Cinematical Seven: Watching Indy Through the Years
Filed under: Action, Paramount, Steven Spielberg, Cinematical Seven

Inevitably, Indiana Jones evokes nostalgia. Steven Spielberg wanted to make a globe-trotting adventure, James Bond style, inspired by the black and white Republic serials of the 1930s. His friend George Lucas had just the hero for him, a rough hewn but debonair explorer who would certainly be at home in those cliffhanging pictures. What makes the first and third films in the Indiana Jones trilogy work is their affectionate regard of the past, combined with a modern, emotional undertow and jet-fueled pace.
What follows are my recollections of watching Indiana Jones through the years. The list is intended as a conversation starter: what are your favorite memories from watching Indy the first, second, third -- or 25th -- time?
1. Raiders of the Lost Ark
Spielberg had risen to the level of unassailable god in my young mind on the basis of Duel, Jaws and Close Encounters of the Third Kind, but 1941 was an awful mess that crashed and burned at the box office, and I had no enthusiasm for a callback to awful '30s serial pictures. Advance word was minimal, as I recall. Lucas' participation didn't help after he'd left me hanging at the end of The Empire Strikes Back, and I was not terribly impressed with the idea of Harrison Ford as leading man (I would have preferred Tom Selleck). None of my friends were talking about the movie.
Still, I reluctantly tramped out to Grauman's Chinese Theater in Hollywood on an overcast Saturday morning in June 1981 to give Spielberg another shot. The opening scene's jungle vibe seemed kinda cool and different, then John Williams' percolating musical began to boil, and I liked how things went from bad to worse -- especially the boulder! The kicker was seeing Indiana running for his life and his pilot buddy hesitating before starting up the plane. After that I was on board and couldn't wait to see what happened next. I left the theater totally pumped up, in love with Karen Allen and devoted to Steven Spielberg; I told everyone I knew to see the movie.
2. Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
Post E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial, of course, expectations were sky high for the Indy prequel. (I chose to ignore his sappy, shallow segment of Twilight Zone: The Movie.) At the time I worked for a tiny company in the suburban San Fernando Valley in Los Angeles; on the morning of May 23, 1984, I was alone in the office (not unusual) when my boss stopped by with his wife and young son to tell me he was blowing off the day to go see the first Temple of Doom show of the day. When two other employees came in and heard about his plans, they clamored to go too, and eventually we convinced him to shut down the office entirely.
Picking up wives and children along the way, our group happily traveled to the theater, bought our tickets and sat down, ready to have a good time. As the first sequence (a song and dance number? Indy in formal wear?) unfolded, our smiles turned to puzzled frowns, and the constant shrieking of the spoiled Willie Scott (Kate Capshaw) irritated. We squirmed at the nasty tone of child slavery and "open heart surgery." The thrill was gone. We were a quiet group afterward, only too eager to get back to work.
3. Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
I moved to New York shortly after Temple of Doom and got busy with a new life. When Last Crusade was being publicized, I still felt burned by Doom, though I admired Spielberg tackling more adult subject matter in The Color Purple and Empire of the Sun. But the prospect of seeing Sean Connery play Indiana Jones' father made me feel like the sequel might be a more jaunty adventure, more Raiders and less Doom. I jumped on the subway train from Brooklyn right after work on May 24, 1989, hoping to catch an early evening show at a big theater in Times Square.
I got one of the last tickets available in the 1,000 seat auditorium, and struggled to find a seat, ending up next to a rather large gentleman who took up considerably more space than his seat allowed. It wasn't an ideal setting, and I worried that I'd be stuck in the middle of a long row if the movie was horrible. Happily, I liked the opening "origins" sequence, I loved Sean Connery as Professor Henry Jones, and Harrison Ford wore Indy like he did that battered fedora. It wasn't Raiders, but it had a similar tone, and if I wasn't thrilled, at least I wasn't disappointed; it left me in a state of contented satisfaction.
4. The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles
The small scale of the adventures never caught my fancy enough to tune in on a regular basis. I only had a 13-inch television, and Indiana Jones was a larger than life character who belonged on the big screen, no matter his age. I watched out of a sense of obligation -- reviews had been fairly positive, and some of my friends really talked up the show -- even though I thought Last Crusade had ended on the right note and any further adventures were best left to the imagination.
5. Trilogy on Laserdisc
Roger Ebert is an evil, evil man. On an episode of Siskel and Ebert at the Movies, he showed his modest home screening room and laserdisc player, and demonstrated its potential for movie lovers by pausing Raiders on the frame where Indy confronts a snake in the Well of Souls -- and the reflection of the glass pane that protected Harrison Ford could be clearly seen. (That's been digitally erased on DVD.) That was the final straw, and I proceeded to go broke buying a laserdisc player and as many movies as I could. My new roommate came into possession of a commercial AV projector; before long, our tiny 12' X 20' dwelling space hosted regular movie nights.
Of course, we had to show the Indy trilogy to our friends (inspired in part by the renewed interest sparked by the TV series). The screening area was packed with sweaty bodies and the floor was littered with soda bottles and pizza boxes by the end of the night. None of us had seen the three films back to back before, but we were in complete agreement that Raiders rocked, Temple of Doom sucked, and Last Crusade was pretty good. People kept making catcalls or drifting out to make phone calls while Doom played, and Last Crusade was not as captivating at the end of a three-movie marathon as it was when it played by itself. More than a decade would pass before I saw any of the movies again.
6. Indiana Jones -- The Adventure Collection
I picked up the latest three-disk DVD set on Friday evening more out of a sense of professional duty than anything else. What more could I hope to glean after all these years? The extra features are quite minimal, as Scott Weinberg noted last week, but it's always the movies themselves that matter most, and I was shocked at how much I still enjoyed Raiders. By the time the horseback/truck scene started, I was literally rocking my chair back and forth with excitement, like I was riding along with Indy. It's a runaway freight train hurtling down a steep mountain, and more thrilling than any theme park attraction.
Speaking of which, Temple of Doom was even worse than I remembered (it's reassuring to hear that even Spielberg and Lucas are less enthusiastic about it than the others), but the real surprise for me was how much better Last Crusade plays than I remembered. Nostalgia fuses with familial reconciliation and the reuniting of old friends to create a warm, sentimental glow. Sure, the edges are sanded off, yet the action sequences hold up well, the twists and turns are clever, the jokes are funny, and the performances are solid.
7. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (Trailer)
I'm writing this late on Saturday night, before the first wave of reviews hit the Net, so I'm still feeling hopeful that the latest adventure of Indiana Jones will prove to be satisfying. I have no stake in the financial outcome, so I don't care if Crystal Skull fails to appeal to a teenage audience or turns out to be a box office dud. All I want is a small measure of the thrill and excitement I felt when I first laid eyes on the most adventuresome archeology professor/treasure hunter in cinematic history.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-18-2008 @ 11:03PM
John said...
In stories like these, of course, one has to bring a healthy suspension of disbelief to enjoy the movie. The magic and superhuman feats never bothered me, but having Professor Jones be an archaeologist really left me puzzled.
I know it's silly, but I always felt that here' was a man who stole artifacts and then proceeded (through his own efforts or not) to destroy the entire archaeological site. Huge temples or catacombs were turned to dust, once the professor went by. No one else would ever be able to admire the magnificent building, search for more treasure or study those long-gone civilizations. Suspending my disbelief and getting caught up in the story left me with a heart ache when I saw the destruction.
One other thing that left a sour taste in my mouth from the Temple of Doom movie was remembering something that they had Jones say in a Raiders. In Raiders, Jones says that the story of power coming from the ark was just a bunch of ancient superstition and hocus-pocus nonsense. However, in the prequel they had him fighting black magic. To me that was a huge sequential error. How could a man that had gone through the events in Doom not be a changed man by the time he gets to the period in Raiders?
Finally in The Last Crusade, I had a hard time suspending my disbelief at the end when instead of building a fake cavern facade, Lucas and Spielberg decided to film in Petra, Jordan. I kept saying to myself, 'Hey, that's Petra, not some unknown cave housing the Holy Grail!"
BTW, it was the violence in Doom that led to creating the PG13 rating. Doom was PG and parents and critics were outraged.
Reply
5-19-2008 @ 9:58AM
Peter Martin said...
I knew about the PG-13 rating ('Gremlins' usually gets tossed in as well), but I have to admit I'd never thought about it from the archeologist viewpoint. Indiana the destroyer of sites?!
Your point about 'Doom' and Indiana's character is a good one.
5-19-2008 @ 10:51AM
kevjohn said...
Is that the original impression you had of Dr. Jones? I remembered being thrilled at his conquests when I first saw them, but I would have only been between 8-17 when all the films came out. You don't do too much deep, introspecitve thinking about damage to culturally historical artifacts and sites when you're 8. But as I sat through Raiders last night for the first time in maybe a decade, the first thing to enter my mind during the Hovitos temple scene was Indy's kind of a douche. He's just stealing these peoples' golden idol; he's a tomb raider. But then I rationalized it by saying he's just trying to protect it from the other tomb raiders who are only out for their personal gain, or in the case of Ark, for the gain of an evil empire.
5-24-2008 @ 12:52AM
Proman said...
1941 Budget: $35 million
Gross: $92.455 million
Crashed and burned my ass. It made a big profit so please, stop spreading lies.
Reply
5-19-2008 @ 9:54AM
Peter Martin said...
The domestic box office for '1941' was only $31.7 million, and it was widely reported as a box office disaster at the time. That was my sense of it. Also, I don't know how long it took for it to open worldwide -- films rolled out over months back in those days, rather than weeks.
Compared to 'Jaws' ($12 million budget, $260 million domestic, $470 million total) and 'Close Encounters' ($20 million budget, $132 million domestic, $300 million total), '1941' certainly underperformed
5-19-2008 @ 2:15AM
doood said...
I guess it's all relative to one's age when they see a movie. I thoroughly enjoyed all three films when I first saw them. Yes the 2nd had a dark tone and didn't mesh with 1 and 3, but that's okay. Same with 'star wars', same with 'back to the future'. Change it up a bit, then bring us back. At least all three kept me tuned in and convinced that Indy could do these things and left no trail behind, because otherwise we (the real world) would have discovered it afterwards (that's what I thought as a child). These films were action packed with great stories and solid characters. At the time Lucas could write and Speolberg left his print on everything giving us that extra 'umph' on every possible sequence, making it the best he could with stunning visuals, great camera moves, and pushing the extra mile on blocking/composition. Having John Williams helped more than you could ever imagine as well.
Anyway, the new installment already seems forced and inconsistent compared to the others. I want to see Indy capture my attention as he did before. But Speilberg, and especially Lucas, were different people then. They've changed, we can see it in their work. Speilberg not so much, but drop Lucas please, he's done! The new Indy is probably no exception.
BUT, I'm sure it'll be great for those seeing Indy for the first time on screen. It'll be what my experience was to Raiders, Doom and Crusade and not understanding why older (maybe jaded) critics were tearing them apart. Unfortunately, the new audience will probably be more interested in Shia than Harrison which is just plain wrong.
Reply
5-19-2008 @ 10:37AM
kevjohn said...
I think Temple of Doom gets a bad rap. Yes it was a lot darker and not nearly as fun as Raiders, but it was still an enjoyable ride. I would have been only 10 years old when it originally hit the theaters, but even then I was smart enough to know... it's just a movie. The most horrifying thing in the film wasn't the heart getting ripped out, it was listening to Kate Capshaw whine and scream all movie long. Unfortunately I've ran into a few too many people like that in the non-film world.
My most vivid memory from seeing the first Indy movie was going to the wrong theater! This stupid theater where I grew up in Cincy had it's main theater building on one street, and an adjunct theater (with 2 screens) catty corner across a busy intersection. After being dropped off by my mother barely in time for the showing at the main theater, only to be told it was at the other one, I had had a hell of a time making it across that street. I got there in the middle of the opening scene, right when Sapito is holding Indy's whip hostage in exchange for the golden statue. I didn't know how much of the movie I'd missed, so I went to go see it again 2 or 3 days later. Not an easy feat for an 8 year old kid in those days.
Reply
5-19-2008 @ 12:40PM
Ben B. said...
Kev John, that story made me laugh and made me remember a recent memory very similar to that. Here in Austin, TX, the Paramount Theater has a summer classics series where they show classic movies all summer long in this old moviehouse. I'm talking Gone with the Wing, 400 Blows, Lawrence of Arabia. And then one summer, they announced they were going to be showing the entire Indiana Jones trilogy. Well needless to say, they didn't need to advertise that to me twice.
I can't remember why, but I was running late for the first film (Raiders) and made it inside just as he was going through the jungle. So thankfully I hadn't missed much more than 1 minute of the movie. However, I was also trying to locate my friends who had saved me a seat and the jungle scene is actually very dark, so I could not see anything in the theater. I actually stood in the aisle until Indy finally emerged from the cave and escaped in the plane. Finally this emergence into light was able to illuminate the theater enough that I was finally able to track down my friends. But for those first 10 minutes, I felt that I was drawn into the atmosphere more than I ever had been before. Course when Indy told his associate to "stay out of the light." I wanted to scream, "hell no! Stand in that light right now!"
Reply
5-19-2008 @ 4:09PM
AJ Wiley said...
Temple of Doom may be the lesser of the three Indy movies, but I still love it...
I mean...Short Round. Short Round!
Reply
5-20-2008 @ 12:33AM
mepsipax said...
Regarding the part about Indy's comment about magic at the beginning of Raiders: what about in Last Crusade when he doubts the power of the Grail despite seeing the Ark's power all those years ago?
I always got the impression that Indy's character arcs were to be self-contained and that he starts as being a skeptic then becoming a believer by the end of each film.
5-24-2008 @ 12:55AM
Proman said...
Peter Martin.
It was never reported is disaster. It's a lie. It's just that compared to how much Jaws and CEOTTC gorssed this was considered an underperformer.
My $92.455 million gross figure is real for the movie's worldwide gross. Look it up if you don't believe me,
Reply