The Geek Beat: Relax, Don't Do It
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Fandom, Comic/Superhero/Geek, The Geek Beat

Geeks are a passionate lot. It's what defines us, really. Actually, I don't think we're any more obsessive about things than anyone else. Lots of people are obsessed with football or NASCAR, and they're not snubbed nearly as much as those of us who follow film, Batman comics or sci-fi shows. But you know, geek passion has a darker side. I guess all obsession does (I've yelled plenty at a hockey game) but there's just something about the way we nerds can get. I'm reminded of this any time Zack Snyder releases something about Watchmen.
Now, I dug Watchmen. The sucker punch of an ending, the horror of the Black Freighter, the loneliness of Doc Manhattan – there's nothing I can say that hasn't already been said by the likes of TIME Magazine. Of course, I view a movie adaptation with a bit of trepidation, but after Lord of the Rings, I don't think anything is truly unfilmable.
But the fandom is wearing me out. I have many friends who love the graphic novel, and I practically dread any news release because it causes such a flurry of panic and disgust among them. The character stills, which I found promising and exciting, were met with not only skepticism, but weeks of pondering. Why were the stills photoshopped? Why were the actors so young? Why were they posed in action shots? On and on it went, my own casual theories – maybe they were just having fun, maybe these are from the heyday of the heroes – dismissed. No, couldn't be! It was simply that Snyder had messed up, end of story, and the movie was doomed.
Now, I dug Watchmen. The sucker punch of an ending, the horror of the Black Freighter, the loneliness of Doc Manhattan – there's nothing I can say that hasn't already been said by the likes of TIME Magazine. Of course, I view a movie adaptation with a bit of trepidation, but after Lord of the Rings, I don't think anything is truly unfilmable.
But the fandom is wearing me out. I have many friends who love the graphic novel, and I practically dread any news release because it causes such a flurry of panic and disgust among them. The character stills, which I found promising and exciting, were met with not only skepticism, but weeks of pondering. Why were the stills photoshopped? Why were the actors so young? Why were they posed in action shots? On and on it went, my own casual theories – maybe they were just having fun, maybe these are from the heyday of the heroes – dismissed. No, couldn't be! It was simply that Snyder had messed up, end of story, and the movie was doomed.
Then came the first set video, which I found to be fantastic. I found the dedication to detail astounding – and, frankly, a confirmation that Snyder knows what he's doing. Would a director intent on accurately reproducing the background graffiti and the fine points of the Gunga Diner really screw with the ending? I can't find the logic in that. Yet the absence of electric cars confirms everyone's worst fears.
But that's beside the point, really. I can't say whether Snyder's devotion is a shallow one, that he sees the surface of the book and not the substance. It's too early to know and I don't want to have to eat my hat if Watchmen turns out to be terrible. No, it is more that the movie doesn't come out until 2009, and I'm already utterly worn out by the discussion of it. And I think, ultimately, this is where geeky passion becomes self-destructive. I can shout at the t.v. when my hockey team misses an open net, I can fume when they make a foolish player trade. But ultimately, sports fans are easily mollified. Their annoyance never reaches the point that nothing the team does satisfies them – because eventually, the team wins, and everyone's happy.
With geeks, it's different. We can spend so much time hating on something that there is no possible way the movie will satisfy us. When the Watchmen set video prompts you to write an essay complaining about how it differs from a particular panel, or how the women's hairstyles and men's suits are all wrong ... well, come on. Sometimes, fandom reaches such a point of anguish that, surely, it defeats even your love for the original source. And across that threshold is where we geeks earn a bad name -- it is a line we really need to start recognizing.
I'm picking on the Alan Moore fans – and I apologize, they are far from alone. Frankly, I've seen it with plenty of things. I discovered Stephen Sondheim fans were incredibly cultish after I declared that Sweeney Todd was "awesome." We know a girl who refused to see it because her love for the original music was too strong. "There's no possible way the movie can be good. None. The original music is practically religious." I love Sondheim lyrics, but – really? Comparable to Mozart's Requiem? Even my sister's boyfriend (who impersonates Jack Sparrow for a living) cannot sit through a pirate movie, not even the one that created his job, without pointing out they are using the wrong era of cutlass or rapier, and that the boots are from far too late a century. Where is the perspective?
Now, I know half the fun of being a geek is bitching about something. Marvel crossovers, the way George Lucas raped your childhood, Hollywood remakes, Joel Schumacher, flames on Optimus Prime . . . the list goes on and on. There's only so many times you can declare your love for Wolverine or Iron Man – somehow, anger over Greedo shooting first is always easier and more fun. And I confess I'm not innocent of insane geekdom. When Robert Zemeckis' Beowulf was released, I railed to anyone who would listen. It was bad timing, really, as my college specialty was medieval literature, and I was fresh off my thesis in Anglo-Saxon poetry. (It holds the school record for length.) Woe to anyone who said it was "incredibly accurate to the poem," because I would go on for hours about how Beowulf was a hero known for his humility and kindness. Beowulf wasn't a braggart, it was that no one involved understood the Anglo-Saxon culture of boasting. I was only stopped from quoting original Old English from the fact that the runes won't post well on a message board. Everyone must have hated me. I know this now. And I doubt that my original intent (to drive everyone to buying a scholarly translation and reading it for themselves) was ever achieved – people must have loathed all things Heorot after I was done with them.
And ultimately, what I came to realize is that the poem will always be there – and that people will read it, and discover all the things J.R.R. Tolkien loved, and that I was so passionate about. The movie came and went, the hollowness exposed, but the poem endures. So will George Hearn's performance in Sweeney Todd, and so will Watchmen. And I know that obsessive fandom will endure just as long – I just wish it could be more fun. Why can't we say how much Jeffery Dean Morgan looks like the Comedian – and how it is really good casting? That we wish the Gunga Diner was real so we could eat there?
I don't know. Maybe I'm getting too Pollyanna, but it seems like this is just such a fantastic time to be a geek. It's finally socially acceptable, and it's suddenly big money. My concern is that the dark and obsessive side of fandom will completely kill it – that directors like Snyder (a proud geek himself -- the man proudly wears a "Han Shot First" shirt) will just give up in frustration. Hollywood will turn its back, completely worn out with trying to maintain a balance of accuracy and accessibility. Because how can anyone really work when the first official stills doom a film, because Superman's shield is all wrong? And that, my friends, is my long winded point. If you find your fingers hovering on your keyboard, ready to rant that the Spirit's mask is black, not blue . . . stop. Think twice. Take a deep breath. Remember that it will always be blue on the page, and that no matter how awful the movie, you'll soon have new fans to discuss the characters with. And maybe one day, one of you will become a self-made trillionare and make your own Spirit movie. But until then, it's just not worth the anguish. Watch, wait, analyze, discuss, maybe even expect the worst – but have some hope for the best.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
4-08-2008 @ 1:17PM
KateGee said...
Your thesis is now not the only thing that holds the record for length.
Maybe you should get some friends who are a little less obsessive - maybe make friends with some potheads for awhile.
Reply
4-09-2008 @ 8:54PM
jj said...
It is called Escape From Planet Crazy, it is available here in a .PDF.
It is about a movie actor, a one time child star who become identified with a single sci-fi hero, Dirk Stanley. His drug habit and crazy environment, ultimately making 3 Dirk Stanley films a year for decades, convinced his mind he was the character. After being locked up in a mental hospital, seen by our hero as an intergalactic fortress, he has quite an adventure. Escape From Planet Crazy.
http://www.maus.ca/Jeff/planetcrazy.pdf
4-08-2008 @ 1:29PM
Moo said...
Great column, couldn't agree more. Kate- even some of my pothead friends pull this stuff.
I'm an optimist at heart and I'm always astounded when the evil fanboys dismiss something out of hand without more than a set still or a casting decision. Sure, some casting decisions are harbingers of doom (I'm looking at you, Justice League) but I at least TRY to look for the silver lining until proven otherwise. There are more "genre" flicks coming out now than in anytime in history. Elisabeth is right...it's a glorious time to be a geek. I'm having fun with it! I wish more of my friends were too...but they are so damned negative all the time. "oh man...this looks so ghey...it's gonna suck...might as well be directed by Uwe".
The other extreme drives me mad too, the fanboys who are so obsessively geeked by a character, story, director, whatever that they are unable to discuss something critically without making it personal or basically pulling the equivalent of sticking their fingers in their ears and going "YAYAYAYAYACANTHEARYOUCANTHEARYOU".
both extremes are evil.......and must be destroyed....
Reply
4-08-2008 @ 1:53PM
Robobagins said...
Everything in moderation. Even moderation. Going overboard once in a while is human.
Reply
4-08-2008 @ 3:04PM
John said...
I couldn't agree more.
I think at the heart of this, fanboys and fangirls need to realize that they're inner-most fantasies will never come to full fruition and, because they would rather not run the risk of being disappointed, their fantasies becoming a reality is just simply too nerve-wrecking for them. There are probably many people who don't want the Watchmen movie adaptation to be released because they don't want their idealized, imagined Watchmen movie to be contradicted. But even if that is the case, so what? People will still have the original graphic novel and people will still be able to read it.
And to all those who think this post is too long: read more.
Reply
4-08-2008 @ 2:10PM
RC said...
If the fanboys are so adamant that a classic story can't be translated to film does this mean we don't try? Should we have told Peter Jackson 10 years ago not to attempt Lord of The Rings? After seeing 300 and Dawn of the Dead I think if anyone can do The Watchmen justice it will be Zach Snyder. Will the movie have every side story and article from the graphic novel? Probably not or else it would be several hours long.
The bottom line is if you took the people who nitpick and complain about movies and ask what their favorites are they are probably the original Star Wars, Star Trek, Indiana Jones, movies that came out when they were kids. So maybe if we watched new movies with the same enthusiasm kids have we would be a lot less disappointed.
Reply
4-08-2008 @ 2:42PM
Moo said...
RC, I'M one of those people (original star wars, Indy, etc.) but your point is well-taken. A lot of geeks of my generation (27-32) seem to try REALLY hard to recapture their childhoods, heh, and I think their perspective suffers as a result. There is NO WAY something is going to approach watching RotJ or Indy in the theater when you are 7 years old...it just isn't! Lord of the Rings is the closest I've ever felt to that again and even it didn't come close. People need to stop trying to regress and just enjoy these new films for what they are.
4-08-2008 @ 2:10PM
ajprice said...
Re the 'Fandom' picture. I recognised the monster in that picture. That's from Doctor Who "Love & Monsters", where the Doctor and Rose are chasing an alien that eats things called a Hoix. In Torchwood Series 2 the Hoix makes another appearance, described as an alien that likes to eat things. (The Torchwood Hoix isn't important to the main story, so I'm not spoiling anything here, just a bit of geek trivia ;) .
Reply
4-08-2008 @ 3:46PM
shakespear said...
I have low expectations for the film.
Look at it from our perspective, we were shown star directors and HBO mini-series, instead we get whatshisname and a 2 hour movie.
It just cannot be done.
Reply
4-08-2008 @ 3:58PM
Eric H said...
You are TOTALLY RIGHT nothing could ever be cut from the comic ever. Ever, not ever.
4-08-2008 @ 3:57PM
Ryan said...
Heh. I went into the article expecting some Doctor Who movie announcement because of the picture.
Good article though and I pretty much agree.
Reply
4-08-2008 @ 4:05PM
ProgGrrl said...
Yeah, sigh...it's true. Geeks can be way, way too hard on creative folks - especially in the cloak of anonymity that the net provides. (I have experienced this thousands of times in the BSG TV fandom for the new series.)
There are some geeks who take a lighter tone. Some even celebrate their favorite things, rather than denigrate. But any genre creator who wants to play online with fans, must learn to develop a thick skin...and must resist the temptation to listen too closely to the naysayers.
Reply
4-08-2008 @ 5:13PM
D Records said...
can i read your thesis?
Reply
4-08-2008 @ 5:49PM
Elisabeth said...
I think trying to download the entire thing might break your computer. Maybe an excerpt...? ;)
4-09-2008 @ 3:20AM
roguescribner said...
Very nice post, Elisabeth.
I count myself as a geek, though by no means do I consider myself hardcore. I enjoy the geeky side of things, but I try not to get caught up in the madness of it, which you touched on. There are far too many things in life to truly get worked up about, and adaptations of geek lore aren't one of them. I'm not saying we can't care about the new stuff, but we should try not to sweat it as much 'cause, as you point out, we still have the old stuff.
As an example, many people cried foul over SUPERMAN RETURNS, saying it wasn't Superman. I loved that movie, but I can see where people are coming from. He didn't wear the modern-day suit, he had more of a swimmer's body than a titan's, he and Lois had a baby, etc. I maintain that art permeates all the dynamics of a character and takes him to places heretofore unexplored. If Superman weren't allowed to change, he never would have flown, he never would have gotten married, and he certainly never would have become as popular as he did.
The same goes for everything we're fans of. Every new installment or interpretation has value, though it may not be our cup of tea. It doesn't destroy what has come before and it may just open up some previously untapped potential. We should be thankful for what we've gotten and hope the future brings us more happiness.
"We'll always have Paris . . ."
Reply
4-09-2008 @ 5:17AM
mike said...
"Remember that it will always be blue on the page, and that no matter how awful the movie, you'll soon have new fans to discuss the characters with. "
Yeah, i keep hearing that.
Hoiw many people actually realise that "Wake up, Dorothy" isn't from the book?
Or that the fanciest gadget that James Bond actually used in the books was probably a knife hidden in the heel of his shoe?
Or that Tarzan is a British peer who speaks perfect English, French and perhaps other languages as well?
Or that Frankenstein's Monster is an intelligent, articulate being seeking revenge on its creator?
Or that Wyatt Earp was a tin-horn gambler and pimp?
Or that Hell Tanner ("Damnation Alley") is the last Hell's Angel, who sets out essentially solo on what's probably a suicide mission across the middle of post-atomic America to deliver medicine from California to Boston in return for a pardon?
Gresham's Law, that says "Bad money drives out good" applies in the realm of popular culture, too - the movie, by virtue of being more widely seen/experienced than the original book (because, let's face it, the literacy level in this country sucks), becomes the version that is known and remembered.
Certainly, the original is still there - well, maybe; if the movie is less than a huge success, the original may well go out of circulation, too - but people react to it on a "Oh, I saw the movie - I don't need to read the book." Or, "I saw the movie - that sucks. Don't bother reading it *or* seeing the movie."
Oh - and as to the Spirit's mask being black or blue - if it's black, i'll be annoyed, but that's the least of my worries about Miller's version. Will it Ellen, Satin or Sand Saref that he makes a junkie hoker with AIDS?
(Way Back When Harlan Ellison was working with (i think) William Friedkin to do a "Spirit" TV movie that never got made. I heard Harlan talking about it; it would have been brilliant. But the network wanted something different than Harlan and Friedkin were willing to deliver. And it never got made. Too bad.)
Reply
4-09-2008 @ 8:45AM
Carol said...
Excellent point. Sometimes it's hard not to bitch - I mean... HAN DID SHOOT FIRST (hehehehehehehe) - but I think accessibility is the key, here. Much as geek movies/tv shows/other are aimed at, well, us geeks, we're still not enough to make profitable audiences to most things we love. Take The Lord of The Rings trilogy. That was expensive!!! No way it could have been that big if it was made only for geek fans. And no way it would have pleased even most of the geeks if it were any smaller.
Sometimes the bashing really worries me. Like right now the fashion is to bash RTD. I confess, I'm not that fond of his episodes. But I'm also very, very grateful that this guy brought Doctor Who back and introduced it to thousands of new fans - myself included. We can bitch about his choices all we want, but isn't it a great thing that at least we have new episodes of Doctor Who? That Joss Whedon's Spike was ressurected in pretty much the same character but under a different name in Torchwood? I don't want these series to go away just because we can't stop complaining.
Reply
4-09-2008 @ 9:59PM
V.M.L. said...
In the WATCHMEN film, the cars ARE electric! Notice that they don't have exhaust pipes!
Anyway, well-typed article. I do believe that bitching too much about the faithfulness of a film adaptation sucks the excitement out of it. Sometimes people should enjoy the films as they are.
About THE SPIRIT. Yeah, Frank Miller's version is going to be different from the comic series, but I don't care. I'm going to view the movie using the auteur theory: respecting Miller as the "artist" of the movie.
Give movie directors a break, crazy fans.
I'm looking forward to the WATCHMEN film. I'd like to see how similar it is to the graphic novel AND what new things they added without making drastic changes.
Reply
4-09-2008 @ 2:56PM
Al Shut said...
Sure the source material will outlast even the most horrible attempts to adapt it but I don't think it's too much to ask, not for perfection, but for the best possible effort.
It's not wrong to bitch about what could have been and if a dim bulb like me can envision something it surely could be put on film.
I want electric cars goddammit!
Reply
4-09-2008 @ 3:37PM
nspannaus said...
your sister dates a pirate?
Reply