
Diary of the Dead isn't a sequel to the other movies in Romero's Dead series, but it does tend to assume that you know Romero's standard operating rules about zombies. If a zombie bites you or if you die in any way, that's it for you -- you're undead. The undead are cannibalistic, and the only way to destroy them is to destroy their braaaaains. Unlike the other Dead movies, this one is shot as if it were a documentary -- a survivor has pieced together footage from the first night that the dead come back to life.
A group of college kids is in the midst of filming a horror movie for their class when the dead start walking. Jason (Joshua Close) decides that whatever they decide to do that night, he wants to capture it on video -- he's not about to give up an opportunity to record what might be a monumental event in history. The group decides to head for campus -- and then realizes how truly horrible the situation has become. Instead, Jason's practical girlfriend Debra (Michelle Morgan) suggests they try to drive to her family's home. In the meantime, they have to avoid attacks from the undead and keep the camera battery charged while encountering a zombie-filled hospital, an Amish farmer (one of the best scenes in the movie), and a stronghold of non-dead guys with lots of weaponry.
Does this sound a little Cloverfield-ish to you? I saw Diary of the Dead first, and I kept thinking that Cloverfield was similar but to my mind, not as entertaining. The plot of Diary allows that the footage can be edited, and that the person shooting it knows something about using a camera. And he has a compelling reason for hanging onto that camera, even if he seems wrongly obsessive about it. The characters in Diary have stronger personalities and are smarter, plus it's easier to distinguish one from another. Michelle Morgan and Amy Lalonde were standouts, except that Lalonde was not convincing as a Texan. (The script was partially to blame for that, with terrible alleged Texas-isms that made an Austin audience laugh in the wrong spots.)
Diary of the Dead is a movie with a cinematic self-awareness: in the opening scene, Debra is complaining about the scene in which she plays a horror victim who is running away from her pursuer in a dumb way. You know that this scene is going to pay off later in the film -- after all, it's a zombie movie -- but the way in which is happens is a moment of welcome amusement in the middle of zombie horror and gore.
Romero's Dead films always have political messages behind them, and this one includes some speculation on the way in which contemporary media and news are changing. If you can't trust the mainstream media, are news bloggers any more trustworthy? The "footage" in the film includes not only Jason's tapes but also clips found on the internet from news cameras, footage that is perhaps being suppressed on mainstream channels, showing zombie attacks.
The group also hears rabid radio broadcasts in their van -- some of the broadcasters might sound vaguely familiar. I didn't realize it until later, but the voice talent for those broadcasters included Stephen King, Wes Craven, Simon Pegg and Guillermo del Toro. These are the only well-known names in the cast -- the actors are all lesser-known faces in order to add to the believability factor.
Diary of the Dead doesn't measure up to Romero's original film, but what can? The 1968 movie is an iconic institution at this point. But this stripped-down zombie flick, shot on DV, has turned out to be my favorite of all the Dead sequels and remakes -- I also think it's the most believable. The combination of horror, humor, and mockumentary works well in this movie.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-15-2008 @ 3:52PM
Dude said...
I am a fan of Night of the Living Dead and Romero, but is he really the godfather of the zombie genre? I recently watched Last Man on Earth with Vincent Price, a 1964 film based on Richard Matheson's 1954 novel, I Am Legend. That film had plenty of zombies...
Reply
2-15-2008 @ 4:27PM
Chris said...
The idea of the zombie has existed for a long time, and movies about zombies have existed since before Romero. Is Romero a 20th/21st century pioneer of the zombie horror movie genre? Sure, I'll give you that, but the idea certainly didn't originate with him.
2-15-2008 @ 4:54PM
Jette said...
Oh, I agree that we've had literature and movies about the undead for a long time. "I Walked with a Zombie" was from 1943. But Romero unquestionably popularized the concept in America and helped establish the zombie horror-movie genre rules that are often followed, or deliberately flaunted, in contemporary film.
Reply
2-15-2008 @ 6:30PM
Christian Toto said...
I think it's fair to pin a "King of the Zombies" button on Romero. But the beauty (wrong choice of words?) of his best zombie films is how he weaves social commentary into the narrative.
With "Diary," he all but takes a shovel and bangs the viewer over the head with what's on his mind. And the final scene is sheer cynicism masquerading as something profound.
Reply
2-15-2008 @ 11:45PM
Kelsey said...
Wasn't it Romero who made zombies crave human flesh? He may not have invented zombies BUT he did create the modern zombie genre.
Reply
2-16-2008 @ 12:21AM
Justin said...
Romero was cool in the 60s, but Land of the Dead was lame lame lame. Give others a chance. Check out "Colin," seems original.
Reply
2-16-2008 @ 9:20PM
jimmy said...
Dude, this movie was lame. It was stupid and boring.
silly in the way its idiotic characters act and annoying in its pretentious self righteous goobly gook, which gets beaten over your head.
Ok, George we get it... now can we get a zombie movie or what?
Bottom line: The "message" is gay (It used to be us vs. us. now it's us vs. them. The only problem is them is us....blah blah blah, all the world media is an evil conspiracy, blah blah blah, do we even deserve to be saved, blah blah blah...Rednecks and white people in general are bad, blah blah blah) the characters are stupid to the insane degree...
("Oh, I just ran over 3 zombies...Now I will pull over and get out of the van and run into the woods crying" "Hay you are being attacked by a zombie..I'm going to stand here and film it instead of helping you" "Hay an abandoned hospital....let's go look for help in there")
This movie was as bad as the 90s remake of Night of the Living Dead.
Reply
2-22-2008 @ 12:48AM
nick said...
so "land of the dead" wasn't his best.
but even haters have to admit that the scene where the zombies have the people up against the fence and are eating them alive is chilling. its shot from a distance and you hear the (unfortunately) still living people screaming and crying out. you also hear the zombies feasting. its just good cinema.
i have high hopes for this one though. they dont know to shoot the head yet i guess....that ought to be interesting.
Reply
3-28-2008 @ 1:18PM
Julia said...
I saw this movie last night, and being part of the Zombie Genre, i really enjoyd it, it was a refreshng new take, way different then any other one George has done, and yes i dub George Romeo as "The god father of zombies", LOL.
in my peronal opinion, and keep in mind these are ALL Only Opinions, All his zombe flicks are bad azz, im glad he got it going ,even if he wasn't the one who first who originally came up with the idea, he made it what it what it is today. Call what you will but you can't really appreciate these movies if you are not a true fan, i am
Reply