Steven Soderbergh Talks 'Che' Release Possibilities
Filed under: Distribution, Exhibition, Movie Marketing
Kim and James both loved Steven Soderbergh's Che at Cannes and Kim, at least, was adamant that the film must be seen in its current four-hour form. Distributors understandably disagree, since a four-hour movie is a tough sell. Exhibitors would probably cry foul too -- intermissions are a logistical pain in the ass, and a long running time means fewer showings per day and more screens theaters must dedicate to an in-demand film. Soderbergh, for his part, seems to have conceded that an uncompromising four-hours-or-bust release might not be in the cards. His suggestion: show Che as one movie for a week in every market, and then split it in two. That seems to me to be, uh... not thought through. So, what: you show the four-hour version for a week at regular ticket prices, and thereafter offer two halves instead? Do you show the full version and then stagger the two films' releases? Both options seem awkward, even giving the appearance that the distributor's trying to pull a fast one -- "I have to pay twice now?!"
On the other hand, I appreciate that Soderbergh is doing everything he can to make sure that the people who want to experience Che as a four-hour epic get to do so. (I'm pretty sure that Telluride and Toronto attendees will get that chance this fall.) He didn't talk about the possibility of cutting the whole thing down to a more pedestrian two-and-a-half or three-hour length, but I can't imagine he'd consider it if the option to release two films is available. The good news for everyone, of course, is that there's always the DVD.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-23-2008 @ 2:15PM
GL said...
4 hours. No way.
Reply
5-23-2008 @ 2:53PM
Dan said...
I wouldn't want to see a movie about a commie icon even if it was 20 minutes. It's good to see this is gonna fail even harder than most leftist movies because of the length.
Reply
5-23-2008 @ 2:56PM
Daniel Vella said...
Why is an intermission so difficult? Where I live (Malta) it's standard practice for every cinema in the country to have an intermission in the middle of every screening...
Reply
5-23-2008 @ 3:07PM
JimeneX said...
Even though I don't relate to right-wingers, I don't plan to see a movie about a man who helped put Castro in power, taking the freedom away from the people...This dude was a cold blooded murderer who didn't believe in freedom of speech among other things...The way he has been romanticized as a freedom fighter is just sickening....
Reply
5-23-2008 @ 4:35PM
Eugene Novikov said...
Who says the movie romanticizes him as a freedom fighter?
5-23-2008 @ 6:57PM
WillTheSecond said...
"Taking freedom away from the people"? WTF? You think there was a democratic government in Cuba before Communism? No, of course there wasn't, that's why there was a revolution. Next you'll be saying that Tsar Nicolas II was a nice and not an authoritarian dictator at all, and that the revolution against him made no sense whatsoever (the Russian revolution was not a specifically left-wing one, it just happened that out of the chaos the Bolsheviks became the dominant group, much like the Islamic clerics of the Iranian revolution against the Shah).
Also as Eugene said: who knows if it romanticises him or not? I ain't seen it, but I doubt Soderbergh would be so crass. If Guevara indeed did not believe in freedom of speech and was open about it, well, at least he was more honest about it than the neo-conservatives...
5-23-2008 @ 7:07PM
JimeneX said...
I was refering to how he's been romanticized in popular culture...
and he helped put Castro in power...look at the freedom they have
Reply
5-23-2008 @ 10:57PM
mike said...
Seeing a movie about a guy doesnt mean you support him or his beliefs. Its not like Che made this movie and will be pocketing profits from it.
It really should have nothing to do with your personal beliefs. I do not think he was the great man who has been romanticized in today's culture by many, but I still saw Motorcycle Diaries and will def see this if not to find out more about him and to support Benicio and Soderbergh for making his passion piece and making a film that does not fit into the mold...
Reply
5-24-2008 @ 2:46AM
Camperton said...
Just release it as two movies.
Reply
5-28-2008 @ 12:58AM
David Qda said...
Well I say it should be released as two movies in the U.S because the Attention span of a U.S.A american is less than one minute. The movie isn't about "Commies" its actually about Ernesto Guevara's participation in the revolutions. It's not a bio-pic or an action flick. So for all of those who can't think for themselves don't go see this movie. It actually involves some thought process to pic up on the subtleties Steven Sodergberg was trying to portray. And for everyone who wears Che Guevara shirts go read up on your history and find out what the symbol actually means. And for everyone who just thinks "oh yeah its just a commie story" go read your history and don't let the American media baffle you into developing your own world views. Because in the U.S the media has been lying to you all since the beginning. Why do you think the U.S is at war with the wrong country. And why didn't Bush get kicked out of the white house after 9/11? Hmm I think its cause the government has full control and the American people don't. Have fun.
Reply
6-17-2008 @ 7:28PM
ElGuero said...
Um, did anybody see the "Motorcycle Diaries"? I don't think that Soderbergh is going to romantizise the man, nor do I think he is going to make him out to be a tyrannical lunatic. Could this be Ocean's 14 in disguise...?! Clooney and the gang trying to lift Ernesto's weapons? Brilliant. In my opinion I just think that he's going to show a piece of history in an entertaining sort o' way.
Reply
6-30-2008 @ 9:52PM
EFM said...
I wouldn't care if it is 4 hours long. Just release it.
Reply