Review: The Forbidden Kingdom
Filed under: Action, Comedy, Drama, Foreign Language, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Lionsgate Films, Theatrical Reviews, The Weinstein Co.

The good news? Two of Asia's biggest action superstars have teamed up for the first time. The bad news? It's 15 years too late. And what's with the white kid?
The Forbidden Kingdom is yet another picture in which we are meant to experience an exotic locale peopled entirely by "others" through the eyes of a Caucasian character. In this case, it's a fantasy world cobbled together from classic Chinese literature and period martial arts movies. As the latest entry in the category of "low expectation, Asian-themed, English-language movies written and directed by respectful American creative talent," the film is slightly above average entertainment. But I grow tired of having to lower my expectations in exchange for the pleasure of seeing talented Asian performers make an appearance on the big screen in America.
Writer John Fusco and director Rob Minkoff make fun of some of the stereotypes inherent in period martial arts pictures, while also sprinkling shout-outs into the material to demonstrate their love and knowledge of the various source materials that inspired them. Jackie Chan and Jet Li are cheerfully engaging as a drunken beggar and monk on a mission, respectively, providing most of the film's comic and action highlights in supporting roles. That's right -- Chan and Li have both achieved Hollywood stardom, are top-billed, are no doubt top-paid, but play second fiddle to "the white kid," Michael Angarano. We waited years for this?
At the height of their creative and physical powers in the early 90s, Chan and Li were mighty towers. Chan dominated the screen as a modern hero / comedian / stunt man extraordinaire (Police Story 3: Super Cop), while Li stood out as a tightly-coiled hero in both historical adventures and contemporary thrillers (Once Upon a Time in China, High Risk).
The two claim that they've talked about working together for at least 15 years, but they put things off too long. Chan just turned 54 and Li is about to turn 45; while both have far more dexterity, flexibility, and screen fighting ability than many men half their age, Chan especially is slowing down. Their first fight may excite long-time fans -- just to see them finally squaring off sent a chill down my spine -- but I kept on flashing back to their earlier, younger days. Oh, what that scene could have been!
Veteran choreographer Yuen Wo-ping (credited as the more IMDb friendly Wo-Ping Yuen) did a fine job of working with the men to highlight their strengths and disguise their limitations. The action choreography is solid, but familiar. Nothing pops out of the fight scenes as new or different or thrilling. It's not horrible, just, well, average, or slightly above average.
The basic problem with the movie as a whole is that it keeps reminding you of the better pictures that inspired it. The story takes off from the idea that young Jason (Angarano) is a big fan of martial arts movies; his bedroom is covered with posters, and he keeps the films pumping through his television to the point that he dreams of the legendary Monkey King. The Monkey King is a mischievous character from the classic Chinese novel Journey to the West; he aspires to immortality and has a mighty staff whose powers change throughout his adventures.
Jason is afraid of a gang of street toughs who look suspiciously like they wandered in from a 1950s b-movie. They threaten Jason, and he becomes an unwilling accomplice as they break into a Chinatown shop owned by an elderly gent (Chan). The old man fights back and is promptly put down, but before he dies he tells Jason to return the mysterious staff in the back of his shop to its rightful owner. Jason grabs the staff and is magically transported to another land in another time.
Properly mystified, Jason soon meets up with Lu Yan (Chan again), a drunken martial arts master; Golden Sparrow (Crystal Liu Yi Fei), a young beauty with her own imposing skills; and the Silent Monk (Li), another enigmatic martial arts master. Lu Yan and the Monk spar over the staff before agreeing that Jason is the proper one to return the weapon to the Monkey King. In this world, the Monkey King has been imprisoned for 500 years by the Jade Warlord (Collin Chou), an evil figure who wants the Monkey King's staff at all costs. Helping the Jade Warlord is Ni Chang, AKA "The Bride With White Hair" (Li Bing Bing), who has her own dreams of immortality.
The latter character is borrowed from a classic 1993 movie, which was based on a novel first published in the 1950s. She's a visually striking character, with hair that stretches to incredible lengths so it can be used as a weapon, and Jason recognizes her from the movie (the poster was hanging in his bedroom). Chan's drunken master is an obvious reference to two movies that he made earlier in his career -- Drunken Master and Drunken Master II (released in North America as The Legend of Drunken Master) -- in which Chan presented his take on the legendary Wong Fei Hung, but a similar beggar/master character also appears in King Hu's Come Drink With Me, which features a fierce female fighter called Golden Swallow. Swallow, Sparrow, homage, rip-off? Probably homage -- the movie gets a shout-out, albeit an awkward one. Li's Silent Monk could have been inspired by any number of similar stock roles in kung fu flicks.
The mixing of various legendary characters plays into the idea that Jason is imagining his entire adventure, like some extended daydream, and, indeed, the entire movie hinges on the need for him to conquer his fears in order to become an adult. But the possibility that he might be trying to resolve his own adolescent challenge is never raised. And that brings us back to wondering: why a white kid?
If the producers had dared to cast an Asian, Asian-American, or African-American, that could have opened up all kinds of interesting twists: the young Asian not acquainted with his own cultural history, the Asian-American torn between two cultures, the African-American similarly -- but differently -- torn. Michael Angarano was terrific last year in Black Irish and Man in the Chair, but here he looks worn out and over matched. He stays stuck in that same gear until almost the last moment of the movie. Maybe if he showed more energy, or if his character displayed more potential for growth as he grappled with suddenly being thrust into such an overwhelming environment, it would make his casting less obviously a marketing ploy.
When I first started watching contemporary Hong Kong action movies in earnest eight or nine years ago, I thought they were markedly better than what I saw coming out of Hollywood at the time. As I caught up with films from earlier in the 1990s, and explored further into the 1980s, I realized that the contemporary films I thought were so good were actually inferior to what had come before. The more I saw, the more I could put things into perspective. My perspective has been further enhanced since the Shaw Brothers catalog has become more readily available on DVD.
Sometimes I like to imagine otherwise, but I am by no means an Asian cinema expert. I still have several hundred movies on my "to watch" list, and I'm constantly reevaluating my perspective on things. If you haven't seen many classic martial arts movies, or have only seen the more recent films made by Chan and Li, you may well enjoy The Forbidden Kingdom much more than I did.
Despite my reservations, it was good to see Li smiling and Chan having a good time, the female leads are attractive and look deadly, and Collin Chou was an appropriately wicked villain. Still, why can't we expect more, even from something so obviously intended as mindless entertainment?










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-18-2008 @ 11:23AM
John R said...
I've said this before on a different review, but everything you said I've seen coming a mile away. When I saw the white kid in the trailer said, "WTF? That white kid looks really out of place." This movie didn't need a white lead. It had freakin' JET LI and JACKIE CHAN, for crying out loud.
It's really unfortunate that its going to take two more examples, "Dragonball" and "Street Fighter", for Hollywood to learn the lesson that whitewashing just DOES NOT work.
"If the producers had dared to cast an Asian, Asian-American, or African-American, that could have opened up all kinds of interesting twists..."
I agree. TAKE A CHANCE for chrissake!
Reply
4-19-2008 @ 1:48PM
GearsofWar said...
And people thought "21" 's casting was just an anomaly?
Reply
4-18-2008 @ 1:40PM
Crispy Chicken said...
I agree with everyone on this. If you're gonna cast some white kid in the movie, better put in someone we know or has some credible acting ability. This feels like "21" where they just dumped a "newcomer nobody" in the lead.
I honestly think John Cho could have played the part in that one, and he has a bigger (growing) following than that guy.
See, I cant even remember the lead guy's name in "21" Im just gonna refer to him as That Guy. Thats how unmemorable, predictable, his performance was.
Im gonna watch this movie for the REAL stars in it (Li, Chan, Chou,) not for that Michael whatshisface kid.
Reply
4-18-2008 @ 2:26PM
Sidney said...
I think The Forbidden Kingdom looks like one of the coolest action/fantasy films to come out in some time, and it should be really cool to see Li and Chan in the same film for the first time ever! Here's an ebay auction I ran across for the movie for an original theatrical poster signed by the entire cast! All proceeds go to a very noble charity, so I thought I'd pass it along: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=200216997523&ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT&ih=010
Reply
4-18-2008 @ 3:32PM
Amorde said...
It's sad that after the success of Crouching tiger, hidden dragon with an all Asian Cast and in a different language no less. Producers still feel the need to throw a random white guy into a movie where he doesn't belong. Did they somehow believe Asian actors and intricate stories can't carry the movie? Why don't they just throw the white kid into a Tyler Perry film then.
Reply
4-18-2008 @ 3:42PM
Paco said...
"If the producers had dared to cast an Asian, Asian-American, or African-American, that could have opened up all kinds of interesting twists..."
You're right on the money with this.
Reply
4-30-2008 @ 10:39PM
Paul said...
You're all being backwardly prejudice on the white boy casting. Are you kidding me??? It HAD to be a white person, no way should it have been an african or oriental. You people are blind. First; the fact that he was not asian louldy marked the good character and nobility of the Good Guys. Jackie and Jet, even that God king, all did not raise a single comment about a strange alien white boy being in their land. At most you hear Jet Li's observation of the boy not being Chinese (da funniest part of the whole movie). They accepted him, taught him, guided him, without reservation. They just proceeded along duly noting he was different and keeping the big picture at hand. TRUE good guys.
Second; this tale and story is inherently WESTERN. It is a "white people" story, meaning that africans and even HONG KONG were never any good at the formula of telling a story via cinema; at least until the 70's or even late 80's. WESTERNERS are the boys who made StarWars, who made Superman, things like Goonies, The NeverEnding Story, etc, etc. This form and style of story telling, HELL this cliche story is strictly an invention of white folks. From George Lucas to Speilburg, to Richard Donner, even to Mel Gibson and Clint Eastwood. Think of that movie "Zathura". This very original style of story and form of adventure is inherently WHITE. WESTERN. U.S.A.
And now Asian cinema has learned from it. It only makes sense that the star, by heritage of the genre, BE the white kid. That's where the hell it came from. Try having a movie called KungFu where the tale takes place in china of a master avenging his teachers death and cast a white guy. Wrong! That genre story type is inherent to the Chinese. They invented that. Get it straight.
Thirdly, and most of all, the whole genre of kung fu chop socky films has most of it's influence upon the white folks of the U.S.A, Britian, and the rest of Europe. It's white folks who are blown away by all the chop socky movies. THEY are the audience who find the exotic possibilities of individual power of their inner selves exciting. Well, them and africans. For China, it's just something that's part of their culture. In white land, it's like "omigod, that's the coolest shit!" And the kid they got to play the fanboy fit the part perfectly. Having a white kid is the U.S's testimony to the chinese that they think they're great. For China its' flattering that the civilized Westerners admire and respect this particular contribution of cinema via the ingenuity of martial arts and super human power. It had to be a white kid, people.
Anyway you look at it, it makes sense. Unless you weren't paying attention to what movie you were looking at, or to the entertainment industries activities and hearths. Now John Saxon in Enter the Dragon: THAT was a guy placed their to hold white people's hand. Bruce was too intense and oriental, you needed some white guy to hold the hand of some disorientated, prejudice white bread.
Heck, even the opening title of that movie wouldn't allow Bruce's name to be alone. And he was the STAR! What bullshit, they HAD to put Saxon's name RIGHT next to Bruce's. As if Saxon were a partner in this creation of a badass kung fu movie. Why don't U critisize about THAT. Give critisizm that makes sense.
Reply
4-23-2008 @ 12:40AM
anh khoi said...
I can understand to a certain extent what your trying to get at Paul. It really shouldn't matter what race the lead is in any genre of movie. But you have to admit though..saying its a "western movie" or "white people film" so the lead has to be white,does sound pretty ignorant and some what racist..Though I strongly doubt or imply that you actual are.
And saying that african american and asian are not any good at making a good story-line or movie compared to "whites" is quite ignorant if you ask me. East asian movies have been just as good if not more creative even without the special effect CGI's and involves more in the well writting script. And have been involved in what you called "white genre" style of movie...which I "sci-fi flick" since the late 50's lol THERE no such thing as a white,black or asian style of movies..there just movies to me dude. Theres loads of asian films with crazy storys of war, drama, magic and horror or whatevers. Of course you wouldnt have seen them to judge them since there not in ENGLISH. And the ones that do make it over here or either really old or LOOSELY translated and most of the original meanings are lost in translation, and the habit of americans producers cutting the usually longer asian films SHORT to fit in with americans usual 1hr 30m's films, makes its appear rushed and with all the missing scenes and chinese to english grammer difference takes ALOT from the movies. sometimes making it seem inferior too american films.
Even crouching Tiger,hidden Dragon won academy awards in various catergorys, even though it was considered a failure in asia..giving the impression that there were better produced films in asia then CTHD.
BTW you can't blame some of the people here for noticing how every film made in america almost, about ASIA or some far away place always has to have a white lead in it, learning the "oriental ways" and save the people from a evil asian dude. which is fine with me if the movies good, but to do it in almost every asian based movie is pretty narrow minded and racist of hollywood. Its a shame our asian super stars can't show there true talents in acting due to english not being there FIRST language. makin them seem lacking in most american produced films. But yeah enough with my ranting, Truce is If the movies good then its good, who cares if hes white or asian or pink or purple..just try not to sound so racially supremest, American cinema is'nt all that great, take away the CGI's and you got mostly B rated cheesy plots, with a couple really good movies. =]
Reply
4-23-2008 @ 4:41PM
Paul said...
I agree with most of what you say there anh koi. And you were right; of course I am not prejudice. As for african americans and asians not being able to tell a story as good as "whites", I still stick with that but perhaps I should make it a bit more clear so that it doesn't sound TOO racist, it's not suppose to. What I'm saying is that asians certainly have a certain style of story telling and thier own kind of genre's and even the same for some africans.
But the white folk are the ones who made story telling very stylish and always carrying a theme. Asian films can tend to lack a theme or point, long before, it was more of a matter of having a show or a few neat scene's.
For that matter, it was white folks who invented the cinema art of story telling. They were the leaders in that field. And they were usually Jewish apparently. If we get into history, it is actually caucasians who have strongly practiced story telling and theme delivery. From Greek tales of some protagonist journey, to Icarus flying too high in the sky. From vikings singing a story of how a great warrior won his victory to Robin hood saving the day. Whereas most of oriental tales and also african tales were not really tales, with a message or an opening and closing, as stories go.
They were instead just facts. The myths or legends would mostly be descriptions of events or physical facts about whatever legend. So all the legends in the Orient and even AFrica were not like some tale of a journey, but rather just records of history. Of course we don't believe in dragons or flying men, but the way these tales go, they state it like objective memory rather than a ride or journey of a tale.
But definately, the whole science fiction or fantasy tale of a young kid learning a lesson and becoming better or stronger is DEFINITELY White folk. The first being directly from England; Lord of the Rings and Narnia.
So THAT specific genre is invented by British white folk thus the kid in this movie was an obvious play, and we still see it being carried on and practiced today.
Also, what you said is true, asians are generally played as villians and scoundrels, like Ming the merciless or something. But Jackie has really put a nice guy face on the asian stereotype, I think. But Jet makes sure we don't forget that the Asian man can be viciously deadly!
We owe much of that to Bruce. Thanx Bruce!
Reply
4-28-2008 @ 6:12PM
Henry said...
To Paul, well, I'm not going to make a long answer, because really, theres not much to say. Your whole argument just shows that you have not watched much of and even less understand asian folklore. You say most oriental tales don't really have messages, openings and ends, and thats completely wrong. They are not stated as facts but usually provide strong messages concealed in an amazing story. Your criticism of it just shows how little you understand Asian tales and films that convey them. I'm Asian American and lived in America all my life. I watched both Asian and American movies, stories etc. I would agree however, that movies like Lord of the Rings (the Frodo part) and Narnia are a genre created by White folks though. This genre is about some nobody becoming this "chosen one". And though I didn't watched Forbidden Kingdom yet, I believe that the movie is that type of genre. And the criticism I have for it, is that such a genre sucks. I liked everything in LOTR except the hobbits and the ring. Narnia was just plain dumb. Perhaps westerners like this idea of individualism, of somehow being the one, and this was what was marketted, how the plot was created, associating the lead with a white person. Asian tales deal more with hard work, strong determination and motivation, and development and change in character. For this movie, you can say that it has to be a white kid for this genre; I won't disagree. I'm just saying, along with others, is that another person would have brought in another genre for the movie, and overall, a better movie in "our" perspective. You like this type of movie? keep it that way; we have our own interests anyway.
4-29-2008 @ 1:23AM
batman said...
Greetings Henry
"Your whole argument just shows that you have not watched much of and even less understand asian folklore", can easily say the same for you. Watch: "Henry, your whole statement just shows that you have not watched much of and even less understand asian folklore". See how unsubstantial that was? Whimsically making statements with no rhyme or reason doesn't qualify it much as worth while statement. Might as well say the moon is made of cheese. "Okay then Henry, I say the moon is made of Potatoes!"
Asian folklore, particularly oriental, does not stand out dominantly as long elaborate stories. A protagonist displaying experiences, epiphanies, severe character change, and carrying a theme. If you think so; name TEN.
And consider how long it would've taken you to collect these ten during your internet research. Or going to a library, a school, or just thinking of them. I hardly doubt U can just think of them though. Again we are only talking of folklore, ancient times; not Cinema or modern novels.
Whereas the caucasian race has a million of them which we could randomly state just by thinking of them without digging and researching, and you'd prolly recognize half of them.
Now, moving on to cinema and modern novels, once again this is STILL lacking. For crying out loud, the only outstanding oriental movie that they made from a novel is "Memoirs of a Giesha" and the irony there underlying my point is that it wasn't even an oriental novel. Some white man wrote it.
It is only LATER, that asian films started ADAPTING the practice of story telling in their movies. Bruce Lee would be one of the loudest to step in that direction. In fact Bruce Lee himself had said that "the quality of asian films are not that good" or words to that effect. With his own films and observing others during the time he did however state that the standard was improving and becoming "taut" as he put it.
This is WAYY after Western Cinema has already lead the way, and provided by example. Thus the orient started following suite. So NOWADAYS you do have good oriental films with a solid theme, and an obvious story. NOWADAYS (esp the Japanese). Sticking with Gong fu, "Robin B Hood" is a clear and mighty example of this starring Jackie Chan.
Back to ancient tales, the orient does in fact state their tales simply as information. Or a matter of fact.
It's like a feat had been performed by some dude and he becomes legend for it; Wong Fie Hung as a case example. Or how about "the green destiny"? Most "stories" in India, China, Africa, etc. are not actual tales. As tales are fabricated, they are FICTION. An artist (who is the author) concocts a story in his creative little head and weaves a piece of fiction with craft, clever literary tools, and a direction from a starting point. And his creation of this is therefore all fiction of course.
But in asia, it doesn't go that way very often. SOME exist like that, but dominantly it's not told like fiction, rather the opposite; it's told like non-fiction. Actual facts and events. Like a list of information, what was the creatures name, where was the province, what was the feat or event, what was the year, etc. Not that we would claim those to be true facts, but that is the nature of the folklore.
Back to the modern world name a few asian flicks, if you want, which have the very bold and obvious craft of story telling. And I mean told well, and very very clear and obvious. Nothing too interpretable, or abstract. When U name these? I'll bet they are WAAYYYYY after Bruce Lee, which was already the heavy point of western influence. For crying out loud that chinese man spoke english and loved James Dean.
As for your dislike for Narnia, it is quite ignorant. Narnia is a great book. It has Awesome story telling, and is really one of the basis for most of modern story telling today. That and Lord of the rings. You sound like an ignorant fool who gets all his information from movies. If that's all U know about Lewis and Tolkein, by movies, then we understand better where you're mind is at.
This was a rather odd statement by you "I would agree however, that movies like Lord of the Rings and Narnia are a genre created by White folks though". AGree? What do you mean agree?? That would not be something to agree with; the authors are white people. That's like something to recognize, not agree. That's like saying "I agree that Jackie Chan is chinese" ???Whatt?? That's not something to agree with, that's a stupid fact.
"You like this type of movie? keep it that way; we have our own interests anyway". That's not a very good reason for me to keep it that way. Different interest does not justify why I would keep liking this movie, in fact it has nothing to do with it. If you like or dislike the movie is not a valid reason for me to like the movie. The movie is either good to me or it aint. And you recommend me to like this type of movie, when you haven't even seen THIS movie.
Your own lack of interest or presence of interest has nothing to do with good stories and decent movies. I enjoy it because it is good art. Now THAT's a good reason to keep it that way.
I suggest to you the same.
Reply
4-29-2008 @ 11:06PM
mariana said...
I waith to see this movie:The Forbidden Kingdom,i dont los this movie
Reply
5-01-2008 @ 11:00PM
J. Nelums said...
Ok, when I first saw the trailer I hated it. I'm sick and tired of seeing the same thing in Hollywood. WHITE PEOPLE WINS." I don't mind white people taking the role (my fav actor is Bruce Willis and Christian Bale). But if you look in the home country that they love white people (look in the animes and Half-Asians are often mixed with white). But you have to remember that some Asians and Americans see black and Spanish as side characters or no memtion at all. But here's the formula to remember.
White: Hero
Black: First to die or a yassir character
Spanish: Drug dealers (See Black)
Asians: White people best friend
Middle Eastern: Terrorist.
that's how the world see us and accept us
Reply
5-09-2008 @ 3:15AM
Paul said...
You need to take that formula back to the lab for re-analysis. This is the formula Nelums:
White: Rich Villain Boss
Black: Hard dude
Asians: Kung Fu killer
Spanish: Smooth lover
I don't know what movies yer watchin. But yer right on the Middle eastern: typically a foreign enemy.