'Ghost in the Shell' is Next in the 3-D Pipeline
Filed under: Animation, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Deals, Tech Stuff, Exhibition, Dreamworks, Steven Spielberg
There's been a flurry of buzz around theatrical 3-D lately, perhaps because James Cameron has come out of hiding to talk a bit about Avatar. (If you haven't yet read this interview with the King of the World, do so immediately.) The last thing we heard was that exhibitors have ganged up on Steven Spielberg for apparently standing in the way of the digital revolution. But Spielberg seems to have seen the light: he's acquired the rights to the Japanese manga Ghost in the Shell for Dreamworks, which plans to film it in -- you guessed it -- digital 3-D. A Dreamworks suit boasts that the story "epitomizes 3-D live-action motion picture possibilities."If that title sounds familiar, it's because the manga has already been adapted into one of the most celebrated anime films of all time. The story involves an attempt to fight cyber-crime by creating a breed of ultra-powerful cyborgs, which strikes me as a terrible idea. I found Mamoru Oshii's movie visually spectacular but impenetrable -- I'm not an anime buff, and it confused the hell out of me. I'm sure that if nothing else, Dreamworks will find a way to solve that problem. Jamie Moss (Street Kings) is taking a crack at writing the adaptation.
3-D still has its naysayers and its crusaders: in the interview I linked above, Cameron announced his intention to make an ordinary, small-scale drama in 3-D just to demonstrate that it's a broadly viable format. But you don't have to listen to either of them. The extent to which Hollywood is investing in 3-D productions speaks volumes on its own.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-15-2008 @ 11:42AM
Robobagins said...
Well it's not as if the property isn't already blemished. You were justified in finding Oshii's adaptation impenetrable. It seems to be his trademark. The original material is much easier to understand.
Reply
4-15-2008 @ 1:23PM
John R said...
Really? As if the original anime wasn't animated well enough.
As far as "impenetrable" goes, its a cake walk compared to Akira. The first time I watched Akira (I was 10), I liked it a lot but had no idea what was going on. It has taken me 20+ viewings over the past 17 years to develop a "theory" for the last 5 minutes of that. Good luck, DiCaprio. You'll pardon me if I have zero faith in your adaptation.
Reply
4-16-2008 @ 5:24AM
Kadabr said...
Eugene Novikov and Christopher Campbell, you have completely missed the point of the Variety's artice (did you even read it?).
Not only do you not understand the difference between digital projection (for all upcoming movies), you have also misunderstood the role Spielberg plays in the entire thing. Yes, as a director he has every right to say how he's movie should be projected. No he is not against either 3D not Digital Projection as a technology (In fact Tintin will use both).
GITS will rule but Spielberg is likely to only produce.
Reply