Mark Romanek Just Quit 'The Wolf Man'?
Filed under: Classics, Horror, RumorMonger, Remakes and Sequels
Hearing that Mark Romanek was going to direct a new stab at The Wolf Man a year ago, with Benicio Del Toro starring, was music to my fangirl ears. It was the sort of project that sliced through remake apprehension, and sounded like tasty, cinematic candy. Well, if Nikki Finke's sources are correct, we can forget that possibility. Over at Deadline Hollywood Daily, she has posted word from her sources, who say that Romanek has just quit the project. And Variety has followed up with confirmation of his departure. What?! Is he nuts!?The source says: "He just blew the opportunity of a lifetime, which is mind-boggling." Indeed! It seems that the $100 million budget wasn't enough for him: "He's a purist, an artiste, an exquisite craftsman, but he just had a budget schedule he couldn't accommodate." Okay... Sure, budgets can make for headaches, but lots of amazing films have been made with small budgets, and we're talking about Del flipping Toro as the Wolf Man, and Anthony Hopkins as Sir John. I might not sell my blood for it, Rodriguez-style, but I'd somehow make it work.
The studio thinks it will fill his shoes pronto, but there's no word about whether they'll stick to their February 18 start date. With Romanek out -- who could fill in his shoes and do the project justice?









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-29-2008 @ 7:32PM
Jenga said...
Chris Cunningham to replace!
Reply
1-30-2008 @ 5:49AM
Benjamin said...
Regarding who can fill; I don't think you can do that; not have prepped a movie yourself and then shoot it and expect it to be anything other than a hack job. No way would Cunningham or Glazer or anyone else the internet talkbacks are calling for do it because they would want to make their own prep decisions I'm sure; they didn't become highly distinctive film makers without doing that.
Romanek was the draw for me on this one. I probably won't see it now. Although I too am shocked that you can't make something for $100 mil these days; what on earth did he want to do with the film?
Reply