RvB's After Images: Raising Cain (1992)
Filed under: Comedy, Thrillers, After Image

The double-role has been a favorite for movie audiences for a long time. Actors as different as Lon Chaney and Ronald Colman have indulged in the two-actors-for-the-price-of-one roles. In The Dark Knight, Aaron Eckhart will get to do a two-fer, playing a character who didn't get nearly enough to do in that Joel Schumacher fiasco. (Though I did very much enjoy the bifurcated Tommy Lee Jones' use of the pluralis majestatis, the royal "we.") Few double-roles, however, are as roundly a good time as Brian De Palma's Raising Cain, a reviled but rich melodrama derived in equal parts from Psycho and the equally scandalous Peeping Tom. Preposterous, invigoratingly silly, and done to a technical turn by Hitchcock's most devoted fan, this forgotten thriller gives John Lithgow -- kindly actor and easy-going TV star of Third Rock from the Sun --a chance to show his hulking, evil side.
I
In De Palma's lens, the extravagantly rich California city of Palo Alto, thinly disguised as "Bay View," is one big nursery. Rolling baby-carriages keep crossing the screen, and almost every luxury car has a toddler seat in it. Key parts of the action take place in a toddler's park where the parents bring their children. A fixture at this park is the plump-faced, tweedy, kindly pediatrician Dr. Carter Nix (Lithgow), who brings his own child there. Anxieties bubble under his calm surface; he's purchased a closed circuit camera to watch his own child sleep. He spends more time with the kid than he does with his restless wife Jenny (Lolita Davidovich). Worse, Jenny runs into an old lover, Jack Dante (Steven Bauer) at the mall. Flustered by the encounter, Jack leaves his hotel keys behind, giving Jenny an excuse for a further visit.
A sort of family reunion is bothering Carter, anyway. It seems that his father, the fearsome Norwegian behavioral psychologist Dr. Nix, has turned up. He'd been presumed dead after "taking a swan dive into a fee-yord," as a local cop (Tom Bower) puts it. And the old man (also played, richly, by Lithgow) has plans to restart the same evil experiments in child rearing which blighted Carter's childhood. The old doctor is probably based on the urban legend that psychologist B. F. Skinner raised his daughter in a cage, but Raising Cain is more like an unofficial sequel to Peeping Tom. The insane father-physician who dominated his scopophiliac son (Karl-Heinz Bohm) through constant filming and observation in that Michael Powell movie, must have been in a similar field to the insane old Norseman.
Now back in action, old Dr. Nix requires kidnapped children. Carter is too weak to do the requisite seizing and chloroforming, which is why it's a good thing his evil twin brother Cain (Lithgow once more) has materialized; a smirking thug in sunglasses who knows all the methods of kidnapping, disposing of bodies and lying to the authorities. Children and the moms start to disappear.
The police are, we may say, total tools in Raising Cain. If Hitchcock's famous comment about his plot development "No one goes to the police because it would be boring," De Palma could add, "no one goes to the police, because they're asleep." Delivering wisecracks and dozing at their desks, the local cops are only forced into action when a retired copper (Barton Heyman) turns up, remembering a similar case from 20 years ago. The elderly cop retrieves the old Doctor Nix's Transylvanian colleague Dr. Waldheim (Frances Sternhagen), who gets to grill Carter and try to probe his secrets. And the delightful, even Almodovaresque absurdity continues. I mean, isn't it a happy thing when you name one of your twin sons "Cain" and he grows up to be the evil one?
De Palma gives up as much tickles as shocks in this one, leaving the actual tragic scenes of the elder doctor's child abuse for our imagination. As Hitchcock said, some want slices of life, and some want slices of cake, and this is pure cake. Instead of pathos, we get the carousel-like wheeling of a flash-forward montage as Jenny imagines, or remembers, or dreams up, a roll in the dead leaves with Jack. How Jenny and Jack met is also rather sweet: we see the flashback of a love scene in a hospital room, punctuated by the horrified reaction of a witness. De Palma tops one of his typically ambitious tracking shots with the invigorating whipping back a sheet off a corpse's face. ("She must have died of horror!" is the warm up...or words so close to that effect that it doesn't merit looking up the exact words.)
In front of the San Francisco Legion of Honor museum, De Palma took an existing statue of Joan of Arc and made up a new one in the charge position, lance lethally pointed forward. The auteur even tops Hitchcock in a gruesome image straight from Psycho, a car swallowed up into a murky oatmeal-colored swamp; this time, the corpse in the trunk revives. The finale is another moment of inspiration, staged at a storm-drenched El Camino Real motel. There, De Palma syncs up three different groups of actors on three different floors.
The violence is at a bare minimum for this sometimes gory director; he's sort of kid-proofed the movie. Children are menaced, but naturally delivered up safe. (It's not where his interests lie, anyway. But two stolen babies seems to be fending for themselves in the motel during a lot of the action.)
Lithgow has a chance to play not just Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, but his father and his sister too. People complain about ham, but they certainly devour a lot of it, and Lithgow's pleasure in getting to pull the various faces is infectious. Raising Cain is a hard film to justify to those who can't stand vast leaps of logic. (No one remembers the Nix case? A mad doctor kidnapping babies in a small city? And they made a TV movie about it, and it's still not a part of the police's collective memory?) There are fastidious viewers who can't handle plot holes and rich Scandinavian stage accents. As I get older, I'm less interested in worrying about "over the top" acting. Who really knows the topography well enough to declare where the top should be? Was Day-Lewis over the top in There Will Be Blood? Or did PT Anderson successfully raise the landscape enough so that his oil gusher-like explosion made perfect sense? Someone needs to cast Paul Dano and Lithgow as father and son...I'm sure Lithgow could bray "Bastard in a basket!" as well as any actor alive.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-08-2008 @ 2:54AM
Greg said...
First off, great blog.
Second off, while I share the enjoyment of this film with you, it's for very different reasons - IMO, this is one of the most hilariously awful movies that has ever been crafted. A true disasterpiece that ranks up there with The Apple and Manos: Hands of Fate. Oh, where to start...
The convenient voice over that pops up halfway through to tell us information DePalma was too lazy to show... the double ham n' cheese (quintuple?) character acting by Lithgow... the utterly unnecessary endless tracking (actually, steadicam) shot that follows the psychologist (as she rambles exposition) down Halls (ooh!), into an Elevator! (ahh!) and even - wait for it - on an Escalator!! (Yow!). Most awesome is the fact that as we enter the escalator, the camera tilts to a dutch angle as we ride it down, just to hammer home that we are, yes indeedy, on an escalator!
Then there's the DePalmistry of the Gratuitous Split Diopter shot... you know the one, where he uses the special lens to put a character close to the camera in focus, while simultaneously keeping background action in focus! Boo ya!
And the lines! "I know what you're going to do, and it's a bad thing!", the aforementioned "She must have died of horror!" and of course the classic, "Boopsie made me do it!"
And don't forget, the epic, never-before-attempted-for-very-good-reasons dream-within-a-dream-within-a-dream-WITHIN-A-DREAM! sequence shot outside the Stanford museum... Never has one character woken up so many times in a cold sweat, only to then wake up in a cold sweat, in cinema history.
Simply put, there is more crap in this movie than a Woodstock Port-O-San, and it is fabulously awesome.
Oh, and did I mention? It was filmed in my hometown. Everytime I drive by the Riviera Motor Lodge on El Camino, my old friends and I give a heartfelt one finger salute to this film and it's epic, awful denouement. I will always remember watching this movie in the theater, standing and applauding at the end with tears in my eyes from laughter, while the sparse audience chuckled and clapped along.
One of my all-time favorites. Rent it. Twice.
Reply
3-08-2008 @ 12:46PM
Richard von Busack said...
Thanks very much for the kind words and the fan's notes on this delightfully ridiculous film. So that's the Cantor museum and not the Legion? I was the more deceived. The establishing shot is pretty short, probably to cover up the crap quality of the plaster statue. While I love Manos (and yearn to see The Apple..what about The Phynx?), I think this is in a different level. The script is, let's face it, garbage--sultry Serbian siren Lolita D. has to put patches on it, and the the holes are risible. ("Oh, wait, did I forget to give you this important information? Never mind, we'll play it in voice over right now.")
There's some spirited filmmaking through out Raising Cain that shows that someone who is decidedly non-crap directed it. The concentric dreams/fantasy/dreams thing is pretty bold, and could be justified; any light sleeper knows what it's like to dream, wake up, fall asleep, and continue with the same dream.
The seemingly pointless steadicam shot--you know, the one I misidentified as a tracking shot? --has a function; it helps distract the viewer from a huge chunk of expository dialogue. In trying (lamentably) to get a last moment pop-up of Lithgow wearing the shameful garments of the opposite sex (!) De Palma justifies that seemingly gratuitous split diopter (hell, I've read Armond White praise just that image!)
Anyway, you sure know your stuff, and I agree: once is not enough for this one of a kind movie. Keep writing in--
3-09-2008 @ 11:17PM
Geoff said...
Regarding the voiceover-- both of you seem to be overlooking the fact that the voiceover happens within Jenny's (Lolita D.'s) dream-within-a-dream-within-a-dream. Therefore, it is almost as if she is narrating to herself, trying to convince herself of the narrative she is voicing. That actually makes it much more clever than the above-described "oh, did I forget to tell you this stuff" riff.
Reply
3-08-2008 @ 8:29PM
Greg said...
Yeah, I differ with some of my friends in that I think DePalma has a talent besides just the capacity to steal from Hitchcock (though, let's face it, DePalma would have Hitch's headstone in his office if it wasn't bolted down). Carrie, though flawed, scared the bejeesus out of me, I was creeped out by Sisters, and heck, I even liked parts of Bonfire of the Vanities.
I think DePalma's relation to Hitchcock and the other masters he liberally rips from is sort of like heavy metal's relationship to the Blues... take the simplest, most obvious and outrageous elements, turn it to 11, and, hey, it's 11 times more awesomer! That being said, I enjoy myself some good heavy metal, as well as the more authentic Blues... and I never miss a DePalma movie.
Judgements about "quality" aside, there's no question DePalma succeeds in maybe the cardinal directive of filmmaking... Don't Be Boring.
Reply
3-08-2008 @ 8:46PM
Richard von Busack said...
That's a beautifully-put comment about Hitch's headstone. I have to say that De Palma topped even Hitchcock in that one swamp-side scene in Raising Cain. But then, I've been warped by his films. I was an usher at a Beverly Hills theater that showed De Palma's Obsession and I suspect I saw it more times than any living human. Loved it! I still go around quoting Lithgow's villain: "You're as wise as Caesar and as honest as the Pope."
And here's the sad part: I saw Obsession 24 times before I saw Vertigo once.
Personally, I'm not aware of flaws in Carrie. I'm deeply fond of another roundly-hated De Palma film Snake Eyes, and Get To Know Your Rabbit was really worth seeing...Oh, and there's such savory material in another despised De Palma film, Black Dahlia; the big lesbian floorshow with k.d. lang for instance.
Do you remember that toast in John Waters' Pecker: "To the end of irony!" Seeing something as rich and delicious as Raising Cain, I'd raise a glass: "To the end of camp!"
Reply