Favreau and Howard Talk 'Iron Man' Sequels
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, RumorMonger, Fandom, Movie Marketing, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels
.jpg)
The following post may contain spoilers, so beware!
The entire Iron Man crew are currently making the press rounds (they'll be in NYC on Sunday, so expect a slew of quotes to come flying next week), and already director Jon Favreau knows exactly where he wants to go with the Iron Man sequels -- so much so that he's dropped a bunch of hints in the first film, due out May 1. He tells Rotten Tomatoes, "I've got another two movies in my head; I'm ready to go and I know the cast feels the same way," he said. "Now it's out of the hands of us, of the filmmakers, and it's even out the hands of your readers. I know all the people who have been following this for two years are going to go and see the movie, and maybe they'll see it twice and I'm very grateful for that. If everybody comes out to see the movie and it's successful, then I'm sure Marvel's going to want to do another."
Be careful with that RT article because they do spoil some stuff, like whether Samuel L. Jackson actually shows up in a cameo role as Nick Fury. But perhaps the biggest set up for a sequel -- spoiler warning -- comes when Jim Rhodes (Terrence Howard) glances at Stark's Mark II Iron Man suit and says to himself, "Next time baby." It certainly looks like the second film would involve Rhodes in costume, possibly as War Machine, but as IGN points out, Rhodes first dons another suit in the comics. Howard told them, "If you've read the comics you'll know that that is the next phase, but there is another intermediate phase in there where he would have to put on his best friend's suit for a period of time."
Howard is referring to the time in the comics when Rhodes is forced to throw on the Iron Man suit because of Stark's alcoholism. However, the suit screws Rhodes up -- he gets headaches, loses control -- and eventually Stark must build another suit to stop his friend. This may, in fact, be the plot for Iron Man 2 -- and I imagine they'll also throw in another major villain since, ya know, it's now a rule that all sequels have more than one villain. What do you think?
For more on the flick, check out Moviefone's 15 Burning Iron Man Questions Answered. Iron Man arrives in theaters on May 1.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-24-2008 @ 10:42PM
Ralph said...
I really never liked the "multiple villain" syndrome in these flicks. Referencing a coming villain isn't a bad thing, but keep it focused.
Reply
4-24-2008 @ 10:43PM
Ralph said...
I should add, though, that my son -- upon seeing the "little heroes" IRON MAN packs -- noted the Hulkbuster Armor and said, "Now that would be a good next movie". Indeed.
Reply
5-22-2008 @ 9:39AM
Zion said...
too early for starks vs. rhodes. better to leave that for the third film. the audience might benefit from a storyline more like Godfather II. developin' a storyline in the present that runs concurrent to a historical storyline. maybe rhodes/potts in danger alongside how starks became acquainted with them.
hints of tony's addiction. instability @ stark industries. a thinkin'man's movie. makin' a deeper/richer story. that's why the first film did so well. by not panderin' to fanny-geekboys & appealin' to a wider/more sophisticated audience.
movies with multiple villians that failed:
1. daredevil
2. batman (choose any one)
3. spiderman 3
4. x-men 3
the only superhero movie with multiple villians to succeed:
SHAFT (starrin' Samuel L. Jackson) ... ha ha ha
Reply