Cinematical

Erik, I can't recall anything in the 1991 remake that didn't borrow heavily from the original, itself a film that happily wallowed in sentimentality. But, sure, kinda fun and cute, and Martin and Keaton displayed a pleasing chemistry together.

Rex, I certainly don't begrudge anyone's enjoyment of the remake. The original is certainly a product of its time period, with the father enshrined as breadwinner and protector of the family, and stay-at-home mother busy looking after the house and children. Where it resonated for me is the idea that the father suddenly found his role usurped by his future son-in-law and didn't know how to deal with it. He wants to reach out and be emotional and express his love for his daughter but doesn't know how. His role was challenged as was his unquestioned (if loving) control of the family.

It's a comedy of the uncomfortable. I don't recall any equivalent resonance in the remake. Times have changed and fathers are no longer recognized as the all-knowing Lord and Master. Modern audiences can probably relate better to the remake. Certainly the need for a more equitable marital arrangement is well expressed, and both mother and daughter are not so subservient to the men in their lives, as in the original. Many of the same comedy beats are observed, though Martin Short is much wilder as the wedding planner. But the father is funny because of Steve Martin's kooky mannerisms, not because his role in the family is threatened.