The Geek Beat: Re-Raiding the Tomb
Filed under: Action, Fandom, Remakes and Sequels, Games and Game Movies, The Geek Beat

The hype surrounding Indiana Jones' return is beginning to subside; now come the recriminations and fanatic defenses of the movie, but the thrill is gone. And before Lucas and Spielberg get bored and confirm a fifth Indiana Jones movie, I'd like to take this moment to offer up another reboot to Paramount.
It is time to bring back Lara Croft.
Last week, she came up again and again on the list of Indy rip-offs, which is a sad state of affairs. She's come down in the world since her 1996 debut. Croft used to be everywhere – magazine covers, t-shirts, posters; she may have originated as a blatant borrowing of Indy, but she quickly took on a pop culture life of her own. From her aqua tank-top to her twin automatics, Lara quickly escaped her progenitor's shadow, and very nearly approaches the iconic status of Indiana himself. While much of it was undoubtedly due to her impressive, er, attributes, I would also like to believe that people flocked to embrace her because she is cool and revolutionary. Marion Ravenwood and Indiana Jones combined, but with better weaponry.
It is time to bring back Lara Croft.
Last week, she came up again and again on the list of Indy rip-offs, which is a sad state of affairs. She's come down in the world since her 1996 debut. Croft used to be everywhere – magazine covers, t-shirts, posters; she may have originated as a blatant borrowing of Indy, but she quickly took on a pop culture life of her own. From her aqua tank-top to her twin automatics, Lara quickly escaped her progenitor's shadow, and very nearly approaches the iconic status of Indiana himself. While much of it was undoubtedly due to her impressive, er, attributes, I would also like to believe that people flocked to embrace her because she is cool and revolutionary. Marion Ravenwood and Indiana Jones combined, but with better weaponry.
Of course, I'm biased towards her (and since everyone is clamoring these days for the return of this character or that, I figured I ought to throw my pick into the ring). I loved the games, and even now her action figure stands proudly next to my laptop, wielding her trademark automatics. I've dressed as her numerous times, and the reaction garnered in even the most dull of Halloween settings suggests she hasn't entirely fallen from favor.
What really hurt her was not the disappointing sales of Tomb Raider Chronicles, it wasn't a backlash due to her breast size, it wasn't over saturation -- it was the two wretched movies they gave her. I confess to owning both -- the first was a gift from a young lad who felt I should have it, the second purely because Gerard Butler is in it. I watch them when I'm sick or bored, as they're like the equivalent of M&M's for my brain. I'm not proud of that, I don't feel particularly good after ingesting them, but hey, I like guns and relics. And I like to mentally edit them into what could have been. The Tomb Raider movies are rife with wasted opportunity. The first film was closer to Croft the archaeologist, the person who can always solve the puzzle, and snatch the prize before the bad guys. The second was an improvement in dialogue, but re-imagined her as a female Bond, more dependent on gadgets than an ability to read dead languages. Combine them together, and you nearly have the perfect Croft movie. (I say nearly because well, come on, the plots are still very wonky.)
Lara Croft also had the misfortune of being played by Angelina Jolie, arguably one of the most famous women in the world. It wasn't that Jolie didn't do a good job -- but Croft became a footnote in Jolie's personal legend, a pop culture icon completely subsumed by an even larger than life figure. One could argue that Lara Croft wasn't much of a character if she couldn't survive Jolie, but I maintain it was the weakness of the movies. People think of the films as Jolie running around in tight clothing in fantastic shape, not as any kind of genuine adventure – and that is largely what they were written as. If you watch the extras on Cradle of Life, the production people begin every introduction with "Well, Angelina wanted to ride a horse, so we wrote that in – and then she wanted to learn an Asian fighting style, so we wrote that in ..." Ideally, a script flows from the character, and what she would do – not the whims of an actress.
And Lara Croft is a great character. I love that she is basically an eccentric aristocrat, handed buckets of money and a posh manor by her family to pursue her curious hobby. She isn't all looks and guns, though, she's every bit as brilliant as Indy when it comes to reading hieroglyphics, and locating lost ruins. While Jones maintains that artifacts belong in a museum, and Croft seems to acquire them for her own satisfaction, both are fairly careless in their acquisition. Croft may be a bit more of a Belloq, but her heart is generally in the right place. She tries to set the evil curse right, even if her carelessness was what unleashed it in the first place. If you haven't, check out the series of cartoons that GameTap did last year for Lara Croft's 10th anniversary. A few are wretched, but they are proof of how fun Croft can be if written right. Everyone from Warren Ellis to Gail Simone did an episode – and if you don't fancy registering on GameTap, it seems they are all available on YouTube.
It is time she came back; she is ripe for a complete reboot. I think she's marketable to everyone: women who want to see a kickass heroine, men who want to see a hot kickass heroine, the audience sitting idle between installments of Indiana Jones and all his Mummy / National Treasure ripoffs, video game fans ... it's a no brainer. Hire one of the GameTap veterans (or someone else from the comic book industry), a good director, a new actress (preferably a relative unknown), and go for it. Skip the origin story, and launch right into the middle of an archaeological adventure, Raiders style. And remember to play up her brains. I have always fancied seeing Croft as a guest-lecturer at Oxford, where she would be upbraided for her destructive excavation methods. I have always wanted to see her in Egypt, like her stint in The Last Revelation. Let her get as bruised and bloody as Indy -- but when it comes to the action, I want plenty of puzzles and booby traps too. Why Kingdom of the Crystal Skull didn't is a mystery. It's what people love about Indy movies, and why people continue flock to National Treasure and Dan Brown. It falls to Lara Croft now. People want adventure movies, and she has never gotten a chance to really shine on the big screen.
Why not, Paramount? You're looking at a long wait for the whispered-about Indiana Jones V. You have another archaeologist in the wings. And her semi-automatics are getting dusty.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-27-2008 @ 1:11PM
Rufus said...
...and if they do, please choose an ENGLISH actress. I was tired of the films the moment I heard yet another English role was going to an American with a practiced accent.
(Been a while since I commented last...)
Reply
5-27-2008 @ 1:19PM
Astin said...
"...and very nearly approaches the iconic status of Indiana himself."
Far from it. Lara Croft is a relative blip in comparison to Indiana Jones in terms of popularity.
Reply
5-30-2008 @ 11:13AM
Martin said...
I've never been a big fan of the films, nor the games, regardless of the copious amounts of ... physicality in both.
But.
You argue a good case.
However, a film like this needs a large budget (just watch Noah Wyle's 'The Librarian' to see ample evidence of what a lack of budget does to an adventure-flick), and an unknown in a big-budget blockbuster? I think not.
Ah well.
Reply
5-27-2008 @ 1:50PM
Batzarro(A.K.A Rap-Rock Cameo) said...
My name is Batzarro, and I aprove this blog page. Even though I never got around to seeing the second movie, The Tomb Raider franchise shouldn't stay dormant. And a New Croft actress as well. There was something about Angellina Jolie that just didn't "click" as Lara Croft, though it is hard to explain.
Reply
5-27-2008 @ 4:39PM
Elisabeth said...
I agree. I didn't really want to bash Jolie as, at the time, she was a logical choice. But she never clicked. I think it was that she didn't really care for the character -- I seem to remember that she even turned it down initially. And from the outset, she didn't play the character as written, she had them tailor the character to fit her. That's why Lara doesn't wear her video game outfit -- Jolie only would wear black or gray. She even tried to get them to let her have a mohawk, if the DVD extras are to be believed.
Wow, I know WAY too much about this...
5-27-2008 @ 1:57PM
madgamer said...
Good read. I'd watch a reboot (or just a new one) for sure.
Reply
5-27-2008 @ 2:59PM
Al Shut said...
Random thought brought to me by this article: The manual to the first game said she wasn't into adventuring until she survived a plane crash in the Hymalaja and was later expelled by her family for spending to much money on travelling, having to rely on writting travel journals to finance her lifestyle.
Whatever happend to that in the movies (and later games)?
I would probably watch another attempt at a Tomb Raider movie, I'm not known to learn much from my mistakes.
Reply
5-27-2008 @ 4:14PM
Moo said...
I think there are plenty of interesting potential stories (quest items) to pursue here. I think this could be a hell of a lot of fun if done right.
I'd be ok with a relatively unknown actress if a bigger-name director were attached who can direct strong women (paging Whedon....paging Joss Whedon)
Reply
5-27-2008 @ 5:04PM
carg0 said...
"It is time to bring back Lara Croft."
(laughing)
uh no...no, it isn't.
Reply
5-27-2008 @ 5:09PM
eric said...
Isn't Rhona Mitra automatically short-listed for Croft? She's British, can convincingly kick ass onscreen, and has some acting chops. She's not unknown but not well-known either...
Reply
5-27-2008 @ 6:15PM
Elisabeth said...
She was always my pick -- she was my favorite of the Eidos models, I think her unceremonious firing cost her the movie part.
5-27-2008 @ 6:24PM
eric said...
Rhona Mitra was an Eidos model? Makes perfect sense, I guess.
It seems to me that this franchise needs someone like Robert Rodriguez: an action-savvy director who can make $40mil look like $100mil (or, in the case of a movie like this, $80mil look like $180mil). If the Tomb Raider movies (or just about any movies) cost less, their success would be almost guaranteed. Raiders was made for what was then a middling budget, and guys like Neil Marshall are great at making small budgets look mongo. Of course, Rodriguez would demand that his awful GF take over the role, and Marshall is busy. But someone along those lines...
Reply
5-28-2008 @ 11:58AM
Tigerlily said...
Why not bring back Lara Croft? She could search for all the things Indy should have done instead of aliens....
Adventure movies are like pirate movies. Great fun and excellent escapism.
Reply
6-14-2008 @ 6:09PM
SunlessNick said...
Let her get as bruised and bloody as Indy -- but when it comes to the action, I want plenty of puzzles and booby traps too.
I thought the two films had opposite problems when it came to Lara Croft's prowess. In the first, there wasn't anything that was allowed to significantly challenge her - which had the knock-on of denying us a chance to see her overcome any challenges. In the second, she seemed more nerfed, needing a lot of rescue, and defeating the last bad guy by stabbing him during a kiss. I'd rather see her grit through situations the way Indy does.
Reply