ 1:14PM
Eddie said...
"You gotta bring ass, to get ass".
VOD Downloads, and especially HD VOD, are currently the next big thing. Not big (or profitable, or functional) now, but they will be *allegedly*. If you want to be in the first (usually the most profitable) wave, you have to get in on the ground floor which is always painful and expensive and cumbersome. The risks are you drop out early and let your experience serve as a lesson for your competitors and successors, but the rewards could be striking gold and finding the model that works and let your competitors chase you until you get tired or they wear down enough of your market share that you cash out and move on to whatever the next big thing is with a nice lead.
But, you're probably right, everyone probably is just too lazy.
Reply
1-04-2008 @ 1:52PM
MCW said...
"I read about this earlier today. Is this just to placate to people's sheer laziness? Is it really that hard to receive a movie in the mail, open the mail and inser the disc into your player?"
The idea is, instead of waiting to receive your movie in the mail, you could instantly start watching the movie on your TV, and you'd save a slot in your rental queue that you otherwise would have used to rent the movie. Plus, you aren't paying extra to rent it on your TV, it is included in your Netflix subscription.
So, it is a very cool idea.
Reply
1-04-2008 @ 3:54PM
soundoftheground said...
isn't Reed Hastings already on record as saying that the netflix business model (renting physical media) will slowly decline in profitability over time? in order for this business to stay profitable it needs something else and it needs to do it before, not after the prevalence of physical media declines - this is the first step.
Reply