Review: Mad Money
Filed under: Comedy, New Releases, MGM, Theatrical Reviews, New in Theaters

I have this theory that on the set of 1991's Father of the Bride, Steve Martin and Diane Keaton turned to each other and said, "You know what? From here on out, let's just keep doing this. Let's just play cute, cuddly versions of our formerly edgy and interesting selves -- slightly goofy mothers and fathers, that kind of thing -- and watch the cash roll in!" Then they high-fived and fell into an awkward, melancholy silence.
Through one unchallenging project after another, Keaton has served up the same old eye rolls, squeals, and stutters until you can't really tell one role from another. And what's really frustrating about watching her squander her talents is that -- as with Martin -- no matter how embarrassing the performance, you can't help but love her anyway. She's at her most unhinged in Mad Money, and painful as it is to watch at times, she does -- just barely -- manage to keep the film afloat.
Keaton plays a wealthy wife whose husband (a typically strong Ted Danson) loses his job, sending the couple into a spiral of debt and repossession. So Keaton takes work as a janitor at the Federal Reserve Bank in Kansas City. (This is a highly unbelievable development, and if you hope to get any enjoyment out of Mad Money, you'd better just accept it, along with all of the other highly unbelievable developments to come.) When money at the bank gets too old and worn out, it gets shredded. Keaton concocts a plan to intercept that money before it gets cut up. It's a difficult to trace and pretty much victimless crime (unless you count damaging the U.S. economy, but it's pretty much screwed already, no?).
To help in her caper, Keaton recruits Queen Latifah, as a Sassy Single Mother™, and Katie Holmes, as a Zany Free Spirit™. I realize I'm not telling you much about the characters, but that's as much thought as the screenwriter -- Glenn Gers -- put into them. Oh, and they're given one additional trait apiece -- Latifah hasn't had sex in seven years, and Holmes can't believe Latifah hasn't had sex in seven years. The actresses do what they can with extremely underwritten roles. Latifah grounds the film by playing it straight and being -- as in every movie she's made -- tough n' sassy. Holmes' personal life has taken the focus off of her acting, but I've always found her to be a highly charming screen presence. She goes quite a bit broader here than normal, relying heavily on those big eyes, and the performance works. If her choice of spouse doesn't wind up getting her whisked away to an alien galaxy, she might have a future as a comedienne.
The film's premise is a solid one, and the old "good people are capable of terrible things" plot has served great dramas for decades. But instead of playing as A Simple Plan or Before the Devil Knows You're Dead with jokes, Mad Money plays more like a less funny version of the Jim Carrey Fun with Dick and Jane (a movie that wasn't exactly uproarious to begin with). A huge portion of Americans (myself included!) are desperate for money, and eager to relate to and laugh with characters in similar situations. But, as in Dick and Jane, the really interesting stuff a movie like this lends itself to beautifully -- moral questions, explorations of poverty, the economy, corporate criminals, etc -- are all barely touched upon or brushed aside in favor of formulaic punchlines and tired slapstick.
A lot of the blame here must go to Gers, who wrote last year's entertaining legal potboiler, Fracture. Maybe he should stick to the thrillers -- the low-key heist set-up of Mad Money really does feel fresh. But everything else in the script -- particularly the laugh count, which by my calculations totaled zero -- comes up mighty short. Don't get me started on the wildly overdone device of having the film start with the criminals already captured, the characters narrating from the interrogation room. Good call -- take a movie with no suspense and make it even less exciting by telling us the ending right up front!
Calle Khouri (Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood) directs, with very little spice. It's a lot of point and shoot, and the film looks about as bland as a mayonnaise sandwich on a paper plate. Khouri won the Academy Award for her Thelma and Louise screenplay, it's a shame she couldn't get some of that film's wonderful female characterization up on the screen here. Keaton deserves better than having to run around twitching and spazzing for laughs. If only she hadn't had that imaginary conversation with Steve Martin...
Let me put it to you like this, if you pay to see Mad Money, you'll be mad you spent the money.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-19-2008 @ 1:01PM
Cincinnati Mike said...
Question...Isn't this basically--or precisely--the same premise as "Who's Minding the Mint?" with Jim Hutton, circa 1970? Is this a remake?
Reply
1-19-2008 @ 1:06PM
Patrick Walsh said...
I've never seen "Mint," but they do sound very similar. "Mad Money" is actually listed as a remake of a 2001 British TV movie called "Hot Money" -- http://imdb.com/title/tt0305648/.
Reply
1-19-2008 @ 1:54PM
Cincinnati Mike said...
thanks for the research...it's been bugging me (don't know why!)
Reply
1-19-2008 @ 6:32PM
YouFaceTheTick said...
Isn't this just a white woman version of Steve Martin/Queen No-Talent's awful Bringing Down the House?
Reply
1-19-2008 @ 6:33PM
Annabeth said...
Great review Patrick!
I enjoyed it more than 27 Dresses the male bashing movie and this was pure fun. I havent seen the original films nor I saw Thelma and Louise but this was entertaining. I think Keaton was better here than Because I said So. Thank you Patrick for your fairness and professionalism because some critics judge Katie's acting with her personal life which is nonsense and I dont think she did this movie to win the Oscars. I think the girl has comic chops and she should do more of it. I think she's perfect in Batman but on the other hand being Batman's girl next door or damsel in distress wont get her the Oscar nod either. It applies to all superhero girlfriends who are just relegated to scream,cry and like MJ who wore that tight wet shirt for Spidey. Even Superheroines projects from Catwoman,Aeon Flux,Tombraider,Elektra,Underworld,Ultraviolet are not paths for the Oscars. This was a crowded weekend from Juno,Mad Money,27 Dresses and the good movie Cloverfield but it made me queasy. JJ Abrams will conquer Hollywood.
Reply
1-20-2008 @ 4:28AM
Dana said...
It helps when you watch a film with no expectations because I came out with a smile.
Reply
1-21-2008 @ 2:59PM
Faye said...
Bucket Lists was really good but Mad Money was more delightful than 27 Dresses. Katie should have stayed on for the Dark Knight. Im depress about Gyllenhaal. She's an average actress, very ugly and her attitude stinks.
Provocateur lingerie dumped her only after one campaign because she is arrogant,insufferable with a bad attitude.
She claimed she did the lingerie ad as an art project.
::almost choked on my soda::
She insulted Katie Holmes acting in Batman so Im banking she will insult Katie more once the Batman premiere tour starts. Poor Batman losing his classy graceful leading lady.
Reply
1-23-2008 @ 12:06PM
Zephaba said...
I couldn't help laughing through the whole thing, I thought the movie was brilliant-and when I read the reviews for it to see what people thought, I was surprised at how many critical people are out there. The actresses were great, the reactions were realistic. (And why do people call movies (I noticed that with this one) with females as the main characters or close to it chick flicks? Is there a name for ones with males in it, like rooster flicks?). And the plot was realistic. I didn't expect much, and in the end it rocked. (And the whole white woman black woman thing that some people have going on with this film...really should get over labels. I don't think it was supposed to be a white version anything just a great film with great actresses to laugh at... )
Reply
3-08-2008 @ 2:08PM
BRENDA HAMILTON BIDDLE said...
I thought the movie was hilarious, and the ending was the surprised of a life time. I really liked it.
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 1:02AM
Kate said...
I liked Mad Money! I don't know why labels are attached to films with women lead characters... "chick flicks".... that label really irritates me. Katie Holms she did an excellent job in the movie. Her personal life married to Cruise overshadows anything (and will continue to do so) she does professionally. I have trouble feeling sympathy for her plight because she knew what she was doing by marrying Cruise. With the amount of money Cruise has, I doubt Katie's worried about putting bread on the table, so she's doing just fine (better then me). Diane did an excellent job and I really love watching this brilliant actress perform. Great movie. I'd highly recommend the film.
Reply