Monday Morning Poll: Who Wants a 'Cloverfield' Sequel?
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Mystery & Suspense, Fandom, Movie Marketing, Remakes and Sequels, Monday Morning Poll

A copy of the brand spanking new Cloverfield DVD (which hits shelves on April 22) arrived in the mail late last week, and after only watching the special features, I have to say I was pretty pleased with it. The two alternate endings (which we posted earlier today) weren't that mind-blowing, but the behind-the-scenes featurettes are fun to watch. Out of the deleted scenes and bloopers, my favorite part was watching how they shot the party scene in the beginning. There's no music in the background (that was all added later on), and so you have this packed apartment with kids, and Hud is shouting, but the entire room is silent, pretending to talk and dance. Very comical to watch. (You also get previously-released trailers for Star Trek and Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.)
Anyway, as we approach the DVD release date, a ton more viral material is starting to hit the web. To be completely honest with you, I get lost in this stuff and don't have the time or patience to spend hours sifting through it all. For those interested, check out posts over at Bloody Disgusting and Slashfilm to get caught up. Reaction was certainly mixed after Cloverfield finally debuted back in January, and after an initial surge at the box office, numbers dropped off significantly. But that won't stop folks from pumping out a sequel, which may or may not focus on the Cloverfield monster's mother. (On the DVD, a special effects dude does clarify that the monster is an infant and scared. Oh, and another guy refers to the monster as "Clover." Unfortunately, no one mentioned a thing about the satellite that falls into the water at the very end. However, I did not listen to Reeves' full commentary on the film; only on the endings.)
I was one of those that really enjoyed Cloverfield for what it was -- a creepy, original monster flick designed for the YouTube generation. That said, I'm not sure they could deliver another completely unique experience in a sequel. But what do you think?










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-07-2008 @ 12:10PM
Travis Tidmore said...
Personally I think you can do a Cloverfield sequel in an entirely new way, who says it has to be following people with a hand held camera this time.
Although I could get behind a hand-held sequel if they did it in 3-D, talk about giving people motion sickness!
www.thecinemaniac.com
Reply
4-07-2008 @ 11:00PM
donny said...
Definitely agree...
They can make another one...BUT, it absolutely has to be as original as the first one was. Which does mean that is can look nothing like the first one.
Perhaps a more traditional (good) horror monster movie a la Aliens?
4-07-2008 @ 12:54PM
Tom Gerlick said...
I'll only be excited about it if it features Cloverfield vs. Mecha Cloverfield!
Reply
4-07-2008 @ 1:12PM
Napier's News said...
Definitely could work hand held cam if it was from a different perspective from another group such as a television crew reporting on the mayhem. I would like to think that the main characters did not die actually during the explosion and that they could continue the film.
Reply
4-07-2008 @ 1:57PM
Gustavo Brunetti said...
Well, I think that they could go like the Alien series and make a different kind of movie. Maybe a false documentary on the attack, an explanation of its life cycle. Anyway, I would really like to know what happens when you're bitten by the little monsters, so I'd watch a sequel only for that.
By the way, I didn't think it was one of the deepest movies I've ever seen, but it certainly is effective: it creeped me out more than, say, The Shining or The Exorcism of Emily Rose, which made the people I was watching them with jump out of their seats.
Reply
4-07-2008 @ 4:21PM
fadedsilverscreen.blogspot.com said...
I'm all for a Cloverfield sequel--as long as they get rid of the handheld camera effect.
Reply
4-07-2008 @ 5:26PM
NvM said...
No.
Remember Blair Witch Project 2?
4-14-2008 @ 12:28AM
mikull said...
personally i thought this whole project was overrated, and was fairly disappointed. i vote no on a sequel.
Reply
4-26-2008 @ 10:08PM
Aaron said...
I think you should make another cloverfield because you did so well with the first one that it's just gonna have people begging for more.And at the point if you do decide to make another movie i hope it has more information about the monster and where it came from.But the movie was great it kicked ass so keep up the good work
Reply
6-02-2008 @ 11:31AM
Michael said...
I would love to see another cloverfield movie,but without the handheld camera please. Thank You
Reply