Review: Sex and the City
Filed under: Comedy, Romance, New Releases, New Line, Theatrical Reviews

Sometimes I feel like my cultural literacy is shamefully limited. I watch a lot of movies but somehow I rarely watch many television shows. I only have the most basic cable, so I could tell you all about the most fascinating shows on Austin community access but nothing about, say, Sex and the City. I saw the movie Sex and the City without ever having watched an episode, with an unfortunate tendency to refer to it as Sex in the City, and with such an ignorance of pop culture that I kept mixing up Carrie Bradshaw with Carrie Underwood. I brought a friend to the screening who was well acquainted with the TV show, in case I needed help, and whispered things like "Is that the theme song?" and "What's the joke?"
Fortunately, for those of us who are encountering Sex and the City for the first time, the movie's opening sequence provides compressed backstories about the four characters so we don't feel lost and confused. But even if we didn't know who had done what and whom and where, the storyline -- set five years after the TV show's end -- is not difficult to follow.
Carrie Bradshaw (Sarah Jessica Parker), a novelist whose material is stolen wholesale from herself and her friends, is marrying her longtime sweetheart, the rich investment banker known as Mr. Big (Chris Noth). She still relies on her three friends for advice: Samantha (Kim Cattrall), who is now living in Malibu with her movie-star boyfriend but jets out to Manhattan the way I would drive out to the farmers market; Charlotte (Kristin Davis), who totes around a sweet little girl she's adopted from China; and Miranda (Cynthia Nixon), who makes ominous comments about marriage since her own is on the rocks. The more they plan, the more lavish Carrie's wedding becomes. Complications ensue, but of course the four women stick together and support each other and buy lots of shoes just like they've always done.
As my friend pointed out, the plot of the film doesn't resemble a movie as much as it does an entire season of Sex and the City, compressed down into a mere 145 minutes. It's episodic and therefore, if you're not familiar with these characters, can take awhile to grab your interest. The charm of this movie for longtime fans of the show is in the characters themselves, not in the details of the plot, but my first impression of these women was not positive -- they appeared shallow, boring, and did nothing but shop and brag and babble on the phone. Fortunately, as the movie progresses, the characters gain more emotional depth and become more interesting and even likeable at times. However, Parker's occasional voiceover (is this a holdover from the TV show?) is irritating and unnecessary. I assume Parker is meant to be a stand-in for Candace Bushnell, whose "Sex and the City" columns and book were the inspiration for the TV show, and perhaps the voiceover was meant to symbolize her reading the stories she's written, but it contributes nothing meaningful to the film.
I can understand the fantasy aspects of a movie where no one hurts for money (even Carrie's assistant, played by Jennifer Hudson, is happy to rent the accoutrements of the rich if she can't afford them), where everyone has a successful career but never spends much time doing actual work, a world of big closets and loads of shoes and scrumptious sex talk. I was reminded a little of Depression-era films that focused on rich women in mansions with gorgeous fur coats, giving viewers a chance to live vicariously through them, but always with a little neurosis or emptiness of emotion that allowed the audience to feel superior. Sex and the City even has a fashion show right in the middle, a throwback to older movies geared toward female audiences like The Women and How to Marry a Millionaire.
Sex and the City has some good comic moments that I enjoyed -- a scene in which Charlotte's daughter is present so the women have to devise a euphemism for talking about sex, a silly montage of Carrie trying on old clothes to "Walk This Way" (with, I am told, an in-joke for fans of the TV show), an amusing but sad scene in which Samantha plans a Valentine's Day surprise for her boyfriend. But I never was able to sympathize much with these high-strung, high-maintenance, over-privileged characters. What can I say: I wear flat sandals and tennis shoes, I thought the designer purses were ugly as sin, and I don't think every woman needs a Brazilian in order to keep her man. And the film seemed far too long -- anything over 110 minutes for a romantic comedy is excessive, no matter how beloved the characters are. I spent a lot of time during the last hour of the film giving my watch surreptitious glimpses, wondering how much longer it would be before the ending, which wasn't hard to predict.
Fans of the TV show may disagree with me: the screening I attended was packed with women in cute dresses and heels (the only time I've ever felt underdressed at a preview screening). They applauded the first notes of the theme song -- until the remix kicked in -- they gasped in unison at Carrie's predicaments and laughed and clapped and had a fine time, although I think even the hardcore fans were dragging toward the end. But if you're not invested in the characters from way back, never longed to drink cosmos with "the girls," if you aren't the sort of person who loves to watch fashion shows and Vogue photoshoots and designer wedding planning, Sex and the City and its consumer-driven fantasy world may elicit little more than yawns.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
5-29-2008 @ 9:58AM
kevjohn said...
I was wondering if I'd ever get around to seeing this one. This review just put the final nail in that coffin. Not only is it about a show and characters I didn't much care for, but it's about them planning a wedding to boot! This film sounds like it was sprayed with a healthy dose of man-repellant.
Reply
5-29-2008 @ 10:14AM
Robin said...
Yes, the VO is a holdover from the show (and one of the most irritating aspects of the show). I was a devoted fan of the show but hated Carrie and Samantha. I'll watch this on DVD probably but am not in a rush at all... and I'll watch it just out of curiosity than anything else. What did they think was so important to disturb the otherwise great ending of the series?
Reply
5-29-2008 @ 11:47AM
Jay said...
I am by no means a major Sex in the City fan, but the entire review seems meaningless since you never watched the show. If you not going to understand the jokes, and meaning behind some of the moments and plot points, then why be the person to write a review. Perhaps you would of hated the TV show as well. So if I were a fan, why would I listen to a review from somehow who doesn't get or care for the show?
Also, you live in Texas, so it seems pretty obvious that wealthy NYC lifestyle is not yours. I am not gay or a cowboy, but I did not use that as a negative in my thoughts on Brokeback Mountain.
This review is a waste of time for everyone except people who want to find a reason not to see it.
Come on Cinematical
Reply
5-29-2008 @ 12:56PM
Max said...
@Jay:
The reasons you think this review is not valid are the EXACT reasons why it is. Most of the country is not New York and I think it's even safe to say most of the country are not fans of the show. This movie needs to play to more than just fans of the show to be successful-- and the big question is whether or not it can do it. This review addresses that question pointedly and honestly. Fans of the show will see the movie no matter what any review says and I'd sooner trust a review from someone who has no attachments than from someone who does.
5-29-2008 @ 1:40PM
thegoldfishpool said...
It shouldn't matter if you have seen the show or not. Any film should stand on it's own two feet. If it's a comedy it should be funny, PERIOD. You should not have to know every episode by heart to get the jokes. I live in Canada, My lifestyle is not that of the characters and I still enjoyed the series. (I also, surprisingly, am a straight Male.) I hope to enjoy the film when I go and see it with my wife. Jette's feelings on the film are as valid as anybody else's, and if she felt that she was left out of something because she wasn't familiar with the series than that is the fault of the filmmakers.
5-29-2008 @ 9:27PM
Mr. R said...
"Also, you live in Texas, so it seems pretty obvious that wealthy NYC lifestyle is not yours. I am not gay or a cowboy, but I did not use that as a negative in my thoughts on Brokeback Mountain."
Jay, just by reading this part of your commentary makes me believe you are a d o u c h e ! Seriously, there are people in Texas that are as wealthy or more than those fictional characters you enjoy watching. You are not gay or a cowboy but you still hated Brokeback? What if it's a well directed movie, are you going to see the films just because you identify? I sure hope you don't like Silence of the Lambs too much.
Coming from a person who writes "would of" and "from somehow who doesn't" makes me assume that it's you who is not from a high NY lifestyle.
So let's just call Sex and the City the TV show that aired on big screens and separate it from movies because most of us who read Cinematical enjoy both things separately.
6-01-2008 @ 1:34AM
whitney said...
Jay I think you are exactly right. Someone who can actually understand the jokes and characters should have written this review. I think it is funny that someone said the movie won't make much by just the people who like the show; in my town the movie sold out for the etire weekend. So I can only imagine how much it made everywhere else. If you don't like the show or aren't even considering going to see it why are you reading this review? Maybe if this movie was based on a TV show the writer was a fan of the review would have been better. I'm sure the friend that you took with you enjoyed the movie seeing as how she knew what was going on. Maybe you're constant questions distracted you from seeing how good the movie is.
5-29-2008 @ 12:40PM
denise said...
I don't get it. Every review I have read so far is from an unqualified writer. Clearly all of the reviews I have read are from people who have never watched the show, so it would be a little difficult for people to relate to the characters and to understand why there's a voiceover, etc.
Coming from somebody who has seen every show aired, I thought the movie was fabulous! It definitely didn't leave me disappointed. There were some cheesy lines, yes, but overall, it was funny and entertaining... and it left me wanting for more...
Reply
5-29-2008 @ 1:13PM
Claudia Lomelí said...
The point of an adaptation means that it should be able to be enjoyed by everybody, not only by fans of the original source. I enjoyed Fellowship of the Ring and I had not read the book previous to that. If anything, your impression of the movies is biased, because you seem to be a fan of the show, which is respectable. Now, putting that aside, just because you liked the film doesn't mean it's a good film, and viceversa.
5-29-2008 @ 5:07PM
jay said...
To the Goldfish and Max:
My point is that if you are going to review the film, then I would rather have a review from someone who could at the very least have a sense of why the show was popular. If you hated the show, and its not your style, that's fine. But most people have scene the show, and like it or hate, could atleast say "well I hated the movie, but loved the show" (or whatever the oppinion is as long as you could recognize the comparison). I fully understand the one SHOULD be able to enjoy the film without seeing the show, but I think it is naive to act as if the film wasn't made for all the people who bought the DVDs, watched the shows, or ran out and bought fancy shows after watching Carrie. And I would applaud the filmmaker for making a film for fans, and not dumbing it down for greater commercial appear, much as fans of comic book movies appreciate staying true to what made them great to begin with.
Furthermore, my complaint about the reviewer not being from NYC is the same as yours. It annoyed me that the reviewer point was that he couldn't relate becasue he wore tennis shoes not manola (or however you spell that), much like I am not a gay cowboy but still enjoyed Brokeback Mountain.
So yes the reviewers feelings are valid, just in my oppinion not worth much. I don't say that to be mean, I just would of just liked a comparison to have been made.
Reply
5-29-2008 @ 11:07PM
Claudia Lomelí said...
Let me get this straight, just because she wasn't into the series her opinion is not worthy? So, every film critic who never heard of Iron Man before but found the movie entertaining is basically wrong? Could you please stop and think for a second, that even if you do enjoy the movie, whether you were a fan of the show or not, there's always the chance that is still a bad movie? I understand and I agree when you say that this is a movie for the fans, clearly it is, but what, so suddenly the opinion of the other percent of the audience who weren't fans of the show becomes meaningless? What if someone who never watched the show happens to like the movie? Would that opinion be unworthy too? Or it would matter because it would agree with you?
5-30-2008 @ 7:36PM
John said...
Jay,
So, if my girlfriend wanted to go see this movie, which review should I read? One from a fan of the series or one who has never watched them before? I have never seen the show. This review speaks to those of us haven't followed the series. This review tells me that I need to negotiate a deal with my girlfriend. Something along the lines of, "If I go see this with you, you have to promise to go see the next XYZ movie with me".
I've read Kims review:
http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/30/review-sex-and-the-city-kims-take/
and understand what a fan would see. I identify with this review. So to me, it means more than it does to you.
5-30-2008 @ 10:22PM
Vicky said...
Just saw the movie - it was fabulous! Just have fun.
Reply
5-31-2008 @ 7:44AM
miknsc said...
Loved the series when it was on and couldn't wait to see the movie. Saw it yesterday and it was wonderful! My girlfriends and I immediately went and had a cosmo after the movie. Perfect ending! I wish they would come up with another show for these ladies together.
Reply
6-02-2008 @ 3:15PM
Kiki said...
I am in no way like those four ladies nor is my lifestyle but I still love the hell out of sex and the city. Even with all of the overextravagance of their lives, the series stood strong for its outrageous themes, lessons, and values of friendship. Not to mention brave, beautiful women acting completely outside of standards of how "women are supposssed to act"- in their personal lives and professional lives. The series and movie is actually pretty admirable once you really examine the core of the characters and plots. And its comedy!! Good lord they are funny! I dont care what anyone says. And that scene with the peekaboo wee wee! PRICELESS.
Reply
6-02-2008 @ 10:37PM
NativeKate said...
IWARNING-SPOILER for those who have not seen.
i am a huge fan of STC HBO series-and I am from Texas! My favorite show of all time. Sadly, I did not care for the movie at all. When Big was incapable of climbing out of the car (unable to get over his selfish childish self) and basically left Carrie standing at the "altar"-that was it for me-it just took it too far. Then Carrie sort of blaming Miranda for getting jilted at the altar because of what she said to Big at rehearsal dinner? PUHLEEZE.
Jennifer Hudson's character was irrevelant. She was the token younger woman of color-didn't find much depth to the relationship between her and Carrie or her character in general. All the squealing "reunions" grated on my nerves and the walk this way scene with Carrie modeling all her old clothes-too cheesy. The opening music/narrative/montage was M-TV-ish and unsophisticated-which should have been my first clue/red flag, but, I like Carrie, overlooked the red flag. I just didn't feel like the movie had 1/2 moxie or edginess that the HBO series did. I sooo wanted to love this movie. Several friends have seen it and loved it, but, not me. I'll go back to watching Seasons 1-6 on my DVD collection................
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 12:20PM
kimberly anderson said...
Reply
6-14-2008 @ 8:32PM
DenisJay said...
Here is an Aussie male perspective! I loved the T.V show so I went along and saw the film yesterday! As a film it was okay but pretty ordinary. I laughed 3 times, and felt moved a couple of times but Samantha has lost some of her groove and Miranda totally irritated me! Charlotte has become boring and Carrie is now very one dimensional! Fabulous this is certainly NOT! As a film it would have made an okay made strictly for television movie!
Reply
6-14-2008 @ 12:14AM
cidronela said...
Well, I do agree that someknowledge of the show would have been expected of someone writing a review on the film, but I also think it is interesting to have the perspective of someone who never saw and episode.
I do have to say I am aware of how shallow Sex and the City is (both the show and the film), and I would be ashamed to admit I actually like the show if it wasn't precisely because I do not expect more of it than what it actualy is: a shallow entertainment that is useful to give my brain a rest.
That being said, I think the film was everything we would have expected from it: cute, but predictable story, sex talk all the time and lots of dresses and fashion display which personally made me feel horrified (it is true: the 80's are back big time!! scary!). Anyone who is aware of what the show stands for would be wrong to expect a major cinematic discovery.
So if you are a fan of the show, go see it, it is like watching a very long episode; if you are not a fan, you don't miss anything believe me.
Oh! by the way: I agree that the rental purses were U-GLY, and, being a Mexican, I higly resen Charlotte's comment "it's Mexico!"; highly derogative and ignorant. Good she "went" in her pants.
Reply
7-23-2008 @ 6:43AM
Kathy Simons said...
Just got in from the movie - what a disappointment. I'll get the bad stuff out of the way first. Charlotte's daughter was no doubt someone's-daughter because she could not even sit on screen and not distract. GET A CHILD ACTRESS! The drama? It's hyper-condensed, unemotive and downright contrived. Having cared for all the charcters from the series, I for one was left NOT caring for any of them by the end.
The show's music was terrible, casting director should be pushed under a bus for their bad influence on the ensemble, and the writers all dropped the ball in favor of drinking and cashing their paychecks. As stupid and silly as the show was, it was smart and had a point... this movie just stops at the stupid and silly. Which leaves the audience feeling, well. Gyped.
Let's see, there is enough blame to go around, so lets continue to spread. The editing? Horrible. Scenes were either too long to keep you interested, or too short to get emotional. The absolutely artificial premise of the cancelled wedding, street encounter and flower bomping were pathetic. If only they had been laughable. Nope, just pathetic.
Finally, acting. Hmmm, well if they had been given something to work with (other than their paychecks) perhaps our fine actresses could have brought something to the screen. Instead, we were left with out-of-touch characters, no intertwined connection between story arcs, and an uninteresting series of trips and misses where there should have been emotional heart-tugging.
How anyone could sit through this and not be bothered by how poorly it was assemble, written and produced would amaze me. Throwing in a black character, some kids, and a sprinkling of the old cast for good measure only serves to remind you how much WASN'T done to make this a good flick.
If they had spent more time on characters and story, and less time on Sarah Jessica Parker trying to hog the screen (from her made-up self to horrible drag queen face in bed), we might have something to talk about. Instead, you get about a half-hours worth of story, and the rest, poorly developed angst.
Which leaves me just one question. How do the people that wrote, edited, produced and directed this mess sleep at night?
I guess on a pillowcase full of bills.
I wish I could sleep after this.
Reply