
Warning: Spoilers for The Mist obviously follow.
Though it opened to an enormous collective yawn, I thought that Stephen King's The Mist -- just released on DVD -- was one of the very best films of last year. Perhaps more accurately, I thought it was a movie that Frank Darabont and Stephen King tailor-made for me. There were moments in it that completely embodied everything I love about the horror genre: when a disheveled, bloodied Jeffrey DeMunn barreled into the supermarket, yelling that "there's something in the mist," the terror in his eyes and voice chilled me to the bone. That intersection between the mundane and the fantastical, the film straddling the line between the world we know and some place far beyond our imagination, is what makes that moment, and many others in The Mist, so scary. It approaches its supernatural conceit with an unforgettable combination of horror and wide-eyed wonder.
No doubt the most controversial and confounding aspect of The Mist is that shocking pitch-black ending that probably cost some foolhardy studio executive his job. So I thought that those of us who have seen the movie could talk about it a bit. Coming at the end of a grueling, draining two hours, it felt like a punch in the face -- and yet, to me at least, it also felt right. After the jump, I'd like to use you folks as a sounding board for my preferred interpretation of the film's conclusion, and also solicit yours. Fair warning: if you click through, you'll be spoiled. And it's something that's worth experiencing for yourself.
The irony is how deeply humanistic the ending is despite its incredible bleakness. By the end of the film, David (Thomas Jane), Amanda (Laurie Holden), Dan (DeMunn) and Irene (Frances Sternhagen) have utterly lost any faith in humanity they may have had, arriving at the realization that most everyone around them is craven, cruel and incapable of reason. When pushed, they all regressed to feral superstition. Having driven out into the mist and glimpsed truly unspeakable horrors all around them (the scene where they see the faint outlines of an otherworldly creature larger than a house is another of those amazing awe-filled moments I will never forget), the four quite reasonably conclude that they're screwed. They've seen what becomes of their fellow man when confronted with such terrors. There's no rescue coming, because there's no way in hell that their puny, cowardly race can survive this intact. So letting David put them (plus his son Billy) out of their misery seems better than being ripped to pieces by whatever is walking around outside of their Jeep.
The twist, of course, is that humanity turns out to have the existential crisis very much under control. Our heroes were wrong, and those four gunshots were severely premature. Some people have interpreted this as an indictment of their nihilism: they were so eager to mock and deplore people of faith that they swung too far in the other direction, and to their deaths. But I prefer a slightly different take: I think the message is that we're not as bad as the worst among us. The crucial variable isn't faith, it's faith in ourselves. David, Irene, Dan and Amanda were simply too quick to extrapolate from the Lord of the Flies scenario that developed inside their supermarket. I found this revelation remarkably moving.
What do you think? Does my reading seem right? Did the ending work for you? And has anyone seen the apparently awesome black-and-white director's cut on the DVD?













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
4-01-2008 @ 12:29PM
Maria Stahl said...
I shouldn't have read this. I assumed the spoilerishnessicity would be the ending that Stephen King wrote, which I already knew.
Although now of course I have to go shuffle my Netflix queue around a bit... :o)
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 12:43PM
Jesse said...
I saw this movie and as I'm watching it I was struck with a few things. The crazy Christian woman was over the top. That character seems to be in every Stephen King horror movie I've seen. I don't know what King has against overly zealous religious people, and even though the character always freaks me out, it seems like he overuses it. Though admitedly I'm not a big enough fan to say that it's definintely the case. Part of me wants to believe no one would be so niave to believe her; that the people in the story were extreme examples of certain types of people but crazier shit has happened in the real world so who knows how far people would be willing to go when faced with the kind of crazy crap going on in that movie.
Moving on, as I was watching the movie and I saw the 4 gun shots I at first assumed he had used one bullet to kill both his son and the woman so that all 5 of them had been killed. Then when he walked out all I said to myself was, there is only one way this movie can end that would satisify me and that's if the mist clears at that very moment and their deaths were for nothing, or even better if the military folk come to the rescue. So to see that happen mere moments later I was both shocked and extremely impressed they not only thought up the exact ending I would have done, but then actually executed it.
Also I thought some of hte plot was similar to Half-Life games. It was as if the movie was told from the prospective of the towns people in the Half-Life. In the sense that the military opens a portal to another dimension and weird alien things filter in.
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 4:39PM
superbagman said...
Half Life was actually inspired by the King novella. The working title of Half Life was Quiver, which was a reference to the name of the military facility from The Mist.
4-01-2008 @ 12:47PM
Okie said...
I thought the ending was perfect. Its what made me recommend this movie to so many people. Most don't like the ending because they don't think they could ever do that to their child. But the alternative was definitely worse.
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 12:55PM
JTS said...
I like you're reading here a lot. A lot of people have derided the film's ending while celebrating the rest of the goodness. For me though, Darabont made a very bold choice, and I would much prefer that filmmakers make bold choices (and be supported by their studio counterparts) then have everyone striving to try to make the largest possible number of audience members happy.
Personally, I more or less fell into the original camp that you outlined that viewed the final twist as a rebuke to the party's seemingly fast loss of hope. I wouldn't go so far as to call the group nihilistic, because Darabont never went so far as to say they didn't believe in anything, but they did allow their hope to evaporate quite quickly, and in that final shot David pays handsomely for having doubted. I guess in some ways that actually mirrors what you lay out above, in that the hope they lost was hope in the resiliency of man. Having walked through the fires they walked through (particularly with their interactions with the soldiers), it's not all that shocking that they made the choice they did.
http://bloodygoodhorror.com/bgh
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 1:27PM
moviegirl said...
The ending was perfect...i was actually shocked that it ended that way...but this movie scared the hell out of me because it made me wonder what i would do if I promised my son's not to "let the monster's get them" and I had 4 bullets in the gun...one of the best movies of last year...
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 1:36PM
Dave Nuttycombe said...
I fully agree with your take. It is an utterly depressing ending -- but exactly the right one, given what the characters (and audience) had gone through. Bravo to everyone for not copping out. Although I understand that the DVD has an alternate ending? Hmmm....
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 1:45PM
Old Salt said...
After I heard the final four gunshots I thought to myself, "what happened to poor Frank Darabont?" For a man that made a movie about the importance of hope in the human spirit (the main idea I took from Shawshank) he had made one of the bleakest films I'd ever seen. I was sure he was going through a messy divorce or the loss of a loved one. Then the mist cleared and it hit me like a ton of bricks: Never give up hope. The downfall of our main character is that he forgot that sometimes hope is all we have, and we have to hold on to it no mater what. Thomas Jane's character thought he was out of options (he was without hope) and forgot to consider; What if the mist suddenly clears? Mr. Darabont (and Mr. King) taught us that hope can save a lost soul in Shawshank, and this time with The Mist, taught us to never give up hope. Well done gentlemen.
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 1:54PM
kevjohn said...
I loved the ending. I thought it was exactly what most people would do in that situation, whether they would admit it or not. I think after spending days (weeks?) cooped up inside that store watching all manner of horrible fates befall your fellow man, eating a bullet would seem like a very reasonable way to go. A quick, easy, and relatively painless death.
...although I probably would have waited a few moments until I saw the creature coming with my own eyes. heh
Reply
5-16-2008 @ 12:07PM
Bryce said...
It would have been on everybody's mind no matter what they say. However, since the kid did wake up, I may have waited until a creature showed up before firing. If the kid had stayed asleep....well still probably would have waited until the last minute, but I wouldn't let some creature tear apart my child and spare the others the same fate.
4-01-2008 @ 1:56PM
Emily Pray said...
First, I am a huge fan of Mr. King, (and Mr. Darabont) and know for certain that they could have never ended the movie the same as the story--it was too open ended, and that's what a lot of people hate about King--he leaves a lot wide open at the end of his tales.
Second I am a huge fan of this movie. I don't scream in horror movies, jump, etc. because most of them just don't creep me out-- not only did this movie creep me out (I'll never look at spidrs and pharmacies the same way again) but the ending floored me. I thought what is the worst thing that could happen-- and then it happened. I don't know about the metaphors that can be associated with such an ending, to me that was the horror of the horror movie-- not blood, not guts and gore, not even the creepy crawlies, but the horror of humanity. Because even though the main characters left the grocery store--they end up in the same place-- they have killed when it wasn't necessary and now they have to deal with the consequences. I am still processing the ending, and I can't wait to buy the DVD for both the commentary and the deleted scenes.
Lastly, this made the second!!!!!! good Stephen King movie last year. I can only hope the streak continues (and please let Frank Darabont do "The Long Walk"!!!)
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 1:58PM
Eugene Novikov said...
The Long Walk is my favorite King book, and one of my favorite books, period. Apparently it means a lot to King, and he has said that he'll never sell the rights to make it into a movie.
4-01-2008 @ 1:58PM
SM1L3Z said...
theres a directors cut i didnt know that but it truly was 1 of the greatest endings ive seen in a long time
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 1:59PM
Gomez said...
As a Brit still waiting for this to arrive at cinemas I was lucky enough to watch this on DVD without any hype or any emphasis being placed on the ending - needless to say it floored me. Possibly the biggest Doh! in movie history.
Had this film just ended like Shaun of the Dead, with the army turning up just in the nick of time (spoiler there, sorry) had the ending been all smiles and sunshine, then The Mist would have been good, but instantly forgettable. We wouldn't be reading this blog for sure.
Too often directors are required to dip their toes in the muddy waters of horror then take them out so that by the end they can reassure everyone that everything is OK. This is lame!
I was brought up on films like The Fog, Carrie, Salem's Lot - films that ended with the horrors still very much alive. Only Se7en sticks out in modern times as being bold enough to end on a downbeat, and David Fincher had to fight for that I believe.
If anything I hope the Mist paves the way for a break from the standard formulaic movie making we've been forced to chew on recently.
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 2:04PM
harosa said...
I had no problem with the ending, what I had a problem with was that it came seconds after he kills everyone, he couldn't have wandered for a minute in the Mist to then see the tanks? It seems to me that all that commotion they were making would've made some noise for them to hear. My main grip was that you get to care for these people and it seems like an unnecessary kick in the nuts to the guy.
Reply
4-09-2008 @ 1:41AM
knhudgins said...
Although I am tired of movies which always seem to end with, ".....and they all lived happily ever after(such as I am Legend?)and in spite of the fact that I have no "nuts" to kick, I too felt the pain!!! True survivors don't quit 2 minutes after their tank reaches 'E'......My husband and I have discussed at least 5 different endings, which all would have left everyone with a satisified theatrical appetite. Couldn't he and the older guy have taken turns pushing the vehicle? Or possibly wait through the night? The entire movie had a time span of maybe 2(3?) days? and the thought of sitting in the vehicle for a few hours was too much to bear?!?!? And then the irony of seeing the poor, helpless woman, whom no one wanted to help, (he even delivered the line to her about having to take care of his son........) riding by with the "5-seconds-too-late" Calvary, with her arms wrapped lovingly around her children, was a bit much :-( Awesome movie, but the ending was a little too depressing for me.....
4-01-2008 @ 2:05PM
Sergio Vera said...
I agree. The movie is about showing you to cling to life, to whatever little you have left, to never surrender, no matter what happens, no matter how worse things are. Keep on going. It may just fade away.
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 2:26PM
John said...
I just watched The Mist last night, and overall I thought it was good, but it reminded me too much of a Stephen King mini-series that I started to feel like I was watching a King mini-series.
Apparently, Darabont used the same crew that shoots the TV show The Shield, and I think it shows: The Mist definitely doesn't feel as cinematic as Darabont's masterwork, The Shawshank Redemption... it just feels like you're watching TV.
In regards to the ending: it's one of the better twist endings I've seen in a while. Nowadays, I feel like twists or reveals have become cheapened by how frequent they have become in movies, and most of them just happen to trick the audience. But with The Mist, the twist ending was surprising AND thought-provoking. I spent the whole movie thinking, "oh, this is a story that's based on the cynical notion that human-beings are inherently savage and self-destructive" but after it finished, I realized that Darabont had completely turned that assumption on its head. The tragic flaw of most of the characters was that they had too much faith in the worst in humankind and no real faith in the best of humankind.
And you could also do all these socio-political allegorical readings of the ending, which I think is great too.
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 2:52PM
Zeke_hero said...
This was by far the greatest horror ending I've ever seen. These movies always tend to go one way or another: We WON! (Any movie where we beat the aliens) or We'll NEVER win! (Any movie that ends in "...of the Dead"). I'll tell you this: I was riveted by the look on Thomas Jane's face when he realized the woman that no one would help at the beginning, who just wanted to get home to her kids, survived and so did her kids. If he'd gone with her, maybe his family would still be alive. Again, not faith in God, but in doing what's right from the start and not after being pushed.
Reply
4-01-2008 @ 2:53PM
Eric H said...
I loved the ending! Glad it was changed from King's ending, of course some changes need to be made considering in the movie you don't know the creatures are coming from the Dark Tower Series.
Reply