Is This Godzilla? You Decide
Filed under: Fandom, Newsstand, Movie Marketing, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Trailers and Clips
As one giant monster is celebrated for destroying Manhattan, another is taken to court. Cloverfield stomps on DVD shelves in North America today (Erik Davis got an early look), and there's no question that the large, rampaging creature in that film was inspired by Godzilla. But the beast only bears a superficial resemblance to the Japanese Lizard King, and his urban rebuilding program was limited to Gotham City. What if he dared to destroy a Japanese city and more closely resembled Godzilla?
The Subway sandwich chain recently aired a new commercial that stepped over the line, in the eyes of Toho Co., the Japanese studio behind the original Godzilla movies. Toho filed a complaint in Los Angeles, according to The Japan Times, alleging that Subway "not only intentionally created a character that closely resembles Godzilla in its physical appearance, but placed the character in a setting, a Japanese city under attack, that is widely associated with Toho's Godzilla films."
Glenn Erickson, AKA DVD Savant, commented: "A big monster attacking a city isn't automatically Toho's private property -- or is it? Is Toho saying that another film company cannot make a movie about a giant monster stomping Tokyo?" He linked to the ad on YouTube; after watching it, I agree that the suit seems "really ridiculous." The monster appears for about four seconds and looks pretty generic. But you be the judge. Take a look at the video and decide for yourself: Does that monster look like Godzilla?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-22-2008 @ 10:05AM
Peter Hall said...
Damn it all, Martin! I finally cast that jingle out of my head and you bring it right on back.
I hate you.
Reply
4-22-2008 @ 3:02PM
Noah said...
I have to agree with Toho, I don't think the monster in the commercial is generic enough, green and godzilla looking, they should have made it at least a different color, or made it goofier with antennas or wings or something
but it could classify as a spoof, and so there are different legal boundaries there (ex. Imaginationland South Park eps.)
Reply
4-22-2008 @ 1:15PM
Mr. R said...
If I were Toho, I would be ashamed of defending something so bad as those Godzilla movies. On the contrary, I would be proud that anyone would make an homage to that one prank I pulled that made me a millionaire, a very bad movie with horrible acting and crappy effects that people actually liked and turned into a cult success. How stupid is that suit?...
Reply
4-22-2008 @ 11:59AM
GL said...
Exactly. Someone should sue for that song.
The monster isn't even doing much destroying, he appears to be extolling the virtues of footlong Subway sandwiches.
Reply
4-22-2008 @ 9:05PM
AJ Wiley said...
Mr. R...have you seen the original Japanese cut of the 1954 Godzilla movie? That is a great film. A shame they didn't stop after that one.
In any case:
The monster is obviously meant to imply Godzilla, but I still find the lawsuit ridiculous. It still has more merit than the current J.K. Rowling trial, though.
Reply
4-28-2008 @ 2:44PM
Hailey said...
For those of you that think that there is no problem with subway highjacking godzilla to basically endorse their own product, would you feel the same if burgur king dressed someone up like ronald mcdonald and had him endorsing burger king. This is not by any means fair use, fair use relates to when copyrighted material is used in an educational manner, an example of this would be if your local news were to do a segment on the upcomming godzilla movie and they showed an image of godzilla to acompany the story. Likewise this falls quite short of the qualifications to be considered parody. What we are dealing with is an advertisement which delibratly portrays godzilla doing what godzilla allways does (destroying a japanese city) just before he stops to endorse a subway product. Are you kidding me peaple? if this isnt copyright infringement then what is?
Reply