Review: Fool's Gold
Filed under: Action, Comedy, Romance, New Releases, Warner Brothers, Theatrical Reviews, Scripts

By the time this review is over, I will have spent more time thinking about Fool's Gold than the writers of its script. This...thing...is one of the sloppiest pictures released by a major studio in recent memory. What can you say about a "romance" with no romance, a "comedy" with no laughs, an "adventure" with no excitement? Though I certainly wasn't rubbing my hands together in anticipation walking in to the theater, I thought this would at least succeed at being an enjoyable time waster. "Attractive people wearing few clothes in exotic locales -- I can handle watching that for a few hours," I thought to myself. But I was wrong. So very wrong. The whole affair is about as compelling as a two-hour fart.
I don't ask a great deal from romantic comedies. I don't need every one to be Annie Hall or When Harry Met Sally or Love, Actually. I don't even need them to be particularly good -- I kinda enjoyed The Holiday, for God's sake! Give me a few laughs, appealing leads, a warm squishy feeling, and you've done your job. Plainly, the makers of Fool's Gold did not do their job. Listen, I know Valentine's Day is coming up, so heed this warning -- if you see this crashing bore of a movie on a first date, your relationship is doomed, cursed even. Do not speak on the way home, avoid eye contact, just go your separate ways and don't speak of the evening again.
A relentlessly shirtless and Nickelback-coiffed Matthew McConaughey plays Finn (have you ever met a "Finn?"), a beach bum/treasure hunter obsessed with finding the "Queens Dowry," 40 chests of treasure lost at sea in 1715. His wife Tess (have you ever met a "Tess?"), played by a relentlessly scowling Kate Hudson, wants to divorce him because he's so immature. But despite her hatred for him, they reunite for one last score and I'm dozing off just writing this sentence. I won't waste your time with the details of the plot. The epic ten-minute sequence in which McConaughey and Hudson explain the history of the treasure is so poorly conceived, so talky, so dry, so dull, that I'm fairly certain sitting through it rendered me impotent. I won't subject you to the same fate.
Perhaps realizing the main story was dead in the water, the filmmakers have padded the story with a seemingly endless parade of charmless, pointless supporting players. There's Alexis Dziena (if you saw Broken Flowers, you remember her shocking nude scene) as a giggly Paris Hilton clone. There's her father, Donald Sutherland -- sporting a British accent that would make Keanu Reeves wince. There's The Cosby Show's Malcolm-Jamal Warner, sporting a Jamaican accent that would make Donald Sutherland wince. There's Ray Winstone, who is supposed to be McConaughey's main competition for the treasure, but inexplicably only appears in a few scenes. Want painfully unfunny stereotypes? There's comedian Kevin Hart as a rapper named Bigg Bunny (ha-ha!), and there's Michael Mulheren and Adam LeFevre as a couple of aging-but-sassy homosexual chefs (ho-ho!). This baby's got it all!
The film was directed by Andy Tennant, who also helmed the vastly superior Hitch -- a film that seems like Bringing Up Baby in comparison. Tennant co-wrote the script with John Claflin and Daniel Zelman (writers of Anacondas 2: Hunt for the Blood Orchid -- a film that seems like Jaws in comparison). I refuse to believe that any of these men found one line of dialogue in this script amusing. Comedy writers use the term "placeholder joke" for a line that works for the moment but will need to be punched up later. Fool's Gold is a placeholder movie, waiting for a thousand fixes that never come.
Hudson and McConaughey are attractive, moderately talented people, but they create a gaping black hole of chemistry nothingness here. Hudson repeatedly comments on McConaughey's amazing sexual prowess, but it's hard to believe they've even shook hands before. Watching these two "romance" each other, you'd swear that right before each scene Hudson turned to McConaughey and whispered "I have the worst diarrhea." Then McConaughey responded "You look exactly like my sister." Then director Andy Tennant shouted "Okay, you two both have herpes...and...action!" I've experienced more romantic sizzle with my desk lamp. And I don't even like my desk lamp.
I'd call Fool's Gold the worst movie of the year, and it certainly is, but that really doesn't make as strong a point as I'd like. It's only February after all. So I'll say it's the worst movie in a couple years. Please don't see it. Do something more fun with your time. You know, like jamming a piece of barbed wire into your urethra.
Pretty scenery, though!










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-08-2008 @ 10:11AM
Chris Vaughn said...
Shit my parents are planning on seeing this, need to warn them haha.
It really makes you wonder what the fuck is going through people's heads when coming up with ideas. Then that makes one wonder whats going through the heads of people who greenlight this stuff.
Reply
2-08-2008 @ 11:54AM
ML said...
When you're watching a promo that is so unappealing that when a line comes up about the main characters being struck by lightning you automatically respond, "Oh, please -- and can I watch?!", you know you have to stay away. After all, the promo is supposed to make even a bad movie look good; it's only a minute! So I figured this movie must be really bad if they couldn't put together a minute that makes it look OK. But you're right, McConaughey & Hudson just aren't draws for me ... and I remember when he was being pushed as the next big thing.
Reply
2-08-2008 @ 12:30PM
DAVID F said...
I think I did a spit-take reading this!
Thank you for brightening my Friday!
Reply
2-08-2008 @ 12:31PM
rex said...
I found this review incredibly helpful. It just so happens I was debating what to do tonight: see Fool's Gold or jam a piece of barbwire up my urethra.
Looks like barbwire followed by a trip to the emergency room for me!
Reply
2-08-2008 @ 12:40PM
Philip said...
Just send the DVD with slo-mo's of Matthew with his shirt off over to the house. That's all my wife is interested in.
Reply
2-08-2008 @ 7:05PM
Mike_NJ said...
The "valentines" and "first date" comment are especially apt for me, since this was near the top of the list of movie choices for a first date this weekend.
Thank you for saving me in advance!
Reply
2-08-2008 @ 7:14PM
Bryan said...
Anacondas 2 has Karl Yune in it, right? Love that Karl Yune.
Reply
2-10-2008 @ 10:01PM
Charlottttttte Piyne said...
I hated it
Reply
2-11-2008 @ 11:05PM
Aberdeen said...
Hey, I went to school with a 'Finn'.
But, y'know, I pretty much hate both actors, so this one was a no-brainer in terms of 'this looks like a waste of time and money'.
Reply
2-14-2008 @ 11:56PM
Jormley said...
That review was hilarious - much better, I imagine, than seeing the actual movie.
Reply
2-16-2008 @ 12:46PM
Dawn Burroughs said...
I totally agree that this was the worst movie I have ever seen. I kept wanting to lean over and ask my fiance if we could leave and just go walk the mall or something! I thought he'd be offended so I suffered through it. There was no action and no romance and it was just as boring as watching ants build a mound. I mean there was only a split second where it shows the side of Matthew's butt. The shot was taken so far away though! Do not waste your time or money on this awful put together show!!
Reply
2-16-2008 @ 7:16PM
Lisa said...
I was going to see this movie tonight so I decided to google some reviews. Now I am reworking my evening plans.
PS - I want to be on your RSS feed so I can get everything you write. That was a riot! You should have been involved in that script.
Reply
2-17-2008 @ 5:52PM
Aggie said...
Sorry many reviewers don't know a great date movie when they see one. It's not about saving the world, it's about fun, entertainment, adventure, chemistry, and just a good time with someone you care about. Get over yourselves, reveiwers! I'm tired of your holy-er than thou attitudes!!! People! Don't expect to be tossed and turned by the same old deep plot story that everyone is so tired of going to see, and reviewers are so happy run off at the mouth about! This is not "THE KILLING FIELDS!" Stop expecting Armegeddon!
It's just a fun adventure with "not hard to look at" actors, and of course, we can't forget legendary Donald Sutherland, who gives his usual outstanding performance.
Just go and enjoy, people!
Reply
2-18-2008 @ 8:26PM
Taylor said...
I actually thought this movie was pretty good. Sometimes it got boring especially when they described the treasure. I saw it twice and told my friends to see it to. It might just be because we like corny movies but i found it good.
Reply
2-21-2008 @ 12:14PM
Aggie said...
Thanks, Taylor for spreading the word. There is a person out there somewhere who wrote and directed this, and he needs to be complimented. He obviously spent a long time on this project, and i'm sick of people always dissing things when they don't look at it the way you did. Thanks for your comment.
2-18-2008 @ 8:28PM
Taylor said...
and those of you who say your not seeing it because of reviews need to just go see it because you might like it unlike these stick-in-the-ass losers
Reply
2-20-2008 @ 2:21PM
Ryerye said...
Fools gold? Plz this shit sucked! I thought it would be funny, but it sucked. I give it 1 star.
Reply
2-22-2008 @ 10:36AM
George said...
I think reading the critics of this movie by Pat Walsh was probably more amusing then seeing the movie itself! great line Pat. Thanks :D
Reply